Specific or general health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip replacement

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 80, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 600-606

  Garellick, Göran ^a   Malchau, Henrik ^a   Herberts, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCORING SYSTEM; TIME; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CEMENTATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GAIT; HEALTH STATUS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PELVIC BONES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0031877611     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.80B4.8345     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Charnley J. Low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1979:246.
2. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fracture: treatment by mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1969;51-A:737-55.
3. Merle d'Aubigné R, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1954;36-A:451-75.
4. Pellici PM, Wilson PD, Sledge CB, et al. Long-term results of revision total hip replacement: a follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1985;67-A:513-6.
5. Gartland JJ. Orthopaedic clinical research: deficiencies in experimental design and determinations of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1988;70-A:1357-64.
6. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Williams J, Papp E. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med A 1981;15:221-9.
7. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, et al. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1980;34:281-6.
8. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, Williams J. Reliability of a population survey tool for measuring perceived health problems: a study of patients with osteoarthrosis. J Epidemiol Community Health 1981;35: 297-300.
9. Wiklund I, Romanus B, Hunt SM. Self-assessed disability in patients with arthrosis of the hip joint: reliability of the Swedish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10:159-63.
10. Hodgkinson JP, Shelley P, Wroblewski BM. The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and the operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Charnley low friction arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 1988;228:105-9.
11. Harris WH, McCarthy JC, O'Neill DA. Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1982;64-A: 1063-7.
12. Bryant MJ, Kernohan WG, Nixon JR, Mollan RAB. A statistical analysis of hip scores. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1993;75-B:705-9.
13. Andersson G. Hip assessment: a comparison of nine different methods. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1972;54-B:621-5.
14. Britton AR, Murray DW, Bulstrode CJ, McPherson K, Denham RA. Pain levels after total hip replacement: their use as endpoints for survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1997;79-B:93-8.
15. Callaghan JJ, Dysart SH, Savory CG, Hopkinson WJ. Assessing the results of hip replacement: a comparison of five different rating systems. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1990;72-B: 1008-9.
16. Galante J. Editorial. The need for a standardized system for evaluating results of total hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1985; 67-A:511-2.
17. Brinker MR, Lund PJ, Cox DD, Barrack RL. Demographic biases found in scoring instruments of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1996;11:820-30.
18. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The sickness impact profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981;19:787-805.
19. Euroquality of life Group: Euroqol. A new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16: 199-208.
20. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF36). 1. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
21. Franzen H, Johnsson R, Nilsson LT. Impaired quality of life 10 to 20 years after primary hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:21-4.
22. Garellick G, Herberts P, Strömberg C, Malchau H. Long-term results of Charnley arthroplasty: a 12-16 year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1994;9:333-40.
23. Kavanagh BF, Wallrichs S, Dewitz M, et al. Charnley low-friction arthroplasty of the hip: twenty year results with cement. J Arthroplasty 1994;9:229-34.
24. Madey SM, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP, Gpetz DD, Johnston RC. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing: the results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997;79-A:53-64.
25. Malchau H, Herberts P, Ahnfelt L. Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 1993;64:497-506.
26. Nilsson LT, Franzén H, Carlsson AS, Onnerfalt R. Early radiographic loosening impairs the function of a total hip replacement: the Nottingham Health Profile of 49 patients at five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1994;76-B:235-9.
27. Carlsson AS, Gentz CF. Radiographic versus clinical loosening of the acetabular component in noninfected total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1984;185:145-50.
28. Devitt A, O'Sullivan T, Quintan W. 16- to 25-year follow-up study of cemented arthroplasty of the hip in patients aged 50 years or younger. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:479-89.
29. Greenfield S. The state of outcome research: are we on target? N Engl J Med 1989;320:1142-3.
30. Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care 1989;27:(3 Suppl):217-32.