Male-biased fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in drosophila melanogaster

Evolution

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1189-1195

  Sharp, Nathaniel P ^a   Agrawal, Aneil F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Mutations; Population genetics; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; ENTOMOLOGY; FITNESS; FLY; MALE; MUTATION; POPULATION GENETICS; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETICS; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MUTATION; MUTATION RATE; POPULATION; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETIC FITNESS; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MUTATION; MUTATION RATE; POPULATION; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 84875804734     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01834.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Agrawal, A. F. 2001. Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction. Nature 411:692-695.
2. Arbuthnott, D., and H. D. Rundle 2012. Sexual selection is ineffectual or inhibits the purging of deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 66:2127-2137.
3. Ashburner, M., K. G. Golic, and R. S. Hawley 2005. Drosophila: a laboratory handbook. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY
4. Bégin, M., and D. J. Schoen 2006. Low impact of germline transposition on the rate of mildly deleterious mutation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 174:2129-2136.
5. Chippindale, A. K., J. R. Gibson, and W. R. Rice 2001. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:1671-1675.
6. Connallon, T., R. M. Cox, and R. Calsbeek 2010. Fitness consequences of sex-specific selection. Evolution 64:1671-1682.
7. Darwin, C. 1859. The origin of species by means of natural selection. Murray, London
8. Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London
9. Davies, E. K., A. D. Peters, and P. D. Keightley 1999. High frequency of cryptic deleterious mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 285:1748-1751.
10. Gibson, J. R., A. K. Chippindale, and W. R. Rice 2002. The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Proc. R. Soc. B 269:499-505.
11. Haag-Liautard, C., M. Dorris, X. Maside, S. Macaskill, D. L. Halligan, D. Houle, B. Charlesworth, and P. D. Keightley 2007. Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila. Nature 445:82-85.
12. Keightley, P. D., E. K. Davies, A. D. Peters, and R. G. Shaw 2000. Properties of ethylmethane sulfonate-induced mutations affecting life-history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans and inferences about bivariate distributions of mutation effects. Genetics 156:143-154.
13. Long, T. A. F., A. F. Agrawal, and L. Rowe 2012. The effect of sexual selection on offspring fitness depends on the nature of genetic variation. Curr. Biol. 22:204-208.
14. Lorch, P., S. Proulx, L. Rowe, and T. Day 2003. Condition-dependent sexual selection can accelerate adaptation. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5:867-881.
15. Mallet, M. A., and A. K. Chippindale 2011. Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females. Heredity 106:994-1002.
16. Mallet, M. A., J. M. Bouchard, C. M. Kimber, and A. K. Chippindale 2011. Experimental mutation-accumulation on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster reveals stronger selection on males than females. BMC Evol. Biol. 11:156.
17. Mallet, M. A., C. M. Kimber, and A. K. Chippindale 2012. Susceptibility of the male fitness phenotype to spontaneous mutation.Biol. Lett. 8:426-429.
18. McGuigan, K., D. Petfield, and M. W. Blows 2011. Reducing mutation load through sexual selection on males. Evolution 65:2816-2829.
19. Meisel, R. P., J. H. Malone and A. G. Clark 2012. Disentangling the relationship between sex-biased gene expression and X-linkage. Genome Res. 22:1255-1265.
20. Pischedda, A., and A. Chippindale 2005. Sex, mutation and fitness: asymmetric costs and routes to recovery through compensatory evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1115-1122.
21. Pischedda, A., and A. K. Chippindale 2006. Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection. Plos Biol. 4:e356-e2103.
22. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
23. Radwan, J. 2004. Effectiveness of sexual selection in removing mutations induced with ionizing radiation. Ecol. Lett. 7:1149-1154.
24. Rice, W. R. 1998. Male fitness increases when females are eliminated from gene pool: implications for the Y chromosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:6217-6221.
25. Rice, W. R. 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:735-742.
26. Rowe, L., and D. Houle 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. B 263:1415-1421.
27. Roze, D., and S. P. Otto 2011. Differential selection between the sexes and selection for sex. Evolution 66:558-574.
28. Sharp, N. P., and A. F. Agrawal 2012. Evidence for elevated mutation rates in low-quality genotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:6142-6146.
29. Sharp, N. P., and A. F. Agrawal 2008. Mating density and the strength of sexual selection against deleterious alleles in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 62:857-867.
30. Siller, S. 2001. Sexual selection and the maintenance of sex. Nature 411:692-695.
31. Whitlock, M. C. 2000. Fixation of new alleles and the extinction of small populations: drift load, beneficial alleles, and sexual selection. Evolution 54:1855-1861.
32. Whitlock, M. C., and A. F. Agrawal 2009. Purging the genome with sexual selection: reducing mutation load through selection on males. Evolution 63:569-582.
33. Whitlock, M. C., and D. Bourguet 2000. Factors affecting the genetic load in Drosophila: synergistic epistasis and correlations among fitness components. Evolution 54:1654-1660.