Using RTI for school improvement: Raising every student's achievement scores

Using RTI for School Improvement: Raising Every Student's Achievement Scores

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-220

  Shores, Cara F ^a   Chester, Kimberly B ^a  

^a Wesley Educational Services   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949772786     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452219301     Document Type: Book

References (252)

1. Barnett, D. W., Elliott, N., Wolsing, L., Bunger, C. E., Haski, H., McKissick, C., et al. (2006). Response to intervention for young children with extremely challenging behaviors: What it might look like. School Psychology Review, 35 (4), 568-582.
2. Batsche, G., Elliott, J., Graden, J. L., Grimes, J., Kovaleski, J. F., Prasse, D., et al. (2006). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation (4th ed.). Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
3. Bender, W. N., & Shores, C. F. (2007). Response to Intervention: A practical guide for every teacher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
4. Bergan, J. R. (1977). Behavioral consultation. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
5. Biancarosa, C., & Snow, C. E. (2006). Reading Next-A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
6. Chafouleas, S. M., McDougal, J. L., Riley-Tillman, T. C., Panahon, C. J., & Hilt, A. M. (2005). What do Daily Behavior Report Cards (DBRCs) measure? An initial comparison of DBRCs with direct observation for off-task behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 669-676. doi:10.1002/pits.20102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.20102
7. Corey, G. (1990). Theory and practice of group counseling. Boston: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
8. Council for Exceptional Children. (2002). Addressing over-representation of African American students in special education: The prereferral intervention process-An administrator's guide. Washington, DC: National Alliance of Black School Educators.
9. Crimmins, D., Farrell, A. F., Smith, P. W., & Bailey, A. (2007). Positive strategies for students with behavior problems. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
10. Cummins, J. (1980). The entry and exit fallacy in bilingual education. NABE Journal, 4 (3), 25-29.
11. Davis, G. N., Lindo, E. J., & Compton, D. L. (2007). Children at risk for reading failure: Constructing an early screening measure. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 39 (5), 32-37.
12. Deno, S., & Mirkin, P. (1977). Data-based program modification. Minneapolis, MN: Leadership Training Institute for Special Education.
13. Deshler, D. (2004, January). We've been waiting for this moment … Are we ready? Retrieved August 29, 2007, from http://www.kucrl.org
14. Fairbanks, S., Sugai, G., Guardino, D., & Lathrop, M. (2007). Response to intervention: Examining classroom behavior support in second grade. Exceptional Children, 73 (3), 288-310.
15. Freeman, D., & Freeman, Y. (2004). Three types of English language learners. School Talk: Newsletter of the National Council of Teachers of English, 9 (4), 1-3.
16. Fuchs, D., & Deshler, D. (2007). What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn't be afraid to ask). Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22 (2), 129-136. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00237.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00237.x
17. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41 (1), 93-98. doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4
18. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2004). Identifying reading disabilities by responsiveness-to-instruction: Specifying measures and criteria. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 216-227. doi:10.2307/1593674 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1593674
19. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18 (3), 157-171. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00072
20. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 39 (5), 14-20.
21. Graner, P. S., Fagella-Luby, M. N., & Fritschmann, N. S. (2005). An overview of responsiveness to intervention. Topics in Language Disorders, 25 (2), 93-105. doi:10.1097/00011363-200504000-00003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200504000-00003
22. Gray, C. (2000). The new social story book. Arlington, TX: Future Horizons.
23. Hilton, A. (2007). Response to intervention: Changing how we do business. Leadership, 36 (4), 16-19.
24. Hollenbeck, A. F. (2007). From IDEA to implementation: A discussion of foundational and future responsiveness-to-intervention research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22 (2), 137-146. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00238.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00238.x
25. Hughes, C., & Deshler, D. (2007, April). RTI in middle and high school: How will the game play out? Retrieved Presentation at the Council for Exceptional Children's National Conference, Louisville, K Y.
26. Joseph, G. E., & Strain, P. S. (2003). Comprehensive evidence-based social-emotional curricula for young children: An analysis. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23, 65-76. doi:10.1177/02711214030230020201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02711214030230020201
27. Klingner, J. K., & Artiles, A. J. (2003). When should bilingual students be in special education? Educational Leadership, 61 (2), 66-71.
