Breeding schemes for the implementation of genomic selection in wheat (Triticum spp.)

Plant Science

Volumn 242, Issue , 2015, Pages 23-36

  Bassi, Filippo M ^a   Bentley, Alison R ^b   Charmet, Gilles ^c   Ortiz, Rodomiro ^d   Crossa, Jose ^e  

^a INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH IN THE DRY AREAS ICARDA   (Syrian Arab Republic)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL BOTANY   (United Kingdom)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

^d SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^e INTERNATIONAL MAIZE AND WHEAT IMPROVEMENT CENTER CIMMYT   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Breeding value; Genetic gain; Genotype environment interaction; Marker aided breeding; Quantitative trait loci

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; PHENOTYPE; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENOME; PROCEDURES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SELECTIVE BREEDING; WHEAT;

GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; PLANT BREEDING; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SELECTIVE BREEDING; TRITICUM;

EID: 84947036382     PISSN: 01689452     EISSN: 18732259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.08.021     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Oury F.-X., Godin C., Mailliard A., Chassin A., Gardet O., Giraud A., Heumez E., Morlais J.-Y., Rolland B., Rousset M., Trottet M., Charmet G. A study of genetic progress due to selection reveals a negative effect of climate change on bread wheat yield in France. Eur. J. Agron. 2012, 40:28-38.
2. Fischer T., Byerlee D., Edmeades G. Crop Yields and Global Food Security 2014, ACIAR, Canberra, Australia.
3. FAO The State of the World's Land and Water Resources for Food and Agriculture: Managing Systems at Risk 2011, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
4. Tanksley S.D., Young N.D., Paterson A.H. RFLP mapping in plant breeding: new tools for and old science. Nat. Biotechnol. 1989, 7:257-264.
5. Tanksley S.D. Molecular markers in plant breeding. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1983, 1:3-8.
6. Bernardo R. Parental selection, number of breeding populations, and size of each population in inbred development. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2003, 107:1252-1256.
7. Xu Y., Crouch J.H. Marker-assisted selection in plant breeding: from publications to practice. Crop Sci. 2008, 48:391-407.
8. Hillel J., Schaap T., Haberfeld A., Jeffreys A.J., Plotzky Y., Cahaner A., Lavu U. DNA fingerprints applied to gene introgression in breeding programs. Genetics 1990, 789:783-789.
9. Hospital F., Chevalet C., Mulsant P. Using markers in gene introgression breeding programs. Genetics 1992, 132:1199-1210.
10. Bonnett D., Rebetzke G.J., Spielmeyer W. Strategies for efficient implementation of molecular markers in wheat breeding. Mol. Breed. 2005, 15:75-85.
11. Howes N.K., Woods S.M. Simulations and practical problems of applying multiple marker assisted selection and doubled haploids to wheat breeding programs. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 1998, 100:225-230.
12. Fernando R.L., Grossman M. Marker assisted selection using best linear unbiased prediction. Genet. Sel. Evol. 1989, 21:246-277.
13. Lande R., Thompson R. Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics 1990, 124:743-756.
14. Zhang W., Smith C. Computer simulation of marker-assisted selection utilizing linkage disequilibrium. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1992, 83:813-820.
15. Frisch M., Melchinger A.E. Selection theory for marker-assisted backcrossing. Genetics 2005, 170:909-917.
16. Frisch M., Bohn M., Melchinger A.E. Comparison of selection strategies for marker-assisted backcrossing of a gene. Crop Sci. 1999, 39:1295-1301.
17. Prigge V., Melchinger A.E., Dhillon B.S., Frisch M. Efficiency gain of marker-assisted backcrossing by sequentially increasing marker densities over generations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 119:23-32.
18. Herzog E., Frisch M. Selection strategies for marker-assisted backcrossing with high-throughput marker systems. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 123:251-260.
19. Dekkers J.C.M., Hospital F. The use of molecular genetics in the improvement of agricultural populations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002, 3:22-32.
20. Bernardo R. Molecular markers and selection for complex traits in plants: learning from the last 20 years. Crop Sci. 2008, 48:1649-1664.
