Dynamics of facilitation and interference in cue-priming and Simon tasks

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 619-641

  Burle, Borís ^c   Van Den Wildenberg, Wery P M ^d   Ridderinkhof, K Richard ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 26244461162     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440540000121     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 170-177.
2. Band, G. P. H., & van Boxtel, G. J. M. (1999). Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: Review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. Acta Psychologica, 101, 179-211.
3. Burle, B., Possamaï, C.-A., Vidal, F., Bonnet, M., & Hasbroucq, T. (2002). Executive control in the Simon effect: An electromyographic and distributional analysis. Psychological Research, 66, 324-336.
4. Burle, B., Vidal, F., Tandonnet, C., & Hasbroucq, T. (2004). Physiological evidence for response inhibition in choice reaction time tasks. Brain and Cognition, 56, 153-164.
5. Craft, J. L., & Simon, J. R. (1970). Processing symbolic information from a visual display: Interference from an irrelevant directional cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 415-420.
6. De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
7. Eimer, M. (1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioural performance. Acta Psychologica, 101, 293-313.
8. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737-1747.
9. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (2002). Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 514-520.
10. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (2003). Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biological Psychology, 64, 7-26.
11. Gottsdanker, R., & Shragg, G. P. (1985). Verification of Donders' subtraction method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 765-776.
12. Hedge, A., & Marsh, N. W. A. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondence on two choice response time. Acta Psychologica, 39, 427-739
13. Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280-290.
14. Hommel, B. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 764-775.
15. Hommel, B. (1996). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 546-571.
16. Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216.
17. Ivanoff, J. (2003). On spatial response code activation in a Simon task. Acta Psychologica, 112, 157-179.
18. Ivanoff, J., Klein, R., & Lupiáñez, J. (2002). Inhibition of return interacts with the Simon effect: An omnibus analysis and its implications. Perception and Psychophysics, 64, 318-327.
19. Jianq, Y., Rouder, J. N., & Speckman, P. L. (2004). A note on the sampling properties of the Vincentizing (quantile averaging) procedure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 48, 186-195.
20. Klapp, S. T., & Hinckley, L. B. (2002). The negative compatibility effect: Unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 255-269.
21. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
22. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
23. Lleras, A., & Enns, J. T. (2004). Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 475-493.
24. Lu, C. H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 174-207.
25. Lupiáñez, J., Milliken, B., Solano, C., Weaver, B., & Tipper, S. P. (2001). On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 753-773.
26. Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1994). Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes. Psychological Research, 56, 144-150.
27. Notebaert, W., & Soetens, E. (2003). An auditory attention shift primes a corresponding response. Psychological Research, 67, 253-260.
28. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
29. Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-238.
30. Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446-461.
31. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002a). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (pp. 494-519). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002b). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66, 312-323.
33. Ridderinkhof, K. R., van der Molen, M. W., & Bashore, T. (1995). Limits on the application of additive factors logic: Violations of stage robustness suggest a dual-process architecture to explain flanker effects on target processing. Acta Psychologica, 90, 29-48.
34. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444-474.
35. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31-88). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
36. Simon, J. R., Acosta, E., Mewaldt, S. P., & Speidel, C. R. (1976). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and his relation to stages of processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 16-22.
37. Simon J. R., & Craft, J. L. (1970). Effects of an irrelevant auditory stimulus on visual choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 272-274.
38. Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (2002). Visual and motor effect in inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1639-1656.
39. Vincent, S. B. (1912). The function of the vibrissae in the behavior of the white rat. Behavioral Monographs, 1, 1-82.
40. Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design: Design and analysis of factorial experiments. New York: McGraw-Hill.
41. Zimba, L. D., & Brito, C. F. (1995). Attention precuing and Simon effects: A test of the attention-coding account of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 58, 102-118.