Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: A comparison between linear methods

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Calus, Mario P L ^a   Huang, Heyun ^a   Vereijken, Addie ^b   Visscher, Jeroen ^c   Ten Napel, Jan ^a   Windig, Jack J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Hendrix Genetics   (Netherlands)

^c ISA Institut de Sélection Animale   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; CHICKEN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EGG; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; PEDIGREE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BREEDING; CHICKENS; EGGS; FEMALE; GENOME; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; LINEAR MODELS; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE;

EID: 84908416757     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-014-0057-5     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME: Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 2001, 157:1819-1829.
2. de los Campos G, Hickey JM, Pong-Wong R, Daetwyler HD, Calus MPL: Whole-genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breeding. Genetics 2013, 193:327-345.
3. Ober U, Erbe M, Long NY, Porcu E, Schlather M, Simianer H: Predicting genetic values: a kernel-based best linear unbiased prediction with genomic data. Genetics 2011, 188:695-708.
4. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM: The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 2007, 177:2389-2397.
5. Goddard M: Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 2009, 136:245-257.
6. Solberg TR, Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA, Meuwissen THE: Reducing dimensionality for prediction of genome-wide breeding values. Genet Sel Evol 2009, 41:29.
7. Habier D, Fernando R, Kizilkaya K, Garrick D: Extension of the Bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. BMC Bioinformatics 2011, 12:186.
8. Calus MPL, Meuwissen THE, De Roos APW, Veerkamp RF: Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Genetics 2008, 178:553-561.
9. Verbyla KL, Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Goddard ME: Accuracy of genomic selection using stochastic search variable selection in Australian Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Genet Res 2009, 91:307-311.
10. De Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME: Reliability of genomic predictions across multiple populations. Genetics 2009, 183:1545-1553.
11. De Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Spelman RJ, Goddard ME: Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle. Genetics 2008, 179:1503-1512.
12. Larmer SG, Sargolzaei M, Schenkel FS: Extent of linkage disequilibrium, consistency of gametic phase, and imputation accuracy within and across Canadian dairy breeds. J Dairy Sci 2014, 97:3128-3141.
13. Bolormaa S, Pryce JE, Kemper K, Savin K, Hayes BJ, Barendse W, Zhang Y, Reich CM, Mason BA, Bunch RJ, Harrison BE, Reverter A, Herd RM, Tier B, Graser H-U, Goddard ME: Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle. J Anim Sci 2013, 91:3088-3104.
14. Erbe M, Hayes BJ, Matukumalli LK, Goswami S, Bowman PJ, Reich CM, Mason BA, Goddard ME: Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. J Dairy Sci 2012, 95:4114-4129.
15. Daetwyler HD, Calus MPL, Pong-Wong R, de los Campos G, Hickey JM: Genomic prediction in animals and plants: simulation of data, validation, reporting, and benchmarking. Genetics 2013, 193:347-365.
16. Canty A, Ripley B: boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R package version 1.2-34. 2009. http://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/boot/index.html.
17. Mäntysaari E, Liu Z, VanRaden P: Interbull validation test for genomic evaluations. Interbull Bull 2010, 41:17-22.
18. Saunders C, Gammerman A, Vovk V: Ridge regression learning algorithm in dual variables. In ICML-1998 Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning. Edited by Shavilk JW, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 1998, 515-521.
19. Marimont R, Shapiro M: Nearest neighbour searches and the curse of dimensionality. IMA J Appl Math 1979, 24:59-70.
20. Liitiäinen E, Corona F, Lendasse A: On the curse of dimensionality in supervised learning of smooth regression functions. Neural Process Letts 2011, 34:133-154.
21. Slepicka JS, Cha SS: Stabilization of ill-posed nonlinear regression model and its application to interferogram reduction. SPIE Proceedings 1991, 1554B:574.
22. Hastie T, Buja A, Tibshirani R: Penalized discriminant analysis. Ann Stat 1995, 23:73-102.
