Judicial independence and the rationing of constitutional remedies

Duke Law Journal

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-80

  Huq, Aziz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84952360186     PISSN: 00127086     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (137)

1. Marin K. Levy, Judicial Attention As A Scarce Resource: A Preliminary Defense of How Judges Allocate Time Across Cases in the Federal Courts of Appeals, 81 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 401, 402 & nn.1-5 (2013) (collecting statements by judges and numerical evidence of increasing caseload pressures).
2. AM. BAR ASS'N STANDING COMM. ON LEGAL AID & INDIGENT DEFENDANTS, GIDEON'S BROKEN PROMISE: AMERICA'S CONTINUING QUEST FOR EQUAL JUSTICE, at iv-v (2004), http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/legal_aid_ indigent_defendants/ls_sclaid_def_bp_right_to_counsel_in_criminal_proceedings.authcheckdam .pdf [http://perma.cc/6JVP-PAZ4]
3. Eve Brensike Primus, A Structural Vision of Habeas Corpus, 98 CALIF. L. REV. 1, 16-23 (2010)
4. MATTHEW R. DUROSE ET AL., BUREAU OF JUSTICE STATISTICS, U.S. DEP'T OF JUSTICE, CONTACTS BETWEEN POLICE AND THE PUBLIC, 2005, at 8 (2007), http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cpp05.pdf [http://perma.cc/6ZW8-TJDT].
5. Aziz Z. Huq, Habeas and the Roberts Court, 81 U. CHI. L. REV. 519, 582 (2014)
6. Thomas K.S. Fu, Note, Against Doctrinal Convergence in Constitutional Remedies, 10 STAN. J. C.R. & C.L. 293, 303-04 (2014).
7. David Rudovsky, Running in Place: The Paradox of Expanding Rights and Restricted Remedies, 2005 U. ILL. L. REV. 1199, 1239.
8. Kyron Huigens, Solving the Apprendi Puzzle, 90 GEO. L.J. 387, 419-20 (2002)
9. John C. Jeffries, Jr., Compensation for Constitutional Torts: Reflections on the Significance of Fault, 88 MICH. L. REV. 82, 98 (1989).
10. John C. Jeffries, Jr., Disaggregating Constitutional Torts, 110 YALE L.J. 259, 263 (2000)
11. John C. Jeffries, Jr., In Praise of the Eleventh Amendment and Section 1983, 84 VA. L. REV. 47, 49 (1998)
12. John C. Jeffries, Jr., The Liability Rule for Constitutional Torts, 99 VA. L. REV. 207, 209 (2013)
13. John C. Jeffries, Jr., The Right-Remedy Gap in Constitutional Law, 109 YALE L.J. 87, 98-100 (1999).
14. Vicki C. Jackson, Packages of Judicial Independence: The Selection and Tenure of Article III Judges, 95 GEO. L.J. 965, 967 (2007).
15. Peter Arenella, Rethinking the Functions of Criminal Procedure: The Warren and Burger Courts' Competing Ideologies, 72 GEO. L.J. 185, 247 (1983)
16. Alan M. Dershowitz & John Hart Ely, Harris v. New York: Some Anxious Observations on the Candor and Logic of the Emerging Nixon Majority, 80 YALE L.J. 1198, 1227 (1971)
17. Louis Michael Seidman, Factual Guilt and the Burger Court: An Examination of Continuity and Change in Criminal Procedure, 80 COLUM. L. REV. 436, 437 (1980)
18. Kevin McGuire, The Institutionalization of the U.S. Supreme Court, 12 POL. ANALYSIS 128, 141 (2004).
19. JUSTIN CROWE, BUILDING THE JUDICIARY: LAW, COURTS, AND THE POLITICS OF INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT 224 (2012).
20. TODD R. CLEAR & NATASHA A. FROST, THE PUNISHMENT IMPERATIVE: THE RISE AND FALL OF MASS INCARCERATION IN AMERICA (2014).
21. Thomas M. Keck, Party, Policy, or Duty: Why Does the Supreme Court Invalidate Federal Statutes?, 101 AM. POL. SCI. REV. 321, 323 (2007).
22. William J. Stuntz, The Uneasy Relationship Between Criminal Procedure and Criminal Justice, 107 YALE L.J. 1, 64 (1997)
23. William J. Stuntz, The Pathological Politics of Criminal Law, 100 MICH. L. REV. 505, 559-65 (2001)
24. Stephen J. Schulhofer, Criminal Justice, Local Democracy, and Constitutional Rights, 111 MICH. L. REV. 1045, 1049-60 (2013).
