The influence of landscape configuration and environment on population genetic structure in a sedentary passerine: Insights from loci located in different genomic regions

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 205-219

  Ferrer, E S ^a,b   Garcia Navas V ^a,b,c   Bueno Enciso, J ^b   Barrientos, R ^b   Serrano Davies, E ^b   Caliz Campal C ^a,d   Sanz, J J ^e   Ortego, J ^d  

^a INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN RECURSOS CINEGÉTICOS IREC CSIC UCLM JCCM   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

^e MUSEO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS NATURALES   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cyanistes caeruleus; Gene flow; Isolation by distance; Isolation by environment; Isolation by resistance; Multiple matrix regression

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENE FLOW; GENOME; ISOLATED POPULATION; ISOLATION EFFECT; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; PASSERINE; POPULATION GENETICS;

CYANISTES CAERULEUS; PASSERIFORMES;

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; GENE FLOW; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; PASSERIFORMES; POPULATION GENETICS; SPAIN;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOSYSTEM; GENE FLOW; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; PASSERIFORMES; SPAIN;

EID: 84953354310     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12776     Document Type: Article

References (108)

1. Adams, R.V. & Burg, T.M. 2015. Influence of ecological and geological features on rangewide patterns of genetic structure in a widespread passerine. Heredity 114: 143-154.
2. Agostini, C., Papetti, C., Patarnello, T., Mark, F.C., Zane, L. & Marino, I.A.M. 2013. Putative selected markers in the Chionodraco genus detected by interspecific outlier tests. Polar Biol. 36: 1509-1518.
3. Amos, J.N., Bennett, A.F., Nally, R.M., Newell, G., Pavlova, A., Radford, J.Q. et al. 2012. Predicting landscape-genetic consequences of habitat loss, fragmentation and mobility for multiple species of woodland birds. PLoS ONE 7: e30888.
4. Amos, J.N., Harrisson, K.A., Radford, J.Q., White, M., Newell, G., Nally, R.M. et al. 2014. Species- and sex-specific connectivity effects of habitat fragmentation in a suite of woodland birds. Ecology 95: 1556-1568.
5. Andrew, R.L., Ostevik, K.L., Ebert, D.P. & Rieseberg, L.H. 2012. Adaptation with gene flow across the landscape in a dune sunflower. Mol. Ecol. 21: 2078-2091.
6. Andrews, K.R. & Luikart, G. 2014. Recent novel approaches for population genomics data analysis. Mol. Ecol. 23: 1661-1667.
7. ST-outlier method. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 323.
8. Barr, K.R., Kus, B.E., Preston, K.L., Howell, S., Perkins, E. & Vandergast, A.G. 2015. Habitat fragmentation in coastal southern California disrupts genetic connectivity in the cactus wren (Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus). Mol. Ecol. 24: 2349-2363.
9. Beaumont, M.A. & Balding, D.J. 2004. Identifying adaptive genetic divergence among populations from genome scans. Mol. Ecol. 13: 969-980.
10. Beaumont, M.A. & Nichols, R.A. 1996. Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 263: 1619-1626.
11. Bélisle, M., Desrochers, A. & Fortin, M.J. 2001. Influence of forest cover on the movements of forest birds: a homing experiment. Ecology 82: 1893-1904.
12. Bierne, N., Welch, J., Loire, E., Bonhomme, O. & David, P. 2011. The coupling hypothesis: why genome scans may fail to map local adaptation genes. Mol. Ecol. 20: 2044-2072.
13. Blondel, J. 1999. Selection-based biodiversity at a small spatial scale in alow-dispersing insular bird. Science 285: 1399-1402.
14. Blondel, J. 2006. The "design" of Mediterranean landscapes: a millennial history of humans and ecological systems during the historic period. Hum. Ecol. 34: 713-729.
15. Blondel, J. 2007. Coping with habitat heterogeneity: the story of Mediterranean blue tits. J. Ornithol. 148: 3-15.
16. Blondel, J. & Aronson, J. 1999. Biology and Wildlife of the Mediterranean Region. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