28. Marler, B., & Sanchez-Lopez, C. (2006, April). Distinguishing learning disabilities from academic difficulties for English language learners. Retrieved Presentation at the 2006 Council for Exceptional Children's Conference, Salt Lake City, UT.
29. Marston, D., Muyskens, P., Lau, M., & Canter, A. (2003). Problem-solving model for decision making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18 (3), 187-200. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00074
30. Maslow, A., & Lowery, R. (1998). Toward a psychology of being (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
31. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. W. (2005). Feasibility and consequences of Response to Intervention: Examination of the issues and scientific evidence as a model for the identification of individuals with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38 (6), 525-531. doi:10.1177/00222194050380060801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380060801
32. National High School Center. (2007). Easing the transition to high school: Research and best practices designed to support high school learning. Retrieved December 12, 2007, from http://www.betterhighschools.org
33. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Retrieved August 21, 2007, from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications
34. National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. (2002). Common ground report. Reston, VA: Author.
35. Ordonez, C. L., Carlo, M. S., Snow, C. E., & McLaughlin, B. (2002). Depth and breadth of vocabulary in two languages: Which vocabulary skills transfer? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (4), 719-728. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.719
36. Payne, R. K. (2005). A framework for understanding poverty. Highlands, TX: aha! Process, Inc.
37. Pennington, H. (2006, October). Expanding learning time in high schools. Retrieved December 10, 2007, from http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2006/10/pdf/extended_learning_report.pdf
38. President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Retrieved July 26, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/inits/commissionsboards/whspecialeducation/index.html
39. Sanders, T. (2007). Helping children thrive at school: The effectiveness of nurture groups. Educational Psychology and Practice, 23 (1), 45-61. doi:10.1080/02667360601154600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02667360601154600
40. Sandomierski, T., Kincaid, D., & Algozzine, B. (2007). Response to intervention and positive behavior support: Brothers from different mothers or sisters with different misters? Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Newsletter, 4 (2), 1-5.
41. Sousa, D. (2001). How the brain learns (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
42. Speece, D. L., & Case, L. P. (2001). Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (4), 735-749. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.735
43. Speece, D. L., Case, L. P., & Molloy, D. E. (2003). Responsiveness to general education instruction as the first gate to learning disabilities identification. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18 (3), 147-156. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00071
44. Sprick, R., Garrison, M., & Howard, L. M. (1998). CHAMPs: A proactive and positive approach to classroom management. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
45. Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., & Gresham, F. M. (2002). Behaviorally effective school environments. In M.Shinn, H.Walker, & G.Stone (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 315-350). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
46. Tilley, W. D. (2003, December). How many tiers are needed for successful prevention and early intervention? Heartland Area Education Agency's evolution from four to three tiers. Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities' Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium, Kansas City, MO.
47. U.S. Department of Education. (2001). No Child Left Behind Executive Summary. Retrieved August 21, 2007, from http://www.nationalreadingpanel.org/publications/nochildleftbehind.htm
48. U.S. Department of Education. (2006, August 14). Assistance to states for the education of children with disabilities and preschool grants for children with disabilities; Final rule. Federal Register, 71 (156), 46786-46787.
49. University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning. (2007). Content Literacy Continuum. Retrieved December 11, 2007, from http://clc.kucrl.org
50. Utay, J. M., & Lampe, R. E. (1995). Use of a group counseling game to enhance social skills of children with LD. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 20 (2), 114-120. doi:10.1080/01933929508411334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01933929508411334
51. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69 (4), 392-409.
52. Vaughn, S., Mathes, P. G., Linan-Thompson, S., & Francis, D. (2005). Teaching English language learners at risk for reading disabilities to read: Putting research into practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20 (1), 58-67. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00121.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00121.x
53. Vaughn Gross Center for Reading and Language Arts. (2006). Preventing reading difficulties: A three-tiered intervention model. Retrieved August 21, 2007, from http://www.texasreading.org
54. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.601
55. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Small, S., & Fanuele, D. P. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39 (2), 157-169. doi:10.1177/00222194060390020401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390020401
56. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80 (2), 139-148.
