System Constraints on Leadership Perceptions, Behavior, and Influence: An Example of Connectionist Level Processes

Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 283-310

  Lord, Robert G ^a   Brown, Douglas J ^a   Harvey, Jennifer L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Cognitive reactions; Interaction patterns; Leadership; Social influence; System constraints

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954158347     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470998458.ch12     Document Type: Chapter

References (140)

1. Albright, L., & Forziati, C. (1995). Cross-situational consistency and perceptual accuracy in leadership.Personalityand Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1269-1276.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1996). A simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist, 51, 355-365.
3. Ansari, M. A. (1990). Managing people at work: Leadership styles and influence strategies. New Delhi, India: Sage.
4. Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Barrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
5. Baron, R. S., Vandello, J. A., & Brunsman, B. (1996). The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 915-927.
6. Barry, B., & Watson, M. R. (1996). Communication aspects of dyadic social influence in organizations: A review and integration of conceptual and empirical developments. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 19, pp. 269-317). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52, 130-139.
8. Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (1991). Connectionism and the mind. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
9. Brown, D. J., Marchioro, C. A., Tan, J. A., & Lord, R. G. (1998). Individual difference variables and leadership perceptions: Linear or catastrophic relationship? Paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.
10. Bruins, J. (1999). Social power and influence tactics: A theoretical introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 7-14.
11. Calder, B. J. (1977). An attribution theory of leadership. In B. M. Staw & G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior (pp. 179-204). Chicago, IL: St. Clair Press.
12. Caldwell, D. F., & Burger, J. M. (1997). Personality and social influence strategies in the workplace.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1003-1012.
13. Cobb, A. T. (1984). An episodic model of power: Toward an integration of theory and research.Academy of Management Review, 9, 482-493.
14. Cronshaw, S. F., & Lord, R. G. (1987). Effects of categorization, attribution, and encoding processes on leadership perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 97-106.
15. Dansereau, F., Alutto, J. A., & Yammarino, R. J. (1984). Theory testing in organizational behavior: The variant approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16. Dansereau, F., & Yammarino, F. (Eds.) (1998). Leadership: The multiple level approaches: Classical and New Wave. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
17. Dillard, J. P. (1990). A goal-driven model of interpersonal influence. In J. P. Dillard (Ed.), Seeking compliance: The production of interpersonal influence messages (pp. 41-56). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
18. Duarte, N. T., Goodson, J. R., & Klich, N. R. (1994). Effects of dyadic quality and duration on performance appraisal. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 499-521.
19. Dunning, D., & Hayes, A. F. (1996). Evidence for egocentric comparison in social judgment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 213-229.
20. Dunning, D., & Sherman, D. A. (1997). Stereotypes and tacit inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 459-471.
21. Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
22. Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.
23. Eden, D. (1992). Leadership and expectations: Pygmalion effects and other self-fulfilling prophecies in organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 3, 271-305.
24. Emrich, C. G. (1999). Context effects in leadership perceptions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 991-1006.
25. Engle, E. M., & Lord, R. G. (1997). Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchanges.Academy of Management Journal, 40, 988-1010.
26. Erez, M., & Earley, P. C. (1993). Culture, self-identity and work. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Farris, G. F., & Lim, F. G. (1969). Effects of performance on leadership, cohesiveness, influence, satisfaction, and subsequent performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 490-497.
28. Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Fleishman, E. A., Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Levin, K. Y., Korotkin, A. L., & Hein, M. B. (1992). Taxonomic efforts in the description of leadership behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation. Leadership Quarterly, 2, 245-289.
30. Foti, R. J., Fraser, S. L., & Lord, R. G. (1982). Effects of leadership labels and prototypes on perceptions of political leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 326-333.
31. Foti, R. J., Lord, R. G., & Dambrot, F. (1992). The effects of election outcomes on descriptions of political leaders. Unpublished Manuscript. University of Akron.
32. Foti, R. J., & Luch, C. H. (1992). The influence of individual differences on the perception and categorization of leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 3, 55-66.
33. Fraser, S. L., & Lord, R. G. (1988). Stimulus prototypicality and general leadership impressions: Their role in leadership and behavioral ratings. Journal of Psychology, 122, 291-303.
