The de novo genome assembly and annotation of a female domestic dromedary of North African origin

Molecular Ecology Resources

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 314-324

  Fitak, Robert R ^a,c   Mohandesan, Elmira ^a   Corander, Jukka ^b   Burger, Pamela A ^a  

^a Institute für Populationsgenetik   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Camelus dromedarius; Adaptation; Demography; Domestication; Next generation sequencing

Indexed keywords

AFRICA; ANIMAL; CAMEL; CLASSIFICATION; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; FEMALE; GENE LIBRARY; GENETICS; GENOME; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MOLECULAR GENETICS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SPAIN;

AFRICA, NORTHERN; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, DOMESTIC; CAMELUS; FEMALE; GENE LIBRARY; GENOME; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SPAIN;

EID: 84955171416     PISSN: 1755098X     EISSN: 17550998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12443     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Agrawal RP, Jain S, Shah S, et al. (2011) Effect of camel milk on glycemic control and insulin requirement in patients with type 1 diabetes: 2-years randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 65, 1048-1052.
2. Akey JM, Eberle MA, Rieder MJ, et al. (2004) Population history and natural selection shape patterns of genetic variation in 132 genes. PLoS Biology, 2, e286.
3. Al-Swailem AM, Shehata MM, Abu-Duhier FM, et al. (2010) Sequencing, analysis, and annotation of expressed sequence tags for Camelus dromedarius. PLoS ONE, 5, e10720.
4. Angiuoli SV, Salzberg SL (2011) Mugsy: fast multiple alignment of closely related whole genomes. Bioinformatics, 27, 334-342.
5. Baes CF, Dolezal MA, Koltes JE, et al. (2014) Evaluation of variant identification methods for whole genome sequencing data in dairy cattle. BMC Genomics, 15, 948.
6. Bao Z, Eddy SR (2002) Automated de novo identification of repeat sequence families in sequenced genomes. Genome Research, 12, 1269-1276.
7. Benson G (1999) Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Research, 27, 573-580.
8. Bradnam KR, Fass JN, Alexandrov A, et al. (2013) Assemblathon 2: evaluating de novo methods of genome assembly in three vertebrate species. GigaScience, 2, 10.
9. Bulliet R (1990) The Camel and the Wheel. Columbia University Press, New York.
10. Burger PA, Palmieri N (2014) Estimating the population mutation rate from a de novo assembled Bactrian camel genome and cross-species comparison with Dromedary ESTs. Journal of Heredity, 105, 839-846.
11. Cantarel BL, Korf I, Robb SM, et al. (2008) MAKER: an easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes. Genome Research, 18, 188-196.
12. Chamala S, Chanderbali AS, Der JP, et al. (2013) Assembly and validation of the genome of the nonmodel basal angiosperm Amborella. Science, 342, 1516-1517.
13. Coulondre C, Miller JH, Farabaugh PJ, Gilbert W (1978) Molecular basis of base substitution hotspots in Escherichia coli. Nature, 274, 775-780.
14. Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, et al. (2011) The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics, 27, 2156-2158.
15. DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, et al. (2011) A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nature Genetics, 43, 491-498.
16. Dutheil JY, Gaillard S, Stukenbrock EH (2014) MafFilter: a highly flexible and extensible multiple genome alignment files processor. BMC Genomics, 15, 53.
17. Ehrlich M, Wang RYH (1981) 5-methylcytosine in eukaryotic DNA. Science, 212, 1350-1357.
18. Ellegren H (2008) Comparative genomics and the study of evolution by natural selection. Molecular Ecology, 17, 4586-4596.
19. Glenn TC (2011) Field guide to next-generation DNA sequencers. Molecular Ecology Resources, 11, 759-769.
20. Griffiths-Jones S, Bateman A, Marshall M, et al. (2003) Rfam: an RNA family database. Nucleic Acids Research, 31, 439-441.
21. Grigson C (2012) Camels, copper and donkeys in the early Iron Age of the southern Levant: Timna revisited. Levant, 44, 82-100.
22. Groves T, Godlee F (2012) Open science and reproducible research. BMJ, 344, e4383.
23. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G (2013) QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics, 29, 1072-1075.
24. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME (2009) Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 433-443.
25. Holt C, Yandell M (2011) MAKER2: an annotation pipeline and genome-database management tool for second-generation genome projects. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 491.
26. Huddleston J, Ranade S, Malig M, et al. (2014) Reconstructing complex regions of genomes using long-read sequencing technology. Genome Research, 24, 688-696.
27. Hunt M, Kikuchi T, Sanders M, et al. (2013) REAPR: a universal tool for genome assembly evaluation. Genome Biology, 14, R47.
28. Jirimutu, Wang Z, Ding G, et al. (2012) Genome sequences of wild and domestic Bactrian camels. Nature Communications, 3, 1202.
29. Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY, et al. (2014) InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics, 30, 1236-1240.
30. Jurka J, Kapitonov VV, Pavlicek A, et al. (2005) Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 110, 462-467.
31. Kelley DR, Schatz MC, Salzberg SL (2010) Quake: quality-aware detection and correction of sequencing errors. Genome Biology, 11, R116.
32. Koch P, Platzer M, Downie BR (2014) RepARK-de novo creation of repeat libraries from whole-genome NGS reads. Nucleic Acids Research, 42, e80.