57. DuFour, R. (2004, May). What is a "professional learning community"? Educational Leadership, 61 (8), 6-11.
58. DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Karhanek, G. (2004). Whatever it takes: How professional learning communities respond when kids don't learn. Bloomington: Solution Tree.
59. Espin, C. A., Busch, T., Shin, J., & Kruschwitz, R. (2001). Curriculum-based measures in the content areas: Validity of vocabulary-matching measures as indicators of performance in social studies. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 142-151. doi:10.1111/0938-8982.00015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0938-8982.00015
60. Espin, C. A., & Foegen, A. (1996). Validity of three general outcome measures for predicting secondary students' performance on content-area tasks. Exceptional Children, 62, 497-514.
61. Espin, C. A., Skare, S., Shin, J., Deno, S. L., Robinson, S., & Brenner, B. (2000). Identifying indicators of growth in written expression for middle-school students. Journal of Special Education, 34, 140-153. doi:10.1177/002246690003400303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002246690003400303
62. Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449-460.
63. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27-48.
64. Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
65. McMillan, J. H. (2000). Fundamental assessment principles for teachers and school administrators. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7 (8). Retrieved August 2007, from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=8
66. National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Inc. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: NASDSE.
67. National Center on Student Progress Monitoring. (2006). Retrieved March 9, 2006, from http://www.studentprogress.org
68. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
69. Northey, S. S. (2005). Handbook on Differentiated Instruction for Middle and High Schools. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, Inc.
70. Schmoker, M. (1999). Results: The key to continuous school improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
71. Stecker, P. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Using curriculum-based measurement for assessing reading progress and for making instruction decisions. Effective Reading Instruction for Individuals with Learning Disabilities Online Academy: Teaching Reading to Individuals with Learning Disabilities. Downloaded May 15, 2007, from http://www.onlineacademy.org/modules
72. Videen, J., Deno, S. L., & Marston, D. (1982). Correct word sequences: A valid indicator of writing proficiency in written expression (Research Report No. 84). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute of Research on Learning Disabilities.
73. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
74. The Access Center. (2004, October). Concrete-representational-abstract instructional approach. Retrieved August 2007 from http://www.k8accesscenter.org/training_resources/CRA_instructional_approach.asp
75. Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2006). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
76. Armbruster, B. B., & Anderson, T. H. (1987). Improving content-area reading using instructional graphics. Reading Research Quarterly, 26 (4), 393-416. doi:10.2307/747895 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747895
77. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.
78. Beecher, J. (1988). Note-taking: What do we know about the benefits: ERIC DIGEST #37. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading, English, and Communications. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EDO CS 88 12).
79. Bretzing, B. H., & Kulhary, R. W. (1979, April). Notetaking and depth of processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4 (2), 145-153. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(79)90069-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X%2879%2990069-9
80. Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10, 14-24.
81. The Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement. (2001, September). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read. Retrieved July 2007 from http://www.nifl.gov/partnershipforreading/publications/reading_first1.html
82. Comprehensive School Reform Program Office. (2002, August). Scientifically based research and the comprehensive school reform program. Retrieved September 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/programs/compreform/guidance/appendc.pdf
83. Cotton, K. (1991, May). Computer assisted instruction. Retrieved September 2007 from http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/5/cu10.html
84. Davey, B. (1983). Think alouds: Modeling the cognitive processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Reading, 27 (1), 44-47.
85. Eaker, R., DuFour, R., & DuFour, R. (2002). Getting started: reculturing schools to become professional learning communities. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.
86. Fleer, M. (1992). Identifying teacher-child interaction which scaffolds scientific thinking in young children. Science Education, 76, 373-397. doi:10.1002/sce.3730760404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760404
87. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Responsiveness to intervention: A blueprint for practitioners, policymakers, and parents. Exceptional Children, 38 (1), 57-61.
88. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 39 (5), 14-20.
89. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C. L., Owen, R., et al. (2003). Enhancing third-grade students' mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95 (2), 306-315. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.306
90. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Hamlett, C. L., Finelli, R., & Courey, S. J. (2004). Enhancing mathematical problem solving among third-grade students with schema-based instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96 (4), 635-647. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.635
91. Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1994). Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science, 5 (3), 152-158. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00652.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00652.x
92. Harrison, M., & Harrison, B. (1986). Developing numeration concepts and skills. Arithmetic Teacher, 33, 1-21.
93. Heacox, D. (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: How to reach and teach all learners, grades 3-12. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.
94. Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1987). Providing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction. Reviewing Educational Research, 56, 473-493.
95. Jacobs, G. (2001). Providing the scaffold: A model for early childhood/primary teacher preparation. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29 (2), 125-130. doi:10.1023/A:1012581113983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1012581113983
96. Jitendra, A. (2002). Teaching students math problem-solving through graphic representation. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34 (4), 34-38.
97. Jitendra, A. K., Griffin, C., Haria, P., Leh, J., Adams, A., & Kaduvetoor, A. (2007). A comparison of single and multiple strategy instruction on third grade students' mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 115-127. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.115
98. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
99. Jones, B., Pierce, J., & Hunter, B. (1989). Teaching children to construct graphic representations. Educational Leadership, 46, 20-25.
100. Kounin, J. S. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Windston.
101. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
102. Marzano, R., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: McREL.
103. Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
104. Marzano, R. J., Marzano, J. S., & Pickering, D. J. (2003). Classroom management that works: Research based strategies for every teacher. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
105. Miller, S. P. (1998, September). Validated practices for teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities: A review of literature. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31(1), 1-24.
106. Montague, M. & Jitendra, A. K. (2006). Teaching Mathematics to Middle School Students with Learning Difficulties. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
107. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
108. No Child Left Behind Act. (2001). Section 9101[37]. Retrieved March 12, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html
109. Nye, P., Crooks, T. J., Powlie, M., & Tripp, G. (1984). Student note-taking related to university examination performances. Higher Education, 13 (1), 85-97. doi:10.1007/BF00136532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00136532
110. Oczkus, L. D. (2005). Reciprocal teaching strategies at work: Improving reading comprehension, grades 2-6: Videotape viewing guide and lesson materials. Retrieved September 2007 from http://www.reading.org/publications/bbv/videos/v500/
111. OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions. (2007). School wide positive behavioral supports. Retrieved July 2007, from http://www.pbis.org/schoolwide.htm
112. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1 (2), 117-175. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
113. Promising Practices Network. (2005). Programs that work: Reciprocal teaching. Retrieved September 10, 2007 from http://www.promisingpractices.net/program.asp?programid=144
114. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64 (4), 479-530.
115. Saenz, L. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies for English language learners with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71 (3), 231-247.
116. Smith, P. L., & Wedman, J. F. (1988). Read-think-aloud protocols: A new data source for formative evaluation. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 1 (2), 13-22. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.1988.tb00011.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-8327.1988.tb00011.x
117. Sprick, R. S., Garrison, M., & Howard, L. (1998). CHAMPs: A proactive and positive approach to classroom management. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
118. Stennett, R. G. (1985). Computer assisted instruction: A review of the reviews. London: The Board of Education for the City of London. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 260 687.)
119. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
120. Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
121. University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning. (2008). Strategic Instruction Model. Retrieved April 7, 2008, from http://www.kucrl.org/sim/index.shtml
122. U.S. Department of Education. (2006, August 14). Assistance to states for the education of children with disabilities and preschool grants for children with disabilities; Final rule. Federal Register, 71 (156), 46786-46787.
123. U.S. Surgeon General. (2000). Executive summary youth violence: A report of the surgeon general. Washington, DC: Public Health Service. Retrieved March 1, 2008 from http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/youthviolence/summary.htm
124. Vaughn, S., & Roberts, G. (2007). Secondary interventions in reading: Providing additional instruction for students at risk. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 39 (5), 40-46.
125. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
126. Weaver, R. (1967). A rhetoric and handbook. New York: Halt, Rinehart, and Winston.
127. Wolfgang, C. H. (2004). Solving discipline and classroom management problems: Methods and models for today's teachers (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John S. Wiley and Sons, Inc.