34. French, J. R. P., & Raven. B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. H. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan-Research Center for Group Dynamics, Institute of Social Research.
35. George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107-116.
36. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1994). Cross-cultural comparison of leadership prototypes. Leadership Quarterly, 2, 121-134.
37. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 827-845.
38. Gilbert, D. T. (1989). Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 189-211). New York: Guilford Press.
39. Glomb, T. M., & Hulin, C. L. (1998). Anger and gender effects in observed supervisor-subordinate dyadic interactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 281-307.
40. Goodstadt, B., & Kipnis, D. (1970). Situational influences on the use of power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 201-207.
41. Goodwin, S. A., Operario, D., & Fiske, S. T. (1998). Situational power and interpersonal dominance facilitate bias and inequality. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 677-698.
42. Graen, G., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 175-208). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
43. Green, S. G., & Mitchell, T. R. (1979). Attributional processes of leaders in leader-member interactions.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 429-458.
44. Hains, S. C., Hogg, M. A., & Duck, J. M. (1997). Self-categorization and leadership: Effects of group prototypicality and leader stereotypicality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1087-1099.
45. Hall, R. J., & Lord, R. G. (1995). Multi-level information-processing explanations of followers' leadership perceptions. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 265-287.
46. Hall, R. J., Makiney, J. D., Marchioro, C. A., Lord, R. G., & Engle, E. M. (April, 1998). Structural equation modeling approaches to the study of leader-member relationships. Paper presented at 13th Annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.
47. Hall, R. J., Marchioro, C. A., Makiney, J. E. D., & Lee, M. (1998). A longitudinal study of personality and individual difference correlates of leadership and group member perceptions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
48. Hall, R. J., Workman, J. W., Marchioro, C. A. (1998). Sex, task, and behavioral flexibility effects on leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 1-32.
49. Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M.-J. (1996). The influence of top-management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659-684.
50. Hanges, P. L., Lord, R. G., Day, D. V., Sipe, W. P., Smith, W. C., & Brown, D. J. (1999). Leadership and gender biases: Dynamic measures and nonlinear modeling. Manuscript submitted for publication.
51. Hill, T. E., & Schmitt, N. (1977). Individual differences in leadership decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19, 353-367.
52. Hogg, M. A., Hains, S. C., & Mason, I. (1998). Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1248-1263.
53. Hollander, E. P. (1992). Leadership, followership, self, and others. Leadership Quarterly, 3, 43-54.
54. Hollander, E. P., & Julian, J. W. (1969). Contemporary trends in the analysis of leadership perceptions.Psychological Bulletin, 71, 387-397.
55. Hollander, E. P., & Offerman, L. R. (1990). Power and leadership in organizations: Relationships in transition. American Psychologist, 45, 179-189.
56. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, A., Dorfman, P. W., Javidan M. M., Dickson, M. W., Gupta, V., & GLOBE. (1999). Cultural influences on leadership: Project GLOBE. In W. Mobley, M. J. Gessner, & V. Arnold (Eds.), Advances in Global Leadership (Vol. 1, pp.171-233). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
57. Jago, A. G., & Vroom, V. H. (1977). Hierarchical level and leadership style. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18, 131-145.
58. Karakowsky, L., & Siegel, J. P. (1999). The effects of proportional representation and gender orientation of the task on emergent leadership behavior in mixed-gender work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 620-631.
59. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
60. Keeney, M. J., & Marchioro, C. A. (1998). A meta-analytic review of the traits associated with leadership emergence: An extension of Lord, DeVader, and Alliger (1986). Presentation at the 13th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.
61. Kelman, H. C. (1974). Further thoughts on the processes of compliance, identification, and internalization.In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Perspectives on social power (pp. 125-171). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
62. Kenny, D. A., & Hallmark, B. W. (1992). Rotation designs in leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 3, 25-41.
63. Kenny, D. A., & Zaccaro, S. J. (1983). An estimate of variance due to traits in leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 678-685.
64. Kerr, S., Schriesheim, C. A., Murphy, C. J., & Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Toward a contingency theory of leadership based upon the Consideration and Initiating Structure literature. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 62-82.
65. Kipnis, D. (1974). The powerholder. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Perspectives on social power (pp.82-122). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
66. Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one's way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440-452.
