Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP

BMC Genetics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  van den Berg, S ^a   Calus, M P L ^a   Meuwissen, T H E ^b   Wientjes, Y C J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Across population; Bayesian variable selection; GBLUP; Genomic prediction; Number of independent chromosome segments

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; CHROMOSOME; GENETIC CORRELATION; GENOTYPE; MODEL; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION MODEL; PREDICTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; ANIMAL; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BOVINE; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; POPULATION GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CATTLE; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 84952980602     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12863-015-0305-x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001;157:1819-29.
2. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Accelerating improvement of livestock with genomic selection. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2013;1:221-37.
3. Goddard ME, Hayes BJ. Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nat Rev Gen. 2009;10:381-91.
4. VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, et al. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:16-24.
5. Goddard ME. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica. 2009;136:245-57.
6. De Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Reliability of genomic predictions across multiple populations. Genetics. 2009;183:1545-53.
7. Hayes BJ, Visscher PM, Goddard ME. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet Res. 2009;91:47-60.
8. Calus MPL, Meuwissen THE, De Roos APW, Veerkamp RF. Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Genetics. 2008;178:553-61.
9. Habier D, Tetens J, Seefried FR, Lichtner P, Thaller G. The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Genet Sel Evol. 2010;42:5.
10. Wientjes YJC, Veerkamp RF, Calus MPL. The effect of linkage disequilibrium and family relationships on the reliability of genomic prediction. Genetics. 2013;193:621-31.
11. Olson KM, VanRaden PM, Tooker ME. Multibreed genomic evaluations using purebred Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95:5378-83.
12. Erbe M, Hayes BJ, Matukumalli LK, Goswami S, Bowman PJ, Reich CM, et al. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95:4114-29.
13. Pryce JE, Gredler B, Bolormaa S, Bowman PJ, Egger-Danner C, Fuerst C, et al. Short communication: Genomic selection using a multi-breed, across-country reference population. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94:2625-30.
14. Brøndum RF, Rius-Vilarrasa E, Stranden I, Su G, Guldbrandtsen B, Fikse WF, et al. Reliabilities of genomic prediction using combined reference data of the Nordic Red dairy cattle populations. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94:4700-7.
15. Karoui S, Carabaño MJ, Díaz C, Legarra A. Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models. Genet Sel Evol. 2012;44:39.
16. de Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Spelman RJ, Goddard ME. Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle. Genetics. 2008;179:1503-12.
17. Zhong S, Dekkers JCM, Fernando RL, Jannink JL. Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a barley case study. Genetics. 2009;182:355-64.
18. Wientjes YCJ, Veerkamp RF, Calus MPL. Using selection index theory to estimate consistency of multi-locus linkage disequilibrium across populations. BMC Genet. 2015;16:87.
19. Thaller G, Krämer W, Winter A, Kaupe B, Erhardt G, Fries R. Effects of variants on milk production traits in German cattle breeds. J Anim Sci. 2003;81:1911-8.
20. Spelman RJ, Ford CA, McElhinney P, Gregory GC, Snell RG. Characterization of the DGAT1 gene in the New Zealand dairy population. J Dairy Sci. 2002;85:3514-7.
21. VanRaden PM, Olson KM, Wiggans GR, Cole JB, Tooker ME. Genomic inbreeding and relationships among Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94:5673-82.
22. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Verbyla K, Goddard ME. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Genet Sel Evol. 2009;41:51.
23. Daetwyler HD, Pong-Wong R, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA. The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics. 2010;185:1021-31.
24. Strandén I, Garrick DJ. Derivation of equivalent computing algorithms for genomic predictions and reliabilities of animal merit. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:2971-5.
25. Wientjes YCJ, Veerkamp RF, Bijma P, Bovenhuis H, Schrooten C, Calus MPL. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction. Genet Sel Evol. 2015;47:5.
26. Pryce JE, Johnston J, Hayes BJ, Sahana G, Weigel KA, McParland S, et al. Imputation of genotypes from low density (50,000 markers) to high density (700,000 markers) of cows from research herds in Europe, North America, and Australasia using 2 reference populations. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97:1799-811.
27. McKay SD, Schnabel RD, Murdoch BM, Matukumalli LK, Aerts J, Coppieters W, et al. Whole genome linkage disequilibrium maps in cattle. BMC Genet. 2007;8:74.
28. Khatkar MS, Nicholas FW, Collins AR, Zenger KR, Cavanagh JAL, Barris W, et al. Extent of genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in Australian Holstein-Friesian cattle based on a high-density SNP panel. BMC Genom. 2008;9:187.
29. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited; 1996.
30. Verbyla KL, Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Goddard ME. Accuracy of genomic selection using stochastic search variable selection in Australian Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Genet Res. 2009;91:307-11.
31. Calus MPL. Right-hand-side updating for fast computing of genomic breeding values. Genet Sel Evol. 2014;46:24.
32. Gilmour AR, Gogel B, Cullis B, Thompson R, Butler D, Cherry M, et al. ASReml user guide release 3.0. Hemel Hempstead: VSN International Ltd; 2009.
33. Goddard ME, Hayes BJ, Meuwissen THE. Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection. J Anim Breed Genet. 2011;128:409-21.
34. Calus MPL, Huang H, Vereijken A, Visscher J, ten Napel J, Windig J. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods. Genet Sel Evol. 2014;46:57.
35. Wientjes YCJ, Calus MPL, Goddard ME, Hayes BJ. Impact of QTL properties on the accuracy of multi-breed genomic prediction. Genet Sel Evol. 2015;47:42.
36. Chen L, Li C, Miller S, Schenkel F. Multi-population genomic prediction using a multi-task Bayesian learning model. BMC Genet. 2014;15:53.
37. Coster A, Bastiaansen JWM, Calus MPL, Van Arendonk JAM, Bovenhuis H. Sensitivity of methods for estimating breeding values using genetic markers to the number of QTL and distribution of QTL variance. Genet Sel Evol. 2010;42:9.
38. Clark SA, Hickey JM, Van Der Werf JHJ. Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation. Genet Sel Evol. 2011;43:18.
39. Bastiaansen JW, Coster A, Calus MP, van Arendonk JA, Bovenhuis H. Long-term response to genomic selection: effects of estimation method and reference population structure for different genetic architectures. Genet Sel Evol. 2012;44:3.
40. Zhou L, Heringstad B, Su G, Guldbrandtsen B, Meuwissen THE, Svendsen M, et al. Genomic predictions based on a joint reference population for the Nordic Red cattle breeds. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97:4485-96.
41. Bolormaa S, Pryce JE, Kemper KE, Savin K, Hayes BJ, Barendse W, et al. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in, and composite beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2013;91:3088-104.
42. Grisart B, Farnir F, Karim L, Cambisano N, Kim J-J, Kvasz A, et al. Genetic and functional confirmation of the causality of the DGAT1 K232A quantitative trait nucleotide in affecting milk yield and composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:2398-403.
43. Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. The distribution of the effects of genes affecting quantitative traits in livestock. Genet Sel Evol. 2001;33:209-29.
44. Hayes BJ, Pryce JE, Chamberlain AJ, Bowman PJ, Goddard ME. Genetic architecture of complex traits and accuracy of genomic prediction: Coat colour, milk-fat percentage, and type in Holstein cattle as contrasting model traits. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001139.
45. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:433-43.