21. K.A. Wetterstrand, (2014). DNA Sequencing Costs: Data from the NHGRI Genome Sequencing Program (GSP), Retrieved 12 June 2014, Available at: http://www.genome.gov/sequencingcosts.
22. Haley C.S., Visscher P.M. Strategies to utilize marker-quantitative trait loci associations. J. Dairy Sci. 1988, 81(Suppl. 2):85-97.
23. Meuwissen T.H.E., Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E. Prediction of total genetic values using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 2001, 157:1819-1829.
24. Bernardo R., Yu J. Prospects for genome-wide selection for quantitative traits in maize. Crop Sci. 2007, 47:1082-1090.
25. Massman J.M., Jung H.-J.G., Bernardo R. Genomewide selection versus marker-assisted recurrent selection to improve grain yield and stover-quality traits for cellulosic ethanol in maize. Crop Sci. 2013, 53:58-66.
26. Würschum T., Reif J.C., Kraft T., Janssen G., Zha Y. Genomic selection in sugar beet breeding populations. BMC Genet. 2013, 14:85. 10.1186/1471-2156-14-85.
27. Falconer D.S., Mackay T.F.C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1996, Longman, New York. fourth ed.
28. Heffner E.L., Lorenz A.J., Jannink J.-L., Sorrells M.E. Plant breeding with genomic selection: gain per unit time and cost. Crop Sci. 2010, 50:1681-1690.
29. Lorenzana R.E., Bernardo R. Accuracy of genotypic value predictions for marker-based selection in biparental plant populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 120:151-161.
30. Schaeffer L.R. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. J. Animal Breed. Genet. 2006, 123:218-223.
31. Wong C.K., Bernardo R. Genomewide selection in oil palm: increasing selection gain per unit time and cost with small populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2008, 116:815-824.
32. Zhong S., Dekkers J.C.M., Fernando R.L., Jannink J.-L. Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a barley case study. Genetics 2009, 182:355-364.
33. Van Raden P.M., Van Tassell C.P., Wiggans G.R., Sonstengard T.S., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Schenkel F.S. Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J.Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:16-24.
34. Calus M.P.L. Genomic breeding value prediction: methods and procedures. Animal 2010, 4:157-164.
35. Luan T.L., Woolliams J.A., Lien S., Kent M., Svendsen M., Meuwissen T.H.E. The accuracy of genomic selection in Norwegian Red Cattle assessed by cross-validation. Genetics 2009, 183:1119-1126.
36. Habier D., Fernando R.L., Dekkers J.C.M. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 2007, 177:2389-2397.
37. Calus M.P.L., Meuwissen T.H.E., de Roos A.P.W., Veerkamp R.F. Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Genetics 2008, 178:553-561.
38. Hickey J.M., Gorjanc G. Simulated data for genomic selection and genome-wide association studies using a combination of coalescent and gene drop methods. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2012, 2:425-427.
39. Hayes B.J., Bowman P.J., Chamberlain A.J., Goddard M.E. Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:433-443.
40. Abera Desta Z., Ortiz R. Genomic selection: genome-wide breeding value prediction in plant improvement. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19:592-601.
41. de los Campos G., Naya H., Gianola D., Crossa J., Legarra A., Manfredi E., Weigel K., Cotes J.M. Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree. Genetics 2009, 182:375-385.
42. Crossa J., de los Campos G., Pérez P., Gianola D., Burgueño J., Araus J.L., Makumbi D., Singh R.P., Dreisigacker S., Yan J., Arief V., Bänziger M., Braun H.-J. Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers. Genetics 2010, 186:713-724.
43. Crossa J., Pérez P., de los Campos G., Mahuku G., Dreisigacker S., et al. Genomic selection and prediction in plant breeding. J. Crop Improv. 2011, 25:239-261.
44. Combs E., Bernardo R. Accuracy of genomewide selection for different traits with constant population size, heritability, and number of markers. Plant Genome J. 2013, 6:1-7.
45. Beyene Y., Semagn K., Mugo S., Tarekegne A., Babu R., Meisel B., Sehabiague P., Makumbi D., Magorokosho C., Oikeh S., Gakunga J., Vargas M., Olsen M., Prasanna B.M., Bänziger M., Crossa J. Genetic gains in grain yield through genomic selection in eight bi-parental maize populations under drought stress. Crop Sci. 2015, 55:154-163.
46. Hofheinz N., Borchardt D., Weissleder K., Frisch M. Genome-based prediction of test cross performance in two subsequent breeding cycles. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 125:1639-1645.
