English Learners Left Behind Standardized Testing as Language Policy

English Learners Left Behind: Standardized Testing as Language Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-207

  Menken, Kate ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949429091     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (224)

1. Abedi, J. (2001) Assessment and accommodations for English language learners: Issues and recommendations. CRESST Policy Brief 4. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
2. Abedi, J. (2004) The no child left behind act and English language learners: Assessment and accountability issues. Educational Researcher 33 (1), 4-14.
3. Abedi, J. and Dietal, R. (2004) Challenges in the no child left behind act for English language learners. CRESST Policy Brief 7. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
4. Abedi, J., Hofstetter, C. and Lord, C. (2004) Assessment accommodations for English language learners: Implications for policy-based empirical research. Review of Educational Research 74 (1), 1-28.
5. Abedi, J. and Lord, C. (2001) The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education 14 (3), 219-234.
6. Advocates for Children. (2004) An Overview of Research on the Effectiveness of Retention on Student Achievement for New York City Schoolchildren. New York: Advocates for Children.
7. Ager, D. (2001) Motivation in Language Planning and Language Policy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
8. Alamillo, L. and Viramontes, C. (2000) Reflections from the classroom: Teacher perspectives on the implementation of proposition 227. Bilingual Research Journal 24 (1 & 2), 1-13.
9. Alexander, N. (1999) English unassailable but unattainable: The dilemma of language policy in South African education. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference of the International Federation for the Teaching of English. On WWW at http://www.nyu.edy/education/teachlearn/ifte/war99.htm. Accessed 6.4.02.
10. Amrein, A. and Berliner, D. (2002) An Analysis of Some Unintended and Negative Consequences of High-Stakes Testing. Tempe: Education Policy Research Unit, Arizona State University. On WWW at http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/EPRU/epru_2002_Research_Writing.htm. Accessed 15.3.03.
11. Anstrom, K. (1995) New directions for Chapter 1/Title I. Directions in Language and Education 1 (7), 1-11. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
12. Antunez, B. and Menken, K. (2000) An Overview of the Preparation and Certification of Teachers Working with LEP Students. Washington, DC: NCELA. On WWW at http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/reports/teacherprep/teacherprep.pdf. Accessed 8.4.03.
13. Arenson, K.W. (2003a) Education dept. test chief has resigned, regents say. New York Times.
14. Arenson, K. (2003b) Math failures are raising concerns about curriculum. New York Times.
15. Arenson, K. (2004) More youths opt for G.E.D., skirting high-school hurdle. New York Times.
16. Artiles, A. and Trent, S. (1994) Overrepresentation of minority students in special education: A continuing debate. Journal of Special Education 27 (4), 410-437.
17. August, D. and Hakuta, K. (eds). (1997) Improving Schooling for Language-Minority Children: A Research Agenda. Committee on Developing a Research Agenda on the Education of Limited-English-Proficient and Bilingual Students, Board on Children, Youth, and Families, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18. Baker, C. (1995) Bilingual education and assessment. In B.M. Jones and P. Ghuman (eds) Bilingualism, Education and Identity (pp 130-158). Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
19. Baker, C. (2001) Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (3rd edn). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
20. Ben-Rafael, E. (1994) Language, Identity, and Social Division: The Case of Israel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Blank, R., Manise, J. and Brathwaite, B. (1999) State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State Schools Officers, Planning Evaluation Service of the U.S. Department of Education.
22. Brisk, M. (2005) Bilingual Education: From Compensatory to Quality Schooling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. California Department of Education (2004) Questions and answers about the California high school exit examination (CAHSEE) test variations. Sacramento, CA: California. Department of Education. On WWW at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/hs/documents/qandatestvar.pdf. Accessed 20.3.06.
24. California Department of Education (2005a) California high school exit examination (CAHSEE) October 2005 English language arts released test questions. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education. On WWW at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/hs/elartq.asp. Accessed 20.3.06.
25. California Department of Education (2005b) California high school exit examination (CAHSEE) questions and answers for parents/guardians. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education. On WWW at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/hs/documents/infoparents05.pdf. Accessed 20.3.06.
26. Cameron, S. and Heckman, J. (1993) The nonequivalence of high school equivalents. Journal of Labor Economics 11 (1), 1-47.
27. Campaign for Fiscal Equity. (2004) The CFE Decision: What Did the Court Decide and What Does it Mean for You and Your Community? New York. On WWW at http://www.cfequity.org/. Accessed 21.11.04.
