Structural basis for assembly and function of the Nup82 complex in the nuclear pore scaffold

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 208, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 283-297

  Gaik, Monika ^a   Flemming, Dirk ^a   Von Appen, Alexander ^b   Kastritis, Panagiotis ^b   Mücke, Norbert ^c   Fischer, Jessica ^a   Stelter, Philipp ^a   Ori, Alessandro ^b   Bui, Khanh Huy ^b   Baßler, Jochen ^a   Barbar, Elisar ^d   Beck, Martin ^b   Hurt, Ed ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^c GERMAN RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (Germany)

^d OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NUCLEOPORIN; PROTEIN NUP82; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; NUP82 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; DIMERIZATION; ELECTRON TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; STOICHIOMETRY; YEAST; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEAR PORE; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NUCLEAR PORE; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX PROTEINS; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84948614429     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201411003     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Altschul, S.F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E.W. Myers, and D.J. Lipman. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
2. Altschul, S.F., T.L. Madden, A.A. Schäffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D.J. Lipman. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.17.3389
3. Bailer, S.M., C. Balduf, J. Katahira, A. Podtelejnikov, C. Rollenhagen, M. Mann, N. Pante, and E. Hurt. 2000. Nup116p associates with the Nup82p- Nsp1p-Nup159p nucleoporin complex. J. Biol. Chem. 275:23540-23548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M001963200
4. Bailer, S.M., C. Balduf, and E. Hurt. 2001. The Nsp1p carboxy-terminal domain is organized into functionally distinct coiled-coil regions required for assembly of nucleoporin subcomplexes and nucleocytoplasmic transport. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:7944-7955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.23.7944-7955.2001
5. Barbar, E. 2008. Dynein light chain LC8 is a dimerization hub essential in diverse protein networks. Biochemistry. 47:503-508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi701995m
6. Bassler, J., M. Kallas, and E. Hurt. 2006. The NUG1 GTPase reveals and Nterminal RNA-binding domain that is essential for association with 60 S pre-ribosomal particles. J. Biol. Chem. 281:24737-24744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M604261200
7. Beck, M., F. Förster, M. Ecke, J.M. Plitzko, F. Melchior, G. Gerisch, W. Baumeister, and O. Medalia. 2004. Nuclear pore complex structure and dynamics revealed by cryoelectron tomography. Science. 306:1387-1390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1104808
8. Belgareh, N., C. Snay-Hodge, F. Pasteau, S. Dagher, C.N. Cole, and V. Doye. Functional characterization of a Nup159p-containing nuclear pore subcomplex. Mol. Biol. Cell. 9:3475-3492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.9.12.3475
9. Bernad, R., H. van der Velde, M. Fornerod, and H. Pickersgill. 2004. Nup358/ RanBP2 attaches to the nuclear pore complex via association with Nup88 and Nup214/CAN and plays a supporting role in CRM1-mediated nuclear protein export. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:2373-2384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.6.2373-2384.2004
10. Brown, J.H. 2010. How sequence directs bending in tropomyosin and other twostranded α-helical coiled coils. Protein Sci. 19:1366-1375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.415
11. Brunger, A.T. 2007. Version 1.2 of the Crystallography and NMR system. Nat. Protoc. 2:2728-2733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.406
12. Bui, K.H., A. von Appen, A.L. DiGuilio, A. Ori, L. Sparks, M.T. Mackmull, T. Bock, W. Hagen, A. Andrés-Pons, J.S. Glavy, and M. Beck. 2013. Integrated structural analysis of the human nuclear pore complex scaffold. Cell. 155:1233-1243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.055
13. Cole, C., J.D. Barber, and G.J. Barton. 2008. The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 36(Suppl. 2):W197-W201.
14. Del Priore, V., C. Heath, C. Snay, A. MacMillan, L. Gorsch, S. Dagher, and C. Cole. 1997. A structure/function analysis of Rat7p/Nup159p, an essential nucleoporin of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Sci. 110:2987-2999.
