Moving environmental DNA methods from concept to practice for monitoring aquatic macroorganisms

Biological Conservation

Volumn 183, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-3

  Goldberg, Caren S ^a   Strickler, Katherine M ^a   Pilliod, David S ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FOREST AND RANGELAND ECOSYSTEM SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Amphibian; Detection; EDNA; Fish; PCR inhibition

Indexed keywords

AMPHIBIAN; AQUATIC ORGANISM; BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE;

AMPHIBIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 85027943288     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.040     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Barnes M.A., Turner C.R., Jerde C.L., Renshaw M.A., Chadderton W.L., Lodge D.M. Environmental conditions influence eDNA persistence in aquatic systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48:1819-1827.
2. Biggs, J., Ewald, N., Valentini, A., Gaboriaud, C., Dejean, T., Griffiths, R.A., Foster, J. Wilkinson, J.W., Arnell, A., Williams, P., Dunn, F., Brotherton, P., 2015. Using eDNA to develop a national volunteer-based monitoring programme for the Great Crested Newt (Triturus cristatus). Biol. Conserv. 183, 19-28.
3. Darling J.A., Mahon A.R. From molecules to management: adopting DNA-based methods for monitoring biological invasions in aquatic environments. Environ. Res. 2011, 111:978-988.
4. Deiner K., Altermatt F. Transport distance of invertebrate environmental DNA in a natural river. PLoS One 2014, 9:e88786.
5. Deiner, K., Walser, J.-C., Mächler, E., Altermatt, F., 2015. Choice of capture and extraction methods affect detection of freshwater biodiversity from environmental DNA. Biol. Conserv. 183, 53-63.
6. Dejean T., Valentini A., Duparc A., Pellier-Cuit S., Pompanon F., Taberlet P., Miaud C. Persistence of environmental DNA in freshwater ecosystems. PLoS One 2011, 6:e23398.
7. Dejean T., Valentini A., Miquel C., Taberlet P., Bellemain E., Miaud C. Improved detection of an alien invasive species through environmental DNA barcoding: the example of the American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus. J. Appl. Ecol. 2012, 49:953-959.
8. Ficetola G.F., Miaud C., Pompanon F., Taberlet P. Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biol. Lett. 2008, 4:423-425.
9. Goldberg C.S., Pilliod D.S., Arkle R.S., Waits L.P. Molecular detection of vertebrates in stream water: a demonstration using Rocky Mountain tailed frogs and Idaho giant salamanders. PLoS One 2011, 6:e22746.
10. Goldberg C.S., Sepulveda A., Ray A., Baumgardt J., Waits L.P. Environmental DNA as a new method for early detection of New Zealand mudsnails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Freshwater Sci. 2013, 32:792-800.
11. Harwood V.J., Staley C., Badgley B.D., Borges K., Korajkic A. Microbial source tracking markers for detection of fecal contamination in environmental waters: relationships between pathogens and human health outcomes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 38:1-40.
12. Jane S.F., Wilcox T.M., McKelvey K.S., Young M.K., Schwartz M.K., Lowe W.H., Letcher B.H., Whiteley A.R. Distance flow and PCR inhibition, eDNA dynamics in two headwater streams. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2014, 11. 10.1111/1755-0998.12285.
13. Jerde C.L., Mahon A.R., Chadderton W.L., Lodge D.M. "Sight-unseen" detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA. Cons. Lett. 2011, 4:150-157.
14. Klymus, K.E., Richter, C.A., Chapman, D.C., Paukert, C., 2015. Quantification of eDNA shedding rates from invasive bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) and silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). Biol. Conserv. 183, 77-84.
15. Laramie, M.B., Pilliod, D.S., Goldberg, C.S., 2015. Characterizing the distribution of an endangered salmonid using environmental DNA analysis. Biol. Conserv. 183, 29-37.
16. Mahon A.R., Jerde C.L., Galaska M., Bergner J.L., Chadderton W.L., Lodge D.M., Hunter M.E., Nico L.G. Validation of eDNA surveillance sensitivity for detection of Asian carps in controlled and field experiments. PLoS One 2013, 8:e58316.
17. McKee, A.M., Spear, S.F., Pierson, T.W., 2015. The effect of dilution and the use of a post-extraction nucleic acid purification column on the accuracy, precision, and inhibition of environmental DNA samples. Biol. Conserv. 183, 70-76.
18. Pilliod D.S., Goldberg C.S., Arkle R.S., Waits L.P. Estimating occupancy and abundance of stream amphibians using environmental DNA from filtered water samples. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci. 2013, 70:1123-1130.
19. Pilliod D.S., Goldberg C.S., Arkle R.S., Waits L.P. Factors influencing detection of eDNA from a stream-dwelling amphibian. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2014, 14:109-116.
20. Renshaw M.A., Olds B.P., Jerde C.L., McVeigh M.M., Lodge D.M. The room temperature preservation of filtered environmental DNA samples and assimilation into a phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol DNA extraction. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2014, (in press). 10.1111/1755-0998.12281.
21. Sigsgaard, E.E., Carl, H. Møller, P.R., Thomsen, P.F., 2015. Monitoring the near-extinct European weather loach Misgurnus fossilis in Denmark by combining traditional fishing surveys and environmental DNA from water samples. Biol. Conserv. 183, 46-52.
22. Spear, S., Groves, J.D., Williams, L.A., Waits, L.P., 2015. Using environmental DNA methods to improve detectability in a hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis) monitoring program. Biol. Conserv. 183, 38-45.
23. Strickler, K.M., Fremier, A.K., Goldberg, C.S., 2015. Quantifying the effects of UV, temperature, and pH on degradation rates of eDNA in aquatic microcosms. Biol. Conserv. 183, 85-92.
24. Taberlet P., Coissac E., Hajibabaei M., Rieseberg L.H. Environmental DNA. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21:1789-1793.
25. Takahara T., Minamoto T., Yamanaka H., Doi H., Kawabata Z.I. Estimation of fish biomass using environmental DNA. PLoS One 2012, 7:e35868.
26. Takahara, T., Minamoto, T., Doi, H., 2015. Effects of sample processing on the detection rate of environmental DNA from the Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio). Biol. Conserv. 183, 64-69.
27. Thomsen, P.F., Willerslev, E., 2015. Environmental DNA - an emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biol. Conserv. 183, 4-18.
28. Thomsen P.F., Kielgast J., Iversen L.L., Møller P.R., Rasmussen M., Willerslev E. Detection of a diverse marine fish fauna using environmental DNA from seawater samples. PLoS One 2012, 7:e41732.
29. Thomsen P.F., Kielgast J., Iversen L.L., Wiuf C., Rasmussen M., Gilbert M.T.P., Orlando L., Willerslev E. Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21:2565-2573.
30. Turner, C.R., Uy, K.L., Everhart, R.C., 2015. Fish environmental DNA is more concentrated in sediments than in surface water. Biol. Conserv. 183, 93-102.
31. Wilcox T.M., McKelvey K.S., Young M.K., Jane S.F., Lowe W.H., Whiteley A.R., Schwartz M.K. Robust detection of rare species using environmental DNA: the importance of primer specificity. PLoS One 2013, 8:e59520.
32. Willerslev E., Cooper A. Ancient DNA. Proc. Royal Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2005, 272:3-16.