67. Klein, K. J., & House, R. J. (1996). On fire: Charismatic leadership and levels of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 183-198.
68. Klein, S. B., Loftus, J., Trafton, J. G., & Fuhrman, R. W. (1992). Use of exemplars and abstractions in trait judgments: A model of trait knowledge about the self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 739-753.
69. Lewter, J., & Lord, R. G. (1992). Affect and the multifactor leadership questionnaire: A replication and extension. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Convention in Las Vegas, NV.
70. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 662-674.
71. Lord, R. G. (1976). Group performance as a function of leadership behavior and task structure: Toward an explanatory theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 17, 76-96.
72. Lord, R. G. (1985). An information processing approach to social perceptions, leadership, and behavioral measurement in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 87-128). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
73. Lord, R. G., Brown, D. J., & Freiberg, S. J. (1999). Understanding the dynamics of leadership: The role of follower self-concepts in the leader/follower relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 1-37.
74. Lord, R. G., De Vader, C., & Alliger, G. (1986). A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalization procedures.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 402-410.
75. Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., & de Vader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 343-378.
76. Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., & Phillips, J. S. (1982). A theory of leadership categorization. In J. G. Hunt, U. Sekaran, and C. Schriesheim (Eds.). Leadership: Beyond establishment views (pp. 104-121). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
77. Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1991). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. New York: Routledge.
78. Lord, R. G., Phillips, J. S., & Rush, M. C. (1980). Effects of sex and personality on perceptions of emergent leadership, influence, and social power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 176- 182.
79. Lord, R. G., & Smith, J. E. (1983). Theoretical, information processing, and situational factors affecting attribution theory models of organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 8, 50-60.
80. Lord, R. G., & Smith, W. G. (1998). Leadership and the changing nature of work performance.In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of work performance: Implications for staffing, personnel decisions, and development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
81. Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385-425.
82. Lowin, A., & Craig, J. R. (1968). The influence of level of performance on managerial style: An experimental object-lesson in the ambiguity of correlational data. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 440-458.
83. Maher, K. (1995). The role of cognitive load in supervisor attributions of subordinate behavior.In M. J. Martinko (Ed.), Attributional theory: An organizational perspective Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.
84. Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective.Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-338.
85. Mann, R. D. (1959). A review of the relationships between personality and performance in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 241-270.
86. Malloy, T. E., & Janowski, C. L. (1992) Perceptions and meta-perceptions of leadership: Components, accuracy, and dispositional correlates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 700-709.
87. Martinko, M. J., & Gardner, W. L. (1987). The leader/member attribution process. Academy of Management Review, 12, 235-249.
88. Marwell, G., & Schmitt, D. R. (1967). Compliance-gaining behavior: A synthesis and model.Sociological Quarterly, 8, 317-328.
89. Matthews, A. M., Lord, R. G., & Walker, J. B. (1990). The development of leadership perceptions in children. Unpublished manuscript, University of Akron.
90. Maurer, T. J., & Lord, R. G. (1991). An exploration of cognitive demands in group interaction as a moderator of information processing variables in perception of leadership. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 821-840.
91. Meindl, J. R. (1995). The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: A social constructionist approach. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 329-341.
92. Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 78-102.
93. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
94. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1998). Reconciling processing dynamics and personality dispositions.Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 229-258.
95. Mumford, M. D., & Connelly, M. S. (1991). Leaders as creators: Leader performance and problem solving in ill-defined domains. Leadership Quarterly, 2, 289-315.
96. Murphy, M. R., & Jones, A. P. (1993). The influence of performance cues and observational focus on performance rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1523-1545.
97. Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 723-739.
98. Nye, J. L., & Forsyth, D. R. (1991). The effects of prototype-based biases on leadership appraisals: A test of leadership categorization theory. Small Group Research, 22, 360-379.
99. O'Connell, M. S., Lord, R. G., & O'Connell, M. K. (1990). An empirical comparison of Japanese and American leadership prototypes: Implications for overseas assignment of managers. Paper presented at Academy of Management Convention, San Francisco, CA.
100. Overwalle, F. V. (1998). Causal explanation as constraint satisfaction: A critique and a feedforward connectionist alternative. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 312-328.