25. Daryl J. Levinson & Richard H. Pildes, Separation of Parties, Not Powers, 119 HARV. L. REV. 2311, 2324-25 (2006)
26. Aziz Z. Huq, Libertarian Separation of Powers, 8 N.Y.U. J.L. & LIBERTY 1006, 1012 (2014)
27. Alfred Hill, Constitutional Remedies, 69 COLUM. L. REV. 1109, 1142 (1969)
28. Giovanna Shay, The New State Postconviction, 46 AKRON L. REV. 473, 475 (2013)
29. Ann Woolhandler, The Common Law Origins of Constitutionally Compelled Remedies, 107 YALE L.J. 77, 81, 111-25 (1997)
30. Lawrence Gene Sager, Fair Measure: The Legal Status of Underenforced Constitutional Norms, 91 HARV. L. REV. 1212, 1215 (1978)
31. Douglas Laycock, How Remedies Became A Field: A History, 27 REV. LITIG. 161, 164- 65 (2008).
32. Orin S. Kerr, Fourth Amendment Remedies and Development of the Law: A Comment on Camreta v. Greene and Davis v. United States, 2011 CATO SUP. CT. REV. 237, 244-45
33. Jennifer E. Laurin, Trawling for Herring: Lessons in Doctrinal Borrowing and Convergence, 111 COLUM. L. REV. 670, 706 (2011)
34. Sina Kian, The Path of the Constitution: The Original System of Remedies, How it Changed, and How the Court Responded, 87 N.Y.U. L. REV. 132, 134 (2012)
35. Antonin Scalia, Sovereign Immunity and Nonstatutory Review of Federal Administrative Action: Some Conclusions from the Public-Lands Cases, 68 MICH. L. REV. 867, 882-86 (1970)
36. James E. Pfander & Jonathan L. Hunt, Public Wrongs and Private Bills: Indemnification and Government Accountability in the Early Republic, 85 N.Y.U. L. REV. 1862, 1868 (2010)
37. Ann Woolhandler, Patterns of Official Immunity and Accountability, 37 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 396, 422-29, 450-51 (1987).
38. Stephen N. Subrin, How Equity Conquered Common Law: The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in Historical Perspective, 135 U. PA. L. REV. 909, 913 (1987)
39. Walter E. Dellinger, Of Rights and Remedies: The Constitution as a Sword, 85 HARV. L. REV. 1532, 1533 (1972)
40. Akhil Reed Amar, Fourth Amendment First Principles, 107 HARV. L. REV. 757, 796 (1994).
41. Samuel L. Bray, The Myth of the Mild Declaratory Judgment, 63 DUKE L.J. 1091, 1095 (2014).
42. Issachar Rosen-Zvi & Talia Fisher, Overcoming Procedural Boundaries, 94 VA. L. REV. 79, 94 (2008)
43. Alan K. Chen, The Facts About Qualified Immunity, 55 EMORY L.J. 229, 233-61 (2006)
44. Joanna C. Schwartz, Myths and Mechanics of Deterrence: The Role of Lawsuits in Law Enforcement Decisionmaking, 57 UCLA L. REV. 1023, 1028-30 (2010)
45. Joanna C. Schwartz, Police Indemnification, 89 N.Y.U. L. REV. 885, 890 (2014)
46. Lant B. Davis et al., Project, Suing the Police in Federal Court, 88 YALE L.J. 781, 810-12 (1979)
47. Theodore Eisenberg & Stewart Schwab, The Reality of Constitutional Tort Litigation, 72 CORNELL L. REV. 641, 686 (1987)
48. PETER H. SCHUCK, SUING GOVERNMENT: CITIZEN REMEDIES FOR OFFICIAL WRONGS 59-81 (1983)
49. Jack M. Beermann, Municipal Responsibility for Constitutional Torts, 48 DEPAUL L. REV. 627, 646 (1999).
50. Amy Silverstein, The Rewards and Frustrations of Successful Constitutional Challenges to State Taxes, 87 J. TAX'N 102, 102 (1997)
51. Richard H. Fallon, Jr., Some Confusions About Due Process, Judicial Review, and Constitutional Remedies, 93 COLUM. L. REV. 309, 345- 52 (1993).
