Genetic structure is influenced by landscape features: Empirical evidence from a roe deer population

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1669-1679

  Coulon, A ^a   Guillot, G ^b   Cosson, J F ^c   Angibault, J M A ^a   Aulagnier, S ^a   Cargnelutti, B ^a   Galan, M ^a,c   Hewison, A J M ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b AgroParisTech   (France)

^c CENTRE DE BIOLOGIE ET DE GESTION DES POPULATIONS   (France)

Author keywords

Barriers; Bayesian computations; Capreolus capreolus; Connectivity; Landscape genetics; Population structure

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DEER; ENVIRONMENT; GENE FLOW; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; TREE;

ANIMALS; DEER; ENVIRONMENT; GENE FLOW; GEOGRAPHY; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; POPULATION DYNAMICS; TREES;

CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS; CERVIDAE;

EID: 33645878576     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02861.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Arnold GW Weeldenburg JR Ng VM 1995 Factors affecting the distribution and abundance of Western grey kangaroos (Macropus fuligiosus) and euros (M. robustus) in a fragmented landscape. Landscape Ecology 10 2 65 74.
2. Beaumont MA Rannala B 2004 The Bayesian revolution in genetics. Nature Reviews 5 251 261.
3. Belkhir K Dawson KJ 2001 A Bayesian approach to the identification of panmicitic populations and the assignment of individuals. Genetical Research 78 59 77.
4. Benjamini Y Hochberg Y 1995 Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statististical Society. Series B 57 289 300.
5. Caizergues A Bernard-Laurent A Brenot J-F Ellison L Rasplus J-Y 2003 Population genetic structure of rock ptarmigan Lagopus mutus in Northern and Western Europe. Molecular Ecology 12 2267 2274.
6. Cargnelutti B Reby D Desneux L Angibault JM Joachim J Hewison AJM 2002 Space use by roe deer in a fragmented landscape. Some preliminary results. Revue d'Ecologie (Terre et Vie) 57 29 37.
7. Cederlund G Bergqvist J Kjellander P et al. 1998 Managing roe deer and their impact on the environment: maximising benefits and minimising costs. In The European Roe Deer: The Biology of Success (eds Andersen R Duncan P Linnell JDC pp. 189 219. Oslo, Norway.
8. Cimmaruta R Bondanelli P Nascetti G 2005 Genetic structure and environmental heterogeneity in the European hake (Merluccius merluccius). Molecular Ecology 14 2577 2591.
9. Corander J Waldmann P Sillanpää MJ 2003 Bayesian analysis of genetic differentiation between populations. Genetics 163 367 374.
10. Coulon A Cosson J-F Angibault JM et al. 2004 Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individual-based approach. Molecular Ecology 13 2841 2850.
11. Danilkin A Hewison AJM 1996 Behavioural Ecology of Siberian and European Roe Deer. Wildlife Ecology and Behavioural Series Chapman & Hall London.
12. Dawson KJ Belkhir K 2001 A Bayesian approach to the identification of panmictic populations and the assignment of individuals. Genetical Reseach 78 59 77.
13. Doums C Cabrera H Peeters C 2002 Population genetic structure and male-biased dispersal in the queenless ant Diacamma cyaneiventre. Molecular Ecology 11 2251 2264.
14. Ehrich D Stenseth NC 2001 Genetic structure of Siberian lemmings (Lemmus sibiricus) in a continuous habitat: large patches rather than isolation by distance. Heredity 86 716 730.
15. Evanno G Regnaut S Goudet J 2005 Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE : a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14 2611 2620.
16. Falush D Stephens M Pritchard JK 2003 Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164 1567 1587.
17. Funk CW Blouin MS Corn PS et al. 2005 Population structure of Columbia spotted frogs (Rana luteiventris) is strongly affected by the landscape. Molecular Ecology 14 483 496.
18. Galan M Cosson J-F Aulagnier S et al. 2003 Cross-amplification tests of ungulate primers in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) to develop a multiplex panel of 12 microsatellite loci. Molecular Ecology Notes 3 142 146.
19. Gerlach G Musolf K 2000 Fragmentation of landscape as a cause for genetic subdivision in bank voles. Conservation Biology 14 4 1066 1074.
20. Goudet J 2001 ) fstat, A program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Available from http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html.
