Resurfacing hip replacement and cemented total hip replacement have equivalent outcome at one year in a disease matched population: A case-control study of patient reported outcome measures

HIP International

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 373-379

  Ray, Robbie ^a   Goudie, Ewan B ^a   Jenkins, Paul ^a   Gaston, Paul ^a  

^a ROYAL INFIRMARY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Case control series; Hip resurfacing; Oxford hip score; Patient reported outcome measures; Total hip replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALGESIA; ARTHRALGIA; ARTICLE; ASTHMA; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; BACKACHE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DIABETES MELLITUS; GENERAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD HIP SCORE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHORT FORM 12; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DIAGNOSTIC SELF EVALUATION; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84885734749     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000035     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Mathers CD, Lopez AD, Murray CJ. The burden of disease and mortality by condition: data, methods, and results for 2001. In: Mathers CD, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, eds. Global burden of disease risk factors. New York: Oxford University Press. 2006;45-93.
2. Van der Waal JM, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J. The impact of non-traumatic hip and knee disorders on health-related quality of life as measured with the SF-36 or SF-12: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(4):1141-1155.
3. Herberts P, Kärrholm J, Garellick G. Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register: Annual Report 2004. Available at: http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se/. Accessed: January 7, 2013.
4. Quesada MJ, Marker DR, Mont MA. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: advantages and disadvantages. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(7 Suppl):69-73.
5. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Shears E, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum follow up of 10 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(1):27-33.
6. Hall D P, Srikantharajah D, Anakwe RE, Gaston P, Howie CR. Patient-reported outcome following metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip and total hip replacement. Hip Int. 2009;19(3):245-250.
7. Lingard EA, Muthumayandi K, Holland J P. Comparison of patient-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(12): 1550-1554.
8. No authors listed. MHRA: Medical device alert: all metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements (MDA/2010/33). Available at: http://www.mhra.gov.uk. Accessed: January 7, 2013.
9. Simpson JM, Villar RN. Hip resurfacing. BMJ. 2010;341: c3459.
10. National Joint Registry for England and Wales: 8th annual report 2011. Available at: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcen-tre/AbouttheNJR/Publicationsandreports/Annualreports/tabid/86/Default.aspx. Accessed: January 7, 2013.
11. Huo MH, Stockton KG, Mont MA, Parvizi J. What's hewing in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(18): 2929-2972.
12. Silva M, Lee KH, Heisel C, Dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried T P. The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthro-plasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(1):40-46.
13. Leonard M, Magill M, Kiely P, Khayyat G. Radiographic comparison of cemented and uncemented total hip arthro-plasty and hip resurfacing. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2007;17(6):583-586.
14. Gartland JJ. Orthopaedic clinical research. Deficiencies in experimental design and determinations of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70(9):1357-1364.
15. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:220-233
16. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(2):185-190.
17. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, The use of the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(8): 1010-1014
18. Scott CE, Howie CR, MacDonald D, Biant LC. J Bone Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(9): 1253-1258.
19. Anakwe RE, Jenkins PJ, Moran M. Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 850 patients. J Arthro-plasty. 2011;26(2):209-213.
20. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health- related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41(5): 582-592.
21. Senn S. Change from baseline and analysis of covariance revisited. Stat Med. 2006;25(24):4334-4344.
22. Wright DB. Comparing groups in a before-after design: when t-test and ANCOVA produce different results. Br J Educ Psychol. 2006;76(Pt 3):663-675
23. Ostendorf M, van Stel H F, Buskens E, et al. Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement: a comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(6): 801-8.
24. Wylde V, Blom AW, Whitehouse SL, Taylor AI, Pattison GT, Bannister GC. Patient-reported outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty: comparison of midterm results. J Arthro-plasty. 2009;24(2):210-216.
25. Kalairaiah Y, Azurza I, Hulme C, Molloy S, Drabu I. Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties-a comparison between the Harris Hip Score and the Oxford Hip Score. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(8):1037-1041.
26. Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, Peterson MG, Charlson ME. Patients expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12(4):387-396.
27. Lieberman JR, Dorey F, Shekelle P, et al. Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(6):835-838.
28. Grissom S P, Dunagan L. Improved satisfaction during inpa-tient rehabilitation after hip and knee artlroplasty: a retrospective analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(11):798-803.
29. Dawson J, Jameson-Shortall E, Emerton M, Issues relating to long-term follow-up in hip arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15(6):710-717.
30. Ayers DC, Franklin PD, Ploutz-Snyder R, Boisvert CB. Total knee replacement outcome and coexisting physical and emotional illness. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;(440):157-161.
31. Riddle DL, Wade JB, Jiranek WA, Kong X. Preoperative pain catastrophizing predicts pain outcome after knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(3):798-806.