52. David Rudovsky, The Qualified Immunity Doctrine in the Supreme Court: Judicial Activism and the Restriction of Constitutional Rights, 138 U. PA. L. REV. 23, 53 (1989)
53. Donald Dripps, Living with Leon, 95 YALE L.J. 906, 907 (1986)
54. David Alan Sklansky, Is the Exclusionary Rule Obsolete?, 5 OHIO ST. J. CRIM. L. 567, 580-81 & n.70 (2008)
55. Paul M. Bator, Finality in Criminal Law and Federal Habeas Corpus for State Prisoners, 76 HARV. L. REV. 441, 452-53 (1963)
56. John H. Blume, AEDPA: The "Hype" and the "Bite," 91 CORNELL L. REV. 259, 262 (2006)
57. Linda Meyer, "Nothing We Say Matters": Teague and New Rules, 61 U. CHI. L. REV. 423, 425 (1994)
58. Richard H. Fallon & Daniel J. Meltzer, New Law, Non-Retroactivity, and Constitutional Remedies, 104 HARV. L. REV. 1731, 1735 (1991)
59. James S. Liebman, Apocalypse Next Time?: The Anachronistic Attack on Habeas Corpus/Direct Review Parity, 92 COLUM. L. REV. 1997, 2015-16 (1992)
60. BRANDON L. GARRETT & LEE KOVARSKY, FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS: EXECUTIVE DETENTION AND POST-CONVICTION LITIGATION 135 (2013)
61. Marin K. Levy, Judging the Flood of Litigation, 80 U. CHI. L. REV. 1007, 1043-49 (2013).
62. Bryan A. Stevenson, The Politics of Fear and Death: Successive Problems in Capital Federal Habeas Corpus Cases, 77 N.Y.U. L. REV. 699, 723-25 (2002).
63. Ira P. Robbins, Whither (or Wither) Habeas Corpus?: Observations on the Supreme Court's 1985 Term, 111 F.R.D. 265, 266-67 (1987)
64. Bert I. Huang, Lightened Scrutiny, 124 HARV. L. REV. 1109, 1115 (2011)
65. James E. Pfander, Iqbal, Bivens, and the Role of Judge-Made Law in Constitutional Litigation, 114 PENN ST. L. REV. 1387, 1389 (2010).
66. Lee Kovarsky, AEDPA's Wrecks: Comity, Finality, and Federalism, 82 TUL. L. REV. 443, 445 (2007)
67. George Tsebelis, Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies: An Empirical Analysis, 93 AM. POL. SCI. REV. 591, 605 (1999).
68. DAVID EPSTEIN & SHARYN O'HALLORAN, DELEGATING POWERS: A TRANSACTION COST APPROACH TO POLICY-MAKING UNDER SEPARATE POWERS 197 (1999).
69. Tara Leigh Grove, The Structural Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction, 124 HARV. L. REV. 869, 871 (2011).
70. Ryan J. Owens, The Separation of Powers and Supreme Court Agenda Setting, 54 AM. J. POL. SCI. 412, 419-24 (2010).
71. Richard L. Hasen, End of the Dialogue? Political Polarization, the Supreme Court, and Congress, 86 S. CAL. L. REV. 205, 217 (2013).
72. Marc Galanter, Why the "Haves" Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, 9 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 95, 97 (1974) (drawing the distinction).
73. Adam D. Chandler, The Solicitor General of the United States: Tenth Justice or Zealous Advocate?, 121 YALE L.J. 725, 728 (2011).
74. Charles Hurt, The Supreme Court's Biggest Loser: Barack Obama, WASH. TIMES (July 1, 2014), http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/1/the-supreme-courts-biggestloser- barack-obama/ [http://perma.cc/H73T-Q6AJ]
75. JOHN W. DEAN, THE REHNQUIST CHOICE: THE UNTOLD STORY OF THE NIXON APPOINTMENT THAT REDEFINED THE SUPREME COURT 16 (2001)
76. Edward A. Purcell, Jr., Reflections on the Fiftieth Anniversary of the March and the Speech: History, Memory, Values, 59 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 17, 56 (2015)
77. J. Mark Ramseyer, The Puzzling (In)dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach, 23 J. LEGAL STUD. 721, 746 (1994)
78. Gordon Bermant & Russell R. Wheeler, Federal Judges and the Judicial Branch: Their Independence and Accountability, 46 MERCER L. REV. 835, 837- 38, 845 (1995).
79. Peter J. Smith, Textualism and Jurisdiction, 108 COLUM. L. REV. 1883, 1892-94 (2008)
80. J. Mark Ramseyer, The Puzzling (In)dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach, 23 J. LEGAL STUD. 721, 746 (1994)
81. Tara Leigh Grove, The Article II Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction, 112 COLUM. L. REV. 250, 260 (2012)
82. Edward A. Hartnett, Questioning Certiorari: Some Reflections Seventy-Five Years After the Judges' Bill, 100 COLUM. L. REV. 1643, 1648 (2000).
