Using selection index theory to estimate consistency of multi-locus linkage disequilibrium across populations

BMC Genetics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Wientjes, Yvonne C J ^a   Veerkamp, Roel F ^a   Calus, Mario P L ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Across population genomic prediction; Consistency of LD; Genomic prediction; Multi locus LD; Selection index theory

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONSISTENCY; CONSTANTS AND COEFFICIENTS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MULTILOCUS LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; PHENOTYPE; PREDICTION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REGRESSION COEFFICIENT; SELECTION INDEX THEORY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; THEORY; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ALGORITHMS; BREEDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC LOCI; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84937576078     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12863-015-0252-6     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA. Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. PLoS One. 2008;3, e3395.
2. Wientjes YCJ, Veerkamp RF, Calus MPL. The effect of linkage disequilibrium and family relationships on the reliability of genomic prediction. Genetics. 2013;193:621-31.
3. Habier D, Tetens J, Seefried FR, Lichtner P, Thaller G. The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Genet Sel Evol. 2010;42:5.
4. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001;157:1819-29.
5. Goddard ME. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica. 2009;136:245-57.
6. De Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Reliability of genomic predictions across multiple populations. Genetics. 2009;183:1545-53.
7. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Verbyla K, Goddard ME. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Genet Sel Evol. 2009;41:51.
8. Hill WG, Robertson A. Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Theor Appl Genet. 1968;38:226-31.
9. De Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Spelman RJ, Goddard ME. Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian. Jersey and Angus cattle Genetics. 2008;179:1503-12.
10. Gautier M, Faraut T, Moazami-Goudarzi K, Navratil V, Foglio M, Grohs C, et al. Genetic and haplotypic structure in 14 European and African cattle breeds. Genetics. 2007;177:1059-70.
11. Heifetz EM, Fulton JE, O'Sullivan N, Zhao H, Dekkers JCM, Soller M. Extent and consistency across generations of linkage disequilibrium in commercial layer chicken breeding populations. Genetics. 2005;171:1173-81.
12. Andreescu C, Avendano S, Brown SR, Hassen A, Lamont SJ, Dekkers JCM. Linkage disequilibrium in related breeding lines of chickens. Genetics. 2007;177:2161-9.
13. Veroneze R, Lopes PS, Guimarães SEF, Silva FF, Lopes MS, Harlizius B, et al. Linkage disequilibrium and haplotype block structure in six commercial pig lines. J Anim Sci. 2013;91:3493-501.
14. Sawyer SL, Mukherjee N, Pakstis AJ, Feuk L, Kidd JR, Brookes AJ, et al. Linkage disequilibrium patterns vary substantially among populations. Europ J Hum Genet. 2005;13:677-86.
15. Zhou L, Ding X, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Lund MS, Su G. Consistency of linkage disequilibrium between Chinese and Nordic Holsteins and genomic prediction for Chinese Holsteins using a joint reference population. Genet Sel Evol. 2013;45:7.
16. Erbe M, Hayes BJ, Matukumalli LK, Goswami S, Bowman PJ, Reich CM, et al. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95:4114-29.
17. Hayes BJ, Chamberlain AJ, McPartlan H, MacLeod IM, Sethuraman L, Goddard ME. Accuracy of marker-assisted selection with single markers and marker haplotypes in cattle. Genet Res. 2007;89:215-20.
18. Grapes L, Firat MZ, Dekkers JCM, Rothschild MF, Fernando RL. Optimal haplotype structure for linkage disequilibrium-based fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using identity by descent. Genetics. 2006;172:1955-65.
19. Meuwissen THE, Goddard ME. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using linkage disequilibria with closely linked marker loci. Genetics. 2000;155:421-30.
20. Calus MPL, Meuwissen THE, Windig JJ, Knol EF, Schrooten C, Vereijken ALJ, et al. Effects of the number of markers per haplotype and clustering of haplotypes on the accuracy of QTL mapping and prediction of genomic breeding values. Genet Sel Evol. 2009;41:11.
21. Abasht B, Sandford E, Arango J, Settar P, Fulton JE, O'Sullivan NP, et al. Extent and consistency of linkage disequilibrium and identification of DNA markers for production and egg quality traits in commercial layer chicken populations. BMC Genom. 2009;10:S2.
22. Smith HF. A discriminant function for plant selection. Ann Eugen. 1936;7:240-50.
23. Hazel LN. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics. 1943;28:476-90.
24. Hazel LN, Lush JL. The efficiency of three methods of selection. J Hered. 1942;33:393-9.
25. Kempthorne O, Nordskog AW. Restricted selection indices. Biometrics. 1959;15:10-9.
26. Lin CY. Index selection for genetic improvement of quantitative characters. Theor Appl Genet. 1978;52:49-56.
27. Pryce JE, Johnston J, Hayes BJ, Sahana G, Weigel KA, McParland S, et al. Imputation of genotypes from low density (50,000 markers) to high density (700,000 markers) of cows from research herds in Europe, North America, and Australasia using 2 reference populations. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97:1799-811.
28. Wientjes YCJ, Veerkamp RF, Bijma P, Bovenhuis H, Schrooten C, Calus MPL. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across population genomic prediction. Genet Sel Evol. 2015;47:5.
29. Browning BL, Browning SR. A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84:210-23.
30. Matukumalli LK, Lawley CT, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Allan MF, Heaton MP, et al. Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle. PLoS One. 2009;4, e5350.
31. Kemper KE, Goddard ME. Understanding and predicting complex traits: Knowledge from cattle. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:R45-51.
32. Jorjani H, Klei L, Emanuelson U. A simple method for weighted bending of genetic (co)variance matrices. J Dairy Sci. 2003;86:677-9.
33. Gilmour AR, Gogel B, Cullis B, Thompson R, Butler D, Cherry M, et al. ASReml user guide release 3.0. Hemel Hempstead: VSN International Ltd; 2009.
34. Yang J, Benyamin B, McEvoy BP, Gordon S, Henders AK, Nyholt DR, et al. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat Genet. 2010;42:565-9.
35. VanRaden PM. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci. 2008;91:4414-23.
36. Pryce JE, Gredler B, Bolormaa S, Bowman PJ, Egger-Danner C, Fuerst C, et al. Short communication: Genomic selection using a multi-breed, across-country reference population. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94:2625-30.
37. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited; 1996.
38. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics. 2007;177:2389-97.
39. Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. The distribution of the effects of genes affecting quantitative traits in livestock. Genet Sel Evol. 2001;33:209-29.
40. Calus MPL, Meuwissen THE, De Roos APW, Veerkamp RF. Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Genetics. 2008;178:553-61.
41. Calus MPL, Huang H, Vereijken A, Visscher J, ten Napel J, Winding JJ. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods. Genet Sel Evol. 2014;46:57.
42. Karoui S, Carabaño M, Díaz C, Legarra A. Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models. Genet Sel Evol. 2012;44:39.
43. Wientjes YCJ, Calus MPL, Goddard ME, Hayes BJ. Impact of QTL properties on the accuracy of multi-breed genomic prediction. Genet Sel Evol. 2015;47:42.
44. Daetwyler HD, Calus MPL, Pong-Wong R, De Los Campos G, Hickey JM. Genomic prediction in animals and plants: Simulation of data, validation, reporting, and benchmarking. Genetics. 2013;193:347-65.