Multi-stage selection strategies: A Monte Carlo investigation of effects on performance and minority hiring

Personnel Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 549-572

  Sackett, Paul R ^a   Roth, Lawrence ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030306018     PISSN: 00315826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01584.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Barrick MR, Mount MK. (1991). The Big 5 personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 44, 1-26.
2. Box GEP, Muller ME. (1958). A note on the generation of random normal deviates. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 610-611.
3. Cascio WF, Outtz J, Zedeck S, Goldstein IL. (1991). Statistical implications of six methods of test score use in personnel selection. Human Performance, 4, 233-264.
4. Cleary TA. (1968). Test bias: Prediction of grades of negro and white students in integrated colleges. Journal of Educational Measurements, 5, 115-124.
5. Cronbach LJ, Gleser GC. (1965). Psychological tests and personnel decisions. Urbana, IL: University of IL Press.
6. Ford JK, Kraiger K, Schechtman SL. (1986). Study of race effects in objective indices and subjective evaluations of performance: A meta-analysis of performance criteria. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 330-337.
7. Hartigan JA, Wigdor AK. (1989). Fairness in employment testing: Validity generalization, minority issues, and the General Aptitude Test Battery. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8. Hunter JE, Schmidt FL, Rauschenberger JM. (1977). Fairness of psychological tests: Implications of four definitions for selection utility and minority hiring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 245-260.
9. Kehoe JF, Tenopyr ML. (1994). Adjustment in assessment scores and their usage: A taxonomy and evaluation of methods. Psychological Assessment, 6, 291-303.
10. Kraiger K, Ford JK. (1985). A meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 56-65.
11. Maxwell SE, Arvey RD. (1993). The search for predictors with high validity and low adverse impact: Compatible or incompatible goals? Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 433-437.
12. Ones DS, Viswesvaran C, Schmidt FL. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679-703.
13. Rothstein HR. (1990). Interrater reliability of job performance ratings: Growth to asymptote level with increasing opportunity to observe. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 322-327.
14. Sackett PR, Roth L. (1991). A Monte Carlo examination of banding and rank order methods of test use in personnel selection. Human Performance, 4, 279-295.
15. Sackett PR, Wilk SL. (1994). Within-group norming and other forms of score adjustment in preemployment testing. American Psychologist, 49, 929-954.
16. Schmidt FL, Mack MJ, Hunter JE. (1984). Selection utility in the occupation of U.S. park ranger for three modes of test use. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 490-497.
17. Wigdor AK, Hartigan JA. (1988). Interim report: Within-group scoring of the General Aptitude Test Battery. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.