A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty: Patients and outcomes

Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 108-112

  Fowble, Vincent A ^a   Dela Rosa, Mylene A ^a   Schmalzried, Thomas P ^a  

^a ST VINCENT MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METAL;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS; BONE NECROSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HEALTH STATUS; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METAL IMPLANTATION; OPERATION DURATION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION; SCIATIC NEUROPATHY; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 12; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEONECROSIS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67649511974     PISSN: 19369719     EISSN: 19369727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Millennium Research Group. Global Markets for Hip Reconstructive Devices 2002. Toronto: Millennium Research Group, 2002.
2. Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:28-39.
3. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:177-184
4. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:167-170
5. Pierce EC Jr. The development of anesthesia guidelines and standards. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1990;16:61.
6. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737-755
7. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-12: How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. (2nd ed). Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1995.
8. Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, et al. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:228-241
9. Booker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:1629-1632
10. D'Antonio J, Capello W, Manley M, et al. Alumina ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty: five-year results of a prospective randomized study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;(436):164-171
11. Long WT, Dorr LD, Gendelman V. An American experience with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties. A 7-year follow- up study. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(Suppl 3):29-34.
12. Migaud H, Jobin A, Chantelot C, et al. Cementless metal-on- metal hip arthroplasty in patients less than 50 years of age. Comparison with a matched control group using ceramic- on-polyethylene after a minimum of 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(Suppl 3):23-28
13. Schmalzried TP, Silva M, dela Rosa M, et al. Optimizing patient selection and outcomes with total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;(441):200-204