Going, going, gone: Characterizing the time-course of congruency sequence effects

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn , Issue SEP, 2010, Pages

  Egner, Tobias ^a   Ely, Sora ^a   Grinband, Jack ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866756947     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00154     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Akcay, C., and Hazeltine, E. (2007). Conflict monitoring and feature overlap: two sources of sequential modulations. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14, 742-748.
2. Alpay, G., Goerke, M., and Sturmer, B. (2009). Precueing imminent conflict does not override sequence-dependent interference adaptation. Psychol. Res. 73, 803-816.
3. Appelbaum, L. G., Smith, D. V., Boehler, C. N., Chen, W. D., and Woldorff, M. G. (in press). Rapid modulation of sensory processing induced by stimulus conflict. J. Cogn. Neurosci.
4. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., and Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev. 108, 624-652.
5. Boy, F., Husain, M., and Sumner, P. (2010). Unconscious inhibition separates two forms of cognitive control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 11134-11139.
6. Bugg, J. M. (2008). Opposing influences on conflict-driven adaptation in the Eriksen flanker task. Mem. Cogn. 36, 1217-1227.
7. Chen, S., and Melara, R. D. (2009). Sequential effects in the Simon task: conflict adaptation or feature integration? Brain Res. 1297, 89-100.
8. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., and McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: a paralleldistributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychol. Rev. 97, 332-361.
9. Davelaar, E. J., and Stevens, J. (2009). Sequential dependencies in the Eriksen flanker task: a direct comparison of two competing accounts. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16, 121-126.
10. Egner, T. (2007). Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 7, 380-390.
11. Egner, T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 374-380.
12. Egner, T., Delano, M., and Hirsch, J. (2007). Separate conflict-specificcognitive control mechanisms in the human brain. Neuroimage 35, 940-948.
13. Egner, T., Etkin, A., Gale, S., and Hirsch, J. (2008). Dissociable neural systems resolve conflict from emotional versus nonemotional distracters. Cereb. Cortex 18, 1475-1484.
14. Egner, T., and Hirsch, J. (2005a). Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1784-1790.
15. Egner, T., and Hirsch, J. (2005b). The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task. Neuroimage 24, 539-547.
16. Gao, J., Wong-Lin, K. F., Holmes, P., Simen, P., and Cohen, J. D. (2009). Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time tasks: decomposition and synthesis of mechanisms. Neural Comput. 21, 2407-2436.
17. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., and Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 121, 480-506.
18. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 494-500.
19. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., and Vu, K. P. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychol. Res. 68, 1-17.
20. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol. Bull. 109, 163-203.
21. Masson, M. E. J., and Loftus, G. R. (2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 57, 203-220.
22. Mayr, U., Awh, E., and Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 450-452.
23. Muller, H. J., and Rabbitt, P. M. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 15, 315-330.
24. Notebaert, W., Gevers, W., Verbruggen, F., and Liefooghe, B. (2006). Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13, 112-117.
25. Notebaert, W., and Verguts, T. (2007). Dissociating conflict adaptation from feature integration: a multiple regression approach. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 33, 1256-1260.
26. Remington, R. J. (1969). Analysis of sequential effects in choice reaction times. J. Exp. Psychol. 82, 250-257.
27. Sanders, A. F. (1971). Probabilistic advance information and the psychological refractory period. Acta Psychol. 35, 128-137.
28. Schuch, S., and Koch, I. (2004). The cost of changing the representation of action: response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks. J.Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 30, 566-582.
29. Soetens, E., Boer, L.C., and Hueting, J. E. (1985). Expectancy or automatic facilitation? Separating sequential effects in two-choice reaction time. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 11, 598-616.
30. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exp. Psychol. 18, 643-662.
31. Taylor, P. C., Nobre, A. C., and Rushworth, M. F. (2007). Subsecond changes in top down control exerted by human medial frontal cortex during conflict and action selection: a combined transcranial magnetic stimulation electroencephalography study. J. Neurosci. 27, 11343-11353.
32. Verguts, T., and Notebaert, W. (2009). Adaptation by binding: a learning account of cognitive control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 252-257.
33. Wühr, P. (2005). Evidence for gating of direct response activation in the Simon task. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12, 282-288.
34. Wühr, P., and Ansorge, U. (2005). Exploring trial-by-trial modulationsof the Simon effect. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 58, 705-731.