Single-Molecule Imaging Reveals a Switch between Spurious and Functional ncRNA Transcription

Molecular Cell

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 597-610

  Lenstra, Tineke L ^a   Coulon, Antoine ^b   Chow, Carson C ^b   Larson, Daniel R ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GALACTOSE; GLUCOSE; GUIDE RNA; HOMODIMER; UNTRANSLATED RNA; FUNGAL RNA; GAL1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; GAL10 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; GALACTOKINASE; LONG UNTRANSLATED RNA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; TRANSACTIVATOR PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHROMATIN; CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEAT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA TEMPLATE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENCE; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE REPRESSION; HYSTERESIS; NONHUMAN; NORTHERN BLOTTING; NUCLEAR LOCALIZATION SIGNAL; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROMOTER REGION; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA SEQUENCE; RNA SYNTHESIS; RNA TRANSCRIPTION; STEADY STATE; TATA BOX; TIME LAPSE IMAGING; TRANSCRIPTION ELONGATION; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; YEAST CELL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; OPERON; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEATS; GALACTOKINASE; GALACTOSE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; OPERON; RNA, FUNGAL; RNA, LONG NONCODING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TRANS-ACTIVATORS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84947785608     PISSN: 10972765     EISSN: 10974164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.09.028     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abramczyk D., Holden S., Page C.J., Reece R.J. Interplay of a ligand sensor and an enzyme in controlling expression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL genes. Eukaryot. Cell 2012, 11:334-342.
2. Acar M., Becskei A., van Oudenaarden A. Enhancement of cellular memory by reducing stochastic transitions. Nature 2005, 435:228-232.
3. Bumgarner S.L., Neuert G., Voight B.F., Symbor-Nagrabska A., Grisafi P., van Oudenaarden A., Fink G.R. Single-cell analysis reveals that noncoding RNAs contribute to clonal heterogeneity by modulating transcription factor recruitment. Mol. Cell 2012, 45:470-482.
4. Camblong J., Iglesias N., Fickentscher C., Dieppois G., Stutz F. Antisense RNA stabilization induces transcriptional gene silencing via histone deacetylation in S. cerevisiae. Cell 2007, 131:706-717.
5. Castelnuovo M., Rahman S., Guffanti E., Infantino V., Stutz F., Zenklusen D. Bimodal expression of PHO84 is modulated by early termination of antisense transcription. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:851-858.
6. Cloutier S.C., Wang S., Ma W.K., Petell C.J., Tran E.J. Long noncoding RNAs promote transcriptional poising of inducible genes. PLoS Biol. 2013, 11:e1001715.
7. Coulon A., Ferguson M.L., de Turris V., Palangat M., Chow C.C., Larson D.R. Kinetic competition during the transcription cycle results in stochastic RNA processing. eLife 2014, 3:e03939.
8. David L., Huber W., Granovskaia M., Toedling J., Palm C.J., Bofkin L., Jones T., Davis R.W., Steinmetz L.M. A high-resolution map of transcription in the yeast genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:5320-5325.
9. Edelstein A., Amodaj N., Hoover K., Vale R., Stuurman N. Computer control of microscopes using μManager. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2010, Chapter 14. Unit 14.20.
10. Gandhi S.J., Zenklusen D., Lionnet T., Singer R.H. Transcription of functionally related constitutive genes is not coordinated. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18:27-34.
11. Geisler S., Lojek L., Khalil A.M., Baker K.E., Coller J. Decapping of long noncoding RNAs regulates inducible genes. Mol. Cell 2012, 45:279-291.
12. Gilbert L.A., Larson M.H., Morsut L., Liu Z., Brar G.A., Torres S.E., Stern-Ginossar N., Brandman O., Whitehead E.H., Doudna J.A., et al. CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell 2013, 154:442-451.
13. Hittinger C.T., Carroll S.B. Gene duplication and the adaptive evolution of a classic genetic switch. Nature 2007, 449:677-681.
14. Hobson D.J., Wei W., Steinmetz L.M., Svejstrup J.Q. RNA polymerase II collision interrupts convergent transcription. Mol. Cell 2012, 48:365-374.
15. Hongay C.F., Grisafi P.L., Galitski T., Fink G.R. Antisense transcription controls cell fate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 2006, 127:735-745.
16. Houseley J., Rubbi L., Grunstein M., Tollervey D., Vogelauer M. A ncRNA modulates histone modification and mRNA induction in the yeast GAL gene cluster. Mol. Cell 2008, 32:685-695.
