Genetic isolation by distance and landscape connectivity in the American marten (Martes americana)

Landscape Ecology

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 877-889

  Broquet, Thomas ^a,f   Ray, Nicolas ^b,c   Petit, Eric ^d   Fryxell, John M ^e   Burel, Françoise ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

American marten; Boreal forest; Connectivity; Dispersal; Effective distance; Genetic structure; Isolation by distance; Landscape genetics

Indexed keywords

BOREAL FOREST; CARNIVORE; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC ISOLATION; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; MOVEMENT;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; ONTARIO;

ANIMALIA; MARTES; MARTES AMERICANA;

EID: 33645889826     PISSN: 09212973     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-005-5956-y     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. F. Adriaensen J.P. Chardon G. De Blust E. Swinnen S. Villalba H. Gulinck E. Matthysen 2003 The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model Landsc. Urban Plan. 64 233 247
2. J.-F. Arnaud 2003 Metapopulation genetic structure and migration pathways in the land snail Helix aspersa: influence of landscape heterogeneity Landscape Ecol. 18 333 346
3. J.C. Avise 2004 Molecular Markers, Natural History, and Evolution Sinauer Associates Sunderland
4. T. Broquet 2004 Structure génétiqueconnectivité du paysage et dispersion de la martre Américaine (Martes americana) en forêt boréale exploitée University of Rennes 1 Rennes Ph.D. Thesis
5. Broquet T., Johnson C.A., Petit E., Thompson I.D., Burel F. and Fryxell J.M. in press. Dispersal and genetic structure in the American marten, Martes americana. Mol. Ecol.
6. S.W. Buskirk S.C. Forrest M.G. Raphael H.J. Harlow 1989 Winter resting site ecology of marten in the central rocky mountains J. Wildl. Manage. 53 191 196
7. S.W. Buskirk R.A. Powell 1994 Habitat ecology of fishers and American martens S.W. Buskirk M.G. Raphael R.A. Powell Martens, Sables, and Fischers. Biology and Conservation Cornell University New York 283 296
8. V. Castric F. Bonney L. Bernatchez 2001 Landscape structure and hierarchical genetic diversity in the brook charrSalvenilus fontinalis Evolution 55 1016 1028
9. J.P. Chardon F. Adriaensen E. Matthysen 2003 Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure: a case study for the Speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.) Landscape Ecol. 18 561 573
10. W.S. Cleveland E. Grosse W.M. Shyu 1992 Local regression models J.M. Chambers T.J. Hastie Statistical Models in S Chapman and Hall New York 309 376
11. A. Coulon J.F. Cosson J.M. Angibault B. Cargnelutti M. Galan N. Morellet E. Petit S. Aulagnier A.J.M. Hewison 2004 Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individual-based approach Mol. Ecol. 13 2841 2850
12. E. Danchin D. Heg B. Doliguez 2001 Public information and breedding habitat selection J. Clobert E. Danchin A.A. Dhondt J.D. Nichols Dispersal Oxford University Press New York 243 258
13. C.S. Davis C. Strobeck 1998 Isolation, variability, and cross-species amplification of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the family Mustelidae Mol. Ecol. 7 1776 1778
14. J.M. Davis J.A. Stamps 2004 The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences Trends Ecol. Evol. 18 411 598
15. R.G. D'Eon S.M. Glenn I. Parfitt M.-J. Fortin 2002 Landscape connectivity as a function of scale and organism vagility in a real forested landscape Conserv. Ecol. 6 10
16. B.K. Epperson 2003 Geographical Genetics Princeton University Press Princeton
17. D.M. Fecske J.A. Jenks 2002 Dispersal by male american marten, Martes americana Can. Field-Nat. 116 309 311
18. C.B. Fenster X. Vekemans O. Hardy 2003 Quantifying gene flow from spatial genetic structure data in a metapopulation of Chamaecrista fasciculata (Leguminosae) Evolution 57 995 1007
19. R.H. Gardner E.J. Gustafson 2004 Simulating dispersal of reintroduced species within heterogeneous landscapes Ecol. Model. 171 339 358
20. B.J. Goodwin 2003 Is landscape connectivity a dependent or independent variable? Landscape Ecol. 18 687 699
21. B.J. Goodwin L. Fahrig 2002 How does landscape structure influence landscape connectivity? Oikos 99 552 570
22. J. Goudet 1995 F-STAT (vers. 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics J. Hered. 86 485 486
23. Goudet J. 2001. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3), updated from Goudet 1995. Available from http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html
