Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy, and technology

The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 397-417

  Scardamalia, Marlene ^a   Bereiter, Carl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948816390     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139519526.025     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Bereiter, C. (2014). Principled practical knowledge: Not a bridge but a ladder. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 4-17.
3. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. D. Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. V. Merrienboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 73-78). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
4. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2010). Can children really create knowledge? Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1). Published online at http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/585.
5. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2012). Theory building and the pursuit of understanding in history, social studies, and literature. In J. R. Kirby & M. J. Lawson (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learn-ingprocesses (pp. 160-177). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bielaczyz, K., & Kapur, M. (2010). Playing epistemic games in science and mathematics classrooms. Educational Technology, 50(5), 19-25.
7. Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J.-F. (2012). Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition. In J. R. Kirby & M. J. Lawson (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes (pp. 276-314). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289-325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Caswell, B., & Bielaczyc, K. (2001). Knowledge Forum: Altering the relationship between students and scientific knowledge. Education, Communication & Information, 1,281-305.
10. Chan, C. K. K. (2011). Bridging research and practice: Implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Honk Kong classrooms. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 147-186.
11. Chan, C. K. K., Lam, I. C. K., & Leung, R. W H. (2012). Can collaborative knowledge building promote both scientific processes and science achievement? International Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(3), 199-227.
12. Chen, B., Scardamalia, M., Acosta, A., Resendes, M., & Kici, D. (2013). Promisingness judgments as facilitators of knowledge building. In N. Rummel, M. Kapur, M. Nathan, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), To see the world and a grain of sand: Learning across levels of space, time, and scale: CSCL 2013 Conference Proceedings Volume 2 - Short papers, panels, posters, demos & community events (pp. 231-232). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
13. Chen, B., Scardamalia, M., Resendes, M., Chuy, M., & Bereiter, C. (2012). Students’ intuitive understanding of promisingness and promisingness judgments to facilitate knowledge advancement. In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson, & P Reimann (Eds.), The future of learning: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS 2012) - Volume 1, Full Papers (pp. 111-118). Sydney, Australia: ISLS.
14. Chuy, M., Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Prinsen, F., Resendes, M., Messina, R., Hunsburger, W, Teplovs, C., & Chow, A. (2010). Understanding the nature of science and scientific progress: A theory-building approach. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36 (1). Published online at http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/580.
15. Dillenbourg, P, & Jermann, P (2006). Designing integrative scripts. In F Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge: Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives (pp. 259-288). New York: Springer.
16. Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. New York: Harper and Row.
17. Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: Online creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & S. Vaid (Eds.), Conceptual structures and processes: Emergence, discovery and change (pp. 461-493). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18. Goldman, S. R., & Scardamalia, M. (Eds.) (2013). Multiple document comprehension (Special issue). Cognition and Instruction, 31(2).
19. Hemetsberger, A., & Reinhardt, C. (2006). Learning and knowledge-building in open-source communities: A social-experimental approach. Management Learning, 37(2), 187-214.
20. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26 (1), 48-94.
21. Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
23. Liu, A. (2012). This is not a book: Transliteracies and long forms of digital attention. Paper presented at the Translitteraties Conference, ENS Cachan, Paris, 7 November 2012. Web: www.stef.ens-cachan.fr/manifs/translit/Alan_Liu_ this-is-not-a-book-slides_2012_11_07.pdf.
24. Martin, R. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press. powerpress http://gsbm-med.pepperdine.edu/gbr/audio/spring2010/designofbiz.mp3.
25. Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96-104.
26. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). 21st century learning: Research, innovation and policy, Paris: OECD.
28. Oshima, J., Oshima, R., & Matsuzawa, Y. (2012). Knowledge Building Discourse Explorer: A social network analysis application for knowledge building discourse. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 903-921.
29. Petroski, H. (1998). Invention by design: How engineers get from thought to thing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Philip, D. N. (2010). Social network analysis to examine interaction patterns in knowledge building communities. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1). Published online at http://cjlt.csj.ualberta.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/577.
31. Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
32. Resendes, M., Chen, B., Acosta, A., & Scardamalia, M. (2013). The effect of formative feedback on vocabulary use and distribution of vocabulary knowledge in a grade two knowledge building class. In N. Rummel, M. Kapur, M. Nathan, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), To see the world and a grain of sand: Learning across levels of space, time, and scale: CSCL 2013 Conference Proceedings Volume 1 - Full Papers & Symposia (pp. 391-398). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
33. Resendes, M., Chen, B., Chuy, M., & Scardamalia, M. (2012, August). The effect of meta-discourse on ways of contributing to an explanation-seeking dialogue in grade 2. Paper presented at the 16th Knowledge Building Summer Institute (KBS12012), Toronto, Canada. Web: ikit.org/SummerInstitute2012/Papers/3024-Resendes.pdf.
34. Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 8, 345-373.
35. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 76-98). Chicago: Open Court.
36. Scardamalia, M. (2003). Knowledge building environments: Extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work. In A. DiStefano, K. E. Rudestam, & R. Silverman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distributed learning (pp. 269-272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
37. Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum®. In A. Kovalchick & K. Dawson (Eds.), Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183-192). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
38. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37-68.
39. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Brett, C., Burtis, P. J., Calhoun, C., & Smith Lea, N. (1992) Educational applications of a networked communal database, Interactive Learning Environments, 2(1), 45-71.
41. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. In K. McGilley (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 201-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Scardamalia, M., Bransford, J., Kozma, R., & Quellmalz, E. (2012). New assessments and environments for knowledge building. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 231-300). New York: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
43. Stahl, G. (2006). Groupcognition: Computersupportforbuildingcollaborativeknowl-edge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Web: http://GerryStahl.net/mit.
44. Sun, Y., Zhang. J., & Scardamalia, M. (2010). Developing deep understanding and literacy while addressing a gender-based literacy gap. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35 (1). Web: http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/576.
45. Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Thagard, P. (2006). Hot thought: Mechanisms and applications of emotional cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Tsoukas, H. (2009). A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 20, 941-957.
48. Van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 259-287.
49. Van Aalst, J., & Truong, M. S. (2011). Promoting knowledge creation discourse in an Asian primary five classroom: Results from an inquiry into life cycles. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), 487-515.
50. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1-30.
51. Woodruff, E., & Meyer, K. (1997). Explanations from intra- and intergroup discourse: Students building knowledge in the science classroom. Research in Science Education, 27 (1), 25-39.
52. Zhang, J., Chen, M.-H., Chen, J., & Mico, T. F. (2013). Computer-supported metadiscourse to foster collective progress in knowledge-building communities. Proceedings of the International Conference of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL). Madison, Wisconsin.
53. Zhang, J., Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C., & Morley, E. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262-307.
54. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7-44.