Transcriptome-wide effects of sexual selection on the fate of new mutations

Evolution

Volumn 69, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 2905-2916

  Collet, Julie M ^a   Blows, Mark W ^a   McGuigan, Katrina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Apparent selection; Drosophila serrata; Female mate choice; Mutation accumulation; Pleiotropy; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

DIVERGENCE; FLY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; MATE CHOICE; MATING SUCCESS; MUTATION; PLEIOTROPY; SEXUAL SELECTION;

DROSOPHILA SERRATA;

TRANSCRIPTOME;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DNA MICROARRAY; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; GENE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MUTATION;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; GENES, INSECT; GENETIC VARIATION; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SELECTION, GENETIC; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84955198334     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12778     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Agrawal, A. F. 2001. Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction. Nature 411:692-695.
2. Almbro, M. and L. W. Simmons . 2014. Sexual selection can remove an experimentally induced mutation load. Evolution 68:295-300.
3. Andersson, M. 1986. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences-sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40:804-816.
4. Arbuthnott, D. and H. D. Rundle . 2012. Sexual selection is ineffectual or inhibits the purging of deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 66:2127-2137.
5. Ayroles, J. F. and G. Gibson . 2006. Analysis of variance of microarray data. Method Enzymol. 411:214-233.
6. Ayroles, J. F., M. A. Carbone, E. A. Stone, K. W. Jordan, R. F. Lyman, M. M. Magwire, S. M. Rollmann, L. H. Duncan, F. Lawrence, R. R. H. Anholt, et al. 2009. Systems genetics of complex traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Genet. 41:299-307.
7. Ayroles, J. F., K. A. Hughes, K. C. Rowe, M. M. Reedy, S. L. Rodriguez-Zas, J. M. Drnevich, C. E. Caceres, and K. N. Paige . 2009. A genomewide assessment of inbreeding depression: Gene number, function, and mode of action. Conserv. Biol. 23:920-930.
8. Barrett, T., D. B. Troup, S. E. Wilhite, P. Ledoux, C. Evangelista, I. F. Kim, M. Tomashevsky, K. A. Marshall, K. H. Phillippy, P. M. Sherman, et al. 2011. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets-10 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:D1005-D1010.
9. Barton, N. H. 1990. Pleiotropic models of quantitative variation. Genetics 124:773-782.
10. Benjamini, Y. and Y. Hochberg . 2000. On the adaptive control of the false discovery fate in multiple testing with independent statistics. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 25:60-83.
11. Blows, M. W., S. L. Allen, J. M. Collet, S. F. Chenoweth, and K. McGuigan . 2015. The phenome-wide distribution of genetic variance. Am. Nat. 186:15-30.
12. Bono, J. M., L. M. Matzkin, E. S. Kelleher, and T. A. Markow . 2011. Postmating transcriptional changes in reproductive tracts of con- and heterospecifically mated Drosophila mojavensis females. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:7878-7883.
13. Carvalho, B. S. and R. A. Irizarry . 2010. A framework for oligonucleotide microarray preprocessing. Bioinformatics 26:2363-2367.
14. Clark, S. C. A., N. P. Sharp, L. Rowe, and A. F. Agrawal . 2012. Relative effectiveness of mating success and sperm competition at eliminating deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Plos One 7:e37351.
15. Collet, J. M. and M. W. Blows . 2014. Female mate choice predicts paternity success in the absence of additive genetic variance for other female paternity bias mechanisms in Drosophila serrata. J. Evol. Biol. 27:2568-2572.
16. Crow, J. F. 1993. How much do we know about spontaneous human mutation-rates. Environ. Mol. Mutagen 21:122-129.
17. Denver, D. R., K. Morris, J. T. Streelman, S. K. Kim, M. Lynch, and W. K. Thomas . 2005. The transcriptional consequences of mutation and natural selection in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Genet. 37:544-548.
