Proteomic analysis of a segregant population reveals candidate proteins linked to mealiness in peach

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 131, Issue , 2016, Pages 71-81

  Almeida, Andréa Miyasaka ^a,b   Urra, Claudio ^a,b   Moraga, Carol ^a,b   Jego, Marcela ^a,b   Flores, Alejandra ^a,b   Meisel, Lee ^d   González, Mauricio ^b,d   Infante, Rodrigo ^d   Defilippi, Bruno G ^c   Campos Vargas, Reinaldo ^a   Orellana, Ariel ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD ANDRÉS BELLO   (Chile)

^b FONDAP Center of Genome Regulation (CGR)   (Chile)

^c INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES AGROPECUARIAS   (Chile)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Chilling injury; Cold; Molecular markers; Postharvest; Proteome

Indexed keywords

ETHYLENE; PROTEOME; VEGETABLE PROTEIN; COLD SHOCK PROTEIN; PLANT PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; ENERGY METABOLISM; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PEACH; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; TWO DIMENSIONAL ELECTROPHORESIS; COLD SHOCK RESPONSE; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD HANDLING; FRUIT; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

COLD SHOCK PROTEINS AND PEPTIDES; COLD-SHOCK RESPONSE; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD HANDLING; FRUIT; PLANT PROTEINS; PROTEOME; PRUNUS PERSICA;