28. Campanile, C. (2004) Higher ‘degree’ of HS kids seek GED. New York Post.
29. Canagarajah, S. (ed.). (2005) Reclaiming the Local in Language Policy and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Capps, R., Fix, M., Murray, J., Ost, J., Passel, J. and Herwantoro, S. (2005) The New Demography of America’s Schools: Immigration and the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
31. Center for Applied Linguistics (2002) Directory of Two-Way Bilingual Immersion Programs in the U.S. Washington, DC.
32. Center on Education Policy (2005) States try harder, but gaps persist: High school exit exams. Written by P. Sullivan, M. Yeager, N. Chudowsky, N. Kober, E. O’Brien and K. Gayler. Washington, DC.
33. Cheng, L. and Watanabe, Y., Curtis, A. (ed.) (2004) Washback in Language Testing: Research Contexts and Methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
34. Cooper, R.L. (1989) Language Planning and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Corson, D. (1999) Language Policy in Schools: A Resource for Teachers and Administrators. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Council of the Great City Schools and National Clearinghouse for English Language
36. Acquisition and Language Instruction Educational Programs. (2002) Assessment Standards for English Language Learners: Executive Summary. Published draft. On WWW at http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/ncbepubs/assessmentstandards/execsum/executivesummary3.htm. Accessed 10.10.02.
37. Crabtree, B. and Miller, W. (eds). (1992) Doing Qualitative Research: Multiple Strategies. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications.
38. Crawford, J. (1992a) Language Loyalties: A Sourcebook on the Official English Controversy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Crawford, J. (1992b) Hold Your Tongue: Bilingualism and the Politics of English-Only. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
40. Crawford, J. (1998) Language politics in the United States. In C. Ovando and P. McLaren (eds) The Politics of Multiculturalism and Bilingual Education: Students and Teachers Caught in the Cross Fire (pp 107-147). New York: McGraw Hill.
41. Crawford, J. (1999) Bilingual Education: History, Politics, Theory and Practice. Los Angeles: Bilingual Education Services Inc.
42. Crawford, J. (2000) At War with Diversity: US Language Policy in an Age of Anxiety. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
43. Crawford, J. (2001) Proposition 203: Anti-bilingual Initiative in Arizona. On WWW at http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/JWCRAWFORD/az-unz.htm. Accessed 11.11.04.
44. Crawford, J. (2002a) Making sense of Census 2000. Tempe, AZ: Language Policy Research Unit, Education Policy Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University. On WWW at http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/LPRU/features/article5.htm. Accessed 19.7.06.
45. Crawford, J. (2002b) OBITUARY: The bilingual ed act, 1968-2002. Rethinking Schools Online, 16 (4), 1-4. On WWW at http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/16_04/Bil164.shtml. Accessed 25.7.06.
46. Crawford, J. (2004) No child left behind: Misguided approach to school accountability for English language learners. Paper for the Forum on ideas to improve the NCLB accountability provisions for students with disabilities and English language learners. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy & National Association for Bilingual Education.
47. Cuban, L. (1998) How schools change reforms. Teachers College Record 99 (3), 453-477.
48. Cummins, J. (1992) Language proficiency, bilingualism, and academic achievement. In P. Richard-Amato and M. Snow (eds) The Multicultural Classroom: Readings for Content-Area Teachers (pp 16-26). White Plains, NY: Longman.
49. Cummins, J. (2000) Language, Power, and Pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the Crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
50. Dale, T. and Cuevas, G. (1992) Integrating mathematics and language learning. In P. Richard-Amato and M. Snow (eds) The Multicultural Classroom: Readings for Content-Area Teachers (pp 330-348). White Plains, NY: Longman.
51. Davila, J. (2004) Ready or Not: On Eve of English Regents Exam, Immigrant Groups Protest Unfair Test, Poor Preparation of Students, and Dropout Crisis. Press Release. New York: New York Immigration Coalition.
52. Dee, T. and Jacob, B. (2006) Do high school exit exams influence educational attainment or labor market performance? NBER Working Paper, No. W12199 (April 2006). On WWW at http://ssrn.com/abstract_900985. Accessed 11.7.06.
53. Del Valle, S. (2002) A Briefing Paper of the Puerto Rican Legal Defense Fund on the New English Regents Exam and Its Impact on English Language Learners. New York: Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund.
54. Education Trust. (2003) “Don’t Turn Back the Clock!” Over 100 African American and Latino Superintendents Voice Their Support for the Accountability Provisions in Title I (NCLB) (press release). Washington, DC: Education Trust.
55. Elmore, R. and Rothman, R. (eds) (1999) Testing, Teaching, and Learning: A Guide for States and School Districts. Committee on Title I Testing and Assessment, the National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
56. Escamilla, K., Mahon, E., Riley-Bernal, H. and Rutledge, D. (2003) High-stakes testing, Latinos, and English language learners: Lessons from Colorado. Bilingual Research Journal 27 (1), 25-49.