83. Howard Gillman, How Political Parties Can Use the Courts to Advance Their Agendas: Federal Courts in the United States, 1875-1891, 96 AM. POL. SCI. REV. 511, 513 (2002).
84. Aziz Z. Huq, When Was Judicial Restraint?, 100 CALIF. L. REV. 579, 583, 587 (2012)
85. Keith E. Whittington, The Least Activist Supreme Court in History? The Roberts Court and the Exercise of Judicial Review, 89 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2219, 2228 fig.1 (2014).
86. Thomas Brennan, Lee Epstein & Nancy Staudt, The Political Economy of Judging, 93 MINN. L. REV. 1503, 1506 (2009)
87. Susan W. Johnson & Donald R. Songer, The Influence of Presidential Versus Home State Senatorial Preferences on the Policy Output of Judges on the United States District Courts, 36 LAW & SOC. REV. 657, 666 (2002)
88. Barry Friedman, The Politics of Judicial Review, 84 TEX. L. REV. 257, 278 & n.105 (2005)
89. Thomas Brennan, Lee Epstein & Nancy Staudt, The Political Economy of Judging, 93 MINN. L. REV. 1503, 1506 (2009)
90. William M. Landes & Richard A. Posner, Rational Judicial Behavior: A Statistical Study, 1 J. LEGAL ANALYSIS 775, 780 (2009)
91. Jonathan R. Macey, Judicial Preferences, Public Choice, and the Rules of Procedure, 23 J. LEGAL STUD. 627, 630 (1994).
92. Eric Helland & Jonathan Klick, The Effect of Judicial Expediency on Attorney Fees in Class Actions, 36 J. LEGAL STUD. 171 (2007)
93. Henry J. Friendly, Averting the Flood by Lessening the Flow, 59 CORNELL L. REV. 634, 642 (1974)
94. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Reflections on the Independence, Good Behavior, and Workload of Federal Judges, 55 U. COLO. L. REV. 1, 7-13 (1983)
95. Lewis F. Powell, Jr., Are the Federal Courts Becoming Bureaucracies?, 68 A.B.A. J. 1370, 1371 (1982).
96. WILLIAM M. RICHMAN & WILLIAM L. REYNOLDS, INJUSTICE ON APPEAL: THE UNITED STATES COURTS IN CRISIS 83-98 (2013)
97. LAURA F. EDWARDS, A LEGAL HISTORY OF THE CIVIL WAR AND RECONSTRUCTION: A NATION OF RIGHTS 151 (2015)
98. KATHERINE BECKETT, MAKING CRIME PAY: LAW AND ORDER IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN POLITICS 47 (1997)
99. Harry A. Chernoff, Christopher M. Kelly & John R. Kroger, Essay, The Politics of Crime, 33 HARV. J. ON LEGIS. 527, 533 (1996)
100. Nick Straley, Miller's Promise: Re-Evaluating Extreme Criminal Sentences for Children, 89 WASH. L. REV. 963, 990 (2014).
101. Ronald F. Wright, Trial Distortion and the End of Innocence in Federal Criminal Justice, 154 U. PA. L. REV. 79, 90-91 (2005).
102. Susan R. Klein & Ingrid B. Grobey, Debunking Claims of Over-Federalization of Criminal Law, 62 EMORY L.J. 1, 16-17 (2012).
103. Anne R. Traum, Mass Incarceration at Sentencing, 64 HASTINGS L.J. 423, 429 (2013).
104. Franklin E. Zimring, Imprisonment Rates and the New Politics of Criminal Punishment, in MASS IMPRISONMENT: SOCIAL CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES 145, 145-46 (David Garland ed., 2001).
105. MICHAEL TONRY, MALIGN NEGLECT: RACE, CRIME, AND PUNISHMENT IN AMERICA 4-7 (1995)
106. DAVID GARLAND, THE CULTURE OF CONTROL 131-32 (2001)
107. Thomas Y. Davies, A Hard Look at What We Know (and Still Need to Learn) About the "Costs" of the Exclusionary Rule: The NIJ Study and Other Studies of "Lost" Arrests, 1983 AM. B. & FOUND. RES. J. 611, 668 (1983)
108. William J. Stuntz, The Virtues and Vices of the Exclusionary Rule, 20 HARV. J.L. & PUB. POL'Y 443, 444 (1997)
109. DAVID SKARBEK, THE SOCIAL ORDER OF THE UNDERWORLD: HOW PRISON GANGS GOVERN THE AMERICAN PENAL SYSTEM (2014).
110. Robert Weisberg, Crime and Law: An American Tragedy, 125 HARV. L. REV. 1425, 1436 (2012)
111. Douglas Laycock, The Neglected Defense of Undue Hardship and the Doctrinal Train Wreck of Boomer v. Atlantic Cement, 4 J. TORT L. 1 (2012).