17. Kaplan C.D., Laprade L., Winston F. Transcription elongation factors repress transcription initiation from cryptic sites. Science 2003, 301:1096-1099.
18. Kar R.K., Qureshi M.T., DasAdhikari A.K., Zahir T., Venkatesh K.V., Bhat P.J. Stochastic galactokinase expression underlies GAL gene induction in a GAL3 mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS J. 2014, 281:1798-1817.
19. Kim T., Xu Z., Clauder-Münster S., Steinmetz L.M., Buratowski S. Set3 HDAC mediates effects of overlapping noncoding transcription on gene induction kinetics. Cell 2012, 150:1158-1169.
20. Lamphier M.S., Ptashne M. Multiple mechanisms mediate glucose repression of the yeast GAL1 gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89:5922-5926.
21. Larson D.R., Zenklusen D., Wu B., Chao J.A., Singer R.H. Real-time observation of transcription initiation and elongation on an endogenous yeast gene. Science 2011, 332:475-478.
22. Malik S., Durairaj G., Bhaumik S.R. Mechanisms of antisense transcription initiation from the 3' end of the GAL10 coding sequence in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013, 33:3549-3567.
23. Margaritis T., Oreal V., Brabers N., Maestroni L., Vitaliano-Prunier A., Benschop J.J., van Hooff S., van Leenen D., Dargemont C., Géli V., Holstege F.C. Two distinct repressive mechanisms for histone 3 lysine 4 methylation through promoting 3'-end antisense transcription. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8:e1002952.
24. Mason P.B., Struhl K. Distinction and relationship between elongation rate and processivity of RNA polymerase II in vivo. Mol. Cell 2005, 17:831-840.
25. Murray S.C., Haenni S., Howe F.S., Fischl H., Chocian K., Nair A., Mellor J. Sense and antisense transcription are associated with distinct chromatin architectures across genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43:7823-7837.
26. Nguyen T., Fischl H., Howe F.S., Woloszczuk R., Serra Barros A., Xu Z., Brown D., Murray S.C., Haenni S., Halstead J.M., et al. Transcription mediated insulation and interference direct gene cluster expression switches. eLife 2014, 3:e03635.
27. Pinskaya M., Gourvennec S., Morillon A. H3 lysine 4 di- and tri-methylation deposited by cryptic transcription attenuates promoter activation. EMBO J. 2009, 28:1697-1707.
28. Qi L.S., Larson M.H., Gilbert L.A., Doudna J.A., Weissman J.S., Arkin A.P., Lim W.A. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell 2013, 152:1173-1183.
29. Raj A., Peskin C.S., Tranchina D., Vargas D.Y., Tyagi S. Stochastic mRNA synthesis in mammalian cells. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e309.
30. Sellick C.A., Jowitt T.A., Reece R.J. The effect of ligand binding on the galactokinase activity of yeast Gal1p and its ability to activate transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:229-236.
31. Struhl K. Transcriptional noise and the fidelity of initiation by RNA polymerase II. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007, 14:103-105.
32. Trcek T., Chao J.A., Larson D.R., Park H.Y., Zenklusen D., Shenoy S.M., Singer R.H. Single-mRNA counting using fluorescent in situ hybridization in budding yeast. Nat. Protoc. 2012, 7:408-419.
33. Uhler J.P., Hertel C., Svejstrup J.Q. A role for noncoding transcription in activation of the yeast PHO5 gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:8011-8016.
34. van Werven F.J., Neuert G., Hendrick N., Lardenois A., Buratowski S., van Oudenaarden A., Primig M., Amon A. Transcription of two long noncoding RNAs mediates mating-type control of gametogenesis in budding yeast. Cell 2012, 150:1170-1181.
35. Venturelli O.S., El-Samad H., Murray R.M. Synergistic dual positive feedback loops established by molecular sequestration generate robust bimodal response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:E3324-E3333.
36. Venturelli O.S., Zuleta I., Murray R.M., El-Samad H. Population diversification in a yeast metabolic program promotes anticipation of environmental shifts. PLoS Biol. 2015, 13:e1002042.
37. Wang J., Atolia E., Hua B., Savir Y., Escalante-Chong R., Springer M. Natural variation in preparation for nutrient depletion reveals a cost-benefit tradeoff. PLoS Biol. 2015, 13:e1002041.
38. Xu Z., Wei W., Gagneur J., Clauder-Münster S., Smolik M., Huber W., Steinmetz L.M. Antisense expression increases gene expression variability and locus interdependency. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7:468.
39. Zacharioudakis I., Gligoris T., Tzamarias D. A yeast catabolic enzyme controls transcriptional memory. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:2041-2046.
40. Zenklusen D., Larson D.R., Singer R.H. Single-RNA counting reveals alternative modes of gene expression in yeast. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:1263-1271.