(No) time for control: Frontal theta dynamics reveal the cost of temporally guided conflict anticipation

Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 787-807

  van Driel, Joram ^a,b   Swart, Jennifer C ^a,c   Egner, Tobias ^d   Ridderinkhof, K Richard ^a   Cohen, Michael X ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Functional connectivity; Oscillatory dynamics; Timing

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALPHA RHYTHM; ANTICIPATION; ASSOCIATION; CONFLICT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; THETA RHYTHM; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALPHA RHYTHM; ANTICIPATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; THETA RHYTHM; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84947038496     PISSN: 15307026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13415-015-0367-2     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Aarts, E., Roelofs, A., & van Turennout, M. (2008). Anticipatory activity in anterior cingulate cortex can be independent of conflict and error likelihood. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 4671–4678. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4400-07.2008
2. Alexander, W. H., & Brown, J. W. (2011). Medial prefrontal cortex as an action–outcome predictor. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 1338–1344. doi:10.1038/nn.2921
3. Appelbaum, L. G., Boehler, C. N., Won, R., Davis, L., & Woldorff, M. G. (2012). Strategic allocation of attention reduces temporally predictable stimulus conflict. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1834–1848. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00209
4. Alpay, G., Goerke, M., & Stürmer, B. (2009). Precueing imminent conflict does not override sequence-dependent interference adaptation. Psychological Research, 73, 803–816. doi:10.1007/s00426-008-0196-9
5. Anguera, J. A., Boccanfuso, J., Rintoul, J. L., Al-Hashimi, O., Faraji, F., Janowich, J., … Gazzaley, A. (2013). Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature, 501, 97–101. doi:10.1038/nature12486
6. Bocanegra, B. R., & Hommel, B. (2014). When cognitive control is not adaptive. Psychological Science, 25, 1249–1255. doi:10.1177/0956797614528522
7. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
8. Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539–546. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.003
9. Botvinick, M., Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, K., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature, 402, 179–181. doi:10.1038/46035
10. Brown, J. W. (2009). Conflict effects without conflict in anterior cingulate cortex: Multiple response effects and context specific representations. NeuroImage, 47, 334–341. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.034
11. Burle, B., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2005). Dynamics of facilitation and interference in cue-priming and Simon tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 619–641. doi:10.1080/09541440540000121
12. Cavanagh, J. F., & Frank, M. J. (2014). Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 414–421. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.012
13. Cavanagh, J. F., Frank, M. J., Klein, T. J., & Allen, J. J. B. (2010). Frontal theta links prediction errors to behavioral adaptation in reinforcement learning. NeuroImage, 49, 3198–3209. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.080
14. Cavanagh, J. F., Zambrano Vazquez, L., & Allen, J. J. B. (2012). Theta lingua franca: A common mid-frontal substrate for action monitoring processes. Psychophysiology, 49, 220–238. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01293.x
15. Cohen, M. X. (2011). Error-related medial frontal theta activity predicts cingulate-related structural connectivity. NeuroImage, 55, 1373–1383. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.072
16. Cohen, M. X. (2014). A neural microcircuit for cognitive conflict detection and signaling. Trends in Neurosciences, 37, 480–490. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2014.06.004
17. Cohen, M. X., & Cavanagh, J. F. (2011). Single-trial regression elucidates the role of prefrontal theta oscillations in response conflict. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 30. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00030
18. Cohen, M. X., & Donner, T. H. (2013). Midfrontal conflict-related theta-band power reflects neural oscillations that predict behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology, 110, 2752–2763. doi:10.1152/jn.00479.2013
19. Cohen, M. X., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2013). EEG source reconstruction reveals frontal-parietal dynamics of spatial conflict processing. PLoS ONE, 8, e57293. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057293.g008
20. Cohen, M. X., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Haupt, S., Elger, C. E., & Fell, J. (2008). Medial frontal cortex and response conflict: Evidence from human intracranial EEG and medial frontal cortex lesion. Brain Research, 1238, 127–142. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.114
21. Cohen, M. X., & van Gaal, S. (2013). Dynamic interactions between large-scale brain networks predict behavioral adaptation after perceptual errors. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 1061–1072. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs069
22. Cohen, M. X., van Gaal, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2009). Unconscious errors enhance prefrontal-occipital oscillatory synchrony. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 54. doi:10.3389/neuro.09.054.2009
23. Corballis, P. M., & Gratton, G. (2003). Independent control of processing strategies for different locations in the visual field. Biological Psychology, 64, 191–209.