15. Delphin, C., T. Guan, F. Melchior, and L. Gerace. 1997. RanGTP targets p97 to RanBP2, a filamentous protein localized at the cytoplasmic periphery of the nuclear pore complex. Mol. Biol. Cell. 8:2379-2390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.8.12.2379
16. De Vries, S.J., A.D. van Dijk, M. Krzeminski, M. van Dijk, A. Thureau, V. Hsu, T. Wassenaar, and A.M. Bonvin. 2007. HADDOCK versus HADDOCK: new features and performance of HADDOCK2.0 on the CAPRI targets. Proteins. 69:726-733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.21723
17. De Vries, S.J., M. van Dijk, and A.M. Bonvin. 2010. The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking. Nat. Protoc. 5:883-897. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2010.32
18. Dominguez, C., R. Boelens, and A.M. Bonvin. 2003. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:1731-1737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja026939x
19. Doye, V., and E. Hurt. 1997. From nucleoporins to nuclear pore complexes. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9:401-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0955-0674(97)80014-2
20. Fahrenkrog, B., and U. Aebi. 2003. The nuclear pore complex: nucleocytoplasmic transport and beyond. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4:757-766. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1230
21. Fernández-Recio, J., M. Totrov, and R. Abagyan. 2004. Identification of proteinprotein interaction sites from docking energy landscapes. J. Mol. Biol. 335:843-865. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.069
22. Finn, R.D., J. Clements, and S.R. Eddy. 2011. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 39(Suppl. 2):W29-W37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr367
23. Fornerod, M., J. van Deursen, S. van Baal, A. Reynolds, D. Davis, K.G. Murti, J. Fransen, and G. Grosveld. 1997. The human homologue of yeast CRM1 is in a dynamic subcomplex with CAN/Nup214 and a novel nuclear pore component Nup88. EMBO J. 16:807-816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/16.4.807
24. Frank, J., M. Radermacher, P. Penczek, J. Zhu, Y. Li, M. Ladjadj, and A. Leith. SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields. J. Struct. Biol. 116:190-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jsbi.1996.0030
25. Frey, S., R.P. Richter, and D. Görlich. 2006. FG-rich repeats of nuclear pore proteins form a three-dimensional meshwork with hydrogel-like properties. Science. 314:815-817. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1132516
26. García de la Torre, J., O. Llorca, J.L. Carrascosa, and J.M. Valpuesta. 2001. HYDROMIC: prediction of hydrodynamic properties of rigid macromolecular structures obtained from electron microscopy images. Eur. Biophys. J. 30:457-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002490100176
27. Gorsch, L.C., T.C. Dockendorff, and C.N. Cole. 1995. A conditional allele of the novel repeat-containing yeast nucleoporin RAT7/NUP159 causes both rapid cessation of mRNA export and reversible clustering of nuclear pore complexes. J. Cell Biol. 129:939-955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.129.4.939
28. Grandi, P., S. Emig, C. Weise, F. Hucho, T. Pohl, and E.C. Hurt. 1995a. A novel nuclear pore protein Nup82p which specifically binds to a fraction of Nsp1p. J. Cell Biol. 130:1263-1273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.130.6.1263
29. Grandi, P., N. Schlaich, H. Tekotte, and E.C. Hurt. 1995b. Functional interaction of Nic96p with a core nucleoporin complex consisting of Nsp1p, Nup49p and a novel protein Nup57p. EMBO J. 14:76-87.
30. Harbury, P.B., T. Zhang, P.S. Kim, and T. Alber. 1993. A switch between two-, three-, and four-stranded coiled coils in GCN4 leucine zipper mutants. Science. 262:1401-1407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.8248779
31. Hodge, C.A., H.V. Colot, P. Stafford, and C.N. Cole. 1999. Rat8p/Dbp5p is a shuttling transport factor that interacts with Rat7p/Nup159p and Gle1p and suppresses the mRNA export defect of xpo1-1 cells. EMBO J. 18:5778-5788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.20.5778
32. Hurt, E.C. 1988. A novel nucleoskeletal-like protein located at the nuclear periphery is required for the life cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 7:4323-4334.
33. Hurwitz, M.E., and G. Blobel. 1995. NUP82 is an essential yeast nucleoporin required for poly(A)+ RNA export. J. Cell Biol. 130:1275-1281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.130.6.1275
34. Jorgensen, W.L., and J. Tirado-Rives. 1988. The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110:1657-1666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja00214a001
35. Kastner, B., N. Fischer, M.M. Golas, B. Sander, P. Dube, D. Boehringer, K. Hartmuth, J. Deckert, F. Hauer, E. Wolf, et al. 2008. GraFix: sample preparation for single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. Nat. Methods. 5:53-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth1139
36. Kastritis, P.L., and A.M. Bonvin. 2010. Are scoring functions in protein-protein docking ready to predict interactomes? Clues from a novel binding affinity benchmark. J. Proteome Res. 9:2216-2225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr9009854
37. Kastritis, P.L., and A.M. Bonvin. 2013a. Molecular origins of binding affinity: seeking the Archimedean point. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 23:868-877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2013.07.001