128. Wright, S. P., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teacher & classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57-67. doi:10.1023/A:1007999204543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007999204543
129. Bender, W. N. (2005). Differentiating math instruction: Strategies that work for K-8 classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
130. Bender, W. N., & Shores, C. F. (2007). Response to intervention: A practical guide for every teacher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
131. DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Karhanek, G. (2004). Whatever it takes: How professional learning communities respond when kids don't learn. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
132. Freeman, R., Eber, L., Anderson, C., Irvin, L., Horner, R., Bounds, M., et al. (2006). Building inclusive school cultures using school-wide PBS: Designing effective individual support systems for students with significant disabilities. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31 (1), 4-17. doi:10.2511/rpsd.31.1.4 http://dx.doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.31.1.4
133. Friend, M. (2005). The power of 2: Making a difference through co-teaching (2nd ed.). Bloomington, IN: Forum on Education.
134. Fuchs, D., & Deshler, D. (2007). What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn't be afraid to ask). Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22 (2), 129-136. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00237.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00237.x
135. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 39 (5), 14-20.
136. Harn, B. A., Kame'enui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (2007). The nature and role of the third tier in a prevention model for kindergarten students. In D.Haager, J.Klingner, & S.Vaughn (Eds.), Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention (1st ed., pp. 161-184). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
137. Heacox, D. (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: How to reach and teach all learners, grades 3-12. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.
138. Hilton, A. (2007). Response to intervention: Changing how we do business. Leadership, 36 (4), 16-19.
139. Hollenbeck, A. F. (2007). From IDEA to implementation: A discussion of foundational and future responsiveness-to-intervention research. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22 (2), 137-146. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00238.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00238.x
140. Huberman, A. M., & Miles, A. B. (1984). Innovation up close: How school improvement works. New York: Plenum.
141. Kamps, D. M., & Greenwood, C. R. (2005). Formulating secondary-level reading interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38 (6), 500-509. doi:10.1177/00222194050380060501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380060501
142. Marston, D., Muyskens, P., Lau, M., & Canter, A. (2003). Problem-solving model for decision making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18 (3), 187-200. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00074
143. Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
144. McTighe, J., & Thomas, R. S. (2003, February). Backward design for forward teaching. Educational Leadership, 60 (5), 52-55.
145. Northey, S. (2005). Handbook on differentiated instruction for middle and high schools. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
146. OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. (2007). Overview of district-wide and state-wide Positive Behavior Support (PBS). Retrieved September 2, 2007, from http://www.pbis.org/statewide.htm
147. Sindelar, P. T., Shearer, D. K., Yendol-Hoppey, D., & Liebert, T. W. (2006). The sustainability of inclusive school reform. Exceptional Children, 72 (3), 317-331.
148. Sprick, R. S. (2006). Discipline in the secondary classroom: A positive approach to behavior management (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
149. Sprick, R. S., Garrison, M., & Howard, L. M. (1998). CHAMPS: A proactive and positive approach to classroom management. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
150. Tilley, W. D. (2003, December). How many tiers are needed for successful prevention and early intervention? Heartland area education agency's evolution from four to three tiers. Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities' Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium, Kansas City, MO.
151. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
152. Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
153. Tomlinson, C. A., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction and understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
154. U.S. Department of Education. (2001). No Child Left Behind Executive Summary. Retrieved August 21, 2007, from http://www.nationalreadingpanel.org/publications/nochildleftbehind.htm
155. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential pitfalls. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18 (3), 137-146. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00070
156. Vaughn, S., & Roberts, G. (2007). Secondary interventions in reading: Providing additional instruction for students at risk. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 39 (5), 40-46.
157. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
158. Barnett, D. W, Elliott, N., Wolsing, L., Bunger, C. E., Haski, H., McKissick, C, et al. (2006). Response to intervention for young children with extremely challenging behaviors: What it might look like. School Psychology Review, 35 (4), 568-582.
159. Bender, W. N., & Shores, C. (2007). Response to intervention: A practical guide for every teacher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
160. Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37 (3), 184-192. doi:10.1177/00224669030370030801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00224669030370030801
161. Fairbanks, S., Sugai, G., Guardino, D., & Lathrop, M. (2007). Response to intervention: Examining classroom behavior support in second grade. Exceptional Children, 73 (3), 288-310.