57. Evans, B. and Hornberger, N. (2005) No child left behind: Repealing and unpeeling federal language education policy in the United States. Language Policy 4, 87-106.
58. Fettes, M. (1997) Language planning and education. In R. Wodak and D. Corson (eds) Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Volume 1: Language Policy and Political Issues in Education. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
59. Fishman, J. (1979) Bilingual education, language planning and English. English World-Wide 1 (1), 11-24.
60. Fishman, J. (1991) Reversing Language Shift. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
61. Fishman, J. (ed.) (2001) Can Threatened Languages be Saved? “Reversing Language Shift” Revisited. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
62. Fishman, J., Conrad, A. and Rubal-Lopez, A. (eds). (1996) Post-Imperial English. Status Change in Former British and American Colonies, 1940-1990. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
63. Fowler, F. (2000) Policy Studies for Educational Leaders: An Introduction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
64. Freeman, R. (2004) Building on Community Bilingualism: Promoting Multiculturalism Through Schooling. Philadelphia: Caslon Publishing.
65. Gàndara, P. (2000) In the aftermath of the storm: English learners in the post-227 era. Bilingual Research Journal 24 (1 & 2), 1-13.
66. García, O. (1992) Societal bilingualism and multilingualism (mimeo). Cited in C. Baker, Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1996. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
67. García, O. (1997) Bilingual education. In F. Coulmas (ed.) The Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp 405-420). Oxford: Blackwell.
68. García, O. (2002) New York’s multilingualism: World languages and their role in a U.S. city. In O. García and J.A. Fishman (eds) The Multilingual Apple: Languages in New York City (2nd edn) (pp 3-50). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
69. García, O. and Fishman, J. (eds) (2002) The Multilingual Apple: Languages in New York City (2nd edn). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
70. García, O. and Menken, K. (2006) The English of Latinos from a plurilingual transcultural angle: Implications for assessment and schools. In S. Nero (ed.) Dialects, Englishes, Creoles, and Education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
71. García, O., Morín, J. and Rivera, K. (2001) How threatened is the Spanish of New York Puerto Ricans? In J. Fishman (ed.) Can Threatened Languages be Saved? (pp 44-73). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
72. García, O. and Trubek, J. (1999) Where have all the minority educators gone and when will they ever learn? Educators for Urban Minorities, 1, 1-8.
73. García, P. (2003) The use of high school exit examinations in four southwestern states. Bilingual Research Journal 27 (3), 431-450.
74. Garcia, P. and Gopal, M. (2003) The relationship to achievement on the California high school exit exam for language minority students. NABE Jounral of Research and Practice 1 (1), 123-137.
75. Gardner, N. (2000) Basque in Education in the Basque Autonomous Community. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Euskal Autonomi Erkidegoko Administrazioa.
76. Glinert, L. (1995) Inside the language planner’s head: Tactical responses to a mass immigration. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 16 (5), 351-371.
77. Glod, M. (2007) Fairfax resists ‘no child’ provision: Immigrants’ tests in English at issue. Washington Post.
78. Goertz, M. and Duffy, M. (2001) Assessment and Accountability Systems in the 50 States. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania. On WWW at http://www.cpre.org/Publications/rr46.pdf. Accessed 15.1.03.
79. Gormley, M. (2004) Bill exempts English learners from exam. New York Newsday. On WWW at http://www.nynewsday.com/news/education/ny-bc-ny-englishlearners0612jun12,0,4219897.story?coll_nyc-manheadlines-education. Accessed 12.6.04.
80. Government Accountability Office. (2006) No Child Left Behind Act: Assistance from Education Could Help States Better Measure Progress of Students with Limited English Proficiency. Washington, DC.
81. Gutiérrez, K., Asato, J., Pacheco, M., Moll, L., Olson, K., Horng, E., Ruiz, R., García, E. and McCarty, T. (2002) ‘Sounding American’: The consequences of new reforms for English language learners. Reading Research Quarterly 37 (3), 328-343.
82. Hakuta, K. (1986) The Mirror of Language: The Debate on Bilingualism. New York: Basic Books.
83. Halliday, M. (1975) Some aspects of sociolinguistics. In E. Jacobsen (ed.) Interactions Between Linguistics and Mathematical Education: Final Report of the Symposium Sponsored by UNESCO, CEDO and ICMI, Nairobi, Kenya. UNESCO report No. ED-74/Conf. 808 (pp 25-52). Paris: UNESCO.
84. Harris, J. and Ford, D. (1991) Identifying and nurturing the promise of gifted black American children. Journal of Negro Education 60 (1), 3-18.
85. Haugen, E. (1983) The implementation of corpus planning: Theory and practice. In J. Cobarrubias and J. Fishman (eds) Progress in Language Planning (pp 269-290). Berlin and New York: Mouton/Walter de Gruyter.
