Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 249-260

  Gartland, Debi ^a   Strosnider, Roberta ^a,b  

^a TOWSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NJCLD

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28044434870     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/4126964     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Conway, S. J., & Kovaleski, J. F. (1998). A model for statewide special education reform: Pennsylvania's Instructional Support Teams. International Journal of Educational Reform, 7, 345-351.
2. Deno, S.; Grimes, J., Reschly, D., & Schräg, J. (2001). PSM review team report. Minneapolis, MN: Minneapolis Public Schools.
3. Foorman, B. R., & Torgesen, J. (2001). Critical elements of classroom and small group instruction promote reading success in all children. Learning disabilities: Research and Practice, 16(4), 203-212.
4. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P., & Young, C. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice, 18(3), 157-171.
5. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Speece, D. L. (2002). Treatment validity as a unifying construct for identifying learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 33-45.
6. Gresham, F. M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 467-519). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Ikeda, M. J., & Gustafson, J. K. (2002). Heartland AEA 11's problem-solving process: Impact on issues related to special education (Research Rep. No. 2002-01). Johnston, IA: Heartland Area Education Agency.
8. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) of 2004, PL 108-446, 20 U.S.C. §§1400 et seq.
9. Learning Disabilities Roundtable. (2002, July). Specific learning disabilities: Finding common ground. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Retrieved from http://www.ncld.org/advocacy/Common Ground.doc
10. Learning Disabilities Roundtable. (2005, February). Comments and recommendations on regulatory issues under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Public Law 108-446. Retrieved from http://www.nasponline.org/advocacy/2004LDRoundtableRecsTransmittal.pdf
11. Lyon, G. R., Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Torgesen, J. K., Wood, F., et al. (2001). Rethinking learning disabilities. In C. E. Finn Jr., A. J. Rotherham, & C. R. Hokanson Jr. (Eds.), Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 259-287). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.excellence.net/library/specialed/index. html
12. Marston, D. (2001, August). A functional and intervention-based assessment approach to establishing discrepancy for students with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the LD Summit, Washington, DC.
13. Marston, D., Muyskens, P., Lau, M., & Canter, A. (2003). Problem-solving model for decision making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice, 18(3), 187-200.
14. McMaster, K. I., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. I. (2003, December). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Paper presented at the NRCLD symposium, Responsiveness to Intervention, Kansas City, MO. Retrieved from www.nrcld.org
15. McNamara, K., & Hollinger, C. (2003). Intervention-based assessment: Evaluation rates and eligibility findings. Exceptional Children, 69(2), 181-193.
16. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1997). Learning disabilities: Preservice preparation of general and special education teachers. In Collective perspectives on issues affecting learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 99-107). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
17. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1998). Learning disabilities: Use of paraprofessionals. In Collective perspectives on issues affecting learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 79-98). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
18. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1999). Professional development for teachers. In Collective perspectives on issues affecting learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 69-78). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
19. National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. (2003, June). Information sheet for Regional Resource Centers. Retrieved from http://www.nrcld.org
20. National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. (2004). Understanding responsiveness to intervention in learning disabilities determination. Retrieved from http://www.nrcld.org
21. National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. (2005). National Research Center on Learning Disabilities mission. Retrieved from http://www.nrcld.org/mission.shtml.
22. National Research Council. (2002). Executive summary: Disproportionate representation of minority students in special education. Washington, DC: Author.
23. President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: Author.
24. Tilly III, W. D., Grimes, J., & Reschly, D. (1993, September-December). Special education system reform: The Iowa story. Communiqué, 22, 1-4.
25. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. S., & Conroy, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with reading disabilities: Immediate and longterm outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33-58, 78.
26. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to intervention: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice, 18(3), 137-146.
27. Vaughn, S., Gersten, R., & Chard, J. E. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67, 99-114.