메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 84, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 47-

In praise of the eleventh amendment and section 1983

(1)  Jeffries Jr , John C a  

a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 0348046795     PISSN: 00426601     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1073807     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (75)

References (9)
  • 1
    • 0346358951 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • "The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State." U.S. Const. amend. XI.
  • 2
    • 33746424172 scopus 로고
    • Edelman v. Jordan
    • Like defects of subject-matter jurisdiction, Eleventh Amendment immunity can be raised for the first time on appeal, Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651, 677-78 (1974); but unlike defects of subject-matter jurisdiction, Eleventh Amendment immunity can be waived if the state consents to suit, Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 17 (1890).
    • (1974) U.S. , vol.415 , pp. 651
  • 3
    • 33746451490 scopus 로고
    • Hans v. Louisiana
    • Like defects of subject-matter jurisdiction, Eleventh Amendment immunity can be raised for the first time on appeal, Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651, 677-78 (1974); but unlike defects of subject-matter jurisdiction, Eleventh Amendment immunity can be waived if the state consents to suit, Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 17 (1890).
    • (1890) U.S. , vol.134 , pp. 1
  • 4
    • 0348249552 scopus 로고
    • Ex parte Young
    • A constitutional claim against a state officer requires state action, but the defendant is said to be "stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct." Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 160 (1908).
    • (1908) U.S. , vol.209 , pp. 123
  • 5
    • 0348249553 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Edelman
    • The reasoning of Exporte Young applies with equal (im)plausibility in every case, yet the precedent applies only in suits for prospective relief. Edelman, 415 U.S. at 667-68.
    • U.S. , vol.415 , pp. 667-668
  • 6
    • 84927043936 scopus 로고
    • Federalism and the Eleventh Amendment
    • See, e.g., Stewart A. Baker, Federalism and the Eleventh Amendment, 48 U. Colo. L. Rev. 139, 139-40, 165-66 (1977) (arguing that federalism concerns underlie Eleventh Amendment doctrines that are explained on other grounds); George D. Brown, State Sovereignty Under the Burger Court - How the Eleventh Amendment Survived the Death of the Tenth: Some Broader Implications of Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon, 74 Geo. L.J. 363, 367, 370 (1985) (reviewing the confusing categories surrounding the Eleventh Amendment and suggesting that it is best viewed as a "limitation on the national government derived ultimately from the structure of the federal system"); William Burnham, "Beam Me Up, There's No Intelligent Life Here": A Dialogue on the Eleventh Amendment with Lawyers from Mars, 75 Neb. L. Rev. 551 (1996) (leading the reader on an entertaining romp through the curiosities of Eleventh Amendment jurisprudence).
    • (1977) U. Colo. L. Rev. , vol.48 , pp. 139
    • Baker, S.A.1
  • 7
    • 0348249550 scopus 로고
    • State Sovereignty Under the Burger Court - How the Eleventh Amendment Survived the Death of the Tenth: Some Broader Implications of Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon
    • See, e.g., Stewart A. Baker, Federalism and the Eleventh Amendment, 48 U. Colo. L. Rev. 139, 139-40, 165-66 (1977) (arguing that federalism concerns underlie Eleventh Amendment doctrines that are explained on other grounds); George D. Brown, State Sovereignty Under the Burger Court - How the Eleventh Amendment Survived the Death of the Tenth: Some Broader Implications of Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon, 74 Geo. L.J. 363, 367, 370 (1985) (reviewing the confusing categories surrounding the Eleventh Amendment and suggesting that it is best viewed as a "limitation on the national government derived ultimately from the structure of the federal system"); William Burnham, "Beam Me Up, There's No Intelligent Life Here": A Dialogue on the Eleventh Amendment with Lawyers from Mars, 75 Neb. L. Rev. 551 (1996) (leading the reader on an entertaining romp through the curiosities of Eleventh Amendment jurisprudence).
    • (1985) Geo. L.J. , vol.74 , pp. 363
    • Brown, G.D.1
  • 8
    • 0348249539 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • "Beam Me Up, There's No Intelligent Life Here": A Dialogue on the Eleventh Amendment with Lawyers from Mars
    • See, e.g., Stewart A. Baker, Federalism and the Eleventh Amendment, 48 U. Colo. L. Rev. 139, 139-40, 165-66 (1977) (arguing that federalism concerns underlie Eleventh Amendment doctrines that are explained on other grounds); George D. Brown, State Sovereignty Under the Burger Court - How the Eleventh Amendment Survived the Death of the Tenth: Some Broader Implications of Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon, 74 Geo. L.J. 363, 367, 370 (1985) (reviewing the confusing categories surrounding the Eleventh Amendment and suggesting that it is best viewed as a "limitation on the national government derived ultimately from the structure of the federal system"); William Burnham, "Beam Me Up, There's No Intelligent Life Here": A Dialogue on the Eleventh Amendment with Lawyers from Mars, 75 Neb. L. Rev. 551 (1996) (leading the reader on an entertaining romp through the curiosities of Eleventh Amendment jurisprudence).
    • (1996) Neb. L. Rev. , vol.75 , pp. 551
    • Burnham, W.1
  • 9
    • 0346988744 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman
    • See, e.g., Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89, 105-06, 119-20
    • U.S. , vol.465 , pp. 89


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.