Are Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasties Meeting the Needs of Our Patients?. A 2-Year Follow-Up Study

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 984-989

  Bow, Jennifer K ^a,b   Rudan, John F ^a,b   Grant, Heather J ^b   Mann, Stephen M ^a   Kunz, Manuela ^b  

^a KINGSTON GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Function; Hip resurfacing; Pain; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; BICYCLE; CORTICAL BONE; COXITIS; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PAIN; HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RIGIDITY; SELF REPORT; SHORT FORM 36; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WALKING; WELLBEING; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITY OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; REOPERATION; SELF REPORT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84861190808     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.01.022     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Mont M.A., Schmalzried T.P., Zywiel M.G., et al. Perceptions concerning hip resurfacing from attendees at the Second Annual U.S. Comprehensive Course on Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009, 67:102.
2. McGrath M.S., Marker D.R., Seyler T.M., et al. Surface replacement is comparable to primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:94.
3. Kunz M., Rudan J.F., Xenoyannis G.L., et al. Computer assisted hip resurfacing using individualized drill templates. J Arthroplasty 2010, 25:600.
4. Bergeron S.G., et al. The early results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a prospective study at a minimum two-year follow-up. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009, 67:132.
5. Mont M.A., et al. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:66.
6. Garbuz D.S., et al. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:318.
7. Marker D.R., Strimbu K., McGrath M.S., et al. Resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: review of comparative clinical and basic science studies. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009, 67:120.
8. Fowble V.A., dela Rosa M.A., Schmalzried T.P.A. Comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty: patients and outcomes. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009, 67:108.
9. Pollard T.C.B., Baker R.P., Eastaugh-Waring S.J., et al. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip: a five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006, 88-B:592.
10. O'Neill M., et al. Canadian academic experience with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009, 67:128.
11. Ebramzadeh E., Campbell P.A., Takamura K.M., et al. Failure modes of 433 metal-on-metal hip implants: how, why, and wear. Orthop Clin N Am 2011, 42:241.
12. Kruger S., Zambelli P.Y., Leyvraz P.F., et al. Computer-assisted placement technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: improvement in accuracy?. Int Orthop 2009, 33:27.
13. Romanowski J.R., Swank M.L. Imageless navigation in hip resurfacing: avoiding component malposition during the surgeon learning curve. J Bone Joint Surg 2008, 90(Suppl 3):65.
14. Cobb J.P., Kannan V., Brust K., et al. Navigation reduces the learning curve in resurfacing total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 463:90.
15. Le Duff M.J., Wisk L.E., Amstutz H.C. Range of motion after stemmed total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing: a clinical study. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009, 67:177.
16. Shimmin A., Bare J. Comparison of functional results of hip resurfacing and total hip replacement: a review of the literature. Orthop Clin N Am 2011, 42:143.
17. Naal F.D., Maffiuletti N.A., Munzinger U., et al. Sports after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med 2007, 35:705.
18. Banerjee M., Bouillon B., Banerjee C., et al. Sports activity after total hip resurfacing. Am J Sports Med 2010, 38:1229.
19. Narvani A., Tsiridis E., Nwaboku H., et al. Sporting activity following Birmingham hip resurfacing. Int J Sports Med 2006, 27:505.
20. LeDuff M.J., Amstutz H.C. Sporting activity after hip resurfacing: changes over time. Orthop Clin N Am 2011, 42:161.
21. Moroni A., Savarino L., Cadossi M., et al. Does ion release differ between hip resurfacing and metal-on-metal THA?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:700.
22. Lavigne M., Therrien M., Nantel J., et al. The John Charnley Award: the functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:326.
23. Amstutz H.C., Le Duff M.J., Campbell P.A., et al. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up. JBJS 2010, 92:2663.
24. Giannini S., Cadossi M., Chiarello E., et al. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 140 consecutive hips with a minimum five year follow-up. A clinical, radiological and histological analysis. Hip Int 2011, 21:052.
25. Rudan J., Harrison M.M., Grant H.J. Determining patient concerns before joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:1115.
26. Willert H.G., Buchhorn G.H., Fayyazi A., et al. Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:28.
27. Pandit H., Glyn-Jones S., McLardy-Smith P., et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:847.