Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Karoui, Sofiene ^a   Carabaño, María Jesús ^a   Díaz, Clara ^a   Legarra, Andrés ^b  

^a INIA   (Spain)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATTLE; DATA SET; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); GENETIC MARKER; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; HERITABILITY; LINEARITY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR;

FRANCE;

ANIMALIA; BOS; BOVINAE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FERTILITY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOME; INBRED STRAIN; LACTATION; METHODOLOGY; PEDIGREE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, INBRED STRAINS; BAYES THEOREM; BREEDING; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FERTILITY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; LACTATION; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PEDIGREE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84872554275     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-44-39     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. VanRaden PM, Van Tassel CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Schenkel F, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 16 24 10.3168/jds.2008-1514 19109259
2. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 433 443 10.3168/jds.2008-1646 19164653
3. A common reference population from four European Holstein populations increases reliability of genomic predictions. Lund MS, de Roos APW, de Vries AG, Druet T, Ducrocq V, Fritz S, Guillaume F, Guldbrandtsen B, Liu Z, Reents R, Schrooten C, Seefried F, Su G, Genet Sel Evol 2011 43 43 10.1186/1297-9686-43-43 22152008
4. Reliabilities of genomic prediction using combined reference data of the Nordic Red dairy cattle populations. Brøndum RF, Rius-Vilarrasa E, Strandén I, Su G, Guldbrandtsen B, Fikse WF, Lund MS, J Dairy Sci 2011 94 4700 4707 10.3168/jds.2010-3765 21854944
5. Brown Swiss genomic evaluation. Zumbach B, Jorjani H, Dürr J, Interbull Bull 2010 42 44 51
6. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AC, Verbyla K, Goddard ME, Genet Sel Evol 2009 41 51 10.1186/1297-9686-41-51 19930712
7. Reliability of genomic breeding values across multiple populations. De Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, Genetics 2009 183 1545 1553 10.1534/genetics. 109.104935 19822733
8. Accuracy of estimated genomic breeding values for wool and meat traits in a multi-breed sheep population. Daetwyler HD, Hickey JM, Henshall JM, Dominik S, Gredler B, van der Werf JHJ, Hayes BJ, Anim Prod Sci 2010 50 1004 1010 10.1071/AN10096
9. Short communication: Genomic selection using a multi-breed across-country reference population. Pryce JE, Gredler B, Bolormaa S, Bowman PJ, Egger-Danner C, Fuerst C, Emmerling R, Sölkner J, Goddard ME, Hayes BJ, J Dairy Sci 2011 94 2625 2630 10.3168/jds.2010-3719 21524555
10. Genomic predictions for New Zealand dairy bulls and integration with national genetic evaluation. Harris BL, Johnson DL, J Dairy Sci 2010 93 1243 1252 10.3168/jds.2009-2619 20172244
11. Across breed multi-trait random regression genomic predictions in the Nordic Red dairy cattle. Makgahlela ML, Mäntysaari EA, Strandén I, Koivula M, Nielsen US, Sillanpää MJ, Juga J, J Anim Breed Genet 2012 in press 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2012.01017x
12. Whole genome evaluation for related populations. Varona L, Moreno C, Ibañez-Escriche N, Altarriba J, Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production: 1-6 August 2010; Leipzig 2010 460
13. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. VanRaden PM, J Dairy Sci 2008 91 4414 4423 10.3168/jds.2007-0980 18946147
14. Genomic selection: Prediction of accuracy and maximization of long term response. Goddard ME, Genetica 2009 136 245 257 10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0 18704696
15. Impacts of both reference population size and inclusion of a residual polygenic effect on the accuracy of genomic prediction. Liu Z, Seefried FR, Reinhardt F, Rensing S, Thaller G, Reents R, Genet Sel Evol 2011 43 19 10.1186/1297-9686-43-19 21586131
16. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Hayes BJ, Visscher PM, Goddard ME, Genet Res 2009 91 47 60 10.1017/S0016672308009981
17. A note on the rationale for estimating genealogical coancestry from molecular markers. Toro MA, García-Cortés LA, Legarra A, Genet Sel Evol 2011 43 27 10.1186/1297-9686-43-27
18. Multiple-country comparison of dairy sires. Schaeffer LR, J Dairy Sci 1994 77 2671 2678 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77209-X 7814738
19. Derivation, calculation, and use of national animal model information. VanRaden PM, Wiggans GR, J Dairy Sci 1991 74 2737 2746 10.3168/jds.S0022- 0302(91)78453-1 1918547
20. Genomic inbreeding and relationships among Holstein, Jersey, and Brown Swiss. VanRaden PM, Olson KM, Wiggans GR, Cole JB, Tooker ME, J Dairy Sci 2011 94 5673 5682 10.3168/jds.2011-4500 22032391
21. Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson DL, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor TJ, J Dairy Sci 2010 93 743 752 10.3168/jds.2009-2730 20105546
22. Efficient computation of the genomic relationship matrix and other matrices used in single step evaluation. Aguilar I, Misztal I, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, J Anim Breed Genet 2011 128 422 428 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2010.00912.x 22059575
23. BLUPf90 and related programs (BGF90). Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Strabel T, Auvray B, Druet T, Lee DH, Proceedings of the 7th Genetics Applied to Livestock Production: 19-23 August 2002; Montpellier 2002 28 07
24. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments. Geweke J, Bayesian Statistics Oxford: Oxford Univ, Bernardo JM, Berger JO, Dawid AP, Smith AFM, 1992 169 193
25. Multibreed genomic evaluations using purebred Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss. Olson KM, VanRaden PM, Tooker ME, J Dairy Sci 2012 95 5378 5383 10.3168/jds.2011-5006 22916944
26. Impacts of inclusion of foreign data in genomic evaluation of dairy cattle. Olson KM, VanRaden PM, Null DJ, J Dairy Sci 2011 94 1 164 165
27. Characterization of the DGAT1 K232A and variable number of tandem repeat polymorphisms in French dairy cattle. Gautier M, Capitan A, Fritz S, Eggen A, Boichard D, Druet T, J Dairy Sci 2007 90 2980 2988 10.3168/jds.2006-707 17517739 (Pubitemid 350049691)
28. Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: Identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition. Grisart B, Coppieters W, Farnir F, Karim L, Ford C, Berzi P, Cambisano N, Mni M, Reid S, Simon P, Spelman R, Georges M, Snell R, Genome Res 2002 12 222 231 10.1101/gr.224202 11827942 (Pubitemid 34162989)
29. Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations. Dassonneville R, Brøndum RF, Druet T, Fritz S, Guillaume F, Guldbrandsten B, Lund MS, Ducrocq V, Su G, J Dairy Sci 2011 94 3679 3686 10.3168/jds.2011-4299 21700057
30. Genomic breeding value prediction and QTL mapping of QTLMAS2010 data using Bayesian methods. Sun X, Habier D, Fernando RL, Garrick DJ, Dekkers JCM, BMC Proc 2011 5 13
31. Experiences with the Illumina high density Bovine BeadChip. Harris BL, Creagh FE, Winkelman AM, Johnson DL, Interbull Bull 2011 44 3 7
32. Mapping of fertility traits in Finnish Ayrshire by genome-wide association analysis. Schulman NF, Sahana G, Iso-Touru T, McKay SD, Schnabel RD, Lund MS, Taylor JF, Virta J, Vilkki JH, Anim Genet 2011 42 263 269 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02149.x 21554346