Use and misuse of comparative methods in the study of adaptation

Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and their Application in Evolutionary Biology

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 351-379

  Hansen, Thomas F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947727937     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-43550-2_14     Document Type: Chapter

References (81)

1. Armbruster WS (2002) Can indirect selection and genetic context contribute to trait diversification? A transition-probability study of bolssom-colour evolution in two genera. J Evol Biol 15:468-486
2. Bartoszek K, Pienaar J, Mostad P, Andersson S, Hansen TF (2012) A comparative method for studying multivariate adaptation. J Theor Biol 314:204-215
3. Baum DA, Larson A (1991) Adaptation reviewed: a phylogenetic methodology for studying character macroevolution. Syst Zool 40:1-18
4. Beaulieu JM, Jhwueng D-C, Boettiger C, O’meara BC (2012) Modeling stabilizing selection: expanding the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model of adaptive evolution. Evolution 66:2369-2383
5. Brooks DR, McLennan DH (1991) Phylogeny, ecology and behavior: a research program in comparative biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
6. Butler MA, King AA (2004) Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modeling approach for adaptive evolution. Am Nat 164:683-695
7. Cheverud JM, Dow MM, Leutenegger W (1985) The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weights among primates. Evolution 39:1335-1351
8. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Harvey PH (1980) Antlers, body size and breeding group size in the Cervida. Nature 285:565-567
9. Coddington JA (1988) Cladistic tests of adaptational hypotheses. Cladistics 4:3-22
10. Cooper N, Jetz W, Freckleton RP (2010) Phylogenetic comparative approaches for studying niche conservatism. J Evol Biol 23:2529-2539
11. Diniz-Filho JAF, Ramos de Sant’ana CE, Bini LM (1998) An eigenvector method for estimating phylogenetic inertia. Evolution 52:1247-1262
12. Diniz-Filho JAF, Rangel TF, Santos T, Bini LM (2012) Exploring patterns of interspecific variation in quantitative traits using sequential phylogenetic eigenvector regressions. Evolution 66:1079-1090
13. Escudero M, Hipp A, Hansen TF, Voje KL, Luceno M (2012) Selection and inertia in the evolution of holocentric chromosomes in sedges (Carex, Cyperaceae). New Phytol 195:237-247
14. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1-15
15. Felsenstein J (2008) Comparative methods with sampling error and within-species variation: contrasts revisited and revised. Am Nat 171:713-725
16. Felsenstein J (2012) A comparative method for both discrete and continuous characters using the threshold model. Am Nat 179:145-176
17. Freckleton RP, Cooper N, Jetz W (2011) Comparative methods as a statistical fix: the dangers of ignoring an evolutionary model. Am Nat 178:E10-E17
18. Frumhoff PC, Reeve HK (1994) Using phylogenies to test hypotheses of adaptation: a critique of some current proposals. Evolution 48:172-180
19. Garland T, Bennett AF, Rezende EL (2005) Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology. J Exper Biol 208:3015-3035
20. Garamszegi LZ, M0ller AP (2010) Effects of sample size and intraspecific variation in phylogenetic comparative studies: a meta-analytic review. Biol Rev 85:797-805
21. Garamszegi LZ, M0ller AP (2011) Nonrandom variation in within-species sample size and missing data in Phylogenetic comparative studies. Syst Biol 60:876-880
22. Geist V (1998) Deer of the world: their evolution, behavior, and ecology. Swan Hill Press, Shrewsbury
23. Gould SJ (1973) Positive allometry of antlers in the “Irish elk”, Megaloceros giganteus. Nature 244:375-376
24. Gould SJ (1974) The evolutionary significance of “bizarre” structures: antler size and skull structure in the “Irish Elk,” Megaloceros giganteus. Evolution 28:191-220
25. Gould SJ (1977) Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Belknap, Cambridge
26. Gould SJ (1998) A lesson from the old masters. In: Gould SJ (ed) Leonardo’s mountain of clams and the diet of worms. Harmon books, pp 179-196
27. Gould SJ (2002) The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Gould SJ, Vrba ES (1982) Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:4-15
28. Hadfield JD, Nakagawa S (2010) General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: phylogenies, taxonomies and multi-trait models for continuous and categorical characters. J Evol Biol 23:494-508
29. Hansen TF (1997) Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51:1341-1351
30. Hansen TF (2012) Adaptive landscapes and macroevolutionary dynamics. In: Svensson EI, Calsbeek R (eds) The adaptive landscape in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 205-226
31. Hansen TF, Bartoszek K (2012) Interpreting the evolutionary regression: the interplay between observational and biological errors in phylogenetic comparative studies. Syst Biol 61:413-425
32. Hansen TF, Martins EP (1996) Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution 50:1404-1417
33. Hansen TF, Orzack SH (2005) Assessing current adaptation and phylogenetic inertia as explanations of trait evolution: the need for controlled comparisons. Evolution 59:2063-2072
34. Hansen TF, Pienaar J, Orzack SH (2008) A comparative method for studying adaptation to a randomly evolving environment. Evolution 62:1965-1977
35. Harmon LJ, Weir JT, Brock CD, Glor RE, Challenger W (2008) Geiger: investigating evolutionary radiations. Bioinformatics 24:129-131
36. Houle D, Pelabon C, Wagner GP, Hansen TF (2011) Measurement and meaning in biology. Quart Rev Biol 86:3-34
37. Hughes S, Hayden TJ, Douady CJ, Tougard C, Germonpre M, Stuart A, Lbova L, Carden RF, Hanni C, Say L (2006) Molecular phylogeny of the extinct giant deer, Megaloceros giganteus. Mol Phylogenet Evol 40:285-291