18. Draghici, S. 2012. Statistics and data analysis for microarrays uding R and bioconductor. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, FL.
19. Drnevich, J. M., M. M. Reedy, E. A. Ruedi, S. Rodriguez-Zas, and K. A. Hughes . 2004. Quantitative evolutionary genomics: differential gene expression and male reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster. P Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 271:2267-2273.
20. Edgar, R., M. Domrachev, and A. E. Lash . 2002. Gene expression omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:207-210.
21. Estes, S., B. C. Ajie, M. Lynch, and P. C. Phillips . 2005. Spontaneous mutational correlations for life-history, morphological and behavioral characters in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 170:645-653.
22. Falconer, D. S. 1981. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longmans Green, London/ New York.
23. Farr, J. A. 1977. Male rarity or novelty, female choice behavior, and sexual selection in guppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Evolution 31:162-168.
24. Frentiu, F. D., M. Adamski, E. A. McGraw, M. W. Blows, and S. F. Chenoweth . 2009. An expressed sequence tag (EST) library for Drosophila serrata, a model system for sexual selection and climatic adaptation studies. BMC Genomics 10:40.
25. Fry, J. D. 2004. On the rate and linearity of viability declines in Drosophila mutation-accumulation experiments: genomic mutation rates and synergistic epistasis revisited. Genetics 166:797-806.
26. Gentleman, R. C., V. J. Carey, D. M. Bates, B. Bolstad, M. Dettling, S. Dudoit, B. Ellis, L. Gautier, Y. C. Ge, J. Gentry, et al. 2004. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. 5:R80.
27. Grafen, A. 1990. Biological signals as handicaps. J. Theor. Biol. 144:517-546.
28. Halligan, D. L. and P. D. Keightley . 2009. Spontaneous mutation accumulation studies in evolutionary genetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40:151-172.
29. Hill, W. G. and X. S. Zhang . 2012. Assessing pleiotropy and its evolutionary consequences: pleiotropy is not necessarily limited, nor need it hinder the evolution of complexity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13:295-295.
30. Hollis, B., J. L. Fierst, and D. Houle . 2009. Sexual selection accelerates the elimination of a deleterious mutant in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 63:324-333.
31. Hollis, B. and D. Houle . 2011. Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 24:1918-1926.
32. Houle, D. 1991. Genetic covariance of fitness correlates-what genetic correlations are made of and why it matters. Evolution 45:630-648.
33. Houle, D. 1998. How should we explain variation in the genetic variance of traits? Genetica 103:241-253.
34. Houle, D., K. A. Hughes, D. K. Hoffmaster, J. Ihara, S. Assimacopoulos, D. Canada, and B. Charlesworth . 1994. The effects of spontaneous mutation on quantitative traits. 1. Variances and covariances of life history traits. Genetics 138:773-785.
35. Houle, D., B. Morikawa, and M. Lynch . 1996. Comparing mutational variabilities. Genetics 143:1467-1483.
36. Innocenti, P. and S. F. Chenoweth . 2013. Interspecific divergence of transcription networks along lines of genetic variance in Drosophila: dimensionality, evolvability, and constraint. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30:1358-1367.
37. Iwasa, Y. and A. Pomiankowski . 1999. Good parent and good genes models of handicap evolution. J. Theor. Biol. 200:97-109.
38. Iwasa, Y., A. Pomiankowski, and S. Nee . 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences II. The 'handicap' principle. Evolution 45:1431-1442.
39. Johnson, T. and N. Barton . 2005. Theoretical models of selection and mutation on quantitative traits. Philos. T Roy. Soc. B 360:1411-1425.
40. Keightley, P. D., E. K. Davies, A. D. Peters, and R. G. Shaw . 2000. Properties of ethylmethane sulfonate-induced mutations affecting life-history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans and inferences about bivariate distributions of mutation effects. Genetics 156:143-154.
