How do consumers describe wine astringency?

Food Research International

Volumn 78, Issue , 2015, Pages 321-326

  Vidal, Leticia ^a   Giménez, Ana ^a   Medina, Karina ^a   Boido, Eduardo ^a   Ares, Gastón ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

Author keywords

Astringency; Check all that apply; Free listing; Involvement; Wine

Indexed keywords

SURVEYS; WHEELS;

ASTRINGENCY; CHECK-ALL-THAT-APPLY; CONSUMER RESPONSE; CONSUMER SEGMENTS; FREE LISTING; INVOLVEMENT; OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS; SENSORY CHARACTERISTICS;

WINE;

EID: 84949183299     PISSN: 09639969     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.09.025     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Arnold R.A., Noble A.C., Singleton V.L. Bitterness and astringency of phenolic fractions in wine. Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1980, 28:675-678.
2. ASTM Standard definitions of terms relating to sensory evaluation of materials and products. Annual book of ASTM standards 2004, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia.
3. Bajec M.R., Pickering G.J. Astringency: mechanisms and perception. Critical Reviews in Food Science & Nutrition 2008, 48:858-875.
4. Ballester J., Patris B., Symoneaux R., Valentin D. Conceptual vs. perceptual wine spaces : Does expertise matter?. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:267-276.
5. Bartlett M.S. Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology 1950, 3:77-85.
6. Bell R., Marshall D.W. The construct of food involvement in behavioral research: Scale development and validation. Appetite 2003, 40:235-244.
7. Carr B.T., Craig-Petsinger D., Hadlich S. A case study in relating sensory descriptive data to product concept fit and consumer vocabulary. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12:407-412.
8. Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951, 16:297-334.
9. Denzin N.K. The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods 1978, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York.
10. Dodd T.H., Pinkelton B.E., Gustafson A.W. External information sources of product enthusiasts. Psychology and Marketing 1996, 13:291-305.
11. Feinerer I., Hornik K., Meyer D. Text mining infrastructure in R. Journal of Statistical Software 2008, 25:1-54.
12. Ferrer-Gallego R., Hernández-Hierro J.M., Rivas-Gonzalo J.C., Escribano-Bailón M.T. Sensory evaluation of bitterness and astringency sub-qualities of wine phenolic compounds: Synergistic effect and modulation by aromas. Food Research International 2014, 62:1100-1107.
13. Gawel R. The use of language by trained and untrained wine tasters. Journal of Sensory Studies 1997, 12:267-284.
14. Gawel R., Oberholster A., Francis I.L. A "Mouth-feel Wheel": Terminology for communicating the mouth-feel characteristics of red wine. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 2000, 6:203-207.
15. Goldsmith R.E., d'Hauteville F. Heavy wine consumption: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. British Food Journal 1998, 100:184-190.
16. Green B.G. Oral astringency: A tactile component of flavor. Acta Psychologica 1993, 84:119-125.
17. Guerrero L., Claret A., Verbeke W., Enderli G., Zakowska-Biemans S., Vanhonacker F., et al. Perception of traditional food products in six European regions using free word association. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:225-233.
18. Hollebeek L.D., Jaeger S.R., Brodie R.J., Balemi A. The influence of involvement on purchase intention for new world wine. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:1033-1049.
19. Hopfer H., Heymann H. Judging wine quality: Do we need experts, consumers or trained panelists?. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 32:221-223.
20. Horn J.L. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika 1965, 30:179-185.
21. Hough G., Ferraris D. Free listing: A method to gain initial insight of a food category. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:295-301.
22. Ishikawa T., Noble A.C. Temporal perception of astringency and sweetness in red wine. Food Quality and Preference 1995, 6:27-33.
23. Kaiser H.F. A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika 1970, 35:401-415.
24. Kaiser H.F., Rice J. Little jiffy, mark iv. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1974, 34:111-117.
25. Kielhorn S., Thorngate J.H. Oral sensations associated with the flavan-3-ols (+)catechin and (-)-epicatechin. Food Quality and Preference 1999, 10:109-116.
26. ten Kleij F., Musters P.A.D. Text analysis of open ended survey responses: A complementary method to preference mapping. Food Quality and Preference 2003, 14:43-52.
27. Krippendorff K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology 2004, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd Ed.
