Optimizing techniques to capture and extract environmental DNA for detection and quantification of fish

Molecular Ecology Resources

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 56-68

  Eichmiller, Jessica J ^a   Miller, Loren M ^a,b   Sorensen, Peter W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Cyprinus carpio; Common carp; Environmental DNA; Invasive species; Quantitative PCR

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; CARP; DEVICES; ECOSYSTEM; EVALUATION STUDY; FILTRATION; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; PROCEDURES; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

ANIMALS; CARPS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; ECOSYSTEM; FILTRATION; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

EID: 84955188074     PISSN: 1755098X     EISSN: 17550998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12421     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Andersen K, Bird KL, Rasmussen M et al. (2012) Meta-barcoding of "dirt" DNA from soil reflects vertebrate biodiversity. Molecular Ecology, 21, 1966-1979.
2. Barnes MA, Turner CR, Jerde CL, Renshaw MA, Chadderton WL, Lodge DM (2014) Environmental conditions influence eDNA persistence in aquatic systems. Environmental Science and Technology, 48, 1819-1827.
3. Bajer PG, Sorensen PW (2012) Using boat electrofishing to estimate the abundance of invasive common carp in small midwestern lakes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 32, 817-822.
4. Biggs J, Ewald N, Valentini A et al. (2015) Using eDNA to develop a national citizen science-based monitoring programme for the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus). Biological Conservation, 183, 19-28.
5. Cao Y, Griffith JF, Dorevitch S, Weisberg SB (2012) Effectiveness of qPCR permutations, internal controls and dilution as means for minimizing the impact of inhibition while measuring Enterococcus in environmental waters. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 113, 66-75.
6. Danielsson LG (1982) On the use of filters for distinguishing between dissolved and particulate fractions in natural waters. Water Research, 16, 179-182.
7. Darling JA, Mahon AR (2011) From molecules to management: adopting DNA-based methods for monitoring biological invasions in aquatic environments. Environmental Research, 111, 978-988.
8. Deiner K, Walser J, Mächler E, Altermatt F (2015) Choice of capture and extraction methods affect detection of freshwater biodiversity from environmental DNA. Biological Conservation, 183, 53-63.
9. Dejean T, Valentini A, Miquel C, Taberlet P, Bellemain E, Miaud C (2012) Improved detection of an alien invasive species through environmental DNA barcoding: the example of the American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 953-959.
10. Dineen SM, Aranda R, Anders DL, Robertson JM (2010) An evaluation of commercial DNA extraction kits for the isolation of bacterial spore DNA from soil. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 109, 1886-1896.
11. Driver PD, Harris JH, Norris RH, Closs GP (1997) The role of the natural environment and human impacts in determining biomass densities of common carp in New South Wales rivers. In: Fish and Rivers in Stress-The NSW Rivers Survey (eds Harris JH, Gehrke PC), pp. 225-250. NSW Fisheries Office of Conservation and the Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Coronulla and Canberra.
12. Eichmiller JE, Bajer PG, Sorensen PW (2014) The relationship between the distribution of common carp and their environmental DNA in a small lake. PLoS ONE, 9, e112611.
13. Egan SP, Barnes MA, Hwang CT et al. (2013) Rapid invasive species detection by combining environmental DNA with light transmission spectroscopy. Conservation Letters, 6, 402-409.
14. Ficetola GF, Miaud C, Pompanon F, Taberlet P (2008) Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biology Letters, 4, 423-425.
15. Frostegård Å, Courtois S, Ramisse V et al. (1999) Quantification of bias related to the extraction of DNA directly from soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65, 5409-5420.
16. Gaillard C (1996) Response: polypropylene tube surfaces may induce denaturation and multimerization of DNA. Science, 271, 223.
17. Gaillard C, Strauss F (1998) Avoiding adsorption of DNA to polypropylene tubes and denaturation of short DNA fragments. Technical Tips Online, 3, 63-65.
18. Goldberg CS, Pilliod DS, Arkle RS, Waits LP (2011) Molecular detection of vertebrates in stream water: a demonstration using Rocky Mountain tailed frogs and Idaho giant salamanders. PLoS ONE, 6, e22746.
19. Goldberg CS, Sepulveda A, Ray A, Baumgardt J, Waits LP (2013) Environmental DNA as a new method for early detection of New Zealand mudsnails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Freshwater Science, 32, 2555-2558.
20. Goldberg CS, Strickler KM, Pilliod DS (2015) Moving environmental DNA methods from concept to practice for monitoring aquatic organisms. Biological Conservation, 183, 1-3.
21. Green HC, Field KG (2012) Sensitive detection of sample interference in environmental qPCR. Water Research, 46, 3251-3260.
22. Haugland RA, Siefring SC, Wymer LJ, Brenner KP, Dufour AP (2005) Comparison of Enterococcus measurements in freshwater at two recreational beaches by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and membrane filter culture analysis. Water Research, 39, 559-568.
23. Hoshino T, Inagaki F (2012) Molecular quantification of environmental DNA using microfluidics and digital PCR. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 35, 390-395.
24. Hutten IM (2007) Handbook of Nonwoven Filter Media. Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, UK.
25. Jane SF, Wilcox TM, McKelvey KS et al. (2014) Distance, flow and inhibition: eDNA dynamics in two headwater streams. Molecular Ecology Resources, 15, 216-227.