162. Fuchs, D., & Deshler, D. (2007). What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn't be afraid to ask). Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22 (2), 129-136. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00237.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00237.x
163. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A blueprint for practitioners, policymakers, and parents. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 38 (1), 57-61.
164. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18 (3), 157-171. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00072
165. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 39 (5), 14-20.
166. Hollenbeck, A. F. (2007). From IDEA to implementation: A discussion of foundational and future responsiveness-to-intervention research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22 (2), 137-146. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00238.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00238.x
167. Kovaleski, J. F. (2007). Response to Intervention: Considerations for research and system change. School Psychology Review, 36 (4), 638-646.
168. Marston, D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in responsiveness to intervention: Prevention outcomes and learning disabilities identification patterns. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38 (6), 539-544. doi:10.1177/00222194050380061001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380061001
169. Speece, D. L., Case, L. P., & Molloy, D. E. (2003). Responsiveness to general education instruction as the first gate to learning disabilities identification. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18 (3), 147-156. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00071
170. Tilley, W. D. (2003, December). How many tiers are needed for successful prevention and early intervention? Heartland Area Education Agency's evolution from four to three tiers. Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities' Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium, Kansas City, MO.
171. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69 (4), 391-408.
172. Vaughn, S., & Roberts, G. (2007). Secondary interventions in reading: Providing additional instruction for students at risk. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 39 (5), 40-46.
173. Bender, W. N., & Shores, C. (2007). Response to intervention: A practical guide for every teacher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
174. Coyne, M. D., Kame'enui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (2004). Improving beginning reading instruction and intervention for students with LD: Reconciling "all" with "each." Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37 (3), 231-239. doi:10.1177/00222194040370030801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370030801
175. Deno, S. L., Fuchs, L. S., Marston, D. B., & Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to develop growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507-524.
176. Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Simos, P. G., Papanicolaou, A. C., & Anthony, J. L. (2007). An implementation of a tiered intervention model: Reading outcomes and neural correlates. In D.Haager, J.Klingner, & S.Vaughn (Eds.), Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention (1st ed., pp. 107-137). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
177. Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., Alfonso, V. C., & Dynda, A. M. (2006). Integration of response to intervention and norm-referenced tests in learning disability identification: Learning from the Tower of Babel. Psychology in the Schools, 43 (7), 807-825. doi:10.1002/pits.20190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.20190
178. Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Lieberman, I. Y., Stuebing, K. K., et al. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37-55.
179. Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., & Deno, S. (1985). The importance of goal ambitiousness and goal mastery to student achievement. Exceptional Children, 52 (3), 63-71.
180. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 39 (5), 14-20.
181. Good, R. H., III, Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Study of Reading, 5, 257-288. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_4
182. Harn, B. A., Kame'enui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (2007). The nature and role of the third tier in a prevention model for kindergarten students. In D.Haager, J.Klingner, & S.Vaughn (Eds.), Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention (1st ed., pp. 161-184). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
183. Hollenbeck, A. F. (2007). From IDEA to implementation: A discussion of foundational and future responsiveness-to-intervention research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22 (2), 137-146. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00238.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00238.x
184. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004. (2004). Federal Register, 71, pp. 46539-46845. Retrieved August 30, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/idea2004.html
185. Kavale, K. A., Holdnack, J. A., & Mostert, M. P. (2005). Responsiveness-to-intervention and the identification of specific learning disability: A critique and alternative proposal. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 77-88.
186. Kovaleski, J. F. (2007). Response to Intervention: Considerations for research and system change. School Psychology Review, 36 (4), 638-646.