86. Hayes, B. and Read, J. (2004) IELTS test preparation in New Zealand: Preparing students for the IELTS academic module. In L. Cheng and Y. Watanabe (eds) with A. Curtis (ed.) Washback in Language Testing: Research Contexts and Methods (pp 97-112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
87. Heath, S. (1983) Ways with Words. New York: Cambridge University Press.
88. Herszenhorn, D. (2006a) U.S. says language exam does not comply with law. New York Times.
89. Herszenhorn, D. (2006b) More students in New York will take regular English test. New York Times.
90. Heubert, J. (2002) First, do no harm. Educational Leadership 60 (4), 26-30.
91. Heubert, J. and Hauser, R. (eds) (1999) High Stakes Testing for Tracking, Promotion, and Graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
92. Heugh, K. (1999) Languages, development and reconstructing education in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development 19, 301-313.
93. Hill, P. (2000) The federal role in education. In D. Ravitch (ed.) Brookings Papers on Education Policy 2000 (pp 11-40). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
94. Holmes, D., Hedlund, P. and Nickerson, B. (2000) Accommodating English Language Learners in State and Local Assessments.Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
95. Hornberger, N. (ed.) (1996) Indigenous Literacies in the Americas: Language Planning from the Bottom Up. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
96. Hornberger, N. (2006a) Nichols to NCLB: Local and global perspectives on U.S. language education policy. In O. García, T. Skutnabb-Kangas and M. Torres-Guzmán (eds) Imagining Multilingual Schools: Languages in Education and Glocalization (pp 223-237). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
97. Hornberger, N. (2006b) Frameworks and models in language policy and planning. In T. Ricento (ed.) An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method (pp 24-41). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
98. Hull, D. (2006). Appeals court upholds exit exam: State schools superintendent hails ruling. The Mercury News. On WWW at http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/15259081.htm. Accessed 20.8.06.
99. Hymes, D. (1972) On communicative competence. In J. Pride and J. Holmes (eds) Sociolinguistics: Selected Readings (pp 269-293). Harmondsworth: Penguin Education.
100. Judd, C., Kidder, L. and Smith, E. (1991) Research Methods in Social Relations. Fort Worth: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
101. Kabbany, J. (2006) Southwest County has at least 1,200 seniors yet to pass exit exam. The Californian.
102. Kaestle, C.F. (2001) Federal aid to education since World War II: Purposes and politics. In The Future of the Federal Role in Elementary and Secondary Education (pp 13-35). Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy. On WWW at http://www.ctredpol.org/pubs/futurefederal_esa/future_fed_role_kaestle.htm. Accessed 7.1.03.
103. Kaplan, R. and Baldauf, R. (1997) Language Planning: From Practice to Theory. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
104. Kindler, A. (2002) Survey of the states’ limited English proficient students and available educational programs and services, 2000-2001 summary report. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. On WWW at http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/states/reports/seareports/0001/sea0001.pdf. Accessed 2.4.03.
105. Kleyn, T. (2007) Multicultural education and bilingual teachers: An examination of convergence and divergence across ethnolinguistic groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University.
106. Kloss, H. (1977) The American Bilingual Tradition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
107. Kuzel, A. (1992) Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In B. Crabtree and W. Miller (eds) Doing Qualitative Research: Multiple Strategies (pp 31-44). Newbury Park: SAGE Publications.
108. Lakshmi, R. (2006) House committee reviews the case of making English the official language of the US. Washington Post.
109. LeCompte, M. and Preissle, J. (1993) Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research (2nd edn). San Diego: Academic Press.
110. Lewin, T. (2004) City resolves legal battle over forcing students out. New York Times. On WWW at http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/19/education/19pushout.html. Accessed 19.6.04.
111. Liebowitz, A. (1969) English literacy: Legal sanction for discrimination. Notre Dame Lawyer 45 (1), 7-67.
112. Linn, R. (2000) Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher 29 (2), 4-16.
113. Marketwire. (2007) Kansas house approves making English the official language: State could become 29th with official English policy. Washington, DC. On WWW at http://www.sys-con.com/read/340274.htm. Accessed 26.2.07.
114. McCarty, T. (2003) Revitalising indigenous languages in homogenising times. Comparative Education 39 (2), 147-163.
115. McCarty, T. (2004) Dangerous difference: A critical-historical analysis of language education policies in the United States. In J. Tollefson and A. Tsui (eds) Medium of Instruction Policies: Which Agenda? Whose Agenda? (pp 71-96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
116. McKay, S. and Weinstein-Shr, G. (1993) English literacy in the U.S.: National policies, personal consequences. TESOL Quarterly 27 (3), 1-14.
