|
Volumn 80, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 285-286
|
A multiplexed droplet digital PCR assay performs better than qPCR on inhibition prone samples
|
Author keywords
Digital PCR; Inhibition; Quantitative PCR; Stool
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
FECES ANALYSIS;
HUMAN;
HUMAN ADENOVIRUS;
HUMAN ADENOVIRUS SPECIES F;
HUMAN CYTOMEGALOVIRUS;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MULTIPLEX POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;
MULTIPLEXED DROPLET DIGITAL PCR ASSAY;
NONHUMAN;
POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;
QUANTITATIVE PCR ASSAY;
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;
VIRUS DETECTION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CYTOMEGALOVIRUS;
CYTOMEGALOVIRUS INFECTION;
FECES;
GENETICS;
HUMAN ADENOVIRUS C;
PROCEDURES;
REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;
VIROLOGY;
ADENOVIRUSES, HUMAN;
CYTOMEGALOVIRUS;
CYTOMEGALOVIRUS INFECTIONS;
FECES;
HUMANS;
MULTIPLEX POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;
REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;
|
EID: 84919339207
PISSN: 07328893
EISSN: 18790070
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.09.004 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (82)
|
References (9)
|