187. Marston, D., Muyskens, P., Lau, M., & Canter, A. (2003). Problem solving model for decision making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18 (3), 187-200. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00074
188. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2005). Feasibility and consequences of response to intervention: Examination of the issues and scientific evidence as a model for the identification of individuals with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38 (6), 525-531. doi:10.1177/00222194050380060801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380060801
189. Reschly, D. J., Hosp, J. L., & Schmied, C. M. (2003, August). And miles to go …: State SLD requirements and authoritative recommendations. Retrieved July 20, 2006, from http://www.nrcld.org
190. Safer, N., Donaldson, W., & Oxaal, I. (2005, March). Using progress monitoring to develop strong IEPs. Retrieved September 15, 2007, from http://www.studentprogress.org
191. Scruggs, T. W., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2002). On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25 (2), 155-168. doi:10.2307/1511299 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1511299
192. Speece, D. L., Case, L. P., & Molloy, D. E. (2003). Responsiveness to general education instruction as the first gate to learning disabilities identification. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18 (3), 147-156. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00071
193. Stecker, P. M. (2006). Monitoring student progress in individualized educational programs using curriculum-based measurement. Retrieved September 15, 2007, from http://www.studentprogress.org
194. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33-38. doi:10.1177/002221940103400104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002221940103400104
195. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Lindamood, P., Rose, E., Conway, T., et al. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91 (4), 579-593. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.579
196. U.S. Department of Education. (2001). Improving literacy by putting reading first: No Child Left Behind executive summary. Retrieved August 21, 2007, from http://www.nationalreadingpanel.org/publications/nochildleftbehind.htm
197. U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Twenty-fifth Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Retrieved December 7, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/osep/research.html
198. U.S. Department of Education. (2006). IDEA Regulations. 71 Federal Register 46540 et seq.
199. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential pitfalls. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18 (3), 137-146. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00070
200. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Small, S., & Fanuele, D. P. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39 (2), 157-169. doi:10.1177/00222194060390020401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390020401
201. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. R., et al. (1997). Changing causal relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to fluent readers: A five-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468-479. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.3.468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.3.468
202. Willis, J. O., & DuMont, R. (2006). And never the twain shall meet: Can response to intervention and cognitive assessment be reconciled? Psychology in the Schools, 43 (8), 901-908. doi:10.1002/pits.20197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.20197
203. Wodrich, D. L., Spencer, M. L., & Daley, K. B. (2006). Combining RTI and psycho-educational assessment: What we must assume to do otherwise. Psychology in the Schools, 43 (7), 797-806. doi:10.1002/pits.20189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.20189
204. Zirkel, P. A. (2007). What does the law say? TEACHING Exceptional Children, 39 (5), 65-66.
205. Zirkel, P. A., & Krohn, N. (2008). RTI after IDEA: A survey of state laws. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 40 (3), 71-73.
206. Adelman, H. S., & Taylor, L. (1997). Toward a scale-up model for replicating new approaches to schooling. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 8, 197-230. doi:10.1207/s1532768xjepc0802_6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532768xjepc0802_6
207. Berkas, N, & Pattison, C. (2007, July/August). What is intervention and why is everyone talking about it?. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from http://www.nctm.org
208. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80 (2), 139-148.
209. Burdette, P. (2007, April). Response to Intervention as it relates to Early Intervening Services: Recommendations. Retrieved March 5, 2008, from http://www.projectforum.org
210. Danielson, L., Doolittle, J., & Bradley, R. (2007). Professional development, capacity building, and research needs: Critical issues for response to intervention implementation. School Psychology Review, 36 (4), 632-637.
211. Deshler, D. (2007, April). The scaling of innovations: Factors to consider beyond professional development. Presentation at the National Council for Exceptional Children's Conference, Louisville, KY.
212. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93-99. doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4
213. Gersten, R., Chard, D., & Baker, S. (2000). Factors enhancing sustained use of research-based instructional practices. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 445-457. doi:10.1177/002221940003300505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300505
214. Glover, T A., & DiPerna, J. C. (2007). Service delivery for response to intervention: Core components and directions for future research. School Psychology Review, 36 (4), 526-540.
215. Gorton, R., Alston, J. A., & Snowden, P. (2007). School leadership & administration: Important concepts, case studies, & simulations (7th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
216. Huberman, A. M., & Miles, A. B. (1984). Innovation up close: How school improvement works. New York: Plenum.
217. Hollenbeck, A. F. (2007). From IDEA to implementation: A discussion of foundational and future responsiveness-to-intervention research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22 (2), 137-146. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00238.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00238.x
218. Klingner, J. K., Arguelles, M. E., Hughes, M. T, & Vaughn, S. (2001). Examining the school wide "spread" of research-based practices. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 221-234. doi:10.2307/1511112 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1511112
219. Kovaleski, J. F. (2007). Response to Intervention: Considerations for research and system change. School Psychology Review, 36 (4), 638-646.
