Affect and persuasion

The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 150-166

  Dillard, James Price ^a   Seo, Kiwon ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949758725     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452218410.n10     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Aar0e, L. (2011). Investigating frame strength: The case of episodic and thematic frames. Political Communication, 28, 207-226. doi:10.1080/10584609.2011.568041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.568041
2. Agrawal, N., & Duhachek, A. (2010). Emotional compatibility and the effectiveness of anti-drinking messages: A defensive processing perspective on shame and guilt. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 263-273. doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.2.263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.2.263
3. Anghelcev, G., & Sar, S. (2011). The influence of pre-existing audience mood on message relevance and the effectiveness of health PSAs: Differential effects by message type. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88, 481-501.
4. Aristotle. (2007). On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse (George A. Kennedy, Trans., 2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University.
5. Banerjee, S. C., Greene, K., & Yanovitzky, I. (2011). Sensation seeking and dosage effect: An exploration of the role of surprise in anti-cocaine messages. Journal of Substance Abuse, 16, 1-13.
6. Brader, T. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 388-405. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.x
7. Chang, C. (2011). The influence of editorial liking and editorial-induced affect on evaluations of subsequent ads. Journal of Advertising, 40, 45-58.
8. Cho, H., & Boster, F. J. (2008). Effects of gain versus loss frame antidrug ads on adolescents. Journal of Communication, 58, 428-446. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00393.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00393.x
9. Dillard, J. P., & Meijnders, A. (2002). Persuasion and the structure of affect. In J. P. Dillard & M. W. Pfau (eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 309-328). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412976046 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412976046
10. Dillard, J. P., & Nabi, R. (2006). The persuasive influence of emotion in cancer prevention and detection messages. Journal of Communication, 56, s123-s139.
11. Dillard, J. P., & Peck, E. (2001). Persuasion and the structure of affect: Dual systems and discrete emotions as complementary models. Human Communication Research, 27, 38-68.
12. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
13. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14. Giessner, S. R., Ryan, M. K., Schubert, T. W., & van Quaquebeke, N. (2011). The power of pictures: Vertical angles in power pictures. Media Psychology, 14, 442-464. doi:10.1080/15213269.2011.620541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2011.620541
15. Gross, K. (2008). Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology, 29, 169-192. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00622.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00622.x
16. Gross, K., & D'Ambrosio, L. (2004). Framing emotional response. Political Psychology, 25, 1-29. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00354.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00354.x
17. Huddy, L., Feldman, S., Taber, C., & Lahav, G. (2005). Threat, anxiety, and support of anti-terrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 610-625.
18. Huddy, L., & Gunnthorsdottir, A. H. (2000). The persuasive effects of emotive visual imagery: Superficial manipulation or the product of passionate reason? Political Psychology, 21, 745-778. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00215
19. Iyer, A., Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2007). Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: The role of anger, shame, and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 572-587. doi:10.1177/0146167206297402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167206297402
20. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291. doi:10.2307/1914185 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1914185
21. Kim, H., Park, K., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Will this trip really be exciting? The role of incidental emotions in product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 983-991. doi:10.1086/644763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/644763
22. Landwehr, J. R., McGill, A. L., & Hermann, A. (2011). It's got the look: The effect of friendly and aggressive "facial" expressions on product liking and sales. Journal of Marketing, 75, 132-146. doi:10.1509/jmkg.75.3.132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.3.132
23. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24. Lerner, J. S., Gonzalez, R. M., Small, D. A., & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14, 144-150. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01433
25. Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 473-493.
26. Lerner, J. S., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2006). Portrait of the angry decision maker: How appraisal tendencies shape anger's influence on cognition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 115-137. doi:10.1002/bdm.515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.515
27. Lindsey, L. L. M., Yun, K. A., & Hill, J. B. (2007). Anticipated guilt as motivation to help unknown others: An examination of empathy as a moderator. Communication Research, 34, 468-480. doi:10.1177/0093650207302789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650207302789
28. Lombard, M., Reich, R. D., Grabe, M. E., Bracken, C. C., & Ditton, T. B. (2000). Presence and television: The role of screen size. Human Communication Research, 26, 75-98.
