Cognitive ability in selection decisions

Handbook of Understanding and Measuring Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 431-468

  Ones, Deniz S ^a   Viswesvaran, Chockalingam ^b   Dilchert, Stephan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84952003773     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452233529.n24     Document Type: Chapter

References (103)

1. Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Within task intercorrelations of skilled performance: Implications for predicting individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 360-364.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.2.360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.2.360
2. Aguinis, H., Henle, C. A., & Ostroff, C. (2001). Measurement in work and organizational psychology. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work & organizational psychology: Personnel psychology (pp. 165-199). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sagedoi:10.4135/9781446221334 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446221334.
3. Barrett, G. V., Polomsky, M. D., & McDaniel, M. A. (1999). Selection tests for firefighters: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 507-513.doi:10.1023/A:1022966820186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022966820186
4. Boehm, V. R. (1977). Differential prediction: A methodological artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 146-154.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.62.2.146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.2.146
5. Borman, W. C., Hanson, M. A., Oppler, S. H., & Pulakos, E. D. (1993). Role of early supervisory experience in supervisor performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 443-449.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.3.443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.3.443
6. Brand, C. (1987). The importance of general intelligence. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Arthur Jensen: Consensus and controversy (pp. 251-265). New York: Falmer.
7. Callender, J. C., & Osburn, H. G. (1981). Testing the constancy of validity with computer-generated sampling distributions of the multiplicative model variance estimate: Results for petroleum industry validation research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 274-281.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.66.3.274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.66.3.274
8. Campion, M. A., Outtz, J. L., Zedeck, S., Schmidt, F. L., Kehoe, J. F., Murphy, K. R., et al. (2001). The controversy over score banding in personnel selection: Answers to 10 key questions. Personnel Psychology, 54, 149-185.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00090.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00090.x
9. Carretta, T. R., & Doub, T. W. (1998). Group differences in the role of g and prior job knowledge in the acquisition of subsequent job knowledge. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 585-593.doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00210-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869%2897%2900210-9
10. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511571312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571312
11. Cascio, W. F., Goldstein, I. L., Outtz, J., & Zedeck, S. (1995). Twenty issues and answers about sliding bands. Human Performance, 8, 227-242.doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0803_8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup0803_8
12. Cascio, W. F., Outtz, J., Zedeck, S., & Goldstein, I. L. (1991). Statistical implications of six methods of test score use in personnel selection. Human Performance, 4, 233-264.doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0404_1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup0404_1
13. Churchill, G. A., Jr., Ford, N. M., Hartley, S. W., & Walker, O. C., Jr. (1985). The determinants of salesperson performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 103-118.doi:10.2307/3151357 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151357
14. Cleary, T. A. (1968). Test bias: Prediction of grades of Negro and White students in integrated colleges. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 115-124.doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1968.tb00613.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1968.tb00613.x
15. Coward, W. M., & Sackett, P. R. (1990). Linearity of ability-performance relationships: A reconfirmation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 295-300.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.297
16. Distefano, M. K., & Paulk, K. D. (1990). Further evaluation of verbal ability selection test and work performance validity with psychiatric aides. Psychological Reports, 67, 845-846.doi:10.2466/PR0.67.7.845-846 http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/PR0.67.7.845-846
17. Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43, 95-103.doi:10.1037/0003-066X.43.2.95 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.2.95
18. Funke, U., Krauss, J., Schuler, H., Heinz, S., & Stapf, K. H. (1987). Zur Prognostizierbarkeit wissenschaftlich-technischer Leistungen mittels Personvariablen: Eine Metaanalyse der Validität diagnostischer Verfahren im Bereich Forschung und Entwicklung. [Predictability of scientific-technical achievement through personal variables: A meta-analysis of the validity of diagnostic procedures in research and development]. Gruppendynamik, 18, 407-428.
19. Galton, F. (1892). Hereditary genius. London: Macmillan.
20. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
21. Ghiselli, E. E. (1956). Differentiation of individuals in terms of their predictability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 40, 374-377.doi:10.1037/h0048071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0048071
22. Ghiselli, E. E. (1966). The validity of occupational aptitude tests. New York: John Wiley.
23. Ghiselli, E. E. (1973). The validity of aptitude tests in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 26, 461-477.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1973.tb01150.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1973.tb01150.x
24. Goldberg, E. L., & Alliger, G. M. (1992). Assessing the validity of the GRE for students in psychology: A validity generalization approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1019-1027.doi:10.1177/0013164492052004026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004026
25. Gottfredson, L. S. (1988). Reconsidering fairness: A matter of social and ethical priorities. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 33, 293-313.doi:10.1016/0001-8791(88)90041-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791%2888%2990041-3
26. Gottfredson, L. S. (1994). The science and politics of race-norming. American Psychologist, 49, 955-963.doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.11.955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.11.955
27. Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79-132.doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90014-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896%2897%2990014-3
28. Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). Where and why g matters: Not a mystery. Human Performance, 15, 25-46.