112. Gillian E. Metzger, Facial Challenges and Federalism, 105 COLUM. L. REV. 873, 877 (2005)
113. Myriam E. Gilles, Reinventing Structural Reform Litigation: Deputizing Private Citizens in the Enforcement of Civil Rights, 100 COLUM. L. REV. 1384, 1399 n.57 (2000).
114. LEE EPSTEIN, WILLIAM LANDES & RICHARD POSNER, THE BEHAVIOR OF FEDERAL JUDGES: A THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL STUDY OF RATIONAL CHOICE 43, 48 (2013)
115. Judith Resnik, Trial as Error, Jurisdiction as Injury: Transforming the Meaning of Article III, 113 HARV. L. REV. 924, 972 (2000)
116. Felix Frankfurter & Thomas G. Corcoran, Petty Federal Offenses and the Constitutional Guaranty of Trial by Jury, 39 HARV. L. REV. 917, 980-82 (1926)
117. Thomas W. Merrill, Article III, Agency Adjudication, and the Origins of the Appellate Review Model of Administrative Law, 111 COLUM. L. REV. 939, 944, 990 (2011)
118. DAVID A. SKEEL, JR., DEBT'S DOMINION: A HISTORY OF BANKRUPTCY LAW IN AMERICA 157-58 (2001)
119. Geraldine Mund, Appointed or Anointed: Judges, Congress, and the Passage of the Bankruptcy Act of 1978 Part Three: On the Hill, 81 AM. BANKR. L.J. 341, 346 n.18, 347-53 (2007)
120. Adam B. Cox, The Temporal Dimension of Voting Rights, 93 VA. L. REV. 361, 372-73 (2007).
121. Cass R. Sunstein, Incommensurability and Valuation in Law, 92 MICH. L. REV. 779, 785-90 (1994)
122. Francis E. McGovern, An Analysis of Mass Torts for Judges, 73 TEX. L. REV. 1821, 1845 (1995)
123. William J. Stuntz, The Political Constitution of Criminal Justice, 119 HARV. L. REV. 780, 799 n.104 (2006)
124. Stephen B. Burbank, The Architecture of Judicial Independence, 72 S. CAL. L. REV. 315, 320 (1999)
125. JACK N. RAKOVE, ORIGINAL MEANINGS: POLITICS AND IDEAS IN THE MAKING OF THE CONSTITUTION 299 (1996)
126. John A. Ferejohn & Larry D. Kramer, Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Institutionalizing Judicial Restraint, 77 N.Y.U. L. REV. 962, 972 (2002).
127. Louis Michael Seidman, Ambivalence and Accountability, 61 S. CAL. L. REV. 1571, 1581 (1988)
128. Deanell Reece Tacha, Independence of the Judiciary for the Third Century, 46 MERCER L. REV. 645, 645 (1995).
129. Archibald Cox, The Independence of the Judiciary: History and Purposes, 21 U. DAYTON L. REV. 565, 571 (1996).
130. Ann Woolhandler, Judicial Deference to Administrative Action-A Revisionist History, 43 ADMIN. L. REV. 197, 214 (1991);
131. GORDON WOOD, CREATION OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC 1777-1787, at 159-61 (1998)
132. Rachel E. Barkow, Separation of Powers and the Criminal Law, 58 STAN. L. REV. 989, 1017 (2006)
133. Rebecca L. Brown, Separated Powers and Ordered Liberty, 139 U. PA. L. REV. 1513, 1536-38, 1537 n.102 (1991).
134. KEVIN MCMAHON, RECONSIDERING ROOSEVELT ON RACE 138, 150-75 (2004).
135. David R. Stras, Book Review Essay, Understanding the New Politics of Judicial Appointments, 86 TEX. L. REV. 1033, 1047-72 (2008).
136. M. Elizabeth Magill, Beyond Powers and Branches in Separation of Powers Law, 150 U. PA. L. REV. 603, 604-05 (2001)
137. M. Elizabeth Magill, The Real Separation in Separation of Powers Law, 86 VA. L. REV. 1127, 1155-57 (2000)