117. McLaughlin, M. and Shepard, L. (1995) Improving Education Through Standards-Based Reform: A Report by the National Academy of Education Panel on Standards-Based Education Reform. Stanford: National Academy of Education.
118. McNeil, L. and Valenzuela, A. (2000) The harmful impact of the TAAS system of testing in Texas: Beneath the accountability rhetoric. Occasional Paper Series, 1 (1). Houston, TX: Rice University Center for Education. In G. Orfield and M. Kornhaber (eds) Raising Standards or Raising Barriers? Inequality and High Stakes Testing in Public Education (pp 127-150) Boston, MA: Harvard Civil Rights Project.
119. Menken, K. (2000) What are the critical issues in wide-scale assessment of English language learners? NCBE Issue Brief No. 6. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education. On WWW at http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu/ncbepubs/issuebriefs/ib6.pdf. Accessed 2.5.02.
120. Menken, K. (2001) When all means all: Standards-based reform and English language learners. NABE News 24 (5), 4-7.
121. Menken, K. (2005) When the test is what counts: How high-stakes testing affects language policy and the education of english language learners in high school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University.
122. Menken, K. (2006a) Historical overview of policies for English language learners. In R. Freeman and E. Hamayan, (eds) Educating English Language Learners: A Guide for Administrators (pp 1-5). Philadelphia, PA: Caslon Publishing.
123. Menken, K. (2006b) Teaching to the test: How standardized testing promoted by the No Child Left Behind Act impacts language policy, curriculum, and instruction for English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal 30 (2), 521-546.
124. Menken, K. (in press) High-stakes testing as de facto language policy in education. In E. Shohamy and N. Hornberger (eds) Encyclopedia of Language and Education (Vol. 7): Language Testing and Assessment. Netherlands: Kluwer.
125. Mensh, E. and Mensh, H. (1991) The IQ Mythology: Class, Race, Gender, and Inequality. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
126. Miles, M. and Huberman, A. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
127. Mishler, E. (1986) Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
128. National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). 1993-94 Schools and Staffing Survey: A Profile of Policies and Practices for Limited English Proficient Students: Screening Methods, Program Support, and Teacher Training. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
129. National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (1999) State K-12 LEP Enrollment and Top Languages. Washington, DC. On WWW at http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/reports/state-data/1998/index.htm. Accessed 20.12.99.
130. National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2002) How has federal policy for language minority students evolved in the US? AskNCELA No. 3. Washington, DC. On WWW at http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/askncela/03history.htm. Accessed 10.1.03.
131. National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2004) How many school-aged English language learners (ELLS) are there in the U.S.? AskNCELA No. 1. Updated October 2004 by Daniel Padolsky. Washington, DC. On WWW at http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/askncela/01leps.htm. Accessed 10.11.04.
132. National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2006a) The growing number of limited English proficient students 1994/95-2004/05. Poster. Washington, DC. On WWW at http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/policy/states/reports/statedata/2004LEP/GrowingLEP_0405_Nov06.pdf. Accessed 10.2.07.
133. National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2006b) History. Washington, DC. On WWW at http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/policy/1_history.htm. Accessed 19.7.06.
134. New York City Department of Education, Division of Assessment and Accountability. (2003a) 2002-2003 Citywide and Statewide Assessment Calendar. New York. On WWW at http://www.nycenet.edu/daa/schedule/index.html. Accessed 3.4.03.
135. New York City Department of Education, Division of Assessment and Accountability. (2003b) 2001-2002 Annual School Reports. New York. On WWW at http://www.nycenet.edu/daa/SchoolReports/. Accessed 12.3.03.
136. New York City Department of Education, Division of Assessment and Accountability. (2004a) 2002-2003 Annual School Reports. New York. On WWW at http://www.nycenet.edu/daa/SchoolReports/. Accessed 1.6.04.
137. New York City Department of Education, Division of Assessment and Accountability. (2004b) The Class of 2003 Four-Year Longitudinal Report and 2002-2003 Event Dropout Rates. New York. On WWW at http://www.nycenet.edu/daa/reports. Accessed 1.6.04.
138. New York City Department of Education, Division of Assessment and Accountability. (2005) 2004-2005 Annual School Reports. New York. On WWW at http://www.nycenet.edu/daa/reports/Class%20of%202005_Four-Year_Longitudinal_Report.pdf. Accessed 26.6.06.
139. New York City Department of Education, Division of English Language Learners and Parent Outreach. (2002) Facts and Figures 2001-2002. New York. On WWW at http://www.nycenet.edu/offices/oell/Facts%20%20Figures%202001%20%202002.pdf. Accessed 1.4.03.