33. Kofler R, Orozco-terWengel P, De Maio N, et al. (2011) PoPoolation: a toolbox for population genetic analysis of next generation sequencing data from pooled individuals. PLoS ONE, 6, e15925.
34. Köhler-Rollefson IU (1991) Camelus dromedarius. Mammalian Species, 375, 1-8.
35. Korf I (2004) Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinformatics, 5, 59.
36. Krishan A, Dandekar P, Nathan N, et al. (2005) DNA index, genome size, and electronic nuclear volume of vertebrates from the Miami Metro Zoo. Cytometry Part A, 65A, 26-34.
37. Laszlo AH, Derrington IM, Ross BC, et al. (2014) Decoding long nanopore sequencing reads of natural DNA. Nature Biotechnology, 32, 829-833.
38. Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics, 25, 1754-1760.
39. Li H, Durbin R (2011) Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences. Nature, 475, 493-496.
40. Li L, Stoeckert CJ Jr, Roos DS (2003) OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Research, 13, 2178-2189.
41. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 25, 2078-2079.
42. Liu Q, Guo Y, Li J, et al. (2012) Steps to ensure accuracy in genotype and SNP calling from Illumina sequencing data. BMC Genomics, 13(Suppl. 8), S8.
43. Lomsadze A, Ter-Hovhannisyan V, Chernoff YO, Borodovsky M (2005) Gene identification in novel eukaryotic genomes by self-training algorithm. Nucleic Acids Research, 33, 6494-6506.
44. Lorenzen ED, Nogúes-Bravo D, Orlando L, et al. (2011) Species-specific responses of Late Quaternary megafauna to climate and humans. Nature, 479, 359-364.
45. Mesirov JP (2010) Accessible reproducible research. Science, 327, 415-416.
46. Minoche AE, Dohm JC, Himmelbauer H (2011) Evaluation of genomic high-throughput sequencing data generated on Illumina HiSeq and Genome Analyzer systems. Genome Biology, 12, R112.
47. Muyldermans S, Baral TN, Retamozzo VC, et al. (2009) Camelid immunoglobulins and nanobody technology. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 128, 178-183.
48. Nawrocki EP, Kolbe DL, Eddy SR (2009) Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments. Bioinformatics, 25, 1335-1337.
49. Orlando L, Ginolhac A, Zhang G, et al. (2013) Recalibrating Equus evolution using the genome sequence of an early Middle Pleistocene horse. Nature, 499, 74-78.
50. Parra G, Bradnam K, Korf I (2007) CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics, 23, 1061-1067.
51. Peng RD (2011) Reproducible research in computational science. Science, 334, 1226-1227.
52. Pool JE, Hellmann I, Jensen JD, Nielsen R (2010) Population genetic inference from genomic sequence variation. Genome Research, 20, 291-300.
53. Pryce JE, Bolormaa S, Chamberlain AJ, et al. (2010) A validated genome-wide association study in 2 dairy cattle breeds for milk production and fertility traits using variable length haplotypes. Journal of Dairy Science, 93, 3331-3345.
54. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A (2000) EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends in Genetics, 16, 276-277.
55. Rimmer A, Phan H, Mathieson I, et al. (2014) Integrating mapping-, assembly- and haplotype-based approaches for calling variants in clinical sequencing applications. Nature Genetics, 46, 912-918.
56. Rizk G, Lavenier D, Chikhi R (2013) DSK: k-mer counting with very low memory usage. Bioinformatics, 29, 652-653.
57. Salzberg SL, Phillippy AM, Zimin A, et al. (2012) GAGE: a critical evaluation of genome assemblies and assembly algorithms. Genome Research, 22, 557-567.
58. Schefers JM, Weigel KA (2012) Genomic selection in dairy cattle: integration of DNA testing into breeding programs. Animal Frontiers, 2, 4-9.
59. Schulz U, Tupac-Yupanqui I, Martínez A, et al. (2010) The Canarian camel: a traditional dromedary population. Diversity, 2, 561-571.
60. Shearer LA, Anderson LK, de Jong H, et al. (2014) Fluorescence in situ hybridization and optical mapping to correct scaffold arrangement in the tomato genome. G3-Genes Genomes Genetics, 4, 1395-1405.
61. Simpson JT, Wong K, Jackman SD, et al. (2009) ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Research, 19, 1117-1123.
62. Smit AFA, Hubley R (2008-2010) RepeatModeler Open-1.0. Available from http://www.repeatmasker.org.
63. Smit AFA, Hubley R, Green P (1996-2010) RepeatMasker Open-3.0. Available from http://www.repeatmasker.org.
64. Spencer PBS, Woolnough AP (2010) Assessment and genetic characterisation of Australian camels using microsatellite polymorphisms. Livestock Science, 129, 241-245.
65. Stanke M, Keller O, Gunduz I, et al. (2006) AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Research, 34, W435-W439.
66. Stodden V, Donoho D, Fomel S, et al. (2010) Reproducible research. Computing in Science and Engineering, 12, 8-13.
67. Sved J, Bird A (1990) The expected equilibrium of the CpG dinucleotide in vertebrate genomes under a mutation model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 87, 4692-4696.
68. Uerpmann H-P, Uerpmann M (2002) The appearance of the domestic camel in south-east Arabia. The Journal of Oman Studies, 12, 235-260.
69. Walser JC, Furano AV (2010) The mutational spectrum of non-CpG DNA varies with CpG content. Genome Research, 20, 875-882.
70. Whitlock MC (2011) Data archiving in ecology and evolution: best practices. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 26, 61-65.
71. Wootton JC, Federhen S (1993) Statistics of local complexity in amino acid sequences and sequence databases. Computers and Chemistry, 17, 149-163.
72. Wu H, Guang X, Al-Fageeh MB, et al. (2014) Camelid genomes reveal evolution and adaptation to desert environments. Nature Communications, 5, 5188.
73. Zerbino DR, Birney E (2008) Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Research, 18, 821-829.