EID: 84948823729     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Nations F and AO of the U.FAOSTAT World Prod Peaches Nectarines 2013.
2. Nations F and AO of the U.FAOSTAT Commod Balanc Crop Prim Equiv 2014.
3. Lurie S., Crisosto C.H. Chilling injury in peach and nectarine. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2005, 37:195-208. 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2005.04.012.
4. Crisosto C.H., Mitchell F.G., Ju Z., Sun R. Susceptibility to chilling injury of peach, Nectarine, and Plum Cultivars Grown in California 1999, 34:1116-1118.
5. Campos-Vargas R., Becerra O., Baeza-Yates R., Cambiazo V., González M., Meisel L., et al. Seasonal variation in the development of chilling injury in "O"Henry' peaches. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 2006, 110:79-83.
6. Sevillano L., Sanchez-Ballesta M.T., Romojaro F., Flores F.B. Physiological, hormonal and molecular mechanisms regulating chilling injury in horticultural species. Postharvest technologies applied to reduce its impact. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89:555-573. 10.1002/jsfa.3468.
7. Migliorini M., Cecchi L., Cherubini C., Trapani S., Cini E., Zanoni B. Understanding degradation of phenolic compounds during olive oil processing by inhibitor addition. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2012, 114:942-950.
8. Pavez L., Hödar C., Olivares F., González M., Cambiazo V. Effects of postharvest treatments on gene expression in Prunus persica fruit: normal and altered ripening. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2013, 75:125-134.
9. Pons C., Martí C., Forment J., Crisosto C.H., Dandekar A.M., Granell A. A bulk segregant gene expression analysis of a peach population reveals components of the underlying mechanism of the fruit cold response. PLoS One 2014, 9:e90706.
10. Puig C.P., Dagar A., Marti Ibanez C., Singh V., Crisosto C.H., Friedman H., et al. Pre-symptomatic transcriptome changes during cold storage of chilling sensitive and resistant peach cultivars to elucidate chilling injury mechanisms. BMC Genomics 2015, 16.
11. Zhou H.W., Lurie S., Lers A., Khatchitski A., Sonego L., Ben A.R. Delayed storage and controlled atmosphere storage of nectarines: two strategies to prevent woolliness. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2000, 18:133-141.
12. Verlag F., Zhou H., Dong L., Ben-Arie R., Lurie S. The role of ethylene in the prevention of chilling injury in nectarines. J. Plant Physiol. 2001, 158:55-61.
13. Palou L., Crisosto C.H., Garner D., Basinal L.M. Effect of continuous exposure to exogenous ethylene during cold storage on postharvest decay development and quality attributes of stone fruits and table grapes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2003, 27:243-254.
14. Ben-Arie R., Sonego L. Pectolytic enzyme activity involved in woolly breakdown of stored peaches. Phytochemistry 1980, 19:2553-2555.
15. Girardi C.L., Corrent A.R., Lucchetta L., Zanuzo M.R., Da Costa T.S., Brackmann A., et al. Effect of ethylene, intermittent warming and controlled atmosphere on postharvest quality and the occurrence of woolliness in peach (Prunus persica cv. Chiripá) during cold storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2005, 38:25-33.
16. Meneses C., Orellana A. Using genomics to improve fruit quality. Biol. Res. 2013, 46:347-352.
17. Cantín C.M., Crisosto C.H., Ogundiwin E.A., Gradziel T., Torrents J., Moreno M.A., et al. Chilling injury susceptibility in an intra-specific peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] progeny. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2010, 58:79-87.
18. Dhanapal A.P., Crisosto C.H. Association genetics of chilling injury susceptibility in peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) across multiple years. 3. Biotech 2013, 3:481-490.
19. Martínez-García P.J., Parfitt D.E., Ogundiwin E.A., Fass J., Chan H.M., Ahmad R., et al. High density SNP mapping and QTL analysis for fruit quality characteristics in peach (Prunus persica L.). Tree Genet. Genomes 2012, 9:19-36.
20. Crisosto C.H., Labavitch J.M. Developing a quantitative method to evaluate peach (Prunus persica) flesh mealiness. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2002, 25:151-158.
21. Resende M.D.V. Genética biométrica e estatística no melhoramento de plantas perenes 2002, Brasília, Embrapa Informação Tecnológica.
22. Abdi N., Holford P., McGlasson B. Application of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to detect proteins associated with harvest maturity in stonefruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2002, 26:1-13.
23. Méchin V., Consoli L., Le Guilloux M., Damerval C. An efficient solubilization buffer for plant proteins focused in immobilized pH gradients. Proteomics 2003, 3:1299-1302.
24. Bradford M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72:248-254.