140. New York City Department of Education, Directory of Offices and Divisions (2006a) Statistical Summaries. On WWW at http://www.nycenet.edu/offices/stats/default.htm. Accessed 15.6.06.
141. New York City Department of Education, Office of English Language Learners. (2006b) ELLs in New York City: Student Demographic Data Report. New York: New York City Department of Education.
142. New York City Independent Budget Office. (2004) Can schools’ ESL and bilingual programs make the grade? Written by N. Rivas Salas and M. Madrick. Inside the Budget, 128.
143. New York State Assembly Standing Committee on Education. (2003) Regents Learning Standards and High School Graduation Requirements. Notice of Public Hearing, New York City. New York: New York State.
144. New York State Department of Education. (2003) English Language Arts Regents Examinations. New York. On WWW at http://www.nysedregents.org/testing/engre/arceng.html. Accessed 10.5.06.
145. New York State Department of Education. (2004a) English Language Arts Regents Examinations. New York. On WWW at http://www.nysedregents.org/testing/engre/arceng.html. Accessed 10.5.06.
146. New York State Department of Education. (2004b) Living Environment Regents Examination. New York. On WWW at http://www.nysedregents.org/testing/scire/regentlive.html. Accessed 10.5.06.
147. New York State Department of Education. (2004c) Math A Regents Examinations. New York. On WWW at http://www.nysedregents.org/testing/mathre/regentmatha.html. Accessed 10.5.06.
148. New York State Department of Education, Bilingual/ESL Network. (2003) Announcements. New York. On WWW at http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/ciai/biling/announce.html. Accessed 3.4.03.
149. New York State Department of Education, Commissioner of Education (1999a) Part 154. Apportionment and Services for Pupils with Limited English Proficiency. New York.
150. New York State Department of Education, Office of Bilingual Education. (1999b) Testing Procedures for Limited English Proficient (LEP) Students. Memorandum from Carmen Perez Hogan, Coordinator, Office of Bilingual Education to District Superintendents, Principals, and C.R. Part 154 contacts. On WWW at http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/ciai/biling/pub/memo010499.html. Accessed 3.4.03.
151. New York State Department of Education, Office of Bilingual Education. (2002) Application for Part 154 of the Regulations of the Commissioner (CR Part 154) and Title III, Part A of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 for the Education of Limited English Proficient (LEP) Students for the 2002-03 School Year. Memorandum from Carmen Perez Hogan, Coordinator, Office of Bilingual Education to District and School Superintendents. On WWW at http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/ciai/biling/CRPT154-TIII-RFP.doc. Accessed 3.4.03.
152. New York State Department of Education, Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment. (2003a) Regents and high school diploma/graduation requirements. Section 100.5 of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education Relating to General Education and Diploma Requirements. On WWW at http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/part100/pages/1005a.html. Accessed 28.4.03.
153. New York State Department of Education, Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment. (2003b) Component Retesting in Comprehensive English and Mathematics A in May 2003. Memorandum to district superintendents and secondary school principals. Dated February 2003. On WWW at http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/ciai/testing/retest/memoretest03.htm. Accessed 28.4.03.
154. New York State Department of Education, Office of Elementary, Middle, Secondary and Continuing Education. (2000) General Education and Diploma Requirements. Albany, NY: New York State Department of Education.
155. Northeast Islands Regional Educational Laboratory at Brown University. (1999) Creating large-scale portfolio assessments that include English language learners. Perspectives on Policy and Practice. Providence. On WWW at http://www.lab.brown.edu/public/pubs/PolPerELL.pdf. Accessed 12.9.02.
156. Orfield, G. (2001) Schools More Separate: Consequences of a Decade of Resegregation. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project of Harvard University.
157. Padolsky, D. (2005) How many school-aged English language learners (ELLs) are there in the U.S.? NCELA Frequently Asked Question #1. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. On WWW at http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/reports/state-data/1998/index.htm. Accessed 3.4.06.
158. Pennock-Roman, M. and Rivera, C. (2006) A Review of Test Accommodations for ELLs: Effect Sizes in Reducing the Mean Achievement Gap. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
159. Phillipson, R. (1992) Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
160. Phillipson, R. and Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1996) English only worldwide or language ecology? TESOL Quarterly 30 (3), 429-452.
161. Phillipson, R., Skutnabb-Kangas, T. and Rannut, M. (eds) (1995) Linguistic Human Rights. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
162. Pitsch, M. (1996) To placate conservatives, measure alters Goals 2000. Education Week.
163. Qi, L. (2005) Stakeholders’ conflicting aims undermine the washback function of a high-stakes test. Language Testing 22 (2), 142-173.
164. Rappaport, S. (2002) Beyond Bilingual Education: Meeting the Needs of English Language Learners in the New York City Public Schools. New York: Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund.
