A new bayesian method for fitting evolutionary models to comparative data with intraspecific variation

Evolution

Volumn 66, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 2697-2707

  Revell, Liam J ^a   Graham Reynolds, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative method; Interspecific data; Phylogenetic tree

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BROWNIAN MOTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PROBABILITY;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION;

BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, GENETIC;

EID: 84865709842     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01645.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ando, T. 2007. Bayesian predictive information criterion for the evaluation of hierarchical Bayesian and empirical Bayes models. Biometrika 94:443-458.
2. Blomberg, S. P., T. Garland, Jr., and A. R. Ives 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717-745.
3. Bokma, F. 2002. Detection of punctuated equilibrium from molecular phylogenies. J. Evol. Biol. 15:1048-1056.
4. ---. 2008. Detection of "punctuated equilibrium" by Bayesian estimation of speciation and extinction rates, ancestral character states, and rates of anagenetic and cladogenetic evolution on a molecular phylogeny. Evolution 62:2718-2726.
5. Bürger, R., G. P. Wagner, and F. Stettinger 1989. How much heritable variation can be maintained in a finite population by mutation-selection balance. Evolution 43:1748-1766.
6. Butler, M. A., and A. A. King 2004. Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modeling approach for adaptive evolution. Am. Nat. 164:683-695.
7. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and A. W. F. Edwards 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 19:233-257.
8. Eastman, J. M., M. E. Alfaro, P. Joyce, A. L. Hipp, and L. J. Harmon 2011. A novel comparative method for identifying shifts in the rate of character evolution on trees. Evolution 65:3578-3589.
9. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Prentice Hall, Essex, U.K.
10. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
11. ---. 2008. Comparative methods with sampling error and within-species variation: contrasts revisited and revised. Am. Nat. 171:713-725.
12. Harmon, L. J., and J. B. Losos 2005. The effect of intraspecific sample size on type I and type II error rates in comparative studies. Evolution 59:2705-2710.
13. Harmon, L. J., J. T. Weir, C. D. Brock, R. E. Glor, and W. Challenger 2008. GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations. Bioinformatics 24:129-131.
14. Heidelberger, P., and P. D. Welch 1983. Simulation run length control in the presence of an initial transient. Oper. Res. 31:1109-1144.
15. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and J. P. Bollback 2001. Empirical and hierarchical Bayesian estimation of ancestral states. Syst. Biol. 50:351-366.
16. Hulsey, C. D., and P. J. Hollingsworth Jr. 2011. Do constructional constraints influence cyprinid (Cyprinidae: Leuciscinae) craniofacial coevolution? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 103:136-146.
17. Ives, A. R., P. E. Midford, and T. Garland Jr. 2007. Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods. Syst. Biol. 56:252-270.
18. Johnson, W. E., E. Eizirik, J. Pecon-Slattery, W. J. Murphy, A. Antunes, E. Teeling, and S. J. O'Brien 2006. The late Miocene radiation of modern Felidae: a genetic assessment. Science 311:73-77.
19. Jones, A. G., S. J. Arnold, and R. Bürger 2003. Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift. Evolution 57:1747-1760.
20. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
21. MathWorks. 2011. MATLAB 7.13 R2011b. The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA
22. Meachen-Samuels, J., and B. Van Valkenburgh 2009. Craniodental indicators of prey size preference in the Felidae. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 96:784-799.
23. Metropolis, N., A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, and A. H. Teller 1953. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21:1087-1092.
24. O'Meara, B. C., C. Ané, M. J. Sanderson, and P. C. Wainwright 2006. Testing for different rates of continuous trait evolution using likelihood. Evolution 60:922-933.
25. Pagel, M. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877-884.
26. Paradis, E., J. Claude, and K. Strimmer 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289-290.
27. Plummer, M., N. Best, K. Cowles, and K. Vines 2006. CODA: convergence diagnostics and output analysis for MCMC. R. News 6:7-11.
28. Posada, D. 2006. ModelTest Server: A web-based tool for the statistical selection of models of nucleotide substitution online. Nucleic Acids Research 34:W700-W703.
29. Price, T. 1997. Correlated evolution and independent contrasts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 352:519-529.
30. R Development Core Team. 2011 R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria
31. Revell, L. J. 2007. Testing the genetic constraint hypothesis in a phylogenetic context: a simulation study. Evolution 61:2720-2727.
32. ---. 2008. On the analysis of evolutionary change along single branches in a phylogeny. Am. Nat. 172:140-147.
33. ---. 2012. Phytools: An R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3:217-223.
34. Revell, L. J., and D. C. Collar 2009. Phylogenetic analysis of the evolutionary correlation using likelihood. Evolution 63:1090-1100.
35. Revell, L. J., L. J. Harmon, and D. C., Collar 2008. Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate. Syst. Biol. 57:591-601.
36. Revell, L. J., D. L. Mahler, P. R. Peres-Neto, and B. D. Redelings 2012. A new phylogenetic method for identifying exceptional phenotypic diversification. Evolution 66:135-146.
37. Rohlf, F. J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55:2143-2160.
38. Ronquist, F., and J. P. Huelsenbeck 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
39. Sanderson, M. J. 2002. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:101-109.
40. Slater, G. J., L. J. Harmon, D. Wegmann, P. Joyce, L. J. Revell, and M. E. Alfaro 2012. Fitting models of continuous trait evolution to incompletely sampled comparative data using Approximate Bayesian Computation. Evolution 66:752-762.
41. Spielgelhalter, D. J., N. G. Best, B. P. Carlin, and A. van der Linde 2002. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. R. Stat. Soc. B64:583-639.
42. Thomas, G. H., and R. P. Freckleton 2012. MOTMOT: models of trait macroevolution on trees. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3:145-151.
43. Thomas, G. H., R. P. Freckleton, and T. Székely 2006. Comparative analyses of the influence of developmental mode on phenotypic diversification rates in shorebirds. Proc. R. Soc. B 273:1619-1624.
44. Van Valkenburgh, B., and K. P. Koepfli 1993. Cranial and dental adaptations to predation in Canids. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 65:15-37.
45. Yang, Z. 2006. Computational molecular evolution. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
46. Yang, Z., and B. Rannala 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:717-724.