24. Correa, Á., Cappucci, P., Nobre, A. C., & Lupiáñez, J. (2010). The two sides of temporal orienting: Facilitating perceptual selection, disrupting response selection. Experimental Psychology, 57, 142–148. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000018
25. Correa, Á., Rao, A., & Nobre, A. C. (2009). Anticipating conflict facilitates controlled stimulus–response selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1461–1472. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21136
26. Cravo, A. M., Rohenkohl, G., Wyart, V., & Nobre, A. C. (2011). Endogenous modulation of low frequency oscillations by temporal expectations. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106, 2964–2972. doi:10.1152/jn.00157.2011
27. Cravo, A. M., Rohenkohl, G., Wyart, V., & Nobre, A. C. (2013). Temporal expectation enhances contrast sensitivity by phase entrainment of low-frequency oscillations in visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 4002–4010. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4675-12.2013
28. Crump, M. J. C., Gong, Z., & Milliken, B. (2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 316–321. doi:10.3758/BF03193850
29. Cunillera, T., Fuentemilla, L., Periañez, J., Marco-Pallarés, J., Krämer, U. M., Càmara, E., … Rodríguez-Fornells, A. (2012). Brain oscillatory activity associated with task switching and feedback processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 16–33. doi:10.3758/s13415-011-0075-5
30. Danielmeier, C., Eichele, T., Forstmann, B. U., Tittgemeyer, M., & Ullsperger, M. (2011). Posterior medial frontal cortex activity predicts post-error adaptations in task-related visual and motor areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 1780–1789. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4299-10.2011
31. de Jong, R., Gladwin, T. E., & ’t Hart, B. M. (2006). Movement-related EEG indices of preparation in task switching and motor control. Brain Research, 1105, 73–82. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.030
32. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9–21. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
33. Desender, K., Van Opstal, F., & Van den Bussche, E. (2014). Feeling the conflict: The crucial role of conflict experience in adaptation. Psychological Science, 25, 675–683. doi:10.1177/0956797613511468
34. Egner, T. (2007). Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 380–390. doi:10.3758/CABN.7.4.380
35. Egner, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005). Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1784–1790. doi:10.1038/nn1594
36. Egner, T., Ely, S., & Grinband, J. (2010). Going, going, gone: Characterizing the time-course of congruency sequence effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 154. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00154
37. Fischer, R., Gottschalk, C., & Dreisbach, G. (2014). Context-sensitive adjustment of cognitive control in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 399–416. doi:10.1037/a0034310
38. Fries, P. (2005). A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: Neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 474–480. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.011
39. Fuster, J. M. (2000). Executive frontal functions. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 66–70. doi:10.1007/s002210000401
40. Ghinescu, R., Schachtman, T. R., Stadler, M. A., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2010). Strategic behavior without awareness? Effects of implicit learning in the Eriksen flanker paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 38, 197–205. doi:10.3758/MC.38.2.197
41. Goldfarb, L., & Henik, A. (2013). The effect of a preceding cue on the conflict solving mechanism. Experimental Psychology, 60, 347–353. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000205
42. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
43. Hanslmayr, S., Pastötter, B., Bäuml, K.-H., Gruber, S., Wimber, M., & Klimesch, W. (2008). The electrophysiological dynamics of interference during the Stroop task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 215–225. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20020
44. Hommel, B. (2011). The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta Psychologica, 136, 189–202. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.011
45. Ide, J. S., Shenoy, P., Yu, A. J., & Li, C.-S. R. (2013). Bayesian prediction and evaluation in the anterior cingulate cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 2039–2047. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-12.2013
46. Ito, S., Stuphorn, V., Brown, J. W., & Schall, J. D. (2003). Performance monitoring by the anterior cingulate cortex during saccade countermanding. Science, 30, 120–122. doi:10.1126/science.1087847
47. Jepma, M., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2012). Temporal expectation and information processing: A model-based analysis. Cognition, 122, 426–441. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.014
48. Kayser, J., & Tenke, C. E. (2006). Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 348–368. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2005.08.034
49. Kennerley, S. W., Walton, M. E., Behrens, T. E. J., Buckley, M. J., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2006). Optimal decision making and the anterior cingulate cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 940–947. doi:10.1038/nn1724
50. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023–1026. doi:10.1126/science.1089910
51. King, J. A., Korb, F. M., & Egner, T. (2012). Priming of control: Implicit contextual cuing of top-down attentional set. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 8192–8200. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0934-12.2012
52. Klein, R. M., & Ivanoff, J. (2011). The components of visual attention and the ubiquitous Simon effect. Acta Psychologica, 136, 225–234. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.08.003
53. Klimesch, W. (2012). Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 606–617. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.007
54. Lai, G., & Mangels, J. A. (2007). Cueing effects on semantic and perceptual categorization: ERPs reveal differential effects of validity as a function of processing stage. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2038–2050. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.013
55. Lehle, C., & Hübner, R. (2008). On-the-fly adaptation of selectivity in the flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 814–818. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.4.814
56. Los, S. A., & Agter, F. (2005). Reweighting sequential effects across different distributions of foreperiods: Segregating elementary contributions to nonspecific preparation. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1161–1170.