165. Reid, K. and Valle, J. (2004) The discursive practice of learning disability: Implications for instruction and parent-school relations. Journal of Learning Disabilities 37 (6), 466-481.
166. Reyes, L. (2006) The Aspira consent decree: Athirtieth-anniversary retrospective of bilingual education in New York City. Harvard Educational Review 76 (3), 369-400.
167. Ricento, T. (1995) A brief history of language restrictionism in the United States. In S. Dicker, R. Jackson, T. Ricento and K. Romstedt (eds) Official English? No!: TESOL’s Recommendations for Countering the Official English Movement in the U.S. Washington, DC: TESOL.
168. Ricento, T. and Hornberger, N. (1996) Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly 30 (3), 401-427.
169. Richard-Amato, P. and Snow, M. (eds). (1992) The Multicultural Classroom: Readings for Content-Area Teachers. White Plains, NY: Longman.
170. Richards, J. and Rodgers, T. (2001) Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
171. Riddle, W. (1999) Education for the disadvantaged: ESEA Title I reauthorization issues. Congressional Research Service Issue Brief. Washington, DC: The Library of Congress.
172. Rivera, C. and Collum, E. (eds) (2006) State Assessment Policy and Practice for English Language Learners: A National Perspective. Mahwah, N: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
173. Rivera, C. and Stansfield, C. (1998) Leveling the playing field for English language learners: Increasing participation in state and local assessments through accommodations. In R. Brandt (ed.) Assessing Student Learning: New Rules, New Realities (pp 65-92). Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
174. Rivera, C. and Stansfield, C. (2000) An Analysis of State Policies for the Inclusion and Accommodation of English Language Learners in State Assessment Programs During 1998-1999. (Executive Summary). Washington, DC: Center for Equity and Excellence in Education, The George Washington University.
175. Rotberg, I. (2000) Campaign 2000: Notes to the next president on education policy. Education Week 19 (28), 29 March 2000.
176. Rothstein, R. (2002) Lessons: States teeter when balancing standards with tests. The New York Times.
177. Ruiz, R. (1984) Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal 8 (2), 15-34.
178. Ruiz de Velasco, J. (2005) Performance-based school reforms and the federal role in helping schools that serve language-minority students. In A. Valenzuela (ed.) Leaving Children Behind: How “Texas-Style” Accountability Fails Latino Youth (pp 33-56). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
179. Rumbaut, R., Massey, D. and Bean, F. (2006) Linguistic life expectancies: Immigrant language retention in southern California. Population and Development Review 32 (3), 447-460.
180. Rumberger, R. (2006) California’s exit exam fails employers. Los Angeles Times.
181. Shohamy, E. (1998) Critical language testing and beyond. Studies in Educational Evaluation 24 (4), 331-345.
182. Shohamy, E. (2001) The Power of Tests: A Critical Perspective on the Uses of Language Tests. London: Longman/Pearson Education.
183. Shohamy, E. (2003) Implications of language education policies for language study in schools and universities. Modern Language Journal 87 (ii), 278-296.
184. Shohamy, E. (2006) Language Policy: Hidden Agendas and New Approaches. London: Routledge.
185. Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2000) Linguistic Genocide in Education - Or Worldwide Diversity and Human Rights? Mahwah: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
186. Sobol, T. (2004a) No child left behind. Unpublished manuscript.
187. Sobol, T. (2004b) A president that “gets it.” In C. Glickman (ed.) Letters to the Next President: What We Can Do About the Real Crisis in Public Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
188. Solano-Flores, G. and Trumball, E. (2003) Examining language in context: The need for new research paradigms in the testing of English-language learners. Educational Researcher 32 (2), 3-13.
189. Spolsky, B. (1995) Measured Words: The Development of Objective Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
190. Spolsky, B. (1998) Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
191. Spolsky, B. (2004) Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
192. Spolsky, B. and Shohamy, E. (1999) The Languages of Israel: Policy, Ideology, and Practice. Philadelphia: Mutilingual Matters.
193. Stansfield, C. and Rivera, C. (2002) How will English language learners be accommodated in state assessments? In R. Lissitz and W. Scafer (eds) Assessment in Educational Reform: Both Means and Ends (pp 125-144). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
194. Steiner-Khamsi, G. (ed.) (2004) The Global Politics of Educational Borrowing and Lending. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
195. Sullivan, P., Yeager, M., Chudowsky, N., Kober, N., O’Brien, E. and Gayler, K. (2005) State High School Exit Exams: States Try Harder, But Gaps Persist. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
196. Texas Education Agency. (2004) Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) Exit Level English Language Arts, Mathematics, Social Studies, Science. Administered July 2004. On WWW at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/resources/release/taks/2004/gr11taksjulyb.pdf. Accessed 3.4.06.