101. Pawar, B. S., & Eastman, K. (1997). The nature and implications of contextual influences on transformational leadership: A conceptual examination. Academy of Management Review, 22, 80-109.
102. Phillips, J. S., & Lord, R. G. (1981). Causal attributions and perceptions of leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 143-163.
103. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Meta-analysis of the relationship between Kerr and Jermier's substitutes for leadership and employee job attitudes, role perceptions, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 380-399.
104. Podsakoff, P. M., Todor, W. D., Grover, R. A., & Huber, V. L. (1984). Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behaviors: Fact or fiction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 21-63.
105. Porter, L. W., Allen, R. W., & Angle, H. L. (1981). The politics of upward influence in organizations.In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp.109-149) Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
106. Raven, B. H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 217-244.
107. Read, S. J., & Marcus-Newhall, A. (1993). Explanatory coherence in social explanations: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 429- 439.
108. Read, S. J., Vanman, E. J., & Miller, L. C. (1997). Connectionism, parallel constraint satisfaction processes, and Gestalt principles: (Re)Introducing cognitive dynamics to social psychology.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 26-53.
109. Robbins, T. L., & DeNisi, A. S. (1994). A closer look at interpersonal affect as a distinct influence on cognitive processing in performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 341- 353.
110. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.). Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
111. Rumelhart, D. E. (1989). The architecture of mind: A connectionist approach. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 122-159). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
112. Rumelhart, D. E., Smolensky, P., McClelland, J. L., & Hinton, G. E. (1986). Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models (pp. 7-56). London: MIT Press.
113. Rush, M. C., Thomas, J. C., & Lord, R. G. (1977). Implicit leadership theory: A potential threat to the internal validity of leader behavior questionnaires. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 93-110.
114. Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
115. Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
116. Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organizational Science, 4, 577-594.
117. Sherman, J. W. (1996). Development and mental representation of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1126-1141.
118. Sherman, J. W., & Klein, S. B. (1994). Development and representation of personality impressions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 972-983.
119. Sipe, W. P., & Hanges, P. J. (1997). Reframing the glass ceiling: A catastrophe model of changes in the perception of women as leaders. Manuscript submitted for publication.
120. Smith, E. R. (1996). What do connectionism and social psychology offer each other? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 893-912.
121. Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (1998). Knowledge acquisition, accessibility, and use in person perception and stereotyping: Simulation with a recurrent connectionist network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 21-35.
122. Smith, W. G., Brown, D. J., Lord, R. G., & Engle, E. (1999). Leadership self-schemas and their effect on leadership impressions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
123. Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96, 58-83.
124. Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature.Journal of Psychology, 25, 35-71.
125. Stogdill, R. M. (1963). Manual for the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire-form XII. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
126. Tedeschi, J. T., Bonoma, T. V., & Schlenker, B. R. (1972). Influence, decision, and compliance.In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), The social influence processes (pp. 346-418). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
127. Tedeschi, J. T., Schlenker, B. R., & Lindskold, S. (1972). The exercise of power and influence: The source of influence. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), The social influence processes (pp. 287-345). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
128. Thomas, A. B. (1988). Does leadership make a difference to organizational performance? Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 388-400.
129. Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 323-345.
130. Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 482-497.
131. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York: Academic Press.
132. Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (1994). The chaos in social psychology. In R. R. Vallacher & A. Nowak (Eds.), Dynamical systems in social psychology (pp. 1-16). London: Academic Press.
133. Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision-making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
134. Wayne, S. J., & Ferris, G. R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisorsubordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 487-499.
135. Winter, L., & Uleman, J. S. (1984). When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneous of trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 237-252.
136. Wofford, J. C., & Goodwin, V. L. (1994). A cognitive interpretation of transactional and transformational leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 5, 160-186.
137. Yukl, G. (1992). Theory and research on leadership in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 147-198), Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
138. Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
139. Zaccaro, S. J., Foti, R. J., & Kenny, D. A. (1991). Self-monitoring and trait-based variance in leadership: An investigation of leader flexibility across multiple group situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 308-315.
140. Zaccaro, S. J., Gilbert, J. A., Thor, K. K., & Mumford, M. D. (1991). Leadership and social intelligence: Linking social perspectiveness and behavioral flexibility of leadership effectiveness.Leadership Quarterly, 2, 317-342.