Replication in interaction and working memory research: Révész (2012) and Goo (2012)

Language Teaching

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 545-555

  Gass, Susan ^a   Valmori, Lorena ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948387188     PISSN: 02614448     EISSN: 14753049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0261444815000038     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
2. Bloom, B. (1954). The thought processes of students in discussion. In S. J. French (ed.), Accent on teaching: Experiments in general education. New York: Harper, 23-46.
3. Conway, A. R. A., M. J. Kane, M. F. Bunting, D. Z. Hambrick, O. Wilhelm & R. W. Engle (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12.5, 769-786.
4. Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effect of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (ed.), Conversational interaction and second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 339-360.
5. Ellis, R., S. Loewen & R. Erlam (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28.2, 339-368.
6. Ferguson, C. (1971). Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity: A study of normal speech, baby talk, foreigner talk and pidgins. In D. Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 141-150.
7. Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Gass, S. & A. Mackey (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Gass, S. & A. Mackey (2006). Input, interaction and output: An overview. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & Z. Dörnyei (eds.), AILA Review. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 3-17.
10. Gass, S. & A. Mackey (2007). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 175-179.
11. Gass, S., J. Behney & B. Uzum (2013). Inhibitory control, working memory, and L2 interaction gains. In K. Droździał-Szelest & M. Pawlak (eds.), Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives on second language learning and teaching. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 91-114.
12. Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34.3, 445-474.
13. Goo, J. & A. Mackey (2013). The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35.1, 127-165.
14. Keck, C., G. Iberri-Shea, N. Tracy-Ventura & S. Wa-Mbalaka (2006). Investigating the empirical link between interaction and acquisition: A quantitative metanalysis. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 91-131.
15. Leeser, M. & G. Sunderman (ms). Methodological issues of working memory tasks for L2 processing research. Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 60.2, 309-365.
16. Lightbown, P. (2007). Transfer appropriate processing as a model for classroom second language acquisition. In Z. H. Han (ed.), Understanding second language process. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 27-44.
17. Loewen, S. (2012). The role of feedback. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. New York: Routledge, 24-40.
18. Loewen, S. & T. Nabei (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In A. Mackey (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 361-377.
19. Long, M. H. (1980). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
20. Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Lyster, R. & K. Saito (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19.1, 37-66.
22. Lyster, R., K. Saito & M. Sato (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching 46.1, 1-40.
23. Mackey, A. (2012). Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Mackey, A. (ed.) (2007). Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Mackey, A. & J. Goo (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 407-452.
26. Mackey, A. & R. Sachs (2012). Older learners in SLA research: A first look at working memory, feedback, and L2 development. Language Learning 62.3, 704-740.
27. Mackey, A., R. Abbuhl & S. Gass (2012). Interactionist approach. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. New York: Routledge, 7-23.
28. Mackey, A., R. Adams, C. Stafford & P. Winke (2010). Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity. Language Learning 60.3, 501-533.
29. Mackey, A., J. Philp, T. Egi, A. Fujii & T. Tatsumi (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback, and L2 development. In P. Robinson (ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 181-209.
30. Nicholas, H., P. Lightbown & N. Spada (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning 51.4, 719-758.
31. Révész, A. (2012). Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning 62.1, 93-132.
32. Révész, A. & Z. H. Han (2006). Task content familiarity, task type and efficacy of recasts. Language Awareness 3.3, 160-179.
33. Russell, J. & N. Spada (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 133-164.
34. Sagarra, N. (2007). Working memory and L2 processing of redundant grammatical forms. In Z. Han (ed.), Understanding second language processes. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 133-147.
35. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (eds.), Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 235-253.
36. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 125-144.
37. Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 471-483.
38. Trofimovich, P., A. Ammar & E. Gatbonton (2007). How effective are recasts: The role of attention, memory, and analytic ability. In A. Mackey (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 171-195.
39. Wagner-Gough, K. & E. Hatch (1975). The importance of input in second language acquisition studies. Language Learning 25.2, 297-308.
40. Williams, J. (2012). Working memory and SLA. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. New York: Routledge, 427-441.