26. Jerde CL, Mahon AR, Chadderton WL, Lodge DM (2011) "Sight-unseen" detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA. Conservation Letters, 4, 150-157.
27. Jerde CL, Chadderton L, Mahon AR et al. (2013) Detection of Asian carp DNA as part of a Great Lakes basin-wide surveillance program. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 70, 522-526.
28. Kennedy NA, Walker AW, Berry SH et al., (2014) The impact of different DNA extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. PLoS ONE, 9, e88982.
29. Klymus KE, Richter CA, Chapman DC, Paukert C (2015) Quantification of shedding rates from invasive bighead carp Hypophthalmichthys nobilis and silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix. Biological Conservation, 83, 77-84.
30. Kontanis EJ, Reed FA (2006) Evaluation of real-time PCR amplification efficiencies to detect PCR inhibitors. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 51, 795-804.
31. Kreader CA (1996) Relief of amplification inhibition in PCR with bovine serum albumin or T4 gene 32 protein. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 62, 1102-1106.
32. Liang Z, Keeley A (2013) Filtration recovery of extracellular DNA from environmental water samples. Environmental Science and Technology, 47, 9324-9331.
33. Lodge DM, Turner CR, Jerde CL et al. (2012) Conservation in a cup of water: estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology, 21, 2555-2558.
34. Lund M, Nordentoft S, Pedersen K, Madsen M (2004) Detection of Campylobacter spp. in chicken fecal samples by real-time PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 42, 5125-5132.
35. Mahmoudi N, Slater GF, Fulthorpe RR (2011) Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for isolation and purification of bacterial and eukaryotic DNA from PAH-contaminated soils. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 57, 623-628.
36. Mahon AR, Jerde CL, Galaska M et al. (2013) Validation of eDNA surveillance sensitivity for detection of Asian carps in controlled and field experiments. PLoS ONE, 8, e58316.
37. McKee AM, Spear SF, Pierson TW (2015) The effect of dilution and the use of a postextraction nucleic acid purification column on the accuracy, precision, and inhibition of environmental DNA samples. Biological Conservation, 183, 70-76.
38. Morrison MA, Benoit G (2001) Filtration artifacts caused by overloading membrane filters. Environmental Science and Technology, 35, 3774-3779.
39. Nichols RV, Königsson H, Danell K, Spong G (2012) Browsed twig environmental DNA: diagnostic PCR to identify ungulate species. Molecular Ecology Resources, 12, 983-989.
40. Olson ZH, Briggler JT, Williams RN (2012) An eDNA approach to detect eastern hellbenders (Cryptobranchus a. alleganiensis) using samples of water. Wildlife Research, 39, 629-636.
41. Pilliod DS, Goldberg CS, Arkle RS, Waits LP (2013) Estimating occupancy and abundance of stream amphibians using environmental DNA from filtered water samples. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 70, 1123-1130.
42. Pilliod DS, Goldberg CS, Arkle RS, Waits LP (2014) Factors influencing detection of eDNA from a stream-dwelling amphibian. Molecular Ecology Resources, 14, 109-116.
43. Renshaw MA, Olds BP, Jerde CL, McVeigh MM, Lodge DM (2014) The room temperature preservation of filtered environmental DNA samples and assimilation into a phenol-choloroform-isoamyl alcohol DNA extraction. Molecular Ecology Resources, 15, 168-176.
44. Schmidt BR, Kéry M, Ursenbacher S, Hyman OJ, Collins JP (2013) Site occupancy models in the analysis of environmental DNA presence/absence surveys: a case study of an emerging amphibian pathogen. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 646-653.
45. Sedlak RH, Kuypers J, Jerome KR (2014) A multiplexed droplet digital PCR assay performs better than qPCR on inhibition prone samples. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 80, 285-286.
46. Smith KF, Wood SA, Mountfort DO, Cary SC (2012) Development of a real-time PCR assay for the detection of the invasive clam, Corbula amurensis, in environmental samples. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 412, 52-57.
47. Spear SF, Groves JD, Williams LA, Waits LP (2015) Using environmental DNA methods to improve detectability in a hellbener (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis) monitoring program. Biological Conservation, 183, 38-45.
48. Taberlet P, Coissac E, Hajibabaei M, Rieseberg LH (2012) Environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology, 21, 1789-1793.
49. Takahara T, Minamoto T, Yamanaka H (2012) Doi H, Kawabata Z Estimation of fish biomass using environmental DNA. PLoS ONE, 7, e35868.
50. Thomsen PF, Kielgast J, Iversen LL et al. (2012) Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology, 21, 2555-2558.
51. Thomsen PF, Willerslev E (2015) Environmental DNA - an emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biological Conservation, 183, 4-18.
52. Tréguier A, Paillisson J, Dejean T, Valentini A, Schlaepfer MA, Roussel J (2014) Environmental DNA surveillance for invertebrate species: advantages and technical limitations to detect invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii in freshwater ponds. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51, 871-879.
53. Turner CR, Barnes MA, Xu CCY, Jones SE, Jerde CL, Lodge DM (2014) Particle size distribution and optimal capture of aqueous macrobial eDNA. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 676-684.
54. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2013) Quality assurance project plan (QAPP): eDNA monitoring of bighead and silver carps. 89 pp.
55. Valiere N, Taberlet P (2000) Urine collected in the field as a source of DNA for species and individual identification. Molecular Ecology, 9, 2150-2152.
56. Wilson IG (1997) Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63, 3741-3751.