Examining the full effects of landscape heterogeneity on spatial genetic variation: A multiple matrix regression approach for quantifying geographic and ecological isolation

Evolution

Volumn 67, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 3403-3411

  Wang, Ian J ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gene flow; Isolation by distance; Isolation by environment; Landscape genetics; Multiple matrix regression; Population genetic structure

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; GENE FLOW; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENETIC VARIATION; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL; ISOLATION EFFECT; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; POPULATION GENETICS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENE FLOW; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETIC ISOLATION BY DISTANCE; ISOLATION BY ENVIRONMENT; LANDSCAPE GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MULTIPLE MATRIX REGRESSION; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE; POPULATION MIGRATION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION;

GENE FLOW; ISOLATION BY DISTANCE; ISOLATION BY ENVIRONMENT; LANDSCAPE GENETICS; MULTIPLE MATRIX REGRESSION; POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE;

ANIMAL MIGRATION; ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE FLOW; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION;

EID: 84888836673     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12134     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Arteaga, M. C., J. E. McCormack, L. E. Eguiarte, and R. A. Medellín . 2011. Genetic admixture in multidimensional environmental space: asymmetrical niche similarity promotes gene flow in armadillos (Dasypus novemcinctus). Evolution 65:2470-2480.
2. Balkenhol, N., and E. L. Landguth . 2011. Simulation modelling in landscape genetics: on the need to go further. Mol. Ecol. 20:667-670.
3. Balkenhol, N., L. P. Waits, and R. J. Dezzani . 2009. Statistical approaches in landscape genetics: an evaluation of methods for linking landscape and genetic data. Ecography 32:818-830.
4. Balloux, F. 2001. EASYPOP (version 1.7): a computer program for the simulation of population genetics. J. Hered. 92:301-302.
5. Chan, L. M., and K. R. Zamudio . 2009. Population differentiation of temperate amphibians in unpredictable environments. Mol. Ecol. 18:3185-3200.
6. Cooke, G. M., N. L. Chao, and L. B. Beheregaray . 2012. Divergent natural selection with gene flow along major environmental gradients in Amazonia: insights from genome scans, population genetics and phylogeography of the characin fish Triportheus albus. Mol. Ecol. 21:2410-2427.
7. Coulon, A., G. Guillot, J.-F. Cosson, J. M. A. Angibault, S. Aulagnier, B. Cargnelutti, M. Galan, and A. J. M. Hewison . 2006. Genetic structure is influenced by landscape features: empirical evidence from a roe deer population. Mol. Ecol. 15:1669-1679.
8. Crispo, E., P. Bentzen, D. N. Reznick, M. T. Kinnison, and A. P. Hendry . 2006. The relative influence of natural selection and geography on gene flow in guppies. Mol. Ecol. 15:49-62.
9. Cushman, S. A., K. S. McKelvey, J. Hayden, and M. K. Schwartz . 2006. Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. Am. Nat. 168:486-499.
10. Dobzhansky, T. G. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
11. Epperson, B. K., B. H. Mcrae, K. Scribner, S. A. Cushman, M. S. Rosenberg, M.-J. Fortin, P. M. A. James, M. Murphy, S. Manel, P. Legendre et al. 2010. Utility of computer simulations in landscape genetics. Mol. Ecol. 19:3549-3564.
12. Funk, W. C., M. S. Blouin, P. S. Corn, B. A. Maxell, D. S. Pilliod, S. Amish, and F. W. Allendorf . 2005. Population structure of Columbia spotted frogs (Rana luteiventris) is strongly affected by the landscape. Mol. Ecol. 14:483-496.
13. Goldberg, C. S., and L. P. Waits . 2010. Comparative landscape genetics of two pond-breeding amphibian species in a highly modified agricultural landscape. Mol. Ecol. 19:3650-3663.
