Impact of Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty on Health-Related Quality of Life Measures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 30, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 1938-1952

  Koutras, Christos ^a,b   Antoniou, Stavros A ^c,d   Talias, Michael A ^b   Heep, Hansjoerg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

^c Neuwerk Hospital   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF HERAKLION   (Greece)

Author keywords

Hip; Meta analysis; Patient reported outcome; Quality of life; Resurfacing arthroplasty; Surface replacement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EUROQOL 5D; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD HIP SCORE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SHORT FORM 12; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOTAL HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; UCLA HIP SCORING SYSTEM; UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES ACTIVITY SCALE; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX; HIP REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84948718260     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.014     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Grigoris P., Roberts P., Panousis K., et al. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the evolution of contemporary designs. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2006, 220(2):95.
2. Hilmarsson S., Soderman P., Herbert P., et al. An epidemiological analysis of a young total hip replacement population in Sweden. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006, 88(Suppl. 1):47.
3. McAuley J.P., Szuszczewicz E.S., Young A., et al. Total hip arthroplasty in patients 50years and younger. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 418:119.
4. Callaghan J.J., Forest E.E., Olejniczak J.P., et al. Charnley total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old. A twenty to twenty-five-year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998, 80(5):704.
5. Wroblewski B.M., Fleming P.A., Siney P.D. Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty of the hip. 20-to-30year results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1999, 81(3):427.
6. Johnson A.J., Zywiel M.G., Hooper H., et al. Narrowed indications improve outcomes for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2011, 69(Suppl. 1):S27.
7. Amstutz H.C. Present state of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing. J Surg Orthop Adv 2008, 17(1):12.
8. Pailhé R., Sharma A., Reina N., et al. Hip resurfacing: a systematic review of literature. Int Orthop 2012, 36(12):2399.
9. Amstutz H.C., Le Duff M.J., Campbell P.A., et al. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92(16):2663.
10. McMinn D.J., Daniel J., Ziaee H., et al. Indications and results of hip resurfacing. Int Orthop 2011, 35(2):231.
11. Murray D.W., Grammatopoulos G., Pandit H., et al. The ten-year survival of the Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2012, 94(9):1180.
12. National Joint Registry for England and Wales 4th Annual Report 2007, NJR Centre, [Available at: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/portals/0/documents/england/reports/njr_ar_4.pdf; last assessed January 22, 2015].
13. Buergi M.L., Walter W.L. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the Australian experience. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(7 Suppl. 3):61.
14. Huo M.H., Stockton K.G., Mont M.A., et al. What's new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92(18):2959.
15. Quesada M.J., Marker D.R., Mont M.A. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: advantages and disadvantages. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(7 Suppl.):69.
16. Pollard T.C., Baker R.P., Eastaugh-Waring S.J., et al. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006, 88(5):592.
17. Shimmin A.J., Bare J., Back D.L. Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005, 36(2):187.
18. Kim T.K., Chang C.B., Kang Y.G., et al. Causes and predictors of patient's dissatisfaction after uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(2):263.
19. Eisler T., Svensson O., Tengström A., et al. Patient expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17(4):457.
20. Gartland J.J. Orthopaedic clinical research. Deficiencies in experimental design and determinations of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988, 70(9):1357.
21. Hirsch H.S. Total joint replacement: a cost-effective procedure for the 1990s. Med Health R I 1998, 81(5):162.
22. Liberati A., Altman D.G., Tetzlaff J., et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009, 339:b2700.
23. Stroup D.F., Berlin J.A., Morton S.C., et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000, 283(15):2008.
24. Berlin J.A. Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? University of Pennsylvania Meta-analysis Blinding Study Group. Lancet 1997, 350(9072):185.
25. Howick J., Chalmers I., Glasziou P., et al. Explanation of the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) levels of evidence (background document). Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine Available at:, [last accessed January 2015]. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653.
26. Higgins J.P., Altman D.G. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 2009, 187. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex. J.P. Higgins, S. Green (Eds.).
27. Moga C., Guo B., Schopflocher D., et al. Development of a quality appraisal tool for case series studies using a modified delphi technique 2012, Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton AB.
28. Dalkey N.C., Brown B.B., Cochran S. The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion 1969, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
29. DerSimonian R., Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986, 7(3):177.
30. Higgins J.P., Altman D.G. Selecting studies and collecting data. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 2009, 151. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex. J.P. Higgins, J. Deeks (Eds.).
31. Hedges L.V., Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis 1985, Academic Press, Boston, Mass.
32. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis in the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale (NJ). 2nd ed.
33. Amstutz H.C., Le Duff M.J. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(6 Suppl. 1):36.
34. Barker K.L., Newman M.A., Hughes T., et al. Recovery of function following hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial comparing an accelerated versus standard physiotherapy rehabilitation programme. Clin Rehabil 2013, 27(9):771.
35. Bisseling P., Smolders J.M., Hol A., et al. Metal ion levels and functional results following resurfacing hip arthroplasty versus conventional small-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty; a 3 to 5year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 2015, 30(1):61. [Epub 2014 Aug 7].
