Validating computationally predicted TMS stimulation areas using direct electrical stimulation in patients with brain tumors near precentral regions

NeuroImage: Clinical

Volumn 4, Issue , 2014, Pages 500-507

  Opitz, Alexander ^a   Zafar, Noman ^a   Bockermann, Volker ^a   Rohde, Veit ^a   Paulus, Walter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Direct electrical stimulation; Finite element method; Motor cortex; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; BRAIN SIZE; BRAIN TUMOR; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; DIRECT ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRODE IMPLANT; ELECTROSTIMULATION THERAPY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; PATIENT MONITOR; PREDICTION; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION SYSTEM; VALIDATION STUDY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVALUATION STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR EVOKED POTENTIAL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; AGED; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTOR CORTEX; NERVE NET; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 84897016486     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22131582     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barker, A.T., Jalinous, R., Freeston, I.L., 1985. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 1, 1106-7, 2860322.
2. Borchers, S., Himmelbach, M., Logothetis, N., Karnath, H.O., 2012. Direct electrical stimulation of human cortex - the gold standard for mapping brain functions? Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 13, 63-70, 22127300.
3. Dayan, E., Censor, N., Buch, E.R., Sandrini, M., Cohen, L.G., 2013. Noninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back. Nature Neuroscience 16, 838-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.3422, 23799477.
4. Desmurget, M., Reilly, K.T., Richard, N., Szathmari, A., Mottolese, C., Sirigu, A., 2009. Movement intention after parietal cortex stimulation in humans. Science (New York, N.Y.) 324, 811-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science. 1169896, 19423830.
5. Desmurget, M., Song, Z., Mottolese, C., Sirigu, A., 2013. Re-establishing the merits of electrical brain stimulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17, 442-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.07.002, 23932195.
6. Diekhoff, S., Uludaǧ, K., Sparing, R., Tittgemeyer, M., Cavuşoǧlu, M., von Cramon, D.Y. et al, 2011. Functional localization in the human brain: gradient-echo, spin-echo, and arterial spin-labeling fMRI compared with neuronavigated TMS. Human Brain Mapping 32, 341-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21024, 20533563.
7. Ferrier, D., 1876. Functions of the Brain. Putnam.
8. Fitzgerald, P.B., Fountain, S., Daskalakis, Z.J., 2006. A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 117, 2584-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2006. 06.712, 16890483.
9. Forster, M.T., Hattingen, E., Senft, C., Gasser, T., Seifert, V., Szelényi, A., 2011. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging: advanced adjuncts in preoperative planning for central region tumors. Neurosurgery 68, 1317-24, discussion: 1324-1315 21273929.
10. Fox, M.D., Halko, M.A., Eldaief, M.C., Pascual-Leone, A., 2012. Measuring and manipulating brain connectivity with resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Neuroimage 62, 2232-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.035, 22465297.
11. Fritsch, G., Hitzig, E., 1870. Über die elektrische Erregbarkeit des Grosshirns. Archiv f ür Anatomie, Physiologie und Wissenschaftliche Medicin 37, 300-32.
12. Gabriel, S., Lau, R.W., Gabriel, C., 1996. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. Physics in Medicine and Biology 41, 2271-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 0031-9155/41/11/003, 8938026.
13. Joucla, S., Yvert, B., 2012. Modeling extracellular electrical neural stimulation: from basic understanding to MEA-based applications. Journal of Physiology, Paris 106, 146-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2011.10. 003, 22036892.
14. Krieg, S.M., Shiban, E., Buchmann, N., Gempt, J., Foerschler, A., Meyer, B. et al, 2012. Utility of presurgical navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation for the resection of tumors in eloquent motor areas. Journal of Neurosurgery 116, 994-1001. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2011.12.JNS111524, 22304452.
15. Legon, W., Sato, T.F., Opitz, A., Mueller, J., Barbour, A., Williams, A. et al, 2014. Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans. Nature Neuroscience 17, 322-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.3620, 24413698.
16. McIntyre, C.C., Mori, S., Sherman, D.L., Thakor, N.V., Vitek, J.L., 2004. Electric field and stimulating influence generated by deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 115, 589-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2003.10.033, 15036055.
17. Minhas, A.S., Jeong, W.C., Kim, Y.T., Han, Y., Kim, H.J., Woo, E.J., 2011. Experimental performance evaluation of multi-echo ICNE pulse sequence in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: Official Journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 66, 957-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ mrm.22872, 21442654.
18. Nummenmaa, A., Stenroos, M., Ilmoniemi, R.J., Okada, Y.C., Hämäläinen, M.S., Raij, T., 2013. Comparison of spherical and realistically shaped boundary element head models for transcranial magnetic stimulation navigation. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 124, 1995-2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.04.019, 23890512.
19. Opitz, A., Legon, W., Rowlands, A., Bickel, W.K., Paulus, W., Tyler, W.J., 2013. Physiological observations validate finite element models for estimating subject-specific electric field distributions induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. NeuroImage 81, 253-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.067, 23644000.
