Precueing imminent conflict does not override sequence-dependent interference adaptation

Psychological Research

Volumn 73, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 803-816

  Alpay, Gamze ^a   Goerke, Monique ^a,b   Stürmer, Birgit ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BRAIN CORTEX; CONFLICT; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DECISION MAKING; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROACTIVE INHIBITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; ATTENTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROACTIVE INHIBITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SERIAL LEARNING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70350214530     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0196-9     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Akçay, C., & Hazeltine, E. (2007). Feature overlap and conflict monitoring: Two sources of sequential modulations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,14, 742-748.
2. Baddeley, A. (1998). Recent developments in working memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology,8, 234-238.
3. Beringer, J. (2001). Experimental Run Time System (ERTS), Version 3.32. Frankfurt: BeriSoft Cooperation.
4. Botvinick, M. M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,7(4), 356-366.
5. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review,108, 624-652.
6. Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8(12), 539-546.
7. Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. Kane, A. Miyake, J. Towse (Eds.), Variation of working memory. NY:Oxford University Press.
8. Chwilla, D. J., & Brunia, C. H. (1991). Event-related potentials to different feedback stimuli. Psychophysiology,28, 123-132.
9. Cohen, J. D., Botvinick, M. M., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex: Who's in control? Nature Neuroscience,3, 421-423.
10. Damen, E. J., & Brunia, C. H. (1994). Is a stimulus conveying task-relevant information a sufficient condition to elicit a stimulus-preceding negativity? Psychophysiology,31, 129-139.
11. De Pisapia, N., & Braver, T. S. (2006). A model of dual control mechanisms through anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex interactions. Neurocomputing,69, 1322-1326.
12. Dosenbach, N. U. F., Fair, D. A., Cohen, A. L., Schlaggar, B. L., & Peterson, S. E. (2008). A dual-networks architecture of top-down control. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience,12(3), 99-105.
13. Egner, T. (2007). Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,7(4), 380-390.
14. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143-149.
15. Fan, J., Kolster, R., Ghajar, J., Suh, M., Knight, R. T., Sarkar, R., et al. (2007). Response anticipation and response conflict: An event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. The Journal of Neuroscience,27(9), 2272-2282.
16. Fernandez-Duque, D., & Knight, M. B. (2008). Cognitive control: Dynamic, sustained, and voluntary influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,34, 340-355.
17. Freitas, A. L., Bahar, M., Yang, S., & Banai, R. (2007). Contextual adjustments in cognitive control across tasks. Psychological Science,18, 1040-1043.
18. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 480-506.
19. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. P. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research,68, 1-17.
20. Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1976). Estimation of the box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in the randomized block and split-plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics,1, 69-82.
21. Hyman, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology,45, 188-196.
22. Kerns, J. G. (2006). Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activity in an fMRI study of trial-to-trial adjustments on the Simon task. NeuroImage,33, 399-405.
23. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science,303, 1023-1026.
24. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., I. I. I., Johnson, M. K., Stenger, V. A., Aizenstein, H., et al. (2005). Decreased conflict- and error-related activity in the anterior cingulate cortex in subjects with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry,162(10), 1833-1839.
25. Lai, G., & Mangels, J. A. (2007). Cueing effects on semantic and perceptual categorization: ERPs reveal differential effects of validity as a function of processing stage. Neuropsychologia,45, 2038-2050.
26. Leuthold, H., Sommer, W., & Ulrich, R. (2004). Preparing for Action: Inferences from CNV and LRP. Journal of Psychophysiology,18, 77-88.
27. Loveless, N. E., & Sanford, A. J. (1974). Slow potential correlates of preparatory set. Biological Psychology,1, 303-314.
28. Mayr, U., & Awh, E. (2008). The elusive link between conflict and conflict adaptation. Psychological Research, this issue.
29. Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience,6, 450-452.
30. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience,24, 167-202.
31. Nieuwenhuis, S., Stins, J. F., Posthuma, D., Polderman, T. J., Boomsma, D. I., & de Geus, E. J. (2006). Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: Conflict adaptation or associative priming? Memory and Cognition,34, 1260-1272.
32. Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2006). Stimulus conflict predicts conflict adaptation in a numerical flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,13, 1078-1084.
33. Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2007). Dissociating conflict adaptation from feature integration: A multiple regression account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,33, 1256-1260.
34. Notebaert, W., Gevers, W., Verbruggen, F., & Liefooghe, B. (2006). Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,13, 112-117.
35. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia,9, 97-113.
36. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160-174.
37. Praamstra, P., Kleine, B. U., & Schnitzler, A. (1999). Magnetic stimulation of the dorsal premotor cortex modulates the Simon effect. NeuroReport,10, 3671-3674.
38. Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2006). Stimulus-response compatibility principles: Data, theory, and application. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
39. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research,66, 312-323.
40. Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004). The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control. Science,306(5695), 443-447.
41. Roberts, A. C., Robbins, T. W., & Weiskrantz, L. (1998). The prefrontal cortex: Executive and Cognitive Functions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Simon, J. R. (1967). Choice reaction time as a function of auditory S-R correspondence, age and sex. Ergonomics,10, 559-564.
43. Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1999). Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science,238, 1657-1661.
44. Stoffels, E.-J. (1996). Uncertainty and processing routes in the selection of a response: An S-R compatibility study. Acta Psychologica,94(2), 227-252.
45. Stürmer, B., & Leuthold, H. (2003). Control over response priming in visuomotor processing: A lateralized event-related potential study. Experimental Brain Research,153, 35-44.
46. Stürmer, B., Soetens, E., Sommer, W., Leuthold, H., & Schröter, H. (2002). Control Over Location-Based Response Activation in the Simon Task: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology,28, 1345-1363.
47. Stürmer, B., Redlich, M., Irlbacher, K., & Brandt, S. (2007). Executive control over response priming and conflict: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Experimental Brain Research,183(3), 329-339.
48. Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M., & Botvinick, M. M. (2005). The conflict adaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience,5, 467-472.
49. van Boxtel, G. J. M., & Brunia, C. H. M. (1994). Motor and non-motor components of the Contingent Negative Variation. International Journal of Psychophysiology,17, 269-279.
50. Vossel, S., Thiel, C. M., & Fink, G. R. (2006). Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex. Neuroimage,32, 1257-1264.
51. Weerts, T. C., & Lang, P. J. (1973). The effects of eye fixation and stimulus and response location on the contingent negative variation (CNV). Biological Psychology,1, 1-19.
52. Wendt, M., Kluwe, R. H., & Peters, A. (2006). Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,32, 644-667.
53. Wühr, P., & Ansorge, U. (2005). Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A,58, 705-731.
54. Wühr, P., & Kunde, W. (2008). Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: Is there regulation of expected response conflict? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,34(4), 838-872.