57. Luks, T. L., Simpson, G. V., Dale, C. L., & Hough, M. G. (2007). Preparatory allocation of attention and adjustments in conflict processing. NeuroImage, 35, 949–958. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.041
58. Luu, P., Tucker, D. M., & Makeig, S. (2004). Frontal midline theta and the error-related negativity: Neurophysiological mechanisms of action regulation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1821–1835. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.03.031
59. MacDonald, A. W., III, Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835–1838.
60. Miller, B. T., & D’Esposito, M. (2005). Searching for “the top” in top-down control. Neuron, 48, 535–538. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.002
61. Miller, E. K. (2000). The prefrontal cortex and cognitive control. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1, 59–65. doi:10.1038/35036228
62. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
63. Nigbur, R., Ivanova, G., & Stürmer, B. (2011). Theta power as a marker for cognitive interference. Clinical Neurophysiology, 122, 2185–2194. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2011.03.030
64. Nobre, A., Correa, A., & Coull, J. (2007). The hazards of time. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17, 465–470. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.006
65. Oliveira, F. T. P., Hickey, C., & McDonald, J. J. (2014). Proactive and reactive processes in the medial frontal cortex: An electrophysiological study. PLoS ONE, 9, e84351. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084351
66. Oostendorp, T. F., & Oosterom, A. (1996). The surface Laplacian of the potential: Theory and application. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 43, 394–405. doi:10.1109/10.486259
67. Pastötter, B., Dreisbach, G., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2013). Dynamic adjustments of cognitive control: Oscillatory correlates of the conflict adaptation effect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 2167–2178. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00474
68. Pernet, C. R., Sajda, P., & Rousselet, G. A. (2011). Single-trial analyses: Why bother? Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 322. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00322
69. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1989). Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Encephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 72, 184–187. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(89)90180-6
70. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66, 312–323. doi:10.1007/s00426-002-0104-7
71. Ridderinkhof, K. R., Forstmann, B. U., Wylie, S. A., Burle, B., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2010). Neurocognitive mechanisms of action control: Resisting the call of the Sirens. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2, 174–192. doi:10.1002/wcs.99
72. Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004a). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science, 306, 443–447. doi:10.1126/science.1100301
73. Ridderinkhof, K. R., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Segalowitz, S. J., & Carter, C. S. (2004b). Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: The role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning. Brain and Cognition, 56, 129–140. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.09.016
74. Rohenkohl, G., Cravo, A. M., Wyart, V., & Nobre, A. C. (2012). Temporal expectation improves the quality of sensory information. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 8424–8428. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0804-12.2012
75. Sauseng, P., Klimesch, W., Stadler, W., Schabus, M., Doppelmayr, M., Hanslmayr, S., … Birbaumer, N. (2005). A shift of visual spatial attention is selectively associated with human EEG alpha activity. European Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 2917–2926. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04482.x
76. Shenhav, A., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2013). The expected value of control: An integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron, 79, 217–240. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.007
77. Siegel, M., Donner, T. H., & Engel, A. K. (2012). Spectral fingerprints of large-scale neuronal interactions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 121–134. doi:10.1038/nrn3137
78. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S–R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.
79. Sperduti, M., Tallon-Baudry, C., Hugueville, L., & Pouthas, V. (2011). Time is more than a sensory feature: Attending to duration triggers specific anticipatory activity. Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 11–18. doi:10.1080/17588928.2010.513433
80. Srinivasan, R., Winter, W. R., Ding, J., & Nunez, P. L. (2007). EEG and MEG coherence: Measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 166, 41–52. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.06.026
81. Stoffels, E.-J. (1996). Uncertainty and processing routes in the selection of a response: An S–R compatibility study. Acta Psychologica, 94, 227–252. doi10.1016/0001-6918(95)00063-1
82. Strack, G., Kaufmann, C., Kehrer, S., Brandt, S., & Stürmer, B. (2013). Anticipatory regulation of action control in a Simon task: Behavioral, electrophysiological, and fMRI correlates. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 47. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00047
83. Thut, G., Nietzel, A., Brandt, S. A., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2006). Alpha-band electroencephalographic activity over occipital cortex indexes visuospatial attention bias and predicts visual target detection. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 9494–9502. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0875-06.2006
84. Umbach, V. J., Schwager, S., Frensch, P. A., & Gaschler, R. (2012). Does explicit expectation really affect preparation? Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 378. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00378
85. van de Vijver, I., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Cohen, M. X. (2011). Frontal oscillatory dynamics predict feedback learning and action adjustment. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 4106–4121. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00110
86. van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Wylie, S. A., Forstmann, B. U., Burle, B., Hasbroucq, T., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2010). To head or to heed? Beyond the surface of selective action inhibition: A review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 222. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00222
87. van Driel, J., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Cohen, M. X. (2012). Not all errors are alike: Theta and alpha EEG dynamics relate to differences in error-processing dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 16795–16806. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0802-12.2012
88. van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2002). The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 593–602. doi:10.1162/08989290260045837
89. Vietze, I., & Wendt, M. (2009). Context specificity of conflict frequency-dependent control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1391–1400. doi:10.1080/17470210802426908
90. Vossel, S., Thiel, C. M., & Fink, G. R. (2006). Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex. NeuroImage, 32, 1257–1264. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.019
91. Wendt, M., & Kiesel, A. (2011). Conflict adaptation in time: Foreperiods as contextual cues for attentional adjustment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 910–916. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0119-4
92. Winter, W. R., Nunez, P. L., Ding, J., & Srinivasan, R. (2007). Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 3946–3957. doi:10.1002/sim.2978
93. Wühr, P., & Kunde, W. (2008). Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: Is there regulation of expected response conflict? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 872–883. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.872