Improving student learning when budgets are tight

Improving Student Learning When Budgets are Tight

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-185

  Odden, Allan R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949985466     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781483387703     Document Type: Book

References (127)

1. Anderson, A. H., Augenblick, J., DeCesare, D., & Conrad, J. (2006). Costs and funding of virtual schools. Denver, CO: Augenblick, Palaich, and Associates. Also retrieved from http://www.inacol.org/research/docs/Costs&Funding.pdf.
2. Aportela, A., & Goetz, M. (2008a). Strategic management of human capital: New leaders for new schools. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
3. Aportela, A., & Goetz, M. (2008b). Strategic management of human capital: The new teacher project. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
4. Archer, J. (2000). The link to higher scores. In R. D.Pea (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass reader on technology and learning (pp. 112-123). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5. Archibald, S. (2008). Strategic management of human capital: Boston. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
6. Baum, M. (2011). Using short-cycle interim assessment to improve educator evaluation, educator effectiveness, and student achievement. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Renaissance Learning.
7. Blankstein, A. M. (2010). Failure is not an option: 6 principles for making student success the only option. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
8. Bloom, B. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16. doi:10.3102/0013189X013006004 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013006004
9. Borman, G., & Boulay, M. (Eds.). (2004). Summer learning: Research, policies, and programs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Borman, G., & Dowling, M. N. (2006). The longitudinal achievement effects of multi-year summer school: Evidence from the teach Baltimore randomized field trial. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 25-48. doi:10.3102/01623737028001025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/01623737028001025
11. Borman, G., Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Chamberlain, A., Madden, N., & Chambers, B. (2007). Final reading outcomes of the national randomized field trial of success for all. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 701-731. doi:10.3102/0002831207306743 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831207306743
12. Boudett, K. P., City, E. A., & Murnane, R. (2007). A step-by-step guide to using assessment results to improve teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
13. Boudett, K. P., & Steele, J. L. (2007). Data wise in action: Stories of schools using data to improve teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
14. Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., Rockoff, J., & Wyckoff, J. (2008). The narrowing gap in New York city teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement in high-poverty schools. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research. doi:10.3386/w14021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w14021
15. Carlson, D., Borman, G. D., & Robinson, M. (2011). A multistate district-level cluster randomized trial of the impact of data-driven reform on reading and mathematics achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 378-398. doi:10.3102/0162373711412765 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0162373711412765
16. Cavanaugh, C. (2009). Getting students more learning time online. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
17. Center on Education Policy. (2011). Districts foresee budget cuts, teacher layoffs and a slowing of education reform efforts. Washington, DC: Author.
18. Chenoweth, K. (2007). It's being done: Academic success in unexpected schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
19. Childress, S. M., Doyle, D. P., & Thomas, D. A. (2009). Leading for equity: The pursuit of excellence in the Montgomery County public schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
20. Clark, R. E. (2010). Retiree health plans for public school teachers after GASB 43 and 45. Education Finance and Policy, 4(5), 438-462. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00009
21. Clark, R. E., & Estes, F. (1999). The development of authentic educational technologies, Educational Technology, 37(2) 5-16.
22. Cooper, H., Charlton, K., Valentine, J. C., & Muhlenbruck, L. (2000). Making the most of summer school: A meta-analytic and narrative review. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65 (1, Serial No. 260).
23. Costrell, R. M., & Podgursky, M. (2009). Peaks, cliffs, and valleys: The peculiar incentives in teacher retirement systems and their consequences for school staffing. Education Finance and Policy, 4(2), 175-211. doi:10.1162/edfp.2009.4.2.175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/edfp.2009.4.2.175
24. Costrell, R. M., & Podgursky, M. (2010). Distribution of benefits in teacher retirement systems and their implications for mobility. Education Finance and Policy, 4(5), 519-557. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00015
25. Crow, T. (Ed.). (2011). Standards for professional learning [Special issue]. Journal of Staff Development, 32(4).
26. Davis, M. R. (2011). Hybrid charters. Digital directions, Spring/Summer 2011, 28-31.
27. DeArmond, M., & Goldhaber, D. (2010). Scrambling the nest egg: How well do teachers understand their pensions, and what do they think about alternative pension structures? Education Finance and Policy, 4(5), 558-586. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00010
28. Dillon, S. (2011, July 6). As budgets are trimmed, time in class is shortened. New York Times, p. A14.
29. Dobbie, W. (2011, July). Teacher characteristics and student achievement: Evidence from teach for America. Retrieved from http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~dobbie/research/TeacherCharacteristics_July2011.pdf.