41. Keightley, P. D. and W. G. Hill . 1990. Variation maintained in quantitative traits with mutation selection balance: pleiotropic side-effects on fitness traits. P Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 242:95-100.
42. Keightley, P. D., T. F. C. Mackay, and A. Caballero . 1993. Accounting for bias in estimates of the rate of polygenic mutation. P Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 253:291-296.
43. Keightley, P. D. and O. Ohnishi . 1998. EMS-induced polygenic mutation rates for nine quantitative characters in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 148:753-766.
44. Lailvaux, S. P., M. D. Hall, and R. C. Brooks . 2010. Performance is no proxy for genetic quality: trade-offs between locomotion, attractiveness, and life history in crickets. Ecology 91:1530-1537.
45. Lande, R. 1982. A quantitative genetic theory of life history evolution. Ecology 63:607-615.
46. Latimer, C. A. L., K. McGuigan, R. S. Wilson, M. W. Blows, and S. F. Chenoweth . 2014. The contribution of spontaneous mutations to thermal sensitivity curve variation in Drosophila serrata. Evolution 68:1824-1837.
47. Lorch, P. D., S. Proulx, L. Rowe, and T. Day . 2003. Condition-dependent sexual selection can accelerate adaptation. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5:867-881.
48. Lynch, M. 1988. The rate of polygenic mutation. Genet. Res. 51:137-148.
49. Lynch, M., J. Blanchard, D. Houle, T. Kibota, S. Schultz, L. Vassilieva, and J. Willis . 1999. Spontaneous deleterious mutation. Evolution 53:645-663.
50. Lynch, M. and W. Gabriel . 1990. Mutation load and the survival of small populations. Evolution 44:1725-1737.
51. Lynch, M. and B. Walsh . 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA.
52. Mack, P. D., V. K. Lester, and D. E. L. Promislow . 2001. Age-specific effects of novel mutations in Drosophila melanogaster-II. Fecundity and male mating ability. Genetica 110:31-41.
53. Mallet, M. A. and A. K. Chippindale . 2011. Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females. Heredity 106:994-1002.
54. Mallet, M. A., C. M. Kimber, and A. K. Chippindale . 2012. Susceptibility of the male fitness phenotype to spontaneous mutation. Biol. Lett. 8:426-429.
55. McGuigan, K. and M. W. Blows . 2013. Joint allelic effects on fitness and metric traits. Evolution 67:1131-1142.
56. McGuigan, K., J. M. Collet, S. L. Allen, S. F. Chenoweth, and M. W. Blows . 2014. Pleiotropic mutations are subject to strong stabilizing selection. Genetics 197:1051-1062.
57. McGuigan, K., J. M. Collet, E. A. McGraw, Y. H. Ye, S. L. Allen, S. F. Chenoweth, and M. W. Blows . 2014. The nature and extent of mutational pleiotropy in gene expression of male Drosophila serrata. Genetics 196:911-921.
58. McGuigan, K., D. Petfield, and M. W. Blows . 2011. Reducing mutation load through sexual selection on males. Evolution 65:2816-2829.
59. McGuigan, K., L. Rowe, and M. W. Blows . 2011. Pleiotropy, apparent stabilizing selection and uncovering fitness optima. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26:22-29.
60. NimbleGen, R. 2011. NimbleGen Software: guide to interpreting the experimental metrics report.
61. Olano-Marin, J., J. C. Mueller, and B. Kempenaers . 2011. Correlations between heterozygosity and reproductive success in the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus): an analysis of inbreeding and single locus effects. Evolution 65:3175-3194.
62. Olson-Manning, C. F., M. R. Wagner, and T. Mitchell-Olds . 2012. Adaptive evolution: evaluating empirical support for theoretical predictions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13:867-877.
63. Perfeito, L., S. Ghozzi, J. Berg, K. Schnetz, and M. Lassig . 2011. Nonlinear fitness landscape of a molecular pathway. Plos Genet 7(7):e1002160.