17. Blondel, J., Thomas, D.W., Charmantier, A., Perret, P., Bourgault, P. & Lambrechts, M.M. 2006. A thirty year study of phenotypic and genetic variation of blue tits in Mediterranean habitat mosaics. Bioscience 56: 661-673.
18. Broquet, T., Ray, N., Petit, E., Fryxell, J.M. & Burel, F. 2006. Genetic isolation by distance and landscape connectivity in the American marten (Martes americana). Landscape Ecol. 21: 877-889.
19. Corbett-Detig, R.B., Zhou, J., Clark, A.G., Hartl, D.L. & Ayroles, J.F. 2014. Genetic incompatibilities are widespread within species. Nature 504: 135-137.
20. Coster, S.S., Babbitt, K.J., Cooper, A. & Kovach, A.I. 2015. Limited influence of local and landscape factors on finescale gene flow in two pond-breeding amphibians. Mol. Ecol. 24: 742-758.
21. Coulon, A., Guillot, G., Cosson, J.F., Angibault, J.M.A., Aulagnier, S., Cargnelutti, B. et al. 2006. Genetic structure is influenced by landscape features: empirical evidence from a roe deer population. Mol. Ecol. 15: 1669-1679.
22. Coulon, A., Fitzpatrick, J.W., Bowman, R., Stith, B.M., Makarewich, C.A., Stenzler, L.M. et al. 2008. Congruent population structure inferred from dispersal behaviour and intensive genetic surveys of the threatened Florida scrub-jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens). Mol. Ecol. 17: 1685-1701.
23. Davis, J.M. & Stamps, J.A. 2004. The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 411-416.
24. Desrochers, A. & Hannon, S.J. 1997. Gap crossing decisions by forest songbirds during the post-fledging period. Conserv. Biol. 11: 1204-1210.
25. Dias, P.C. & Blondel, J. 1996. Local specialization and maladaptation in the Mediterranean blue tit (Parus caeruleus). Oecologia 107: 79-86.
26. Dias, P., Verheyen, G. & Raymond, M. 1996. Source-sink populations in Mediterranean blue tits: evidence using single-locus minisatellite probes. J. Evol. Biol. 9: 965-978.
27. Dutta, T., Sharma, S., Maldonado, J.E., Wood, T.C., Panwar, H.S. & Seidensticker, J. 2013. Fine-scale population genetic structure in a wide-ranging carnivore, the leopard (Panthera pardus fusca) in central India. Divers. Distrib. 19: 760-771.
28. Earl, D.A. & vonHoldt, B.M. 2012. structure harvester: a website and program for visualizing structure output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 4: 359-361.
29. Edelaar, P., Alonso, D., Lagerveld, S., Senar, J.C. & Björklund, M. 2012. Population differentiation and restricted gene flow in Spanish crossbills: not isolation-by-distance but isolation-by-ecology. J. Evol. Biol. 25: 417-430.
30. Evanno, G., Regnaut, S. & Goudet, J. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14: 2611-2620.
31. Excoffier, L., Laval, G. & Schneider, S. 2005. arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinform. 1: 47-50.
32. Falush, D., Stephens, M. & Pritchard, J.K. 2003. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164: 1567-1587.
33. Ferrer, E.S., García-Navas, V., Sanz, J.J. & Ortego, J. 2014. Individual genetic diversity and probability of infection by avian malaria parasites in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus). J. Evol. Biol. 27: 2468-2482.
34. Foerster, K., Delhey, K., Johnsen, A., Lifjeld, J.T. & Kempenaers, B. 2003. Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings. Nature 425: 714-717.
35. Foll, M. & Gaggiotti, O.E. 2008. A genome scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a Bayesian perspective. Genetics 180: 977-993.
36. Freedman, A.H., Thomassen, H.A., Buermann, W. & Smith, T.B. 2010. Genomic signals of diversification along eco-logical gradients in a tropical lizard. Mol. Ecol. 19: 3773-3788.
37. Garant, D., Forde, S.E. & Hendry, A.P. 2007. The multifarious effects of dispersal and gene flow on contemporary adaptation. Funct. Ecol. 21: 434-443.
38. García-Canseco, V. 1997. Parque Nacional de Cabañeros. Ecohabitat, Ciudad Real.
39. García-Navas, V. & Sanz, J.J. 2011. The importance of a main dish: nestling diet and foraging behaviour in Mediterranean blue tits in relation to prey phenology. Oecologia 165: 639-649.
40. García-Navas, V. & Sanz, J.J. 2012. Environmental and within-nest factors influencing nestling feeding patterns in Mediterranean blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus). Condor 114: 612-620.