25. Berth M., Moser F.M., Kolbe M., Bernhardt J. The state of the art in the analysis of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis images. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 76:1223-1243.
26. Grove H., Jørgensen B.M., Jessen F., Søndergaard I., Jacobsen S., Hollung K., et al. Combination of Statistical Approaches for Analysis of 2-DE Data Gives Complementary Results research articles 2008, 5119-5124.
27. Shevchenko A., Wilm M., Vorm O., Mann M. Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins from silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68:850-858.
28. Verde I., Abbott A.G., Scalabrin S., Jung S., Shu S., Marroni F., et al. The high-quality draft genome of peach (Prunus persica) identifies unique patterns of genetic diversity, domestication and genome evolution. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45:487-494.
29. Wilcoxon F., Bulletin S.B., Dec N. Individual comparisons by ranking methods published by: international biometric society. Int. Biometric Soc. 2015, 1:80-83.
30. Abdallah C., Dumas-Gaudot E., Renaut J., Sergeant K. Gel-based and gel-free quantitative proteomics approaches at a glance. Int. J. Plant Genomics 2012.
31. Ogundiwin E.A., Martí C., Forment J., Pons C., Granell A., Gradziel T.M., et al. Development of ChillPeach genomic tools and identification of cold-responsive genes in peach fruit. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 68:379-397.
32. Vizoso P., Meisel L.A., Tittarelli A., Latorre M., Saba J., Caroca R., et al. Comparative EST transcript profiling of peach fruits under different post-harvest conditions reveals candidate genes associated with peach fruit quality. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:423.
33. Nilo R., Saffie C., Lilley K., Baeza-Yates R., Cambiazo V., Campos-Vargas R., et al. Proteomic analysis of peach fruit mesocarp softening and chilling injury using difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE). BMC Genomics 2010, 11:43.
34. Giraldo E., Díaz A., Corral J.M., García A. Applicability of 2-DE to assess differences in the protein profile between cold storage and not cold storage in nectarine fruits. J. Proteome 2012, 75:5774-5782.
35. Zeevaart J.A.D., Creelman R.A. Metabolism and physiology of abscisic acid. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1988, 39:439-473.
36. González R.M., Iusem N.D. Twenty years of research on Asr (ABA-stress-ripening) genes and proteins. Planta 2014, 239:941-949.
37. Ecker J.R. The ethylene signal transduction pathway in plants. Science 1994, 268:667-675.
38. Sauter M., Moffatt B., Saechao M.C., Hell R., Wirtz M. Methionine salvage and S-adenosylmethionine: essential links between sulfur, ethylene and polyamine biosynthesis. Biochem. J. 2013, 451:145-154.
39. Nilo R., Campos-Vargas R., Orellana A. Assessment of Prunus persica fruit softening using a proteomics approach. J. Proteome 2012, 75:1618-1638.
40. Toledo T.T., Nogueira S.B., Cordenunsi B.R., Gozzo F.C., Pilau E.J., Lajolo F.M., et al. Proteomic analysis of banana fruit reveals proteins that are differentially accumulated during ripening. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2012, 70:51-58.
41. Malacrida C., Valle E.M., Boggio S.B. Postharvest chilling induces oxidative stress response in the dwarf tomato cultivar Micro-Tom. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 127:10-18.
42. 2+ signalling to membrane dynamics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6:449-461.
43. Monastyrskaya K., Babiychuk E.B., Draeger A. The annexins: spatial and temporal coordination of signaling events during cellular stress. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2009, 66:2623-2642.
44. Lo Piero A.R., Mercurio V., Puglisi I., Petrone G. Gene isolation and expression analysis of two distinct sweet orange [Citrus sinensis L. (Osbeck)] tau-type glutathione transferases. Gene 2009, 443:143-150.
45. Wisniewski M.E., Bassett C.L., Renaut J., Farrell R., Tworkoski T., Artlip T.S. Differential regulation of two dehydrin genes from peach (Prunus persica) by photoperiod, low temperature and water deficit. Tree Physiol. 2006, 26:575-584.
46. Close T.J. Dehydrins: a commonalty in the response of plants to dehydration and low temperature. Physiol. Plant. 1997, 100:291-296.
47. Hanin M., Brini F., Ebel C., Toda Y., Takeda S., Masmoudi K. Plant dehydrins and stress tolerance: versatile proteins for complex mechanisms. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6:1503-1509. 10.4161/psb.6.10.17088.
48. Godoy J.a., Lunar R., Torres-Schumann S., Moreno J., Rodrigo R.M., Pintor-Toro J.a. Expression, tissue distribution and subcellular localization of dehydrin TAS14 in salt-stressed tomato plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 1994, 26:1921-1934.