28. Langstaff S.A., Guinard X.J., Lewis M.J. Sensory evaluation of the mouth feel of beer. ASBC Journal 1991, 49:54-59.
29. Lawless H.T., Corrigan C.J., Lee C.B. Interactions of astringent substances. Chemical Senses 1994, 19(141):154.
30. Lawless H.T. Flavor description of white wine by "expert" and nonexpert wine consumers. Journal of Food Science 1984, 49:120-123.
31. Lawless L.J.R., Civille G.V. Developing Lexicons: A review. Journal of Sensory Studies 2013, 28:270-281.
32. Lea A.G.H., Arnold G.M. The phenolics of ciders: Bitterness and astringency. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1978, 29:478-483.
33. Lee C.A., Vickers Z.M. The astringency of whey protein beverages is caused by their acidity. International Dairy Journal 2008, 18:1153-1156.
34. Lee C.B., Lawless H.T. Time-course of astringent sensations. Chemical Senses 1991, 16:225-238.
35. Lee C.A., Vickers Z.M. Discrimination among astringent samples is affected by choice of palate cleanser. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:93-99.
36. Lehrer A. Talking about wine. Language 1975, 51:901-923.
37. Lesschaeve I., Noble A.C. Polyphenols: Factors influencing their sensory properties and their effects on food and beverage preferences. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005, 81:330S-335S.
38. Lockshin L. Involved or not involved. Australian and New Zealand Wine Industry Journal 1998, 13(3):302-303.
39. Lockshin L.S., Spawton A.L., MacIntosh G. Using product, brand and purchasing involvement for retail segmentation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 1997, 4(3):171-183.
40. Lockshin L., Quester P., Spawton T. Segmentation by involvement or nationality for global retailing: A cross-national comparative study of wine shopping behaviours. Journal of Wine Research 2001, 12(3):223-236.
41. Lyman B.J., Green B.G. Oral astringency: Effects of repeated exposure and interactions with sweeteners. Chemical Senses 1990, 15:151-164.
42. Marshall D., Bell R. Relating the food involvement scale to demographic variables, food choice and other constructs. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:871-879.
43. Meilgaard M.C., Muller J.E. Progress in descriptive analysis of beer and brewing products. Technical Quarterly of the Master Brewers Association of America 1987, 24:79-85.
44. Mittal B., Lee M.-S. A causal model of consumer involvement. Journal of Economic Psychology 1989, 10:363-389.
45. Modell S. Triangulation between case study and survey methods in management accounting research: An assessment of validity implications. Management Accounting Research 2005, 16:231-254.
46. Mouret M., Lo Monaco G., Urdapilleta I., Parr W.V. Social representations of wine and culture: A comparison between France and New Zealand. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 30:102-107.
47. Parr W.V., Ballester J., Peyron D., Grose C., Valentin D. Perceived minerality in Sauvignon wines: Influence of culture and perception mode. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 41:121-132.
48. Peynaud E. The taste of wine: The art and science of wine appreciation 1987, Macdonald Orbis, London.
49. R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2013, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
50. Revelle, W. (2013) psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research, Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych%20Version%20=1.4.1.
51. Ross C.F., Hinken C., Weller K. Efficacy of palate cleansers for reduction of astringency carryover during repeated ingestions of red wine. Journal of Sensory Studies 2007, 22:293-312.
52. Rusell Bernard H. Free listing. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches 2005, 301-311. AltaMiraPress, Lanham, MD. 4th ed. H. Rusell Bernard (Ed.).
53. Sáenz-Navajas M.P., Avizcurri J.M., Ferreria V., Fernández-Zurbano P. Sensory changes during bottle storage of Spanish red wines under different initial oxygen doses. Food Research International 2014, 66:235-246.
54. Smith V., Møgelvang-Hansen P., Hyldigc G. Spin versus fair speak in food labelling: A matter of taste?. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:1016-1025.
55. Solomon G.E.A. Psychology of novice and expert wine talk. American Journal of Psychology 1990, 103:495-517.
56. Sowalsky R.A., Noble A.C. Comparison of the effects of concentration, pH and anion species on astringency and sourness of organic acids. Chemical Senses 1998, 23:343-349.
57. Swahn J., Öström Å., Larsson U., Gustafsson I.-B. Sensory and semantic language model for red apples. Journal of Sensory Studies 2010, 25:591-615.
58. Symoneaux R., Galmarini M.V. Open-ended questions. Novel techniques in sensory characterization and consumer profiling 2014, CRC Press, Boca Ratón. P. Varela, G. Ares (Eds.).
59. Wansink B., Painter J. Descriptive menu labels effect on sales. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 2001, 42:68-72.