38. Huxley JS (1932) Problems of relative growth. Lincoln Mac Veagh-The Dial Press, New York
39. Ingram T, Mahler DL (2013) SURFACE: detecting convergent evolution from comparative data by fitting Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models with stepwise Akaike information criterion. Methods Ecol Evol 4:416-425
40. Ives AR, Garland T Jr (2010) Phylogenetic logistic regression for binary dependent variables. Syst Biol 59:9-26
41. Ives AR, Midford PE, Garland T Jr (2007) Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods. Syst Biol 56:252-270
42. Kelly C, Price TD (2004) Comparative methods based on species mean values. Math Biosci 187:135-154
43. Kemp TS (2006) The origin of mammalian endothermy: a paradigm for the evolution of complex biological structure. Zool J Linn Soc 147:473-488
44. Kemp TS (2007) The origin of higher taxa: macroevolutionary processes, and the case of the mammals. Acta Zoologica 88:3-22
45. Labra A, Pienaar J, Hansen TF (2009) Evolution of thermal physiology in Lioleamus lizards: adaptation, phylogenetic inertia and niche tracking. Am Nat 174:204-220
46. Labra A, Voje KL, Seligmann H, Hansen TF (2010) Evolution of the third eye: a phylogenetic comparative study of parietal-eye size as an ecophysiological adaptation in Liolaemus lizards. Biological J Linn Soc 101:870-883
47. Lajeunesse MJ (2009) Meta-analysis and the comparative phylogenetic method. Am Nat 174:369-381
48. Lande R (1976) Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30:314-334
49. Larson A, Losos JB (1996) Phylogenetic systematics of adaptation. In: Rose MR, Lauder GW (eds) Adaptation. Academic press, San Diego, pp 187-220
50. Lister AM et al (2005) The phylogenetic position of the ‘giant deer’ Megaloceros giganteus. Nature 438:850-853
51. Lynch M (1991) Methods for the analysis of comparative data in evolutionary biology. Evolution 45:1065-1080
52. Maddison DR (1994) Phylogenetic methods for inferring the evolutionary history and processes of change in discretely valued characters. Ann Rev Entomol 39:267-292
53. Martins EP (2000) Adaptation and the comparative method. Trends Ecol Evol 15:296-299
54. Martins EP (2004) Compare, version 4.6b. Computer programs for the statistical analysis of comparative data. Distributed by the author at http://compare.bio.indiana.edu/. Technical report, Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
55. Martins EP, Hansen TF (1997) Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am Nat 149:646-667
56. Mitchell WA, Valone TJ (1990) The optimization research program: studying adaptations by their function. Quart Rev Biol 65:43-52
57. Nunn CL (2011) The comparative approach in evolutionary anthropology and biology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
58. O’meara BC (2012) Evolutionary inferences from phylogenies: a review of methods. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 43:267-285
59. O’meara BC, Ane C, Sanderson MJ, Wainwright PC (2006) Testing for different rates of continuous trait evolution using likelihood. Evolution 60:922-933
60. Pagel MD (1994) Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc R Soc B 255:37-45
61. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) Ape: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289-290
62. Pennell MW, Harmon LJ (2013) An integrative view of phylogenetic comparative methods: connections to population genetics, community ecology, and paleobiology. Ann New York Acad Sci 1289:90-105
63. Plard F, Bonenfant C, Gaillard J-M (2011) Revisiting the allometry of antlers among deer species: male-male sexual competition as a driver. Oikos 120:601-606
64. Price T (1997) Correlated evolution and independent contrasts. Philos Trans R Soc B 355:1599-1606
65. Reeve HK, Sherman PW (1993) Adaptation and the goals of evolutionary research. Quart Rev Biol 68:1-32
66. Reeve HK, Sherman PW (2001) Optimality and phylogeny: a critique of current thought. In: Orzack SH, Sober E (eds) Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 64-113
67. Rensch B (1959) Evolution above the species level. Wiley, New York
68. Revell LJ (2010) Phylogenetic signal and linear regression on species data. Methods Ecol Evol 1:319-329
69. Revell LJ, Reynolds G (2012) A new bayesian method for fitting evolutionary models to comparative data with intraspecific variation. Evolution 66:2697-2707
70. Ridley M (1983) The explanation of organic diversity: the comparative method and adaptations for mating. Clarendon Press, Oxford
71. Schluter D, Price T, Mooers AO, Ludwig D (1997) Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51:1699-1711
72. Simpson GG (1944) Tempo and mode in evolution. Columbia University Press, New York
73. Smith RJ, Jungers WL (1997) Body mass in comparative primatology. J Human Evol 32:523-559
74. Sober E (1984) The nature of selection: evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. Bradford books, Cambridge
75. Sober E (2008) Evidence and evolution: the logic behind the science. Cambridge University press, Cambridge
76. Stone GN, Nee S, Felsenstein J (2011) Controlling for non-independence in comparative analysis of patterns across populations within species. Phil Trans R Soc B 366:1410-1424
77. Voje KL, Hansen TF (2013) Evolution of static allometries: slow rate of adaptive change in allometric slopes of eye span in stalk-eyed flies. Evolution 67:453-467
78. Voje KL, Hansen TF, Egset CK, Bolstad GH, Pelabon C (2014) Allometric constraints and the evolution of allometry. Evolution 68: 866-885
79. Ward R (1903) Records of big game: with the distribution, characteristic, dimensions, weights, and horn and tusk measurements of the different species, 4th edn. Rowland Ward, Limited, London
80. Westoby M, Leishman MR, Lord JM (1995) On misunderstanding the ‘phylogenetic correction’. J Ecol 83:531-534
81. Williams GC (1992) Natural selection: domains, levels, and challenges. Oxford University Press, Oxford