20. Opitz, A., Windhoff, M., Heidemann, R.M., Turner, R., Thielscher, A., 2011. How the brain tissue shapes the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroimage 58, 849-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. neuroimage.2011.06.069, 21749927.
21. Pascual-Leone, A., Bartres-Faz, D., Keenan, J.P., 1999. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying the brain-behaviour relationship by induction of 'virtual lesions'. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 354, 1229-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1999. 0476, 10466148.
22. Pashut, T., Wolfus, S., Friedman, A., Lavidor, M., Bar-Gad, I., Yeshurun, Y. et al, 2011. Mechanisms of magnetic stimulation of central nervous system neurons. PLoS Computational Biology 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi. 1002022, 21455288.
23. Penfield, W., Boldrey, E., 1937. Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain 60, 389-443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/60.4.389.
24. Picht, T., Schmidt, S., Brandt, S., Frey, D., Hannula, H., Neuvonen, T. et al, 2011. Preoperative functional mapping for rolandic brain tumor surgery: comparison of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation to direct cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery 69, 581-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/NEU. 0b013e3182181b89, discussion: 588 21430587.
25. Picht, T., Schulz, J., Hanna, M., Schmidt, S., Suess, O., Vajkoczy, P., 2012. Assessment of the influence of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation on surgical planning for tumors in or near the motor cortex. Neurosurgery 70, 1248-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318243881e, discussion: 1256-1247 22127045.
26. Radman, T., Ramos, R.L., Brumberg, J.C., Bikson, M., 2009Brain Stimulation 2, 215-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.007, 20161507.
27. Ranck, J.B. Jr., 1975. Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review. Brain Research 98, 417-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(75)90364-9, 1102064.
28. Ruohonen, J., Karhu, J., 2010. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurophysiologie Clinique = Clinical Neurophysiology 40, 7-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. neucli.2010.01.006, 20230931.
29. Salvador, R., Silva, S., Basser, P.J., Miranda, P.C., 2011. Determining which mechanisms lead to activation in the motor cortex: a modeling study of transcranial magnetic stimulation using realistic stimulus waveforms and sulcal geometry. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 122, 748-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. clinph.2010.09.022, 21035390.
30. Sollmann, N., Picht, T., Mäkelä, J.P., Meyer, B., Ringel, F., Krieg, S.M., 2013. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for preoperative language mapping in a patient with a left frontoopercular glioblastoma. Journal of Neurosurgery 118, 175-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2012.9.JNS121053, 23101450.
31. Stoney, S.D. Jr., Thompson, W.D., Asanuma, H., 1968. Excitation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical microstimulation: effective extent of stimulating current. Journal of Neurophysiology 31, 659-69, 5711137.
32. Tarapore, P.E., Findlay, A.M., Honma, S.M., Mizuiri, D., Houde, J.F., Berger, M.S. et al, 2013. Language mapping with navigated repetitive TMS: proof of technique and validation. Neuroimage 82, 260-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. neuroimage.2013.05.018, 23702420.
33. Terao, Y., Ugawa, Y., Sakai, K., Miyauchi, S., Fukuda, H., Sasaki, Y. et al, 1998. Localizing the site of magnetic brain stimulation by functional MRI. Experimental Brain Research 121, 145-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s002210050446, 9696383.
34. Thielscher, A., Opitz, A., Windhoff, M., 2011. Impact of the gyral geometry on the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroimage 54, 234-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.061, 20682353.
35. Tolias, A.S., Sultan, F., Augath, M., Oeltermann, A., Tehovnik, E.J., Schiller, P.H. et al, 2005. Mapping cortical activity elicited with electrical microstimulation using FMRI in the macaque. Neuron 48, 901-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.034, 16364895.
36. Tufail, Y., Matyushov, A., Baldwin, N., Tauchmann, M.L., Georges, J., Yoshihiro, A. et al, 2010. Transcranial pulsed ultrasound stimulates intact brain circuits. Neuron 66, 681-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.05. 008, 20547127.
37. Vitikainen, A.M., Salli, E., Lioumis, P., Mäkelä, J.P., Metsähonkala, L., 2013. Applicability of nTMS in locating the motor cortical representation areas in patients with epilepsy. Acta Neurochirurgica 155, 507-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1609-5, 23328919.
38. Wassermann, E.M., Wang, B., Zeffiro, T.A., Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone, A., Toro, C. et al, 1996. Locating the motor cortex on the MRI with transcranial magnetic stimulation and PET. NeuroImage 3, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg. 1996.0001, 9345470.
39. Weiss, C., Nettekoven, C., Rehme, A.K., Neuschmelting, V., Eisenbeis, A., Goldbrunner, R. et al, 2012. Mapping the hand, foot and face representations in the primary motor cortex - retest reliability of neuronavigated TMS versus functional MRI. Neuroimage 66C, 531-42, 23116812.
40. Windhoff, M., Opitz, A., Thielscher, A., 2013. Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on.nite elements: an optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models. Human Brain Mapping 34, 923-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21479, 22109746.