64. Pischedda, A. and A. Chippindale . 2005. Sex, mutation and fitness: asymmetric costs and routes to recovery through compensatory evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1115-1122.
65. Promislow, D. E. L., E. A. Smith, and L. Pearse . 1998. Adult fitness consequences of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:10687-10692.
66. Radwan, J. 2004. Effectiveness of sexual selection in removing mutations induced with ionizing radiation. Ecol. Lett. 7:1149-1154.
67. Radwan, J., J. Unrug, K. Snigorska, and K. Gawronska . 2004. Effectiveness of sexual selection in preventing fitness deterioration in bulb mite populations under relaxed natural selection. J. Evol. Biol. 17:94-99.
68. Rest, J. S., C. M. Morales, J. B. Waldron, D. A. Opulente, J. Fisher, S. Moon, K. Bullaughey, L. B. Carey, and D. Dedousis . 2013. Nonlinear fitness consequences of variation in expression level of a eukaryotic gene. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30:448-456.
69. Rose, M. R. 1982. Antagonistic pleiotropy, dominance, and genetic variation. Heredity 48:63-78.
70. Rowe, L. and D. Houle . 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. P Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 263:1415-1421.
71. Runcie, D. E. and S. Mukherjee . 2013. Dissecting high-dimensional phenotypes with Bayesian sparse factor analysis of genetic covariance matrices. Genetics 194(3):753-767.
72. Savic Veselinovic, M., S. Pavkovic-Lucic, Z. Kurbalija Novicic, M. Jelic, and M. Andelkovic . 2013. Sexual selection can reduce mutational load in Drosophila subobscura. Genetika-Belgrade 45:537-552.
73. Schaack, S., D. E. Allen, L. C. Latta, K. K. Morgan, and M. Lynch . 2013. The effect of spontaneous mutations on competitive ability. J. Evol. Biol. 26:451-456.
74. Sharp, N. P. and A. F. Agrawal . 2008. Mating density and the strength of sexual selection against deleterious alleles in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 62:857-867.
75. Sharp, N. P. and A. F. Agrawal . 2013. Male-biased fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 67:1189-1195.
76. Smith, G., Y. X. Fang, X. Liu, J. Kenny, A. R. Cossins, C. C. de Oliveira, W. J. Etges, and M. G. Ritchie . 2013. Transcriptome-wide expression variation associated with environmental plasticity and mating success in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 67:1950-1963.
77. Storey, J. D. and R. Tibshirani . 2003. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:9440-9445.
78. Tomkins, J. L., J. Radwan, J. S. Kotiaho, and T. Tregenza . 2004. Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:323-328.
79. Wagner, A. 2007. Energy costs constrain the evolution of gene expression. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 308B:322-324.
80. Wayne, M. L., M. Telonis-Scott, L. M. Bono, L. Harshman, A. Kopp, S. V. Nuzhdin, and L. M. McIntyre . 2007. Simpler mode of inheritance of transcriptional variation in male Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:18577-18582.
81. Wenzel, M. A., L. M. I. Webster, S. Paterson, F. Mougeot, J. Martinez-Padilla, and S. B. Piertney . 2013. A transcriptomic investigation of handicap models in sexual selection. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67:221-234.
82. Whitlock, M. C. and A. F. Agrawal . 2009. Purging the genome with sexual selection: reducing mutation load through selection on males. Evolution 63:569-582.
83. Whitlock, M. C. and D. Bourguet . 2000. Factors affecting the genetic load in Drosophila: synergistic epistasis and correlations among fitness components. Evolution 54:1654-1660.
84. Wyman, M. J., A. F. Agrawal, and L. Rowe . 2010. Condition-dependence of the sexually dimorphic transcriptome in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 64:1836-1848.
85. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection-selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53:205-214.
86. Zahavi, A.. 1977. Cost of honesty: further remarks on handicap principle. J. Theor. Biol. 67:603-605.