24. M.L. Hale P.W.W. Lurz M.D.F. Shirley S. Rushton R.M. Fuller K. Wolff 2001 Impact of landscape management on the genetic structure of red squirrel populations Science 293 2246 2248
25. I. Hanski 1999 Metapopulation Ecology Oxford University Press Oxford
26. O. Hardy 2003 Estimation of pairwise relatedness between individuals and characterization of isolation-by-distance processes using dominant genetic markers Mol. Ecol. 12 1577 1588
27. O. Hardy X. Vekemans 1999 Isolation by distance in a continuous population: reconciliation between spatial autocorrelation and population genetics models Heredity 83 145 154
28. O.J. Hardy X. Vekemans 2002 SPAGeDI: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels Mol. Ecol. Notes 2 618 620
29. R. Leblois F. Rousset A. Estoup 2004 Influence of spatial and temporal heterogeneities on the estimation of demographic parameters in a continuous population using individual microsatellite data Genetics 166 1081 1092
30. E. Michels K. Cottenie L. Neys K. De Gelas P. Coppin L. De Meester 2001 Geographical and genetic distances among zooplankton populations in a set of interconnected ponds: a plea for using GIS modelling of the effective geographical distance Mol. Ecol. 10 1929 1938
31. A. Moilanen I. Hanski 2001 On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology Oikos 95 147 151
32. J.E. Neigel 1997 A comparison of alternative strategies for estimating gene flow from genetic markers Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28 105 128
33. D.C. Payer D.J. Harrison 2003 Influence of forest structure on habitat use by American marten in an industrial forest For. Ecol. Manage. 179 145 156
34. K.G. Poole A.D. Porter A. de Vries C. Maundrell S.D. Grindal C.C. St. Clair 2004 Suitability of a young deciduous-dominated forest for American marten and the effects of forest removal Can. J. Zool. 82 423 435
35. R Development Core Team 2005. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
36. N. Ray 2004 Pathmatrix, a GIS tool to compute effective distances among samples Mol. Ecol. Notes 5 177 180
37. F. Rousset 1997 Genetics differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance Genetics 145 1219 1228
38. F. Rousset 2000 Genetic differentiation between individuals J. Evol. Biol. 13 58 62
39. F. Rousset 2001a Genetic approaches to the estimation of dispersal rates J. Clobert E. Danchin A.A. Dhondt J.D. Nichols Dispersal Oxford University Press New York 18 28
40. Rousset F. 2001b. Inferences from spatial population genetics. In: Balding D.J. (ed.), Handbook of Statistical Genetics, John Wiley and Sons 681-712.
41. F. Rousset 2004 Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations Princeton University Press Princeton
42. V. Selonen I.K. Hanski 2004 Young flying squirrels (Pteromys volans) dispersing in fragmented forests Behav. Ecol. 15 564 571
43. E.C. Soutiere 1979 Effects of timber harvesting on marten in Maine J. Wildl. Manage. 43 850 860
44. J.D. Steventon J.T. Major 1982 Marten use of habitat in a commercially clear-cut forest J. Wildl. Manage. 46 175 182
45. J. Sumner F. Rousset A. Estoup C. Moritz 2001 Neighbourhood sizedispersal and density estimates in the prickly forest skink (Gnypetoscincus queenslandiae) using individual genetic and demographic methods Mol. Ecol. 10 1917 1927
46. P.D. Taylor L. Fahrig K. Henein G. Merriam 1993 Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure Oikos 68 571 573
47. L. Tischendorf L. Fahrig 2000 How should we measure landscape connectivity? Landscape Ecol. 15 633 641
48. L. Tischendorf L. Fahrig 2001 On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology. A reply Oikos 95 152 155
49. G. Verbeylen L. De Bruyn F. Adriaensen E. Matthysen 2003 Does matrix resistance influence Red suirrel (Sciurus vulgairs L. 1758) distribution in an urban landscape? Landscape Ecol. 18 791 805
50. C.C. Vos A.G. Antonisse-de-Jong P.W. Goedhart M.J.M. Smulders 2001 Genetic similarity as a measure for connectivity between fragmented populations of the moor frog (Rana arvalis) Heredity 86 598 608
51. W.R. Watt J.A. Baker D.M. Hogg J.G. [tmp] McNicol B.J. Naylor 1996 Forest Management Guidelines for the Provision of Marten Habitat Queen' Printer for Ontario Sault Ste. Marie
52. J.A. Wiens 2001 The landscape context of dispersal J. Clobert E. Danchin A.A. Dhondt J.D. Nichols Dispersal Oxford University Press New York 96 109
53. S. Wright 1943 Isolation by distance Genetics 28 114 138