41. García-Navas, V., Sanz, J.J., Merino, S., Martínez-de la Puente, J., Lobato, E., del Cerro, S. et al. 2011. Experimental evidence for the role of calcium in eggshell pigmentation pattern and breeding performance in blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus. J. Ornithol. 152: 1-82.
42. García-Navas, V., Ferrer, E.S. & Sanz, J.J. 2012. Plumage yellowness predicts foraging ability in the blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 106: 418-429.
43. García-Navas, V., Ferrer, E.S., Sanz, J.J. & Ortego, J. 2014. The role of immigration and local adaptation on fine-scale genotypic and phenotypic population divergence in a less mobile passerine. J. Evol. Biol. 27: 1590-1603.
44. Garnier-Gere, P. & Dillmann, C. 1992. A computer-program for testing pairwise linkage disequilibria in subdivided populations. J. Hered. 83: 239.
45. Garroway, C.J., Radersma, R., Sepil, I., Santure, A.W., De Cauwer, I., Slate, J. et al. 2013. Fine-scale genetic structure in a wild bird population: the role of limited dispersal and environmentally based selection as causal factors. Evolution 67: 3488-3500.
46. Geraldes, A., Farzaneh, N., Grassa, C.J., McKown, A.D., Guy, R.D., Mansfield, S.D. et al. 2014. Landscape genomics of Populus trichocarpa: the role of hybridization, limited gene flow, and natural selection in shaping patterns of population structure. Evolution 68: 3260-3280.
47. Goudet, J. 1995. fstat (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 86: 485-486.
48. Guo, S.W. & Thompson, E.A. 1992. A monte-carlo method for combined segregation and linkage analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 51: 1111-1126.
49. Hansson, B., Bensch, S. & Hasselquist, D. 2004. Lifetime fitness of short- and long-distance dispersing great reed warblers. Evolution 58: 2546-2557.
50. Harrisson, K.A., Pavlova, A., Amos, J.N., Takeuchi, N., Lill, A., Radford, J.Q. et al. 2013. Disrupted fine-scale population processes in fragmented landscapes despite large-scale genetic connectivity for a widespread and common cooperative breeder: the superb fairy-wren (Malurus cyaneus). J. Anim. Ecol. 82: 322-333.
51. He, Q.X., Edwards, D.L. & Knowles, L.L. 2013. Integrative testing of how environments from the past to the present shape genetic structure across landscapes. Evolution 67: 3386-3402.
52. Hubisz, M.J., Falush, D., Stephens, M. & Pritchard, J.K. 2009. Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 9: 1322-1332.
53. Hutchison, D.W. & Templeton, A.R. 1999. Correlation of pairwise genetic and geographic distance measures: inferring the relative influences of gene flow and drift on the distribution of genetic variability. Evolution 53: 1898-1914.
54. Illera, J.C., Koivula, K., Broggi, J., Paeckert, M., Martens, J. & Kvist, L. 2011. A multi-gene approach reveals a complex evolutionary history in the Cyanistes species group. Mol. Ecol. 20: 4123-4139.
55. Jakobsson, M. & Rosenberg, N.A. 2007. clumpp: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23: 1801-1806.
56. Jha, S. & Kremen, C. 2013. Urban land use limits regional bumble bee gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 22: 2483-2495.
57. Laine, V.N., Herczeg, G., Shikano, T. & Primmer, C.R. 2012. Heterozygosity-behaviour correlations in nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) populations: contrasting effects at random and functional loci. Mol. Ecol. 21: 4872-4884.
58. Langin, K.M., Sillett, T.S., Funk, W.C., Morrison, S.A., Desrosiers, M.A. & Ghalambor, C.K. 2015. Islands within an island: repeated adaptive divergence in a single population. Evolution 69: 653-665.
59. Lee-Yaw, J.A., Davidson, A., McRae, B.H. & Green, D.M. 2009. Do landscape processes predict phylogeographic patterns in the wood frog? Mol. Ecol. 18: 1863-1874.
60. Manel, S., Schwartz, M.K., Luikart, G. & Taberlet, P. 2003. Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 89-197.
61. Martínez-Cruz, B., Godoy, J.A. & Negro, J.J. 2007. Population fragmentation leads to spatial and temporal genetic structure in the endangered Spanish imperial eagle. Mol. Ecol. 16: 477-486.
62. Matthysen, E., Adriaensen, F. & Dhondt, A.A. 2001. Local recruitment of great and blue tits (Parus major, P. caeruleus) in relation to study plot size and degree of isolation. Ecography 24: 33-42.