197. Texas Education Agency, Student Assessment Division. (2004) Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) Information Booklet. Austin, TX. On WWW at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/taks/booklets/math/g11.pdf. Accessed 3.4.06.
198. Thomas, W. and Collier, V. (1997) School Effectiveness for Language Minority Students. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
199. Tollefson, J. (1991) Planning Language, Planning Inequality: Language Policy in the Community. London and New York: Longman.
200. Uebelacker, K. (2005) Fair Testing. Teacher Action Research Paper. San Francisco: San Francisco Education Fund Leadership Institute. On WWW at http://www.teachersnetwork.org/tnli/research/prep/uebelacker.htm. Accessed 27.3.06.
201. Urban Teacher Collaborative. (2000) The Urban Teacher Challenge: Teacher Demand and Supply in the Great City Schools. On WWW at http://cgcs.org/reports/2000/RNT-0101.pdf. Accessed 20.7.00.
202. US Census Bureau. (2000) QT-P16 Language spoken at home: 2000. Census 2000 Summary File 3. Washington, DC. US Census Bureau.
203. US Citizenship and Immigration Services (2004) A guide to naturalization. Form M-476. On WWW at http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/services/natz/guide.htm. Accessed 14.8.06.
204. US Department of Education. (1994) The Improving America’s Schools Act of 1994: Summary Sheets. Washington, DC.
205. US Department of Education. (2001) The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. P.L. 107-110. Washington, DC.
206. US Department of Education, Office of English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement for Limited English Proficient Students. (2003) DRAFT Non-regulatory Guidance on the Title III State Formula Grant Program. Part II: Standards, Assessments, and Accountability. Washington, DC.
207. US Department of Education, Office of the Education Secretary. (2006) Secretary Spellings announces partnership with states to improve accountability for limited English proficient students. Press Release, July 27, 2006. On WWW at http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2006/07/07272006.html. Accessed 1.8.06.
208. Valencia, R. and Villarreal, B. (2005) Texas’ second wave of high-stakes testing: Anti-social promotion legislation, grade retention, and adverse impact on minorities. In A. Valenzuela (ed.) Leaving Children Behind: How “Texas-Style” Accountability Fails Latino Youth (pp 113-152). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
209. Valenzuela, A. (1999) Subtractive Schooling: U.S.-Mexican Youth and the Politics of Caring. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
210. Valenzuela, A. (2002) High-stakes testing and U.S.-Mexican youth in Texas: The case for multiple compensatory criteria in assessment. Harvard Journal of Hispanic Policy 14, 97-116.
211. Valenzuela, A. (ed.) (2005) Leaving Children Behind: How “Texas-Style” Accountability Fails Latino Youth. New York: State University of New York Press.
212. Warren, J., Jenkins, K. and Kulick, R. (2005) High school exit examinations and state level completion and GED rates, 1975-2002. Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Boston, April 2004. On WWW at http://www.soc.umn.edu/~warren/WJK.pdff. Accessed 11.7.06.
213. Wiley, T. (1996) Language planning and policy. In S. McKay and N. Hornberger (eds) Sociolinguistics and Language Teaching (pp 103-147). New York: Cambridge University Press.
214. Wiley, T. and Lukes, M. (1996) English-only and standard English ideologies in the U.S. TESOL Quarterly 30 (3), 511-535.
215. Wiley, T. and Wright, W. (2004) Against the undertow: Language-minority education policy and politics in the ‘age of accountability’. Educational Policy 18 (1), 142-168.
216. Wright, S. (ed.) (1996) Language and the State: Revitalization and Revival. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
217. Wright, W. (2002) The effects of high stakes testing in inner-city elementary school: The curriculum, the teachers, and the English language learners. Current Issues in Education, 5 (5). On WWW at http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume5/number5/. Accessed 1.12.02.
218. Wright, W. (2004) Intersection of language and assessment policies for English language learners in Arizona. Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
219. Wright, W. (2005) Evolution of federal policy and implications of No Child Left Behind for language minority students. Policy Brief. Tempe, AZ: Language Policy Research Unit (LPRU), Education Policy Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University. On WWW at http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/EPRU/documents/EPSL-0501-101-LPRU.pdf. Accessed 19.7.06.
220. Yin, R. (1984) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.
221. Zehr, M. (2006a) New era for testing English-learners begins. Education Week.
222. Zehr, M. (2006b) New York, Arizona at odds with Education Department over English testing. Education Week.
223. Zehr, M. (2007) States adopt new tests for English-learners. Washington Post. On WWW at http://www.elladvocates.org/media/NCLB/EdWeek24jan07.html. Accessed 10.2.07.
224. Zelasko, N. and Antunez, B. (2000) If Your Child Learns in Two Languages. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.