Open-ended questions

Novel Techniques in Sensory Characterization and Consumer Profiling

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 307-332

  Symoneaux, Ronan ^a   Galmarini, Mara V ^b,c  

^a Ecole Superieure d'Agriculture   (France)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA ARGENTINA   (Argentina)

^c Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929573083     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/b16853     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Ares, G., Giménez, A., Barreiro, C., and Gámbaro, A. 2010. Use of an open-ended question to identify drivers of liking of milk desserts. Comparison with pref-erence mapping techniques. Food Quality and Preference 21: 286-294.
2. ASTM. 1977. Manual on Sensory Testing Methods, Vol. SPT 434. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
3. Bécue-Bertaut, M., Álvarez-Esteban, R., and Pagès, J. 2008. Rating of products through scores and free-text assertions: Comparing and combining both. Food Quality and Preference 19: 122-134.
4. Bécue-Bertaut, M. and Pagès, J. 2008. Multiple factor analysis and clustering of a mixture of quantitative, categorical and frequency data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 52: 3255-3268.
5. Blancher, G., Chollet, S., Kesteloot, R., Hoang, D. N., Cuvelier, G., and Sieffermann, J. M. 2007. French and Vietnamese: How do they describe tex-ture characteristics of the same food? A case study with jellies. Food Quality and Preference 18: 560-575.
6. Carson, R. T., Lewis, B. E., Shiff, S. J., Johnston, J. M., Dennee-Sommers, B., Lasch, K. E., Hwang, S., and Marquis, P. 2011. Pgi20 ibs-c patient symptom reports: Analysis of exploratory open-ended questions. Value in Health 14: A183-A184.
7. Chollet, S., Lelièvre, M., Abdi, H., and Valentin, D. 2011. Sort and beer: Everything you wanted to know about the sorting task but did not dare to ask. Food Quality and Preference 22: 507-520.
8. Christian, L. M. and Dillman, D. A. 2004. The influence of graphical and sym-bolic language manipulations on responses to self-administered questions. Public Opinion Quarterly 68: 57-80.
9. Elmore, J. R., Heymann, H., Johnson, J., and Hewett, J. E. 1999. Preference map-ping: Relating acceptance of “creaminess” to a descriptive sensory map of a semi-solid. Food Quality and Preference 10: 465-475.
10. Escofier, B. and Pagès, J. 2008. Analyses factorielles simples et multiples: Objectifs, méthodes et interprétation, 4ème edn. Paris, France: Dunod.
11. Faye, P., Brémaud, D., Durand Daubin, M., Courcoux, P., Giboreau, A., and Nicod, H. 2004. Perceptive free sorting and verbalization tasks with naive subjects: An alternative to descriptive mappings. Food Quality and Preference 15: 781-791.
12. Faye, P., Brémaud, D., Teillet, E., Courcoux, P., Giboreau, A., and Nicod, H. 2006. An alternative to external preference mapping based on consumer perceptive mapping. Food Quality and Preference 17: 604-614.
13. Faye, P., Courcoux, P., Giboreau, A., and Qannari, E. M. 2013. Assessing and taking into account the subjects’ experience and knowledge in consumer studies. Application to the free sorting of wine glasses. Food Quality and Preference 28: 317-327.
14. Galmarini, M. V., Symoneaux, R., Chollet, S., and Zamora, M. C. 2013. Understanding apple consumers’ expectations in terms of likes and dislikes: Use of comment analysis in a cross-cultural study. Appetite 63: 27-36.
15. Galmarini, M. V., van Baren, C., Zamora, M. C., Chirife, J., Di Leo Lira, P., and Bandoni, A. 2011. Impact of trehalose, sucrose and/or maltodextrin addition on aroma retention in freeze dried strawberry puree. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 46: 1337-1345.
16. Geer, J. G. 1991. Do open-ended questions measure “salient” issues? Public Opinion Quarterly 55: 360-370.
17. Hanson, J. L., Balmer, D. F., and Giardino, A. P. 2011. Qualitative research meth-ods for medical educators. Academic Pediatrics 11: 375-386.
18. Heath, T. P. and Chatzidakis, A. 2012. The transformative potential of market-ing from the consumers’ point of view. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 11: 283-291.
19. Israel, G. 2006. Visual cues and response format effects in mail surveys. In Annual Meeting of the Southern Rural Sociological Association, Orlando, FL.
20. Jordan-Zachery, J. S. and Seltzer, R. 2012. Responses to affirmative action: Is there a question order affect? The Social Science Journal 49: 119-126.
21. Lawless, H. T. and Heymann, H. 1998. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices. New York: Chapmann & Hall.
22. Moussaoui, K. A. and Varela, P. 2010. Exploring consumer product profiling techniques and their linkage to a quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Quality and Preference 21: 1088-1099.
23. Nestrud, M. A. and Lawless, H. T. 2010. Perceptual mapping apples and cheeses using projective mapping and sorting. Journal of Sensory Studies 25: 390-405.
24. Niedomysl, T. and Malmberg, B. 2009. Do open-ended survey questions on migration motives create coder variability problems? Population, Space and Place 15: 79-87.
25. Perrin, L. and Pagès, J. 2009. Construction of a product space from the ultra-flash profiling method: Application to 10 red wines from the Loire valley. Journal of Sensory Studies 24: 372-395.
26. Perrin, L., Symoneaux, R., Maître, I., Asselin, C., Jourjon, F., and Pagès, J. 2008. Comparison of three sensory methods for use with the Napping® proce-dure: Case of ten wines from Loire valley. Food Quality and Preference 19: 1-11.
27. Prescott, J., Lee, S. M., and Kim, K. 2011. Analytic approaches to evaluation modify hedonic responses. Food Quality and Preference 22: 391-393.
28. Rostaing, H., Ziegelbaum, H., Boutin, E., and Rogeaux, M. 1998. Analyse de commentaires libres par la techniques des réseaux de segments. In Fourth International Conference on the Statistical Analysis of Textual Data, JADT’98.
29. Sinesio, F., Peparaio, M., Moneta, E., and Comendador, F. J. 2010. Perceptive maps of dishes varying in glutamate content with professional and naive subjects. Food Quality and Preference 21: 1034-1041.
30. Smyth, J. D., Dillman, D. A., Christian, L. M., and Mcbride, M. 2009. Open-ended questions in web surveys: Can increasing the size of answer boxes and providing extra verbal instructions improve response quality? Public Opinion Quarterly 73: 325-337.
31. Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1957. Statistical Methods, 6th edn. Ames, IA: The Iowa State University Press.
32. Symoneaux, R., Galmarini, M. V., and Mehinagic, E. 2012. Comment analysis of consumer’s likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping. A case study on apples. Food Quality and Preference 24: 59-66.
33. ten Kleij, F. and Musters, P. A. D. 2003. Text analysis of open-ended survey responses: A complementary method to preference mapping. Food Quality and Preference 14: 43-52.
34. Varela, P. and Ares, G. 2012. Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characteriza-tion. Food Research International 48: 893-908.
35. Woodward, J. L. and Franzen, R. 1948. A study of coding reliability. Public Opinion Quarterly 12: 253-257.