29. Major, L. H. (2011). The mediating role of emotions in the relationship between frames and attribution of responsibility for health problems. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 88, 502-522.
30. McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2008). Mechanisms of political radicalization: Pathways toward terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 20, 415-433. doi:10.1080/09546550802073367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546550802073367
31. Millar, M., & Millar, K. (2000). Promoting safe driving behavior: The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 853-866. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02827.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02827.x
32. Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 141-144doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613%2803%2900029-9
33. Morley, D. D., & Walker, K. (1987). The role of importance, novelty, and plausibility in producing belief change. Communication Monographs, 54, 436-442. doi:10.1080/03637758709390243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758709390243
34. Nabi, R. L. (1999). A cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Communication Theory, 9, 292-320. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00172.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00172.x
35. Nabi, R. L. (2010). The case for emphasizing discrete emotions in communication research. Communication Monographs, 77, 153-159. doi:10.1080/03637751003790444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637751003790444
36. Nan, X. (2009). Emotional responses to televised PSAs and their influence on persuasion: An investigation of the moderating role of faith in intuition. Communication Studies, 5, 426-442.
37. O'Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2006). The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages. Communication Yearbook, 30, 1-43.
38. Phan, K. L., Wager, T., Taylor, S. F., & Liberzon, I. (2002). Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: A meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. NeuroImage, 16, 331-348. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1087
39. Prochaska, J. O., Johnson, S., & Lee, P. (1998). The transtheoretical model of behavior change. In S. A. Schumaker, E. B. Schron, J. K. Ockene, & W. L. McBee (eds.), The handbook of health behavior change (pp. 59-84), 2nd ed.New York, NY: Springer.
40. Roseman, I. J. (2001). A model of appraisal in the emotion system: Integrating theory, research, and applications. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 68-91). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41. Russell, J. A., & Feldman Barrett, L. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 805-819. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.805
42. Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In K. R. Scherer, & P. Ekman (eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293-317). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (eds.). (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
44. Schneider, T. R., Salovey, P., Apanovitch, A. M., Pizarro, J., McCarthy, D., Zullo, J., et al. (2001). The effects of message framing and ethnic targeting on mammography use among low-income women. Health Psychology, 20, 256-266. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.20.4.256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.20.4.256
45. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
46. Seo, K., & Dillard, J. P. (2012). (Unpublished data). University Park: Pennsylvania State University.
47. Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2007). The influence of behavior inhibition/approach systems and message framing on the processing of persuasive health messages. Communication Research, 34, 433-467. doi:10.1177/0093650207302787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650207302787
48. Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397-420). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
49. Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychogical Science, 15, 322-325. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x
50. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2008). The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 114-137.) New York, NY: Guilford.
51. Turner, M. M. (2007). Using emotion in risk communication: The Anger Activism Model. Public Relations Review, 33, 114-119. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.013
52. Wakefield, M. A., Germain, D., & Durkin, S. J. (2008). How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand preference? An experimental study. Tobacco Control, 17, 416-421. doi:10.1136/tc.2008.026732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2008.026732
53. Wang, X. (2011). The role of anticpated guilt in intentions to register as organ donors and to discuss organ donation with family. Health Communication, 26, 683-690. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.563350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.563350
54. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-Expanded Form. Iowa City: University of Iowa.
55. Yan, C., Dillard, J. P., & Shen, F. (2010). The effects of mood, message framing, and behavioral advocacy on persuasion. Journal of Communication, 60, 344-363. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01485.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01485.x
56. Yan, C., Dillard, J. P., & Shen, F. (in press). Emotion, motivation, and the persuasive effects of message framing. Journal of Communication.
57. Zanna, M. P., & Rempel, J. K. (1988). Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. In D. Bar-Tal & A. W. Kruglanski (eds.), The social psychology of knowledge (pp. 315-334). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58. Zillmann, D. (1999). Exemplification theory: Judging the whole by some of its parts. Media Psychology, 1, 69-94. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0101_5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0101_5
59. Zillmann, D. (2006). Exemplification effects in the promotion of safety and health. Journal of Communication, 56, S221-S237.