21. Guillot G Estoup A Mortier F Cosson J-F 2005a A spatial statistical model for landscape genetics. Genetics 170 3 1261 1280.
22. Guillot G Mortier F Estoup A 2005b GENELAND : a computer package for landscape genetics. Molecular Ecology Notes 5 3 708 711.
23. Gyllenstrand N Seppä P 2003 Conservation genetics of the wood ant, Formica lugubris, in a fragmented landscape. Molecular Ecology 12 2931 2940.
24. Hampton JO Spencer PBS Alpers DL et al. 2004 Molecular techniques, wildlife management and the importance of genetic population structure and dispersal: a case study with feral pigs. Journal of Applied Ecology 41 735 743.
25. Hewison AJM Vincent JP Joachim J et al. 2001 The effects of woodland fragmentation and human activity on roe deer distribution in agricultural landscapes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79 679 689.
26. Hewison AJM Vincent JP Joachim J et al. 1998 Modelling the effects of woodland fragmentation on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) distribution in agricultural landscapes. Gibier et Faune Sauvage 15 (hors série tome, 2) 323 329.
27. Keller I Nentwig W Largiadèr CR 2004 Recent habitat fragmentation due to roads can lead to significant genetic differenciation in an abundant flightless ground beetle. Molecular Ecology 13 2983 2994.
28. Linnell J Wahlström LK Gaillard J-M 1998 From birth to independence: birth, growth, neonatal mortality, hiding behaviour and dispersal. In The European Roe Deer: The Biology of Success (eds Andersen R Duncan P Linnell JDC pp. 257 283. Scandinavian University Press Oslo, Norway.
29. Luiselli L Capizzi D 1997 Influences of area, isolation and habitat features on distribution of snakes in Mediterranean fragmented woodlands. Biodiversity and Conservation 6 1339 1351.
30. Manel S Schwartz MK Luikart G Taberlet P 2003 Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18 4 189 197.
31. Mönkkönen M Reunanen P Nikula A Wydeven AP 1995 A regional landscape analysis and prediction of favorable gray wolf habitat in the northern Great Lakes region. Conservation Biology 9 279 294.
32. Moran MD 2003 Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos 100 2 403 404.
33. Moritz C 1994 Defining 'Evolutionarily Significant Units' for conservation. Trends in Evolution & Ecology 9 373 375.
34. ST and microsatellite polymorhism in the marine fish, walleye pollock (Theragra chacogramma): implications for resolving weak population structure. Molecular Ecology 13 1799 1814.
35. Pritchard JK Stephens M Donnelly P 2000 Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155 945 959.
36. Pritchard JK Wen W 2003 ) Documentation for structure software: version 2. Available from: http://pritch.bsd.uchicago.edu.
37. Raymond M Rousset F 1995 GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecuminicism. Journal of Heredity 86 248 249.
38. Rueness EK Jorde PE Hellborg L et al. 2003 Cryptic population structure in a large, mobile mammalian predator: the Scandinavian lynx. Molecular Ecology 12 2623 2633.
39. San José C Lovari S 1998 Ranging movements of female roe deer: do home-loving does roam to mate? Ethology 104 721 728.
40. Schneider S Roessli D Excoffier L 2000 ) arlequin version 2.000: A software for population genetic data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, Department of Anthropology, University of Geneva Switzerland.
41. Schulte-Hostedde AI Gibbs LH Millar JS 2001 Microgeographic genetic structure in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus). Molecular Ecology 10 1625 1631.
42. Storey JD 2002 A direct approach to false discovery rates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B 64 3 479 498.
43. Taylor PD Fahrig L Henein K Merriam G 1993 Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68 3 571 573.
44. Verhoeven KJF Simonsen KL McIntyre LM 2005 Implementing false discovery rate control: increasing your power. Oikos 108 643 647.
45. Wahlström LK 1994 The significance of male-male aggression for yearling dispersal in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 33 409 412.
46. Wahlström LK Liberg O 1995 Contrasting dispersal patterns in two Scandinavian roe deer Capreolus capreolus populations. Wildlife Biology 1 3 159 164.
47. Wang M Schreiber A 2001 The impact of habitat fragmentation and social structure on the population genetics of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) in Central Europe. Heredity 86 703 715.
48. Weir BS Cockerham CC 1984 Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38 1358 1370.