63. McDevitt, A.D., Oliver, M.K., Piertney, S.B., Szafrańska, P.A., Konarzewski, M. & Zub, K. 2013. Individual variation in dispersal associated with phenotype influences fine-scale genetic structure in weasels. Conserv. Genet. 14: 499-509.
64. McRae, B.H. 2006. Isolation by resistance. Evolution 60: 1551-1561.
65. McRae, B.H. & Beier, P. 2007. Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 19885-19890.
66. McRae, B.H., Dickson, B.G., Keitt, T.H. & Shah, V.B. 2008. Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution and conservation. Ecology 89: 2712-2724.
67. Milá, B., Wayne, R.K., Fitze, P. & Smith, T.B. 2009. Divergence with gene flow and fine-scale phylogeographical structure in the wedge-billed woodcreeper, Glyphorynchus spirurus, a Neotropical rainforest bird. Mol. Ecol. 18: 2979-2995.
68. Munshi-South, J. 2012. Urban landscape genetics: canopy cover predicts gene flow between white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) populations in New York City. Mol. Ecol. 21: 1360-1378.
69. Murphy, M.A., Dezzani, R., Pilliod, D.S. & Storfer, A. 2010. Landscape genetics of high mountain frog metapopulations. Mol. Ecol. 19: 3634-3649.
70. Mylecraine, K.A., Bulgin, N.L., Gibbs, H.L., Vickery, P.D. & Perkins, D.W. 2008. Limited genetic structure and evidence for dispersal among populations of the endangered Florida grasshopper sparrow, Ammodramus savannarum floridanus. Conserv. Genet. 9: 1633-1638.
71. Nosil, P., Vines, T.H. & Funk, D.J. 2005. Perspective: reproductive isolation caused by natural selection against immigrants from divergent habitats. Evolution 59: 705-719.
72. Oetjen, K. & Reusch, T.B.H. 2007. Genome scans detect consistent divergent selection among subtidal vs. intertidal populations of the marine angiosperm Zostera marina. Mol. Ecol. 16: 5156-5167.
73. Olano-Marin, J., Dawson, D.A., Girg, A., Hansson, B., Ljungqvist, M., Kempenaers, B. et al. 2010. A genome-wide set of 106 microsatellite markers for the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus). Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10: 516-532.
74. Olano-Marin, J., Mueller, J.C. & Kempenaers, B. 2011a. Heterozygosity and survival in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus): contrasting effects of presumably functional and neutral loci. Mol. Ecol. 20: 4028-4041.
75. Olano-Marin, J., Mueller, J.C. & Kempenaers, B. 2011b. Correlations between heterozygosity and reproductive success in the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus): an analysis of inbreeding and single locus effects. Evolution 65: 3175-3194.
76. Orsini, L., Vanoverbeke, J., Swillen, I., Mergeay, J. & De Meester, L. 2013. Drivers of population genetic differentiation in the wild: isolation by dispersal limitation, isolation by adaptation and isolation by colonization. Mol. Ecol. 22: 5983-5999.
77. Ortego, J., García-Navas, V., Ferrer, E.S. & Sanz, J.J. 2011. Genetic structure reflects natal dispersal movements at different spatial scales in the blue tit, Cyanistes caeruleus. Anim. Behav. 82: 131-137.
78. Ortego, J., Gugger, P.F. & Sork, V.L. 2015. Climatically stable landscapes predict patterns of genetic structure and admixture in the Californian canyon live oak. J. Biogeogr. 42: 328-338.
79. Pavlova, A., Amos, J.N., Goretskaia, M.I., Beme, I.R., Buchanan, K.L., Takeuchi, N. et al. 2012. Genes and song: genetic and social connections in fragmented habitat in a woodland bird with limited dispersal. Ecology 93: 1717-1727.
80. Peterman, W.E., Anderson, T.L., Ousterhout, B.H., Drake, D.L., Semlitsch, R.D. & Eggert, L.S. 2015. Differential dispersal shapes population structure and patterns of genetic differentiation in two sympatric pond breeding salamanders. Conserv. Genet. 16: 59-69.
81. Pflüger, F.J. & Balkenhol, N. 2014. A plea for simultaneously considering matrix quality and local environmental conditions when analysing landscape impacts on effective dispersal. Mol. Ecol. 23: 2146-2156.
82. Porlier, M., Garant, D., Perret, P. & Charmantier, A. 2012a. Habitat-linked population genetic differentiation in the blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus. J. Hered. 103: 781-791.