38. Kastritis, P.L., and A.M. Bonvin. 2013b. On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact. J. R. Soc. Interface. 10:20120835. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.0835
39. Köhler, A., and E. Hurt. 2010. Gene regulation by nucleoporins and links to cancer. Mol. Cell. 38:6-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.040
40. Kraemer, D., R.W. Wozniak, G. Blobel, and A. Radu. 1994. The human CAN protein, a putative oncogene product associated with myeloid leukemogenesis, is a nuclear pore complex protein that faces the cytoplasm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:1519-1523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.4.1519
41. Kraemer, D.M., C. Strambio-de-Castillia, G. Blobel, and M.P. Rout. 1995. The essential yeast nucleoporin NUP159 is located on the cytoplasmic side of the nuclear pore complex and serves in karyopherin-mediated binding of transport substrate. J. Biol. Chem. 270:19017-19021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.32.19017
42. Leitner, A., R. Reischl, T. Walzthoeni, F. Herzog, S. Bohn, F. Förster, and R. Aebersold. 2012. Expanding the chemical cross-linking toolbox by the use of multiple proteases and enrichment by size exclusion chromatography. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 11:M111.014126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M111.014126
43. Lim, R.Y.H., B. Fahrenkrog, J. Köser, K. Schwarz-Herion, J. Deng, and U. Aebi. Nanomechanical basis of selective gating by the nuclear pore complex. Science. 318:640-643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1145980
44. Ludtke, S.J., P.R. Baldwin, and W. Chiu. 1999. EMAN: semiautomated software for high-resolution single-particle reconstructions. J. Struct. Biol. 128:82-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jsbi.1999.4174
45. Lutzmann, M., R. Kunze, K. Stangl, P. Stelter, K.F. Tóth, B. Böttcher, and E. Hurt. 2005. Reconstitution of Nup157 and Nup145N into the Nup84 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 280:18442-18451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M412787200
46. MacLean, B., D.M. Tomazela, N. Shulman, M. Chambers, G.L. Finney, B. Frewen, R. Kern, D.L. Tabb, D.C. Liebler, and M.J. MacCoss. 2010. Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics. 26:966-968. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq054
47. Makio, T., D.L. Lapetina, and R.W. Wozniak. 2013. Inheritance of yeast nuclear pore complexes requires the Nsp1p subcomplex. J. Cell Biol. 203:187-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201304047
48. Martínez, N., A. Alonso, M.D. Moragues, J. Pontón, and J. Schneider. 1999. The nuclear pore complex protein Nup88 is overexpressed in tumor cells. Cancer Res. 59:5408-5411.
49. Mastronarde, D.N. 2005. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152:36-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007
50. Montpetit, B., N.D. Thomsen, K.J. Helmke, M.A. Seeliger, J.M. Berger, and K. Weis. 2011. A conserved mechanism of DEAD-box ATPase activation by nucleoporins and InsP6 in mRNA export. Nature. 472:238-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09862
51. Napetschnig, J., G. Blobel, and A. Hoelz. 2007. Crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of the human protooncogene Nup214/CAN. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:1783-1788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610828104
52. Nehrbass, U., H. Kern, A. Mutvei, H. Horstmann, B. Marshallsay, and E.C. Hurt. NSP1: a yeast nuclear envelope protein localized at the nuclear pores exerts its essential function by its carboxy-terminal domain. Cell. 61:979-989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(90)90063-K
53. Nissan, T.A., J. Bassler, E. Petfalski, D. Tollervey, and E. Hurt. 2002. 60S preribosome formation viewed from assembly in the nucleolus until export to the cytoplasm. EMBO J. 21:5539-5547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdf547
54. Noble, K.N., E.J. Tran, A.R. Alcázar-Román, C.A. Hodge, C.N. Cole, and S.R. Wente. 2011. The Dbp5 cycle at the nuclear pore complex during mRNA export II: nucleotide cycling and mRNP remodeling by Dbp5 are controlled by Nup159 and Gle1. Genes Dev. 25:1065-1077. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.2040611
55. Nyarko, A., and E. Barbar. 2011. Light chain-dependent self-association of dynein intermediate chain. J. Biol. Chem. 286:1556-1566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.171686
56. Ori, A., N. Banterle, M. Iskar, A. Andrés-Pons, C. Escher, H. Khanh Bui, L. Sparks, V. Solis-Mezarino, O. Rinner, P. Bork, et al. 2013. Cell typespecific nuclear pores: a case in point for context-dependent stoichiometry of molecular machines. Mol. Syst. Biol. 9:648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2013.4
57. Ori, A., A. Andrés-Pons, and M. Beck. 2014. The use of targeted proteomics to determine the stoichiometry of large macromolecular assemblies. Methods Cell Biol. 122:117-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-417160-2.00006-0
58. Pettersen, E.F., T.D. Goddard, C.C. Huang, G.S. Couch, D.M. Greenblatt, E.C. Meng, and T.E. Ferrin. 2004. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25:1605-1612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20084
