Good parent and good genes models of handicap evolution

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 200, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 97-109

  Iwasa, Yoh ^a   Pomiankowski, Andrew ^b  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EVOLUTION; GENE; HEALTH STATUS; HERITABILITY; PARENT; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 0033533461     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.0979     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. ANDERSSON M. B. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution. 40:1986;804-820.
2. ANDERSSON M. Sexual Selection. 1994;Princeton University Press, Princeton.
3. BURLEY N. Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. Am. Nat. 127:1986;415-445.
4. COCKBURN A. An Introduction to Evolutionary Ecology. 1991;Blackwell, Oxford.
5. COLLIAS N. E., COLLIAS E. C. Nest Building and Bird Behaviour. 1984;Princeton University Press, Princeton.
6. DAVID P., HINGLE A., GREIG D., RUTHERFORD A., POMIANKOWSKI A., FOWLER K. Male sexual ornament size but not asymmetry reflects condition in stalk-eyed flies. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 265:1998;2211-2216.
7. GRAFEN A. Biological signals as handicaps. J. theor. Biol. 144:1990;517-546.
8. HARADA Y., IWASA Y. Female mate preference to receive maximum paternal care: a two-step game. Am. Nat. 147:1996;996-1027.
9. HEYWOOD J. S. Sexual selection by the handicap mechanisms. Evolution. 43:1989;1387-1397.
10. HILL G. E. Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature. 350:1991;337-339.
11. HILL G. E., MONTGOMERIE R. Plumage color signals nutritional condition in the house finch. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 258:1994;47-52.
12. HOEZLER G. A. The good parent process of sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 38:1989;1067-1078.
13. IWASA Y., POMIANKOWSKI A. Evolution of mate preferences for multiple sexual ornaments. Evolution. 48:1994;853-867.
14. IWASA Y., POMIANKOWSKI A. Continual change in mate preferences. Nature. 377:1995;420-422.
15. IWASA Y., POMIANKOWSKI A., NEE S. The evolution of costly mate preferences. II. The 'handicap' principle. Evolution. 45:1991;1431-1442.
16. JOHNSTONE R. A. Honest signalling, perceptual error and the evolution of all-or-none displays. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 256:1994;169-175.
17. KNAPP R. A., KOVACH J. T. Courtship as an honest indicator of male parental quality in the bicolor damselfish, Stegastes partitus. Behav. Ecol. 2:1991;295-300.
18. LANDE R. Models of specification by sexual selection on polygenic characters. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78:1981;3721-3725.
19. Møller A. P. Sexual Selection in the monogamous swallow (Hirundo rustica). II. Mechanisms of intersexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 5:1992;603-624.
20. Møller A. P. Sexual Selection and the Barn Swallow. 1994;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
21. NORRIS K. J. Female choice and the quality of parental care in the great tit Parus major. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27:1990;275-281.
22. NORRIS K. J. Heritable variation in a plumage indicator of viability in male great tits Parus major. Nature. 362:1993;537-539.
23. POMIANKOWSKI A. The costs of choice in sexual selection. J. theor. Biol. 128:1987;195-218.
24. POMIANKOWSKI A., IWASA Y. Evolution of multiple sexual ornaments by Fisher's process of sexual selection. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 253:1993;173-181.
25. POMIANKOWSKI A., IWASA Y. Runaway ornament diversity caused by Fisherian sexual selection. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95:1998;5106-5111.
26. POMIANKOWSKI A., IWASA Y., NEE S. The evolution of costly mate preferences. I. Fisher and biased mutation. Evolution. 45:1991;1422-1430.
27. PRICE T., SCHLUTER D., HECKMAN N. E. Sexual selection when the female directly benefits. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 48:1993;187-211.
28. SAETRE G. P., FOSSNES T., SLAGSVOLD T. Food provisioning in the pied flycatcher - do females gain direct benefits from choosing bright-colored males. J. Anim. Ecol. 64:1995;21-30.
29. SCHLUTER D., PRICE T. Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 253:1993;117-122.
30. TANAKA Y. Social selection and the evolution of animal signals. Evolution. 50:1996;512-523.
31. YACHI S. How can honest signalling evolve - the role of handicap principle. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 262:1995;283-288.