83. Porlier, M., Charmantier, A., Bourgault, P., Perret, P., Blondel, J. & Garant, D. 2012b. Variation in phenotypic plasticity and selection patterns in blue tit breeding time: between- and within-population comparisons. J. Anim. Ecol. 81: 1041-1051.
84. Postma, E. & van Noordwijk, A.J. 2005. Gene flow maintains a large genetic difference in clutch size at a small spatial scale. Nature 443: 65-68.
85. Pritchard, J.K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
86. Quéméré, E., Crouau-Roy, B., Rabarivola, C. Jr, Louis, E.E. & Chikhi, L. 2010. Landscape genetics of an endangered lemur (Propithecus tattersalli) within its entire fragmented range. Mol. Ecol. 19: 1606-1621.
87. Raymond, M. & Rousset, F. 1995. genepop (version-1.2) - population-genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86: 248-249.
88. Rice, W.R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223-225.
89. Rosenberg, N.A. 2004. distruct: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4: 137-138.
90. Sexton, J.P., Hangartner, S.B. & Hoffmann, A.A. 2014. Genetic isolation by environment or distance: which pattern of gene flow is most common? Evolution 68: 1-15.
91. Seymour, M., Rasanen, K., Holderegger, R. & Kristjansson, B.K. 2013. Connectivity in a pond system influences migration and genetic structure in threespine stickleback. Ecol. Evol. 3: 492-502.
92. Shafer, A.B.A. & Wolf, J.B.W. 2013. Widespread evidence for incipient ecological speciation: a meta-analysis of isolation by-ecology. Ecol. Lett. 16: 940-950.
93. Slatkin, M. 1993. Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations. Evolution 47: 264-279.
94. Stamps, J.A., Krishnan, V.V. & Willits, N.H. 2009. How different types of natal experience affect habitat preference. Am. Nat. 174: 623-630.
95. Storfer, A., Murphy, M.A., Evans, J.S., Goldberg, C.S., Robinson, S., Spear, S.F. et al. 2007. Putting the 'landscape' in landscape genetics. Heredity 98: 128-142.
96. Storfer, A., Murphy, M.A., Spear, S.F., Holderegger, R. & Waits, L.P. 2010. Landscape genetics: where are we now? Mol. Ecol. 19: 3496-3514.
97. Temple, H.J., Hoffman, J.I. & Amos, W. 2006. Dispersal, philopatry and intergroup relatedness: fine-scale genetic structure in the white-breasted thrasher, Ramphocinclus brachyurus. Mol. Ecol. 15: 3449-3458.
98. Thomassen, H.A., Cheviron, Z.A., Freedman, A.H., Harrigan, R.J., Wayne, R.K. & Smith, T.B. 2010. Spatial modelling and landscape-level approaches for visualizing intra-specific variation. Mol. Ecol. 19: 3532-3548.
99. Tornero, J. 2003. Los Quintos de Mora. OAPN-Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid.
100. Veit, M.L., Robertson, R.J., Hamel, P.B. & Friesen, V.L. 2005. Population genetic structure and dispersal across a fragmented landscape in cerulean warblers (Dendroica cerulea). Conserv. Genet. 6: 159-174.
101. Wang, I.J. 2013. Examining the full effects of landscape heterogeneity on spatial genetic variation: a multiple matrix regression approach for quantifying geographic and ecological isolation. Evolution 67: 3403-3411.
102. Wang, I.J. & Bradburd, G. 2014. Isolation by environment. Mol. Ecol. 23: 5649-5662.
103. Wang, I.J., Savage, W.K. & Shaffer, H.B. 2009. Landscape genetics and least-cost path analysis reveal unexpected dispersal routes in the California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense). Mol. Ecol. 18: 1365-1374.
104. Wang, I.J., Glor, R.E. & Losos, J.B. 2013. Quantifying the roles of ecology and geography in spatial genetic divergence. Ecol. Lett. 16: 175-182.
105. Wheelwright, N.T. & Mauck, R.A. 1998. Philopatry, natal dispersal, and inbreeding avoidance in an island population of savannah sparrows. Ecology 79: 755-767.
106. Wiens, J.A. 2001. The landscape context of dispersal. In: Dispersal (J. Clobert, E. Danchin, A.A. Dhondt & J.D. Nichols, eds), pp. 96-99. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
107. Wright, S. 1945. Isolation by distance under diverse systems of mating. Genetics 30: 571-572.
108. Zhao, Y., Vrieling, K., Liao, H., Xiao, M., Zhu, Y., Rong, J. et al. 2013. Are habitat fragmentation, local adaptation and isolation-by-distance driving population divergence in wild rice Oryza rufipogon? Mol. Ecol. 22: 5531-5547.