14. Hendry, A. P. 2009. Ecological speciation! Or the lack thereof?Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 66:1383-1398.
15. Holderegger, R., and H. H. Wagner . 2008. Landscape Genetics. BioScience 58:199-207.
16. Jaquiéry, J., T. Broquet, A. H. Hirzel, J. Yearsley, and N. Perrin . 2011. Inferring landscape effects on dispersal from genetic distances: how far can we go?Mol. Ecol. 20:692-705.
17. Landguth, E. L., S. A. Cushman, and N. A. Johnson . 2012. Simulating natural selection in landscape genetics. Mol. Ecol. Res. 12:363-368.
18. Leblois, R., A. Estoup, and F. Rousset . 2009. IBDSim: a computer program to simulate genotypic data under isolation by distance. Mol. Ecol. Res. 9:107-109.
19. Lee, C.-R., and T. Mitchell-Olds . 2011. Quantifying effects of environmental and geographical factors on patterns of genetic differentiation. Mol. Ecol. 20:4631-4642.
20. Lee-Yaw, J. A., A. Davidson, B. H. Mcrae, and D. M. Green . 2009. Do landscape processes predict phylogeographic patterns in the wood frog?Mol. Ecol. 18:1863-1874.
21. Legendre, P., and M. Fortin . 2010. Comparison of the Mantel test and alternative approaches for detecting complex multivariate relationships in the spatial analysis of genetic data. Mol. Ecol. Res. 10:831-844.
22. Legendre, P., F.-J. Lapointe, and P. Casgrain . 1994. Modeling brain evolution from behavior: a permutational regression approach. Evolution 48:1487-1499.
23. Manel, S., M. K. Schwartz, G. Luikart, and P. Taberlet . 2003. Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:189-197.
24. Manel, S., F. Berthoud, E. Bellemain, M. Gaudeul, G. Luikart, J. E. Swenson, L. P. Waits, P. Taberlet, and I. Consortium . 2007. A new individual-based spatial approach for identifying genetic discontinuities in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 16:2031-2043.
25. Manly, B. F. J. 1986. Randomization and regression methods for testing for associations with geographical, environmental and biological distances between populations. Res. Pop. Ecol. 28:201-218.
26. Manly, B. F. J.. 1991. Distance matrices and spatial data. Pp. 112-140 in Randomization and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman and Hall, New York.
27. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
28. McRae, B. H., and P. Beier . 2007. Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:19885-19890.
29. Murphy, M. A., R. Dezzani, D. S. Pilliod, and A. Storfer . 2010a. Landscape genetics of high mountain frog metapopulations. Mol. Ecol. 19:3634-3649.
30. Murphy, M. A., J. S. Evans, and A. Storfer . 2010b. Quantifying Bufo boreas connectivity in Yellowstone National Park with landscape genetics. Ecology 91:252-261.
31. Niemiller, M. L., B. M. Fitzpatrick, and B. T. Miller . 2008. Recent divergence with gene flow in Tennessee cave salamanders (Plethodontidae: Gyrinophilus) inferred from gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 17:2258-2275.
32. Nosil, P. 2004. Reproductive isolation caused by visual predation on migrants between divergent environments. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:1521-1528.
33. Nosil, P.. 2008. Speciation with gene flow could be common. Mol. Ecol. 17:2103-2106.
34. Nosil, P., T. H. Vines, and D. J. Funk . 2005. Reproductive isolation caused by natural selection against immigrants from divergent habitats. Evolution 59:705-719.
35. Ogden, R., and R. S. Thorpe . 2002. Molecular evidence for ecological speciation in tropical habitats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:13612-13615.
36. Pease, K. M., A. H. Freedman, J. P. Pollinger, J. E. McCormack, W. Buermann, J. Rodzen, J. Banks, E. Meredith, V. C. Bleich, R. J. Schaefer, et al. 2009. Landscape genetics of California mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus): the roles of ecological and historical factors in generating differentiation. Mol. Ecol. 18:1848-1862.