30. DuFour, R., DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (2008). Revisiting professional learning communities at work: New insights for improving schools. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
31. DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Karhanek, G. (2010). Raising the bar and closing the gap: Whatever it takes. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
32. Earle, R. S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education. Educational Technology Magazine, 42 (1), 5-13. Retrieved August, 2010 from http://bookstoread.com/etp/earle.pdf.
33. Education Trust. (2009). The education trust [website]. Retrieved from http://www.edtrust.org.
34. Education Week. (2011). E-Learning for special populations [Supplement issue for August 24, 2011]. Education Week, 31(1), S1-S20.
35. Educational Leadership. (2007/2008). [Entire issue: Informative assessment]. 65(4).
36. Elmore, R., & Burney, D. (1999). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement. In L.Darling-Hammond & G.Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 263-291). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37. Farr, S. (2010). Teaching as leadership: The highly effective teacher's guide to closing the achievement gap. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
38. Fashola, O. S. (1998). Review of extended-day and after-school programs and their effectiveness. Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk, Johns Hopkins University.
39. Felton, R. (2010). An overview of reading: Reading problems and effective reading programs. Los Angeles, CA: Lawrence O. Picus & Associates.
40. Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. M. (1999). Tennessee's class size study: Findings, implications, misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 97-109. doi:10.3102/01623737021002097 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/01623737021002097
41. Finn, J. D., Gerger, S. B., Achilles, C. M., & Zaharias, J. B. (2001). The enduring effects of small classes. Teachers College Record, 103(2), 145-183. doi:10.1111/0161-4681.00112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00112
42. Friedberg, L., & Turner, S. (2010). Labor market effects of pensions and implications for teachers. Education Finance and Policy, 4(5), 463-491. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00011
43. Fullan, M. (2010). All systems go: The change imperative for whole system reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
44. Fusaro, J. A. (1997). The effect of full day kindergarten on student achievement: A meta-analysis. Child Study Journal, 27(4), 269-277.
45. Goetz, M., & Aportela, A. (2008). Strategic management of human capital: Teach for America. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
46. Goertz, M., & Levin, S. (2008). Strategic management of human capital: New York City. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
47. Goldhaber, D., & Theobold, R. (2011). Managing the teacher workforce in austere times: The implications of teacher layoffs. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for Education Data & Research.
48. Hansen, J. (2010). An introduction to teacher retirement benefits. Education Finance and Policy, 4(5), 402-437. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00012
49. Harris, D. N., & Adams, S. J. (2007). Understanding the level and causes of teacher turnover: A comparison with other professions. Economics of Education Review, 26, 325-337. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.09.007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.09.007
50. Heitin, L. (2011). Reliance grows for alternative certification. Education Week, 30 (5), p. 5.
51. Henry, G., Thompson, C., Bastian, K. C., Fortner, C. K., Kershaw, D. C., Purtell, K. M., & Zulli, R. A. (2010). Portal report: Teacher preparation and student test scores in North Carolina. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Carolina Institute for Public Policy.
52. Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2011). The rise of K-12 blended learning. Watertown, MA: Innosight Institute.
53. Howell, W. G., West, M. R., & Peterson, P. E. (2011). Public and Teachers Increasingly Divided on Key Education Issues. Retrieved from http://educationnext.org/public-and-teachers-increasingly-divided-on-key-education-issues.
