Developmental assessment: Lifting literacy through professional learning teams

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 383-397

  Griffin, Patrick ^a   Murray, Leanne ^b   Care, Esther ^a   Thomas, Amanda ^a   Perri, Pierina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b Catholic Education Office Melbourne   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960008259     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2010.516628     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ACER (Australian Council for Educational Research). 1994. Developmental Assessment Resource for Teachers (DART). Melbourne: ACER.
2. Alton-Lee, A. 2004. A collaborative knowledge building strategy to improve educational policy and practice: Work in progress in the Ministry of Education's best evidence synthesis programme. Paper presented for a symposium at the annual conference of the New Zealand Association for Research in Education, November 24-26, in Wellington, New Zealand.
3. Ball, D., and D. Cohen. 1999. Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice based theory of professional education. In Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice, ed. G. Sykes and L. Darling-Hammond, 3-32. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
4. Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan 80, no. 2: 139-147.
5. Block, C.C., and M. Pressley, eds. 2002. Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. New York: Guildford Press.
6. Bransford, J., S. Derry, D. Berliner, and K. Hammermass. 2005. Theories of learning and their role in teaching. In Preparing teachers for a changing world, ed. L. Darling-Hammond and J. Bransford, 40-87. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
7. Brown, R., E. Care, and J. Deans. 2007. The Link Program: Investigating the relevance and implications of preschool theory and practice for primary school teacher professional development. Australian Research in Early Childhood Education Journal 14, no. 2: 95-106.
8. Campbell, D.T., and M.J. Russo. 1999. Social experimentation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Fullan, M. 2005. Building a more responsive system of public education. In Report of the consultation on future directions for public education and training: One size doesn't fit all, ed. Department of Education and Training, 175-234. Sydney: Department of Education and Training.
10. Griffin, P. 2007. The comfort of competence and the uncertainty of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation 33, no. 1: 87-99.
11. Halverson, R., J. Grigg, R. Prichett, and C. Thomas. 2005. The new instructional leadership: Creating data-driven instructional systems in schools. WCER Working Paper No. 2005-2009. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research. http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers/Working_Paper_No_2005_9.pdf (accessed March 3, 2009).
12. Hawley, W.D., and L. Valli. 1999. The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In Teaching as a learning profession, ed. L. Darling-Hammond and G. Sykes, 127-150. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13. Hill, P.W., and C.A.M. Crévola. 1997. The literacy challenge in Australian primary schools. IARTV Seminar Series, No. 69. Melbourne: IARTV.
14. Hill, P., C. Crevola, and D. Hopkins. 2000. Teaching and learning as the heartland of school improvement. IARTV Seminar Series, No. 100. Melbourne: IARTV.
15. Johnson, E. 2000. MLC: Still leading ways to learn with technology - a developmental approach to teacher development. In ACCE 2000: Learning technologies, teaching and the future of schools: The ACCE 2000 conference proceedings, ed. ACCE, 1-3. Melbourne: Australian Council for Computers in Education.
16. Joyce, B., and B. Showers. 2002. Student achievement through staff development. Whiteplains, NY: Longman.
17. Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 2000. Participatory action research. In Handbook of qualitative research, ed. N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, 567-606. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Ladson-Billings, G., and M.L. Gomez. 2001. Just showing up: Supporting early literacy through teachers' professional communities. Phi Delta Kappan 82, no. 9: 675-680.
19. Mokhtari, K., C.A. Rosemary, and P.A. Edwards. 2007. Making instructional decisions based on data: What, how, and why. The Reading Teacher 61, no. 4: 354-359.
20. Mossensen, J., P. Hill, and G. Masters. 1993. Tests of reading comprehension (TORCH). Melbourne: ACER.
21. Murray, L. 2006. Inquiry and professional learning teams. Unpublished project report submitted as part of a master's degree, The University of Melbourne.
22. Perkins, D. 2006. Teaching for understanding. http://www.pz.harvard.edu/PIs/DP.htm (accessed June 17, 2008).
23. Phillips, G., S. McNaughton, and S. MacDonald. 2004. Managing the mismatch: Enhancing early literacy progress for children with diverse language and cultural identities in mainstream urban schools in New Zealand. Journal of Educational Psychology 96, no. 2: 309-323.
24. Pool, B., C. Parkin, and C. Parkin. 2002. Prose Reading Observation, Behaviour and Evaluation of Comprehension (PROBE). 2nd ed. Wellington, NZ: Triune Initiatives.
25. Pressley, M. 2002. Comprehension strategies instruction: A turn-of-the-century status report. In Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices, ed. C.C. Block and M. Pressley, 11-27. New York: Guilford.
26. Rasch, G. 1960. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
27. Richardson, V. 1990. Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Researcher 19, no. 7: 10-18.
28. Robinson, V., and M.K. Lai. 2006. Practitioner research for educators: A guide to improving classrooms and schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
29. Smylie, M. 1994. Redesigning teachers' work: Connections to the classroom. Review of Research in Education 20: 129-177.
30. Snow, C.E., M.S. Burns, and P. Griffin. 1998. Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
31. Taylor, B.M., P.D. Pearson, D. Peterson, and M.C. Rodriguez. 2005. The CIERA school change framework: An evidence based approach to professional development and school reading improvement. Reading Research Quarterly 40, no. 1: 40-69.
32. Timperley, H.S., and V.J.M. Robinson. 2001. Achieving school improvement through challenging and changing teachers' schema. Journal of Educational Change 2, no. 4: 281-300.
33. Vygotsky, L.S. 1986. Thought and language. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
34. Watson, J.G., and S. Mason. 2003. Understanding schools' capacity to use data. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 21-25, in Chicago, USA.
35. Wright, B.D., and M. Stone. 1979. Best test design. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.