Narrowed indications improve outcomes for hip resurfacing arthroplasty

Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases

Volumn 69, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages

  Johnson, Aaron J ^a   Zywiel, Michael G ^a   Hooper, Hassan ^a   Mont, Michael A ^a  

^a SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BONE NECROSIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMORAL HEAD SIZE; FEMUR HEAD; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DYSPLASIA; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; LEARNING CURVE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTTRAUMATIC OSTEOARTHRITIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SURGEON; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960442468     PISSN: 19369719     EISSN: 19369727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:36-43.
2. Aulakh TS, Kuiper JH, Dixey J, Richardson JB. Hip resurfacing for rheumatoid arthritis: independent assessment of 11- year results from an international register. Int Orthop. 2010 May 25; Epub ahead of print.
3. Beaule PE, Amstutz HC, Le Duff M, Dorey F. Surface arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the hip: hemiresurfacing versus metal-on-metal hybrid resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:54-58.
4. Daniel J, Ziaee H, Kamali A, et al. Ten-year results of a double-heat-treated metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br.92:20-27.
5. McBryde CW, Revell MP, Thomas AM, et al. The influence of surgical approach on outcome in Birmingham hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:920-6.
6. McBryde CW, Theivendran K, Thomas AM, et al. The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am.92:105-12.
7. Mont MA, Marker DR, Smith JM, et al. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:66-71.
8. Prosser GH, Yates PJ, Wood DJ, et al. Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: evaluation of risk factors for early revision. Acta Orthop. 81:66-71.
9. Schmalzried TP, Silva M, de la Rosa MA, et al. Optimizing patient selection and outcomes with total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:200-4.
10. Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD, et al. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:63-70.
11. Shimmin A, Beaule PE, Campbell P. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:637-54.
12. Siebel T, Maubach S, Morlock MM. Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASR hip resurfacing implantations. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2006;220:345-53.
13. Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH, et al. Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:66-71.
14. Stulberg BN, Trier KK, Naughton M, Zadzilka JD. Results and lessons learned from a United States hip resurfacing investigational device exemption trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 3):21-6.
15. Wisk LE, Amstutz HC. Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing in Rheumatoid Patients. A report on thirteen hips with minimum 3 year follow-up. Hip Int. 21:59-65.