37. Peres-Neto, P. R., P. Legendre, S. Dray, and D. Borcard . 2006. Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87:2614-2625.
38. Petren, K., P. R. Grant, B. R. Grant, and L. F. Keller . 2005. Comparative landscape genetics and the adaptive radiation of Darwin's finches: the role of peripheral isolation. Mol. Ecol. 14:2943-2957.
39. Pinho, C., and J. Hey . 2010. Divergence with gene flow: models and data. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 41:215-230.
40. Räsänen, K., and A. P. Hendry . 2008. Disentangling interactions between adaptive divergence and gene flow when ecology drives diversification. Ecol. Lett. 11:624-636.
41. Richardson, J. L. 2012. Divergent landscape effects on population connectivity in two co-occurring amphibian species. Mol. Ecol. 18:4437-4451.
42. Richards-Zawacki, C. L. 2009. Effects of slope and riparian habitat connectivity on gene flow in an endangered Panamanian frog, Atelopus varius. Divers. Distrib. 15:796-806.
43. Robertson, J. M., M. C. Duryea, and K. R. Zamudio . 2009. Discordant patterns of evolutionary differentiation in two Neotropical treefrogs. Mol. Ecol. 18:1375-1395.
44. Savage, W. K., A. K. Fremier, and H. Bradley Shaffer . 2010. Landscape genetics of alpine Sierra Nevada salamanders reveal extreme population subdivision in space and time. Mol. Ecol. 19:3301-3314.
45. Short Bull, R. A., S. A. Cushman, R. Mace, T. Chilton, K. C. Kendall, E. L. Landguth, M. K. Schwartz, K. Mckelvey, F. W. Allendorf, and G. Luikart . 2011. Why replication is important in landscape genetics: American black bear in the Rocky Mountains. Mol. Ecol. 20:1092-1107.
46. Smouse, P. E., J. C. Long, and R. R. Sokal . 1986. Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst. Zool. 35:627-632.
47. Spear, S. F., and A. Storfer . 2010. Anthropogenic and natural disturbance lead to differing patterns of gene flow in the Rocky Mountain tailed frog, Ascaphus montanus. Biol. Conserv. 143:778-786.
48. Spear, S. F., C. R. Peterson, M. D. Matocq, and A. Storfer . 2005. Landscape genetics of the blotched tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum melanostictum). Mol. Ecol. 14:2553-2564.
49. Spear, S. F., N. Balkenhol, M.-J. Fortin, B. H. Mcrae, and K. Scribner . 2010. Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis. Mol. Ecol. 19:3576-3591.
50. Storfer, A., M. A. Murphy, J. S. Evans, C. S. Goldberg, S. Robinson, S. F. Spear, R. Dezzani, E. Delmelle, L. Vierling, and L. P. Waits . 2007. Putting the "landscape" in landscape genetics. Heredity 98:128-142.
51. Storfer, A., M. A. Murphy, S. F. Spear, R. Holderegger, and L. P. Waits . 2010. Landscape genetics: where are we now? Mol. Ecol. 19:3496-3514.
52. Thorpe, R. S., Y. Surget-Groba, and H. Johansson . 2008. The relative importance of ecology and geographic isolation for speciation in anoles. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363:3071-3081.
53. Wang, I. J. 2009. Fine-scale population structure in a desert amphibian: landscape genetics of the black toad (Bufo exsul). Mol. Ecol. 18:3847-3856.
54. Wang, I. J.. 2012. Environmental and topographic variables shape genetic structure and effective population sizes in the endangered Yosemite toad. Divers. Distrib. 18:983-990.
55. Wang, I. J., and K. Summers . 2010. Genetic structure is correlated with phenotypic divergence rather than geographic isolation in the highly polymorphic strawberry poison-dart frog. Mol. Ecol. 19:447-458.
56. Wang, I. J., W. K. Savage, and H. Bradley Shaffer . 2009. Landscape genetics and least-cost path analysis reveal unexpected dispersal routes in the California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense). Mol. Ecol. 18:1365-1374.
57. Wright, S. 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114-138.
58. Zellmer, A. J., M. M. Hanes, S. M. Hird, and B. C. Carstens . 2012. Deep phylogeographic structure and environmental differentiation in the carnivorous plant Sarracenia alata. Syst. Biol. 61:763-777.