36. Bow J.K., Rudan J.F., Grant H.J., et al. Are hip resurfacing arthroplasties meeting the needs of our patients? A 2-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27(6):984.
37. Brennan S.A., Khan F., McQuillan J., et al. Neck narrowing in resurfacing hip arthroplasty: a vascular insult?. Ir J Med Sci 2013, 182(2):201.
38. Costa M.L., Achten J., Parsons N.R., et al. Total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with arthritis of the hip joint: single centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2012, 344:e2147.
39. Fowble V.A., dela Rosa M.A., Schmalzried T.P. A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty-patients and outcomes. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009, 67(2):108.
40. Hall D.P., Srikantharajah D., Anakwe R.E., et al. Patient-reported outcome following metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip and total hip replacement. Hip Int 2009, 19(3):245.
41. Hing C.B., Back D.L., Bailey M., et al. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007, 89(11):1431.
42. Kim P.R., Beaulé P.E., Laflamme G.Y., et al. Causes of early failure in a multicenter clinical trial of hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(6 Suppl. 1):44.
43. Larbpaiboonpong V., Turajane T., Pragtong P. The early outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent Thai surgeon experiences. J Med Assoc Thai 2009, 92(Suppl. 6):134.
44. McGrath M.S., Desser D.R., Ulrich S.D., et al. Total hip resurfacing in patients who are sixty years of age or older. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl. 3):27.
45. Patel R., Stygall J., Harrington J., et al. Intra-operative cerebral microembolisation during primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty compared with primary hip resurfacing. Acta Orthop Belg 2009, 75(5):671.
46. Penny J.Ø., Ovesen O., Varmarken J.E., et al. Similar range of motion and function after resurfacing large-head or standard total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2013, 84(3):246.
47. Rahman W.A., Greidanus N.V., Siegmeth A., et al. Patients report improvement in quality of life and satisfaction after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013, 471(2):444.
48. Ray R., Goudie E.B., Jenkins P., et al. Resurfacing hip replacement and cemented total hip replacement have equivalent outcome at one year in a disease matched population: a case-control study of patient reported outcome measures. Hip Int 2013, 23(4):373.
49. Stiehler M., Goronzy J., Hartmann A., et al. The First SICOT Oral Presentation Award 2011: imageless computer-assisted femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing: a prospective randomised trial. Int Orthop 2013, 37(4):569.
50. Anakwe R.E., Jenkins P.J., Moran M. Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 850 patients. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26(2):209.
51. Mahomed N., Gandhi R., Daltroy L., et al. The self-administered patient satisfaction scale for primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis 2011, 2011:591253.
52. Ware J., Kosinski M., Keller S.D. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996, 34(3):220.
53. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996, 37(1):53.
54. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15(12):1833.
55. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Carr A., et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1996, 78(2):185.
56. Garellick G., Malchau H., Herberts P. Specific or general health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip replacement. A comparison between the Harris hip score and the Nottingham Health Profile. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1998, 80(4):600.
57. Amstutz H.C., Thomas B.J., Jinnah R., et al. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984, 66(2):228.
58. Jiang Y., Zhang K., Die J., et al. A systematic review of modern metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing vs standard total hip arthroplasty in active young patients. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26(3):419.
59. Marshall D.A., Pykerman K., Werle J., et al. Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014, 472(7):2217.
60. Health Quality Ontario Metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2006, 6(4):1.
61. Sehatzadeh S., Kaulback K., Levin L. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an analysis of safety and revision rates. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2012, 12(19):1.
62. Van der Weegen W., Hoekstra H.J., Sijbesma T., et al. Survival of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2011, 93(3):298.
63. Ethgen O., Bruyère O., Richy F., et al. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A(5):963.
64. Ritter M.A., Thong A.E., Davis K.E., et al. Long-term deterioration of joint evaluation scores. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004, 86(3):438.
65. Quintana J.M., Escobar A., Bilbao A., et al. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005, 13(12):1076.
66. Van Gerwen M., Shaerf D.A., Veen R.M. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2010, 81(6):680.
67. Edlin R., Tubeuf S., Achten J., et al. Cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty: economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial. BMJ Open 2012, 2(5):1.
68. Heintzbergen S., Kulin N.A., Ijzerman M.J., et al. Cost-utility of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared to conventional total hip replacement in young active patients with osteoarthritis. Value Health 2013, 16(6):942.
69. Gandhi S.K., Salmon J.W., Zhao S.Z., et al. Psychometric evaluation of the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Clin Ther 2001, 23(7):1080.
70. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Frost S., et al. Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2001, 83(8):1125.
71. Murray D.W., Fitzpatrick R., Rogers K., et al. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007, 89(8):1010.
72. Söderman P. On the validity of the results from the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 2000, 71(296):1.
73. Söderman P., Malchau H. Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 384:189.
74. Naal F.D., Impellizzeri F.M., Leunig M. Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467(4):958.
75. Berend K.R., Lombardi A.V., Adams J.B., et al. Unsatisfactory surgical learning curve with hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93(Suppl. 2):89.
76. Pijls B.G., Dekkers O.M., Middeldorp S., et al. AQUILA: assessment of quality in lower limb arthroplasty. An expert Delphi consensus for total knee and total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011, 12:173.
77. Easterbrook P.J., Berlin J.A., Gopalan R., et al. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991, 337(8746):867.
78. Jadad A., Sullivan C., Luo D. Patients' preferences for Turbuhaler or pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) in the treatment. From Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology 2000.