54. International Association for K-12 Online Learning (iNACOL). (2010). A national primer on K-12 online learning, version 2. Retrieved from http://www.inacol.org/research/docs/iNCL_NationalPrimerv22010-web.pdf.
55. Kimball, S. (2008). Strategic management of human capital: Chicago. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
56. Konstantopoulos, S., & Chung, V. (2009). What are the long-term effects of small classes on the achievement gap? Evidence from the lasting benefits study. American Journal of Education, 116(1), 125-154. doi:10.1086/605103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/605103
57. Koppich, J. (2008). Strategic management of human capital: Long Beach. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
58. Krueger, A. (2002). Understanding the magnitude and effect of class size on student achievement. In L.Mishel & R.Rothstein (Eds.), The class size debate (pp. 7-35). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
59. Krueger, A., & Whitmore, D. M. (2001). Would smaller classes help close the black-white achievement gap? (Working paper #451). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University. Retrieved from http://www.irs.princeton.edu/pubs/pdfs/451.pdf.
60. Kulik, J. (1994). Meta-analytical studies of findings on computer-based instruction. In E.Baker & H. F.O'Neil Jr., (Eds.), Technology assessment in education and training (pp. 9-34). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
61. Kulik, J. (2003). Effects of using instructional technology in elementary and secondary schools: What controlled evaluation studies say (SRI Project Number P10446.001). Arlington, VA: SRI International.
62. Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teaching sorting and the plight of urban schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(61), 37-62. doi:10.3102/01623737024001037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/01623737024001037
63. Lee, V., & Smith, J. (1997). High school size: Which works best, and for whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(3), 205-228. doi:10.3102/01623737019003205 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/01623737019003205
64. Levenson, N. (2011). Something has got to change: Rethinking special education (Working Paper #2011-01). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
65. Levin, J. D., & Quinn, M. (2003). Missed opportunities: How we keep high-quality teachers out of urban classrooms. New York, NY: The New Teacher Project. Retrieved from http://www.newteacherproject.org/report.html.
66. Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers' work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106(4), 532-575. doi:10.1086/444197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/444197
67. Madden, N. A., Slavin, R., Karweit, N., Dolan, L. J., & Wasik, B. A. (1993). Success for all: Longitudinal effects of a restructuring program for inner-city elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 123-148. doi:10.3102/00028312030001123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312030001123
68. Marks, H.M., & Louis, K.S. (1997). Does teacher empowerment affect the classroom? The implications of teacher empowerment for teachers' instructional practice and student academic performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(3) 245-275. doi:10.3102/01623737019003245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/01623737019003245
69. Mass Insight Education. (2011). Mass insight education [website]. Retrieved from http://www.massinsight.org.
70. McCombs, J. S., Augustine, C. H., Schwartz, H. L., Bodilly, S. J., McInnis, B., Lichter, D. S., & Cross, A. B. (2011). Making summer count: How summer programs can boost children's learning. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.
71. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
72. Milanowski, A. (2008a). Do teacher pay levels matter?Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
73. Milanowski, A. (2008b). How to pay teachers for student performance outcomes. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
74. Milanowski, A. (2011). Strategic measures of teacher performance. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(7), 19-25. doi:10.1177/003172171109200705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200705
75. Milanowski, A., Heneman, H. G., III, & Kimball, S. (2009). Review of teaching performance assessments for use in human capital management. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Retrieved from http://www.smhc-cpre.org/resources/.
76. Milanowski, A., & Odden, A. (2007). A new approach to the cost of teacher turnover (Working Paper #13). Seattle: University of Washington, Evans School of Public Policy, Center on Reinventing Public Education, School Finance Redesign Project.
77. Miles, K. H., & Frank, S. (2008). The strategic school: Making the most of people, time, and money. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
78. Miles, K. H., Odden, A., Fermanich, M., & Archibald, S. (2004). Inside the black box of school district spending on professional development: Lessons from five urban districts. Journal of Education Finance, 30(1), 1-26.