47. Hofheinz N., Frisch M. Heteroscedastic ridge regression approaches for genome-wide prediction with a focus on computational efficiency and accurate effect estimation. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2014, 4:539-546.
48. Zhao Y., Mette M.F., Gowda M., Longin C.F., Reif J.C. Bridging the gap between marker-assisted and genomic selection of heading time and plant height in hybrid wheat. Heredity 2014, 112:638-645.
49. Zhao Y., Mette M.F., Reif J.C. Genomic selection in hybrid breeding. Plant Breed. 2015, 134:1-10.
50. Longin C.F.H., Reif J.C. Redesigning the exploitation of wheat genetic resources. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19:631-636.
51. Longin C.F.H., Reif J.C., Würschum T. Long-term perspective of hybrid versus line breeding in wheat based on quantitative genetic theory. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127:1635-1641.
52. Longin C.F., Mi X., Melchinger A.E., Reif J.C., Würschum T. Optimum allocation of test resources and comparison of breeding strategies for hybrid wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127:2117-2226.
53. Goddard M. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 2009, 136:245-257.
54. Daetwyler H.D., Pong-Wong R., Villanueva B., Woolliams J.A. The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics 2010, 185:1021-1031.
55. de Los Campos G., Vazquez A.I., Fernando R., Klimentidis Y.C., Sorensen D. Prediction of complex human traits using the genomic best linear unbiased predictor. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003608.
56. de Roos A.P.W., Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E. Reliability of genomic predictions across multiple populations. Genetics 2009, 183:1545-1553.
57. Long N., Gianola D., Rosa G.J.M., Weigel K.A. Long-term impacts of genome-enabled selection. J. Appl. Genet. 2011, 52:467-480.
58. Pszczola M., Strabel T., Mulder H.A., Calus M.P.L. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:389-400.
59. Wimmer V., Lehermeier C., Albrecht T., Auinger H.-J., Wang Y., Schön C.-C. Genome-wide prediction of traits with different genetic architecture through efficient variable selection. Genetics 2013, 195:573-587.
60. Dawson J.C., Endelman J.B., Heslot N., Crossa J., Poland J., Dreisigacker S., et al. The use of unbalanced historical data for genomic selection in an international wheat breeding program. Field Crops Res. 2013, 154:12-22.
61. Ly D., Hamblin M.T., Rabbi I., Melaku G., Bakare M., Gauch H.G., et al. Relatedness and genotype-by-environment interaction affect prediction accuracies in genomic selection: a study in cassava. Crop Sci. 2013, 53:1312-1325.
62. Heslot N., Yang H.-P., Sorrells M.E., Jannink J.-L. Genomic selection in plant breeding: a comparison of models. Crop Sci. 2012, 52:146-160.
63. Poland J., Endelman J., Dawson J., Rutkoski J., Wu S., Manes Y., et al. Genomic selection in wheat breeding using genotyping-by-sequencing. Plant Genome J. 2012, 5:103-113.
64. Solberg T.R., Sonesson A.K., Woolliams J.A., Meuwissen T.H.E. Genomic selection using different marker types and densities. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86:2447-2454.
65. Rutkoski J.E., Poland J., Jannink J.-L., Sorrells M.E. Imputation of unordered markers and the impact on genomic selection accuracy. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2013, 3:427-439.
66. Isidro J., Jannink J.-L., Akdemir D., Poland J., Heslot N., Sorrells M.E. Training set optimization under population structure in genomic selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2015, 128:145-158.
67. Hayes B.J., Visscher P.M., Goddard M.E. Increased accuracy of selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet. Res. 2009, 91:47-60.
68. Meuwissen T.H.E. Accuracy of breeding values of unrelated individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2009, 41:35.
69. Heffner E.L., Jannink J.-L., Iwata H., Souza E., Sorrells M.E. Genomic selection accuracy for grain quality traits in biparental wheat populations. Crop Sci. 2011, 51:2597-2606.
70. Heffner E.L., Jannink J.-L., Sorrells M.E. Genomic selection accuracy using multifamily prediction models in a wheat breeding program. Plant Genome 2011, 4:65-75.
71. Riedelsheimer C., Endelman J.B., Stange M., Sorrells M.E., Jannink J.-L., Melchinger A.E. Genomic predictability of interconnected biparental maize populations. Genetics 2013, 194:493-503.
72. Lorenz A.J., Smith K.P., Jannink J.-L. Potential and optimization of genomic selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in six-row barley. Crop Sci. 2012, 52:1609-1621.
