Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Wientjes, Yvonne C J ^a   Veerkamp, Roel F ^a   Bijma, Piter ^a   Bovenhuis, Henk ^a   Schrooten, Chris ^b   Calus, Mario P L ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b CRV BV   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CATTLE; CORRELATION; ESTIMATION METHOD; GENOME; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; POPULATION GENETICS; SIMULATION;

ALGORITHM; ALLELE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BOVINE; BREEDING; FEMALE; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; METAGENOMICS; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETICS; PROCEDURES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ALGORITHMS; ALLELES; ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; FEMALE; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOME; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MALE; METAGENOMICS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE;

EID: 84924134583     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-014-0086-0     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA. Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3395.
2. Van Raden PM. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci. 2008;91:4414-23.
3. De Los Campos G, Vazquez AI, Fernando R, Klimentidis YC, Sorensen D. Prediction of complex human traits using the genomic best linear unbiased predictor. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003608.
4. Zhong S, Dekkers JCM, Fernando RL, Jannink JL. Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: A barley case study. Genetics. 2009;182:355-64.
5. De Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Spelman RJ, Goddard ME. Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle. Genetics. 2008;179:1503-12.
6. De Los Campos G, Klimentidis YC, Vazquez AI, Allison DB. Prediction of expected years of life using whole-genome markers. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e40964.
7. Spelman RJ, Ford CA, McElhinney P, Gregory GC, Snell RG. Characterization of the DGAT1 gene in the New Zealand dairy population. J Dairy Sci. 2002;85:3514-7.
8. Thaller G, Krämer W, Winter A, Kaupe B, Erhardt G, Fries R. Effects of DGAT1 variants on milk production traits in German cattle breeds. J Anim Sci. 2003;81:1911-8.
9. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Verbyla K, Goddard ME. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Genet Sel Evol. 2009;41:51.
10. Schrooten C, Schopen GCB, Beatson P: Across-breed genomic evaluation based on BovineHD genotypes, and phenotypes of bulls and cows. In Proceedings of the 64th EAAP annual meeting 26-30 August 2013; Nantes. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2013:229.
11. Pryce JE, Gredler B, Bolormaa S, Bowman PJ, Egger-Danner C, Fuerst C, et al. Short communication: genomic selection using a multi-breed, across-country reference population. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94:2625-30.
12. Simeone R, Misztal I, Aguilar I, Vitezica ZG. Evaluation of a multi-line broiler chicken population using a single-step genomic evaluation procedure. J Anim Breed Genet. 2012;129:3-10.
13. Ibánez-Escriche N, Fernando RL, Toosi A, Dekkers JCM. Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance. Genet Sel Evol. 2009;41:12.
14. Harris BL, Creagh FE, Winkelman AM, Johnson DL. Experiences with the Illumina high density Bovine BeadChip. Interbull Bull. 2011;44:3-7.
15. Erbe M, Hayes BJ, Matukumalli LK, Goswami S, Bowman PJ, Reich CM, et al. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95:4114-29.
16. Daetwyler HD, Pong-Wong R, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA. The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics. 2010;185:1021-31.
17. Clark SA, Hickey JM, Van Der Werf JHJ. Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation. Genet Sel Evol. 2011;43:18.
18. Wientjes YCJ, Veerkamp RF, Calus MPL. The effect of linkage disequilibrium and family relationships on the reliability of genomic prediction. Genetics. 2013;193:621-31.
19. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001;157:1819-29.
20. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited; 1996.
21. Su G, Christensen OF, Ostersen T, Henryon M, Lund MS. Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e45293.
22. Wittenburg D, Melzer N, Reinsch N. Including non-additive genetic effects in Bayesian methods for the prediction of genetic values based on genome-wide markers. BMC Genet. 2011;12:74.
23. Bohren BB, Hill WG, Robertson A. Some observations on asymmetrical correlated responses to selection. Genet Res. 1966;7:44-57.
24. Yang J, Benyamin B, McEvoy BP, Gordon S, Henders AK, Nyholt DR, et al. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat Genet. 2010;42:565-9.
25. Goddard ME, Hayes BJ, Meuwissen THE. Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection. J Anim Breed Genet. 2011;128:409-21.
26. Pryce JE, Johnston J, Hayes BJ, Sahana G, Weigel KA, McParland S, et al. Imputation of genotypes from low density (50, 000 markers) to high density (700, 000 markers) of cows from research herds in Europe, North America, and Australasia using 2 reference populations. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97:1799-811.
27. McKay SD, Schnabel RD, Murdoch BM, Matukumalli LK, Aerts J, Coppieters W, et al. Whole genome linkage disequilibrium maps in cattle. BMC Genet. 2007;8:74.
28. Khatkar MS, Nicholas FW, Collins AR, Zenger KR, Cavanagh JAL, Barris W, et al. Extent of genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in Australian Holstein-Friesian cattle based on a high-density SNP panel. BMC Genom. 2008;9:187.
29. Mrode RA, Thompson R. Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding values. Wallingford: CABI Publishing; 2005.
30. Gilmour AR, Gogel B, Cullis B, Thompson R, Butler D, Cherry M, et al. ASReml User Guide Release 3.0. Hemel Hempstead: VSN International Ltd; 2009.
31. Powell JE, Visscher PM, Goddard ME. Reconciling the analysis of IBD and IBS in complex trait studies. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:800-5.
32. Clark SA, Hickey JM, Daetwyler HD, Van Der Werf JHJ. The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes. Genet Sel Evol. 2012;44:4.
33. Legates JE. Heritability of fat yields in herds with different production levels. J Dairy Sci. 1962;45:990-3.
34. Boldman KG, Freeman AE. Adjustment for heterogeneity of variances by herd production level in dairy cow and sire evaluation. J Dairy Sci. 1990;73:503-12.
35. Makgahlela ML, Mäntysaari EA, Strandén I, Koivula M, Nielsen US, Sillanpää MJ, et al. Across breed multi-trait random regression genomic predictions in the Nordic Red dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet. 2013;130:10-9.
36. Strandén I, Mäntysaari EA. Use of random regression model as an alternative for multibreed relationship matrix. J Anim Breed Genet. 2013;130:4-9.
37. Harris BL, Johnson DL. Genomic predictions for New Zealand dairy bulls and integration with national genetic evaluation. J Dairy Sci. 2010;93:1243-52.
38. Karoui S, Carabaño M, Díaz C, Legarra A. Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models. Genet Sel Evol. 2012;44:39.
39. Daetwyler HD: Genome-wide evaluation of populations. PhD thesis. Wageningen: Wageningen University, Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre; 2009.
40. Erbe M, Gredler B, Seefried FR, Bapst B, Simianer H. A function accounting for training set size and marker density to model the average accuracy of genomic prediction. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e81046.
41. Goddard ME, Hayes BJ. Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:381-91.
42. Kemper KE, Goddard ME. Understanding and predicting complex traits: knowledge from cattle. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:R45-51.
43. Matukumalli LK, Lawley CT, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Allan MF, Heaton MP, et al. Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e5350.
44. Legarra A, Baloche G, Barillet F, Astruc J, Soulas C, Aguerre X, et al. Within- and across-breed genomic predictions and genomic relationships for Western Pyrenees dairy sheep breeds Latxa, Manech, and Basco-Béarnaise. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97:3200-12.
45. Coster A, Bastiaansen JWM, Calus MPL, Van Arendonk JAM, Bovenhuis H. Sensitivity of methods for estimating breeding values using genetic markers to the number of QTL and distribution of QTL variance. Genet Sel Evol. 2010;42:9.