79. Monahan, A. B. (2010). Public pension plan reform: The legal framework. Education Finance and Policy, 4(5), 617-636. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00014
80. Newmann, F., and Associates. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
81. Noell, G. H., & Gansl, K. A. (2009). Teach for America teachers' contribution to student achievement in Louisiana in grades 4-9: 2004-2005 to 2006-2007. Baton Rouge: Louisiana Department of Education, Division of Planning, analysis and Information Resources. Retrieved from http://www.nctq.org/docs/TFA_Louisiana_study.pdf.
82. Nye, B., Hedges, L. V., & Konstantopulos, S. (2001). The long-term effects of small classes in early grades: Lasting benefits in mathematics achievement at grade nine. Journal of Experimental Education, 69(3), 245-258. doi:10.1080/00220970109599487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220970109599487
83. Nye, B., Hedges, L. V., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2002). Do low-achieving students benefit more from small classes? Evidence from the Tennessee class size experiment. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 24(3), 201-217. doi:10.3102/01623737024003201 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/01623737024003201
84. Odden, A. (2008a). How to fund teacher compensation changes. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
85. Odden, A. (2008b). New teacher pay structures: The compensation side of the strategic management of human capital. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
86. Odden, A. (2009). Ten strategies for doubling student performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
87. Odden, A. (2011a). Strategic management of human capital in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
88. Odden, A. (2011b). The dollars and sense of comprehensive professional learning. Journal of Staff Development, 32(4), 26-32.
89. Odden, A., & Archibald, S. (2001). Reallocating resources: How to boost student achievement without spending more. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
90. Odden, A., & Archibald, S. (2009). Doubling student performance… and finding the resources to do it. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
91. Odden, A., Borman, G., & Fermanich, M. (2004). Assessing teacher, classroom, and school effects, including fiscal effects. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 4-32. doi:10.1207/s15327930pje7904_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327930pje7904_2
92. Odden, A., Goetz, M., & Picus, L. O. (2008). Using available evidence to estimate the cost of educational adequacy. Education Finance and Policy, 3(3), 374-397. doi:10.1162/edfp.2008.3.3.374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/edfp.2008.3.3.374
93. Odden, A., Goetz, M., & Picus, L. O. (2010). Merging costs with effective resource strategies. In J.Adams Jr., (Ed.), Smart money: Using educational resources to accomplish ambitious learning goals (pp. 141-156). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
94. Odden, A., & Picus, L. O. (2008). School finance: A policy perspective (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
95. Odden, A., & Picus, L. O. (2010). Career technical education. (Report prepared for the Wyoming Select Committee on Recalibration). Cheyenne, WY: Legislative Services Organization.
96. Odden, A., & Picus, L. O. (2011). Improving teaching and learning when budgets are tight. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(1), 42-48. doi:10.1177/003172171109300107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003172171109300107
97. Odden, A., Picus, L. O., & Goetz, M. (2010). A 50 state strategy to achieve school finance adequacy. Educational Policy, 24(4), 628-654. doi:10.1177/0895904809335107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0895904809335107
98. Ohio Legislative Committee on Education Oversight. (2005). The Operating Costs of Ohio's eCommunity Schools. Columbus, OH: Legislative Office of Education Oversight.
99. O'Toole, J. & Lawler, E. E., III. (2006). The new American workplace. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
100. Partin, E. (2010). Did you know? Fiscal impact of raising student-teacher ratios in Ohio. Dayton, OH: Fordham Institute. Retrieved July 2011 from http://www.educationgadfly.net/flypaper/2010/07/did-you-know-fiscal-impact-of-raising-student-teacher-ratios-in-ohio/.
101. Patall, E., Cooper, H., & Allen, A. B. (2011). Extending the school day or year: A systematic review of research (1985-2009). Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 401-436. doi:10.3102/0034654310377086 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654310377086
102. Pew Research Center. (2010). Millennials: A portrait of generation Next: Confident. Connected. Open to change. Retrieved from http://pewsocialtrends.org/assets/pdf/millennials-confident-connected-open-to-change.pdf.