49. Brini F., Hanin M., Lumbreras V., Irar S., Pagès M., Masmoudi K. Functional characterization of DHN-5, a dehydrin showing a differential phosphorylation pattern in two Tunisian durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) varieties with marked differences in salt and drought tolerance. Plant Sci. 2007, 172:20-28.
50. Goday A., Jensen A.B., Culiáííez-macia F.A., Alba M.M., Figueras M. The maize abscisic acid-responsive protein Rabl7 1s located in the nucleus and lnteracts with nuclear localization signals. Plant Cell 1994, 6:351-360.
51. Pelletier K., Murrell J.R., Shirley B.W. HowoH. Plant Physiol. 1997, 113:1437-1445.
52. Harborne J.B., Williams C.A. Advances in flavonoid research since 1992. Phytochemistry 2000, 55:481-504.
53. Bianco A., Cavarischia C., Guiso M. Total synthesis of anthocyanidins via heck reaction. Nat. Prod. Res. 2006, 20:93-97.
54. Zhang Z., Pang X., Ji Z., Jiang Y. Role of anthocyanin degradation in litchi pericarp browning. Food Chem. 2001, 75:217-221.
55. Zhang Z., Pang X., Xuewu D., Ji Z., Jiang Y. Role of peroxidase in anthocyanin degradation in litchi fruit pericarp. Food Chem. 2005, 90:47-52.
56. Ogundiwin E.A., Peace C.P., Nicolet C.M., Rashbrook V.K., Gradziel T.M., Bliss F.A., et al. Leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase gene (PpLDOX): a potential functional marker for cold storage browning in peach. Tree Genet. Genomes 2008, 4:543-554.
57. Brummell D., Dal Cin V., Crisosto C.H., Labavitch J.M. Cell wall metabolism during maturation, ripening and senescence of peach fruit. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55:2029-2039.
58. Dawson D.M., Melton L.D., Watkins C.B. Cell wall changes in nectarines (Prunus persica). Plant Physiol. 1992, 100:1203-1210.
59. Fruk G., Cmelik Z., Jemric T., Hribar J., Vidrih R. Pectin role in woolliness development in peaches and nectarines: a review. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 2014, 180:1-5.
60. Fischer R.L., Bennett A.B. Role of cell wall hydrolases in fruit ripening. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1991, 42:675-703.
61. Lahaye M., Quemener B., Causse M., Seymour G.B. Hemicellulose fine structure is affected differently during ripening of tomato lines with contrasted texture. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2012, 51:462-470.
62. Buescher R.W., Furmanski R.J. Role of pectinesterase and polygalacturonase in the formation of woolliness in peaches. J. Food Sci. 1978, 43:264-266.
63. Shoshan-Barmatz V., Ben-Hail D. VDAC, a multi-functional mitochondrial protein as a pharmacological target. Mitochondrion 2012, 12:24-34.
64. 2+-dependent control of the permeability properties of the mitochondrial outer membrane and voltage-dependent anion-selective channel (VDAC). J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:17347-17358.
65. Etienne C., Moing A., Dirlewanger E., Raymond P., Rothan C. Isolation and characterization of six peach cDNAs encoding key proteins in organic acid metabolism and solute accumulation: involvement in regulating peach fruit acidity 2002, 37:259-270.
66. Duchoslav M., Fischer L. Parallel subfunctionalisation of PsbO protein isoforms in angiosperms revealed by phylogenetic analysis and mapping of sequence variability onto protein structure. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15:133.
67. Escobar-Gutierrez A.J., Gaudillere J.-P. Carbon partitioning in source leaves of peach, a sorbitol-synthesizing species, is modified by photosynthetic rate. Physiol. Plant. 1997, 100:353-360.
68. Abidi W., Cantín C.M., Jiménez S., Giménez R., Moreno M.Á., Gogorcena Y. Influence of antioxidant compounds, total sugars and genetic background on the chilling injury susceptibility of a non-melting peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) progeny. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 95:351-358.
69. Bar-Peled M., Neill M.A.O. Plant nucleotide sugar formation, interconversion, and salvage by sugar. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2011, 67:127-155.
70. Seifert G.J. Nucleotide sugar interconversions and cell wall biosynthesis: how to bring the inside to the outside. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7:277-284.
71. Footitt S., Cornah J.E., Pracharoenwattana I., Bryce J.H., Smith S.M. The Arabidopsis 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase-2 (kat2-1) mutant exhibits increased flowering but reduced reproductive success. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58:2959-2968.
72. Carrie C., Murcha M.W., Millar A.H., Smith S.M., Whelan J. Nine 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolases (KATs) and acetoacetyl-CoA thiolases (ACATs) encoded by five genes in Arabidopsis thaliana are targeted either to peroxisomes or cytosol but not to mitochondria. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 63:97-108.
73. Syrkin E., Nikolauf B.J. Plants contain multiple biotin enzymes: discovery of carboxylase and pyruvate carboxylase in the plant kingdom. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1990, 258:179-186.