23. Granville V, Rasson JP: Multivariate discriminant analysis and maximum penalized likelihood density estimation. J Roy Stat Soc B 1995, 57:501-517.
24. Sun Z, Zhang Z, Wang H: Consistency and error analysis of prior-knowledge-based kernel regression. Neurocomputing 2011, 74:3476-3485.
25. Lauer F, Bloch G: Incorporating prior knowledge in support vector regression. Mach Learn 2008, 70:89-118.
26. Wang L, Mu ZC, Guo H: Prior knowledge-based fuzzy support vector regression. In Fuzzy Systems, 2008 FUZZ-IEEE 2008 (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence); 2008:392-395.
27. Dadousis C: The use of principal component analysis for predicting genomic breeding values. MSc thesis. Wageningen University, Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre; 2012.
28. Mulder HA, Lidauer M, Stranden I, Mantysaari EA, Pool MH, Veerkamp RF: MiXBLUP Manual. Lelystad: ABGC, Wageningen UR Livestock Research; 2010.
29. Legarra A, Misztal I: Technical note: computing strategies in genome-wide selection. J Dairy Sci 2008, 91:360-366.
30. VanRaden PM: Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci 2008, 91:4414-4423.
31. Daetwyler HD, Pong-Wong R, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA: The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics 2010, 185:1021-1031.
32. Clark SA, Hickey JM, van der Werf JHJ: Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation. Genet Sel Evol 2011, 43:18.
33. Calus MPL: Right-hand-side updating for fast computing of genomic breeding values. Genet Sel Evol 2014, 46:24.
34. Gaspa G, Pintus MA, Nicolazzi EL, Vicario D, Valentini A, Dimauro C, Macciotta NPP: Use of principal component approach to predict direct genomic breeding values for beef traits in Italian Simmental cattle. J Anim Sci 2013, 91:29-37.
35. Pintus MA, Gaspa G, Nicolazzi EL, Vicario D, Rossoni A, Ajmone-Marsan P, Nardone A, Dimauro C, Macciotta NPP: Prediction of genomic breeding values for dairy traits in Italian Brown and Simmental bulls using a principal component approach. J Dairy Sci 2012, 95:3390-3400.
36. Pintus MA, Nicolazzi EL, Van Kaam JBCHM, Biffani S, Stella A, Gaspa G, Dimauro C, Macciotta NPP: Use of different statistical models to predict direct genomic values for productive and functional traits in Italian Holsteins. J Anim Breed Genet 2013, 130:32-40.
37. Karoui S, Carabano MJ, Diaz C, Legarra A: Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models. Genet Sel Evol 2012, 44:39.
38. Pryce JE, Gredler B, Bolormaa S, Bowman PJ, Egger-Danner C, Fuerst C, Emmerling R, Solkner J, Goddard ME, Hayes BJ: Short communication: genomic selection using a multi-breed, across-country reference population. J Dairy Sci 2011, 94:2625-2630.
39. Toosi A, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM: Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations. J Anim Sci 2010, 88:32-46.
40. Brøndum RF, Rius-Vilarrasa E, Strandén I, Su G, Guldbrandtsen B, Fikse WF, Lund MS: Reliabilities of genomic prediction using combined reference data of the Nordic Red dairy cattle populations. J Dairy Sci 2011, 94:4700-4707.
41. Olson KM, VanRaden PM, Tooker ME: Multibreed genomic evaluations using purebred Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss. J Dairy Sci 2012, 95:5378-5383.
42. Simeone R, Misztal I, Aguilar I, Vitezica ZG: Evaluation of a multi-line broiler chicken population using a single-step genomic evaluation procedure. J Anim Breed Genet 2012, 129:3-10.
43. Pszczola M, Strabel T, Mulder HA, Calus MPL: Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population. J Dairy Sci 2012, 95:389-400.
44. Wolc A, Stricker C, Arango J, Settar P, Fulton JE, O'Sullivan NP, Preisinger R, Habier D, Fernando R, Garrick DJ, Lamont SJ, Dekkers JCM: Breeding value prediction for production traits in layer chickens using pedigree or genomic relationships in a reduced animal model. Genet Sel Evol 2011, 43:5.
45. Qanbari S, Hansen M, Weigend S, Preisinger R, Simianer H: Linkage disequilibrium reveals different demographic history in egg laying chickens. BMC Genet 2010, 11:103.
46. Kranis A, Gheyas AA, Boschiero C, Turner F, Yu L, Smith S, Talbot R, Pirani A, Brew F, Kaiser P, Hocking PM, Fife M, Salmon N, Fulton J, Strom TM, Haberer G, Weigend S, Preisinger R, Gholami M, Qanbari S, Simianer H, Watson KA, Woolliams JA, Burt DW: Development of a high density 600K SNP genotyping array for chicken. BMC Genomics 2013, 14:59.
47. Wolc A, Arango J, Jankowski T, Dunn I, Settar P, Fulton JE, O'Sullivan NP, Preisinger R, Fernando RL, Garrick DJ, Dekkers JCM: Genome-wide association study for egg production and quality in layer chickens. J Anim Breed Genet 2014, 131:173-182.