103. Phelps, L. A. (2006). Career and technical education in Wisconsin's new economy: Challenges and investment imperatives. (Paper prepared for the Wisconsin School Finance Adequacy Task Force). Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
104. Pianta, R., Allen, J., & King, H. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333(6045), 1034-1037. doi:10.1126/science.1207998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1207998
105. Picus, L. O., Odden, A., Aportela, A., Mangan, M. T., & Goetz, M. (2008). Implementing school finance adequacy: School level resource use in Wyoming following adequacy-oriented finance reform. (Report prepared for the Wyoming Legislative Service Office). North Hollywood, CA: Lawrence O. Picus and Associates. Retrieved from http://legisweb.state.wy.us/2008/interim/schoolfinance/Resources.pdf.
106. Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
107. Price, S., Odden, A., & Picus, L. O. (2010). Recalibration of instructional materials and technology costs. (Report prepared for the Wyoming Select Committee on Recalibration). Cheyenne, WY: Legislative Services Organization.
108. Raudenbusch, S. (2009). The Brown legacy and the O'Connor challenge: Transforming schools in the images of children's potential. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 169-180. doi:10.3102/0013189X09334840 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09334840
109. Roblyer, M. D. (2005). Educational Technology Research That Makes a Difference: Series Introduction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 5 (2). Retrieved from http://www.cite-journal.org/vol5/iss2/seminal/article1.cfm.
110. Roza, M. (2010). Educational economics: Where do school funds go?Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
111. Schrum, L. M., & Levine, B. B. (2009). Leading 21st century schools: Harnessing technology for engagement and achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
112. Slavin, R. (1996). Neverstreaming: Preventing learning disabilities. Educational Leadership, 53(5), 4-7.
113. Slavin, R. E., Madden, N., Calderon, M., Chamberlain, A., & Hennessy, M. (2011). Reading and language outcomes of a multi-year randomized evaluation of transitional bilingual education. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 33(3), 47-58. doi:10.3102/0162373711398127 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0162373711398127
114. Spillane, J. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
115. Staker, H. (2011). The rise of K-12 blended learning: Profiles of emerging models. Retrieved in July 2011 from http://www.innosightinstitute.org/innosight/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/The-Rise-of-K-12-Blended-Learning.pdf.
116. Stringfield, S., Ross, S. M., & Smith, L., (1996). Bold plans for school restructuring: The New American Schools designs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
117. Teach For America. (2010). Retention report. New York, NY: Teach For America.
118. Tennessee Higher Education Commission. (2010). 2010 report card on the effectiveness of teacher training programs. Nashville, TN: Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
119. Texas Center for Education Research. (2000). The cost of teacher turnover. (Paper prepared for the Texas State Board for Educator Certification). Austin, TX: Author.
120. Thayer, J. (2004). Professional development: Costs and effectiveness in one rural district. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin-Madison.
121. Torgeson, J. K. (2004). Avoiding the devastating downward spiral. American Educator, s28 (3), 6-19, 45-47.
122. U.S. Department of Education. (2010a). Educational technology in public school districts: Fall 2008. Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010003.pdf.
123. U.S. Department of Education. (2010b). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/NETP-2010-final-report.pdf.
124. Watson, J., Murin, A., Vashaw, L., Gemin, B., & Rapp, C. (2010). Keeping pace with K-12 online learning: An annual review of policy and practice. Durango, CO: Evergreen Education Group. Retrieved from http://www.kpk12.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/KeepingPaceK12_2010.pdf.
125. Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., & Keeling, D. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. New York, NY: The New Teacher Project. Retrieved from http://widgeteffect.org/downloads/TheWidgetEffect.pdf.
126. Wise, B., & Rothman, R. (2010). The online learning imperative: A solution to three looming crises in education [Issue brief]. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
127. Xu, Z., Hannaway, J., & Taylor, C. (2008). Making a difference? The effects of Teach For America in high school. Washington DC: The Urban Institute and CALDER. Retrieved on March 13, 2008 from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411642_Teach_America.pdf.