59. Philo, J.S. 2006. Improved methods for fitting sedimentation coefficient distributions derived by time-derivative techniques. Anal. Biochem. 354:238-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2006.04.053
60. Rout, M.P., J.D. Aitchison, A. Suprapto, K. Hjertaas, Y. Zhao, and B.T. Chait. 2000. The yeast nuclear pore complex: composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 148:635-651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.148.4.635
61. Roy, A., A. Kucukural, and Y. Zhang. 2010. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Protoc. 5:725-738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2010.5
62. Schmitt, C., C. von Kobbe, A. Bachi, N. Panté, J.P. Rodrigues, C. Boscheron, G. Rigaut, M. Wilm, B. Séraphin, M. Carmo-Fonseca, and E. Izaurralde. Dbp5, a DEAD-box protein required for mRNA export, is recruited to the cytoplasmic fibrils of nuclear pore complex via a conserved interaction with CAN/Nup159p. EMBO J. 18:4332-4347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.15.4332
63. Stafford, W.F., III. 1992. Boundary analysis in sedimentation transport experiments: a procedure for obtaining sedimentation coefficient distributions using the time derivative of the concentration profile. Anal. Biochem. 203:295-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(92)90316-Y
64. Stelter, P., R. Kunze, D. Flemming, D. Höpfner, M. Diepholz, P. Philippsen, B. Böttcher, and E. Hurt. 2007. Molecular basis for the functional interaction of dynein light chain with the nuclear-pore complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 9:788-796. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1604
65. Stelter, P., R. Kunze, M. Radwan, E. Thomson, K. Thierbach, M. Thoms, and E. Hurt. 2012. Monitoring spatiotemporal biogenesis of macromolecular assemblies by pulse-chase epitope labeling. Mol. Cell. 47:788-796. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.015
66. Stuwe, T., L.S. von Borzyskowski, A.M. Davenport, and A. Hoelz. 2012. Molecular basis for the anchoring of proto-oncoprotein Nup98 to the cytoplasmic face of the nuclear pore complex. J. Mol. Biol. 419:330-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2012.03.024
67. Swapna, L.S., K. Srikeerthana, and N. Srinivasan. 2012. Extent of structural asymmetry in homodimeric proteins: prevalence and relevance. PLoS ONE. 7:e36688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036688
68. Thierbach, K., A. von Appen, M. Thoms, M. Beck, D. Flemming, and E. Hurt. 2013. Protein interfaces of the conserved Nup84 complex from Chaetomium thermophilum shown by crosslinking mass spectrometry and electron microscopy. Structure. 21:1672-1682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2013.07.004
69. Thompson, K.S., C.R. Vinson, and E. Freire. 1993. Thermodynamic characterization of the structural stability of the coiled-coil region of the bZIP transcription factor GCN4. Biochemistry. 32:5491-5496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi00072a001
70. Tran, E.J., Y. Zhou, A.H. Corbett, and S.R. Wente. 2007. The DEAD-box protein Dbp5 controls mRNA export by triggering specific RNA:protein remodeling events. Mol. Cell. 28:850-859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.09.019
71. Trokter, M., N. Mücke, and T. Surrey. 2012. Reconstitution of the human cytoplasmic dynein complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109:20895-20900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210573110
72. van Deursen, J., J. Boer, L. Kasper, and G. Grosveld. 1996. G2 arrest and impaired nucleocytoplasmic transport in mouse embryos lacking the protooncogene CAN/Nup214. EMBO J. 15:5574-5583.
73. van Heel, M., G. Harauz, E.V. Orlova, R. Schmidt, and M. Schatz. 1996. A new generation of the IMAGIC image processing system. J. Struct. Biol. 116:17-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jsbi.1996.0004
74. von Lindern, M., S. van Baal, J. Wiegant, A. Raap, A. Hagemeijer, and G. Grosveld. 1992. Can, a putative oncogene associated with myeloid leukemogenesis, may be activated by fusion of its 3' half to different genes: characterization of the set gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:3346-3355.
75. Walzthoeni, T., M. Claassen, A. Leitner, F. Herzog, S. Bohn, F. Förster, M. Beck, and R. Aebersold. 2012. False discovery rate estimation for crosslinked peptides identified by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods. 9:901-903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2103
76. Waterhouse, A.M., J.B. Procter, D.M. Martin, M. Clamp, and G.J. Barton. 2009. Jalview Version 2-a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics. 25:1189-1191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033
77. Weirich, C.S., J.P. Erzberger, J.M. Berger, and K. Weis. 2004. The N-terminal domain of Nup159 forms a β-propeller that functions in mRNA export by tethering the helicase Dbp5 to the nuclear pore. Mol. Cell. 16:749-760. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.10.032
78. Yoshida, K., H.-S. Seo, E.W. Debler, G. Blobel, and A. Hoelz. 2011. Structural and functional analysis of an essential nucleoporin heterotrimer on the cytoplasmic face of the nuclear pore complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108:16571-16576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112846108
79. Zhang, Y. 2008. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics. 9:40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-40