220. Marston, D., Reschly, A. L., Lau, M. Y., Muyskens, P., & Canter, A. (2007). Historical perspectives and current trends in problem solving. In D.Haager, J.Klingner, & S.Vaughn (Eds.), Evidence-based reading practices in Response to Intervention (1st ed., pp. 265-285). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
221. Mellard, D. F., Byrd, S. E., Johnson, E., Tollefson, J. M., & Boesche, L. (2004). Foundations and research on identifying model responsiveness-to-intervention sites. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 27, 243-256. doi:10.2307/1593676 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1593676
222. National Association of School Psychologists. (2006). The role of the school psychologist in the RTI process. Retrieved March 7, 2008, from http://www.nasponline.org
223. National Joint Committee on LD. (2005). Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 28, 249-260. doi:10.2307/4126964 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4126964
224. National Staff Development Council. (2001). NSDC's Standards for Staff Development. Retrieved March 5, 2008, from http://www.nsdc.org
225. Nelson, J. M., & Machek, G. R. (2007). A survey of training, practice, and competence in reading assessment and intervention. School Psychology Review, 36 (2), 311-327.
226. Praisner, C. L. (2003). Attitudes of elementary school principals toward the inclusion of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69 (2), 135-145.
227. Sindelar, P. T., Shearer, D. K., Yendol-Hoppey, D., & Liebert, T. W. (2006). The sustainability of inclusive school reform. Exceptional Children, 72 (3), 317-331.
228. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential pitfalls. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18 (3), 137-146. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00070
229. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
230. Wodrich, D. L., Spencer, M. L., & Daley, K. B. (2006). Combining RTI and psycho-educational assessment: What we must assume to do otherwise. Psychology in the Schools, 43 (7), 797-806. doi:10.1002/pits.20189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.20189
231. Benjamin, A. (2002). Differentiated instruction: A guide for middle and high school teachers. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
232. Gregory, G. H., & Kuzmich, L. (2004). Data driven differentiation in the standards-based classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
233. Heacox, D. (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: How to reach and teach all learners, grades 3-12. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.
234. Northey, S. (2005). Handbook on differentiated instruction for middle and high schools. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
235. Thousand, J. S., Villa, R. A., & Nevin, A. I. (2007). Differentiating instruction: Collaborative planning and teaching for universally designed learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
236. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
237. Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
238. Tomlinson, C. A., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction and understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
239. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
240. Crimmins, D., Farrell, A. F., Smith, P. W., & Bailey, A. (2007). Positive strategies for students with behavior problems. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
241. Jenson, W, Rhode, G., & Reavis, H. K. (1994). Tough Kid Tool Box. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
242. Marzano, R. J. (2003). Classroom management that works: Research-based strategies for every teacher. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
243. Sprick, R. S. (2006). Discipline in the secondary classroom: A positive approach to behavior management (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
244. Sprick, R. S., Garrison, M., & Howard, L. M. (1998). CHAMPs: A proactive and positive approach to classroom management. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
245. Marzano, R., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: McREL.
246. Montague, M., & Jitendra, A. K. (2006). Teaching mathematics to middle school students with learning difficulties. New York: The Guilford Press.
247. Muschla, J. A., & Muschla, G. R. (2006). Hands-on math projects with real-life applications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
248. Oczkus, L. D. (2003). Reciprocal teaching at work: Strategies for improving reading comprehension. Orinda, CA: International Reading Association.
249. Posamentier, A. S., & Jaye, D. (2006). What successful math teachers do, grades 6-12: 79 research-based strategies for the standards-based classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
250. Rathvon, N. (1999). Effective school interventions: Strategies for enhancing academic and social competence. New York: Guilford Press.
251. Rogers, S., & Graham, S. (2006). The high performance toolbox: Succeeding with performance tasks, projects, and assessments. Evergreen, CO: Peak Learning Systems, Inc.
252. Hosp, M. K., Hosp, J. L., Howell, K. W (2007). The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford Press.