73. Asoro F.G., Newell M.A., Beavis W.D., Scott M.P., Jannink J.-L. Accuracy and training population design for genomic selection on quantitative traits in elite North American oats. Plant Genome 2011, 4:132-144.
74. Rutkoski J., Singh R.P., Huerta-Espino J., Bhavani S., Poland J., Jannink J.-L., Sorrells M.E. Efficient use of historical data for genomic selection: a case study of stem rust resistance in wheat. Plant Genome J. 2015, 8:1-10.
75. Bentley A.R., Scutari M., Gosman N., Faure S., Bedford F., Howell P., Cockram J., Rose G.A., Barber T., Irigoyen J., Horsnell R., Pumfrey C., Winnie E., Schacht J., Beauchêne K., Praud S., Greenland A., Balding D., i, Mackay J. Applying association mapping and genomic selection to the dissection of key traits in elite European wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127:2619-2633.
76. Davison C.A., Hinkley D.V. Bootstrap Methods and their Applications 1997, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
77. Spindel J., Begum H., Akdemir D., Virk P., Collard C., Redoña E., Atlin G., Jannink J.-L.-, McCouch S.R. Genomic selection and association mapping in rice (Oryza sativa): effect of trait genetic architecture, training population composition, marker number and statistical model on accuracy of rice genomic selection in elite, tropical rice breeding lines. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11:e1004982.
78. Rincent R., Laloë D., Nicolas S., Altmann T., Brunel D., Revilla P., Rodríguez V.M., Moreno-Gonzalez J., Melchinger A., Bauer E., Schoen C.-C., Meyer N., Giauffret C., Bauland C., Jamin P., Laborde J., Monod H., Flament P., Charcosset A., Moreau L. Maximizing the reliability of genomic selection by optimizing the calibration set of reference individuals: comparison of methods in two diverse groups of maize inbreds (Zea mays L.). Genetics 2012, 192:715-728.
79. Burgueño J., de-los-Campos G., Weigel K., Crossa J. Genomic prediction of breeding values when modeling genotype×environment interaction using pedigree and dense molecular markers. Crop Sci. 2012, 52:707-719.
80. Malosetti M., Voltas J., Romagoza I., Ullrich S.E., van Eeuwjik F.A. Mixed models including environmental covariables for studying QTL by environment interaction. Euphytica 2004, 137:139-145.
81. Malosetti M., Boers M.P., Bink M.C.A.M., van Eeuwjik F.A. Multi-trait QTL analysis based on mixed model with parsimonious covariance matrices. In: Proc. 8th World Congress Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 13-18 August 2006 2015, http://www.wcgalp8.org.br/wcgalp8, Article 25-04.
82. Denis J.B. Analyse de regression factorielle. Biom. Praxim. 1980, 20:1-34.
83. Heslot N., Akdemir D., Sorrells M.E., Jannink J.-L. Integrating environmental covariates and crop modeling into the genomic selection framework to predict genotype by environment interactions. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127:463-480.
84. Jarquín D., Crossa J., Lacaze X., Cheyron P., Daucourt J., Lorgeou J., Piraux F., et al. A reaction norm model for genomic selection using high-dimensional genomic and environmental data. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127:595-607.
85. Zhang X., Pérez-Rodríguez P., Semagn K., Beyene Y., Babu R., López-Cruz M.A., San Vicente F., Olsen M., Buckler E., Jannink J.-L., Prasanna B.M., Crossa J. Genomic prediction in biparental tropical maize populations in water-stressed and well-watered environments using low-density and GBS SNPs. Heredity 2015, 114:291-299.
86. Lopez-Cruz M., Crossa J., Bonnett D., Dreisigacker S., Poland J., Jannink J.-L., Singh R.P., Autrique E., de los Campos G. Increased prediction accuracy in wheat breeding trials using a marker environment interaction genomic selection model. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2015, 10.1534/g3.114.016097.
87. Cregan P.B., Busch R.H. Early generation bulk hybrid yield testing of adapted hard red spring wheat crosses. Crop Sci. 1977, 17:887-891.
88. Endelman J.B., Atlin G.N., Beyene Y., Semagn K., Zhang X., Sorrells M.E., Jannink J.-L. Optimal design of preliminary yield trials with genome-wide markers. Crop Sci. 2014, 54:48-59.
89. Ornella L., Pérez P., Tapia E., González-Camacho J.M., Burgueño J., Zhang X., Singh S., San Vicente F., Bonnett D., Dreisigacker S., Singh R., Long N., Crossa J. Genomic-enabled prediction with classification algorithms. Heredity 2014, 112:616-626.
90. Robertson A. A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proc. R. Soc. B 1960, 153:234-249.
91. Hallauer A.R., Miranda J.B. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding 1988, 166-167. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.