29. Guion, R. M. (1998). Assessment, measurement, and prediction for personnel decisions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Hartigan, J. A., & Wigdor, A. K. (Eds.) (1989). Fairness in employment testing: Validity generalization, minority issues, and the general aptitude test battery. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
31. Hezlett, S. A., Kuncel, N. R., Vey, M. A., Ahart, A., Ones, D. S., Campbell, J. P., et al. (2001, April). The predictive validity of the SAT: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Symposium presented at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego.
32. Howard, A. (Ed.) (1995). The changing nature of work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Hunter, J. E. (1983). Test validation for 12,000 jobs: An application of job classification and validity generalization to the General Aptitude Test Battery (USES Test Research Report № 45). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
34. Hunter, J. E. (1985). Differential validity across jobs in the military. Report for Research Applications, Inc., in partial fulfillment of DOD Contract № F41689-83-C-0025.
35. Hunter, J. E. (1986). Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 340-362.doi:10.1016/0001-8791(86)90013-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791%2886%2990013-8
36. Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.72 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.72
37. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1976). A critical analysis of the statistical and ethical implications of various definitions of test fairness. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1053-1071.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.6.1053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.83.6.1053
38. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting for error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Intelligence and job performance: Economic and social implications. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 2, 447-472.doi:10.1037/1076-8971.2.3-4.447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.2.3-4.447
40. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, R. (1979). Differential validity of employment tests by race: A comprehensive review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 721-735.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.4.721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.4.721
41. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139-155.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139
42. Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53-69.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.53 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.53
43. Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
44. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
45. Kehoe, J. F. (2002). General mental ability and selection in private sector organizations: A commentary. Human Performance, 15, 97-106.
46. Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2001). A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the Graduate Records Examinations: Implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 162-181.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.162
47. Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148-161.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.148
48. Lent, R. H., Aurbach, H. A., & Levin, L. S. (1971). Predictors, criteria and significant results. Personnel Psychology, 24, 519-533.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1971.tb00374.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1971.tb00374.x
49. Levine, E. L., Spector, P. E., Menon, S., Narayanan, L., & Cannon-Bowers, J. (1996). Validity generalization for cognitive, psychomotor, and perceptual tests for craft jobs in the utility industry. Human Performance, 9, 1-22.doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0901_1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup0901_1
50. Linn, R. (1982). Ability testing: Individual differences, prediction, and differential prediction. in A. K. Wigdor & W. R. Garner (Eds.), Ability testing: Uses, consequences, and controversies (pp. 335-388). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
51. Lombardo, M. M., & Eichenger, R. W. (1996). Learning agility: The Learning II Architect. Greensboro, NC: Lominger Limited.
52. Martinussen, M. (1996). Psychological measures as predictors of pilot performance: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 1-20.doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0601_1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0601_1
53. McCloy, R. A., Campbell, J. P., & Cudeck, R. (1994). A confirmatory test of a model of performance determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 493-505.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.493
54. McHenry, J. J., Hough, L. M., Toquam, J. L., Hanson, M. A., & Ashworth, S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and criterion domains. Personnel Psychology, 43, 335-354.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb01562.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb01562.x
55. Morrison, T., & Morrison, M. (1995). A meta-analytic assessment of the predictive validity of the quantitative and verbal components of the Graduate Record Examination with graduate grade point average representing the criterion of graduate success. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 309-316.doi:10.1177/0013164495055002015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055002015
56. Nathan, B. R., & Alexander, R. A. (1988). A comparison of criteria for test validation: A meta-analytic investigation. Personnel Psychology, 41, 517-535.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00642.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00642.x
57. Ohlott, P. J., Ruderman, M. N., & McCauley, C. D. (1994). Gender differences in managers’ developmental job experiences. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 46-67.doi:10.2307/256769 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256769
58. Olea, M., & Ree, M. J. (1994). Predicting pilot and navigator criteria: Not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 845-851.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.845
59. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1996). Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 209-226.doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199611)17:6<609:AID-JOB1828>3.0.CO;2-K http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-1379%28199611%2917:6%3C609:AID-JOB1828%3E3.0.CO;2-K
60. Ozer, D. J. (1985). Correlation and the coefficient of determination. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 307-315.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.307
61. Pearlman, K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1980). Validity generalization results for tests used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 373-406.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.373
62. Pitcher, B. (1974). Predicting law school grades for female law students (Annual council report). Washington, DC: Law School Admission Council.
63. Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 612-624.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612
64. Ree, M. J., & Carretta, T. R. (2002). g2K. Human Performance, 15, 3-23.
65. Ree, M. J., Earles, J. A., & Teachout, M. S. (1994). Predicting job performance: Not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 518-524.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.518
66. Reeve, C. L., & Hakel, M. D. (2002). Asking the right questions about g. Human Performance, 15, 47-74.
67. Roth, P. L., Bevier, C. A., Bobko, P. L., Switzer, F. S., & Tyler, P. (2001). Ethnic group differences in cognitive ability in employment and educational settings: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 54, 297-330.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00094.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00094.x
68. Rothstein, H. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1992). Differential validity by sex in employment settings. Journal of Business & Psychology, 7, 45-62.doi:10.1007/BF01014342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01014342
69. Rothstein Hirsh, H., Northrop, L. C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1986). Validity generalization results for law enforcement occupations. Personnel Psychology, 39, 399-420.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00589.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00589.x
70. Sackett, P. R., & Roth, L. (1996). Multi-stage selection strategies: A Monte Carlo investigation of effects on performance and minority hiring. Personnel Psychology, 49, 787-830.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb02450.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb02450.x
71. Sackett, P. R., & Yang, H. (2000). Correction for range restriction: An extended typology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 112-118.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.112
72. Sager, C. R., Peterson, N. G., Oppler, S. H., Rosse, R. L., & Walker, C. B. (1997). An examination of five indexes of test battery performance: Analysis of the ECAT battery. Military Psychology, 9, 97-120.doi:10.1207/s15327876mp0901_6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp0901_6
73. Salgado, J. F., & Anderson, N. (2002). Cognitive and GMA testing in the European Community: Issues and evidence. Human Performance, 15, 75-96.
74. Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., de Fruyt, F., & Rolland, J. P. (2003a). International validity generalization of GMA and cognitive abilities: A European community meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 56, 573-605.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00751.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00751.x
75. Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., de Fruyt, F., & Rolland, J. P. (2003b). A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1068-1081.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1068
76. Schmidt, F. L. (1991). Why all banding procedures in personnel selection are logically flawed. Human Performance, 4, 265-278.doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0404_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup0404_2
77. Schmidt, F. L. (2002). The role of general cognitive ability and job performance: Why there cannot be a debate. Human Performance, 15, 187-210.
78. Schmidt, F. L., Gast-Rosenberg, I., & Hunter, J. E. (1980). Validity generalization results for computer programmers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 643-661.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.6.643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.6.643
79. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 529-540.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.62.5.529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.5.529
80. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1984). A within setting empirical test of the situational specificity hypothesis in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 37, 317-326.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1984.tb01453.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1984.tb01453.x
81. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1995). The fatal internal contradiction in banding: Its statistical rationale is logically inconsistent with its operational procedures. Human Performance, 8, 203-214.doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0803_6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup0803_6
82. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
83. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Caplan, J. R. (1981). Validity generalization results for two groups in the petroleum industry. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 261-273.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.66.3.261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.66.3.261
84. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Outerbridge, A. N. (1986). The impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 432-439.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.432
85. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., Outerbridge, A., & Goff, S. (1988). Joint relation of experience and ability with job performance: Test of three hypotheses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 46-57.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.1.46 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.73.1.46
86. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Pearlman, K. (1981). Task differences as moderators of aptitude test validity in selection: A red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 166-185.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.66.2.166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.66.2.166
87. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., Pearlman, K., & Shane, G. S. (1979). Further tests of the Schmidt-Hunter Bayesian validity generalization procedure. Personnel Psychology, 32, 257-281.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1979.tb02134.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1979.tb02134.x
88. Schmidt, F. L., & Kaplan, L. B. (1971). Composite vs. multiple criteria: A review and resolution of the controversy. Personnel Psychology, 24, 419-434.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1971.tb00365.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1971.tb00365.x
89. Schmidt, F. L., Pearlman, K., & Hunter, J. E. (1980). The validity and fairness of employment and educational tests for Hispanic Americans: A review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 33, 705-724.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1980.tb02364.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1980.tb02364.x
90. Schmitt, N., & Chan, D. (1998). Personnel selection: A theoretical approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
91. Schmitt, N., Gooding, R. Z., Noe, R. A., & Kirsch, M. (1984). Meta-analyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 37, 407-422.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1984.tb00519.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1984.tb00519.x
92. Schrader, W. B., & Pitcher, B. (1974). Prediction of law school grades for Mexican American and Black American students (Annual council report). Washington, DC: Law School Admission Council.
93. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
94. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
95. Sternberg, R. J., & Detterman, D. K. (1986). What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
96. Terman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.doi:10.1037/10014-000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10014-000
97. Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel selection: Test and measurement techniques. New York: John Wiley.
98. Verive, J. M., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Short-term memory tests in personnel selection: Low adverse impact and high validity. Intelligence, 23, 15-32.doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(96)80003-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896%2896%2980003-1
99. Vinchur, A. J., Schippmann, J. S., Switzer, F. S., III, & Roth, P. L. (1998). A meta-analytic review of predictors of job performance for salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 586-597.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.586
100. Vineberg, R., & Joyner, J. N. (1982). Prediction of job performance: Review of military studies. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization.
101. Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2002). Agreements and disagreements on the role of general mental ability (GMA) in industrial, work, and organizational psychology. Human Performance, 15, 211-231.
102. Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2003). Using cognitive ability in personnel selection: implications for diversity in organizations. in F. Avallone, H. K. Sinangil, & A. Caetano (Eds.), Identity and diversity in organizations (pp. 185-191). Milan: Guerini Studio.
103. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250-270.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250