Association mapping reveals the role of purifying selection in the maintenance of genomic variation in gene expression

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 50, 2015, Pages 15390-15395

  Josephs, Emily B ^a   Lee, Young Wha ^a   Stinchcombe, John R ^a   Wright, Stephen I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Association mapping; Gene expression; Population genomics

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CAPSELLA; CAPSELLA GRANDIFLORA; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; NONHUMAN; OUTCROSSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURIFYING SELECTION; CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; PLANT GENE; PLANT GENOME; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ALLELES; BASE COMPOSITION; CAPSELLA; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENE FREQUENCY; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, PLANT; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84950108704     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1503027112     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Johnson T, Barton N (2005) Theoretical models of selection and mutation on quantitative traits. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360(1459):1411-1425.
2. Barton NH, Keightley PD (2002) Understanding quantitative genetic variation. Nat Rev Genet 3(1):11-21.
3. Kousathanas A, Oliver F, Halligan DL, Keightley PD (2011) Positive and negative selection on noncoding DNA close to protein-coding genes in wild house mice. Mol Biol Evol 28(3):1183-1191.
4. Williamson RJ, et al. (2014) Evidence for widespread positive and negative selection in coding and conserved noncoding regions of Capsella grandiflora. PLoS Genet 10(9): e1004622.
5. Zhu Q, et al. (2011) A genome-wide comparison of the functional properties of rare and common genetic variants in humans. Am J Hum Genet 88(4):458-468.
6. Lee YW, Gould BA, Stinchcombe JR (2014) Identifying the genes underlying quantitative traits: A rationale for the QTN programme. AoB Plants 6(0):plu004, 10.1093/aobpla/plu004.
7. Haudry A, et al. (2013) An atlas of over 90, 000 conserved noncoding sequences provides insight into crucifer regulatory regions. Nat Genet 45(8):891-898.
8. Brem RB, Kruglyak L (2005) The landscape of genetic complexity across 5, 700 gene expression traits in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(5):1572-1577.
9. Brem RB, Yvert G, Clinton R, Kruglyak L (2002) Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast. Science 296(5568):752-755.
10. Rockman MV, Skrovanek SS, Kruglyak L (2010) Selection at linked sites shapes heritable phenotypic variation in C. elegans. Science 330(6002):372-376.
11. Ronald J, Akey JM (2007) The evolution of gene expression QTL in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One 2(7):e678.
12. Massouras A, et al. (2012) Genomic variation and its impact on gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet 8(11):e1003055.
13. Pickrell JK, et al. (2010) Understanding mechanisms underlying human gene expression variation with RNA sequencing. Nature 464(7289):768-772.
14. Lappalainen T, et al.; Geuvadis Consortium (2013) Transcriptome and genome sequencing uncovers functional variation in humans. Nature 501(7468):506-511.
15. Battle A, et al. (2014) Characterizing the genetic basis of transcriptome diversity through RNA-sequencing of 922 individuals. Genome Res 24(1):14-24.
16. Tung J, Zhou X, Alberts SC, Stephens M, Gilad Y (2015) The genetic architecture of gene expression levels in wild baboons. eLife 4, 10.7554/eLife.04729.
17. Kudaravalli S, Veyrieras J-B, Stranger BE, Dermitzakis ET, Pritchard JK (2009) Gene expression levels are a target of recent natural selection in the human genome. Mol Biol Evol 26(3):649-658.
18. Lappalainen T, Montgomery SB, Nica AC, Dermitzakis ET (2011) Epistatic selection between coding and regulatory variation in human evolution and disease. Am J Hum Genet 89(3):459-463.
19. Fraser HB (2013) Gene expression drives local adaptation in humans. Genome Res 23(7):1089-1096.
20. Ye K, Lu J, Raj SM, Gu Z (2013) Human expression QTLs are enriched in signals of environmental adaptation. Genome Biol Evol 5(9):1689-1701.
21. Potokina E, et al. (2008) Gene expression quantitative trait locus analysis of 16 000 barley genes reveals a complex pattern of genome-wide transcriptional regulation. Plant J 53(1):90-101.
22. West MAL, et al. (2007) Global eQTL mapping reveals the complex genetic architecture of transcript-level variation in Arabidopsis. Genetics 175(3):1441-1450.
23. Bolon Y-T, Hyten DL, Orf JH, Vance CP, Muehlbauer GJ (2014) eQTL networks reveal complex genetic architecture in the immature soybean seed. Plant Genome 7:1.
24. Gan X, et al. (2011) Multiple reference genomes and transcriptomes for Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 477(7365):419-423.
25. Zhang X, Cal AJ, Borevitz JO (2011) Genetic architecture of regulatory variation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Res 21(5):725-733.
26. Fu J, et al. (2013) RNA sequencing reveals the complex regulatory network in the maize kernel. Nat Commun 4:2832.
27. Slotte T, Foxe JP, Hazzouri KM, Wright SI (2010) Genome-wide evidence for efficient positive and purifying selection in Capsella grandiflora, a plant species with a large effective population size. Mol Biol Evol 27(8):1813-1821.
28. Raj A, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2014) fastSTRUCTURE: Variational inference of population structure in large SNP data sets. Genetics 197(2):573-589.
29. Capen EC, Clapp RV, Campbell WM (1971) Competitive bidding in high-risk situations. J Petroleum. Available at: https://www.onepetro.org/journal-paper/SPE-2993-PA.
30. Zondervan KT, Cardon LR (2004) The complex interplay among factors that influence allelic association. Nat Rev Genet 5(2):89-100.
31. St Onge KR, Källman T, Slotte T, Lascoux M, Palmé AE (2011) Contrasting demographic history and population structure in Capsella rubella and Capsella grandi-flora, two closely related species with different mating systems. Mol Ecol 20(16): 3306-3320.
32. Slotte T, et al. (2013) The Capsella rubella genome and the genomic consequences of rapid mating system evolution. Nat Genet 45(7):831-835.
33. Lunter G, Goodson M (2011) Stampy: a statistical algorithm for sensitive and fast mapping of Illumina sequence reads. Genome Res 21(6):936-939.
34. McKenna A, et al. (2010) The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 20(9):1297-1303.
35. Van der Auwera GA, et al. (2013) From FastQ data to high-confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 11(1110):11.10.1-11.10.33.
36. Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W (2015) HTSeq-A Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31(2):166-169.
37. Oliphant TE (2007) Python for scientific computing. Computing in Science & Engineering 9:10-20.
38. Storey JD, Bass AJ, Dabney A, Robinson D (2015) qvalue: Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control. R package version 2.2.0.
39. Degner JF, et al. (2009) Effect of read-mapping biases on detecting allele-specific expression from RNA-sequencing data. Bioinformatics 25(24):3207-3212.
40. Corbett-Detig RB, Hartl DL, Sackton TB (2015) Natural selection constrains neutral diversity across a wide range of species. PLoS Biol 13(4):e1002112.