Redesigning the exploitation of wheat genetic resources

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 631-636

  Longin, C Friedrich H ^a   Reif, Jochen C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENETICS AND CROP PLANT RESEARCH IPK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Allele mining; Genetic resources; Genome wide selection; Hybrid technology; Wheat

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; BREEDING; CEREAL; CHIMERA; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; PHENOTYPE; WHEAT;

ALLELES; BREEDING; CEREALS; CHIMERA; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; PHENOTYPE; TRITICUM;

EID: 84908156023     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.06.012     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Ray D.K., et al. Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PLOS ONE 2013, 8:e66428.
2. Reynolds M., et al. Raising yield potential of wheat. I. Overview of a consortium approach and breeding strategies. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 62:439-452.
3. Bhullar N.K., et al. Unlocking wheat genetic resources for the molecular identification of previously undescribed functional alleles at the Pm3 resistance locus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:9519-9524.
4. Tester M., Langridge P. Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 2010, 327:818-822.
5. King J., King I. Expanding the genetic base of wheat. Proceedings of the International Workshop of the Wheat Yield Consortium 2013, 56-57. CENEB, CIMMYT. M.P. Reynolds, H.J. Braun (Eds.).
6. Reif J.C., et al. Wheat genetic diversity trends during domestication and breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 110:859-864.
7. Feuillet C., et al. Cereal breeding takes a walk on the wild side. Trends Genet. 2007, 24:24-32.
8. McCouch S., et al. Feeding the future. Nature 2013, 499:23-24.
9. Paux E., et al. A physical map of the 1 gigabase bread wheat chromosome 3B. Science 2008, 322:101-104.
10. Cavanagh C.R., et al. Genome-wide comparative diversity uncovers multiple targets of selection for improvement in hexaploid wheat landraces and cultivars. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:8057-8062.
11. Wang S., et al. Characterization of polyploid wheat genomic diversity using a high-density 90,000 SNP array. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2014, 10.1111/pbi.12183.
12. Brenchley R., et al. Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature 2012, 491:705-710.
13. Jia J., et al. Aegilops tauschii draft genome sequence reveals a gene repertoire for wheat adaptation. Nature 2013, 496:91-95.
14. Heslot N., et al. Impact of marker ascertainment bias on genomic selection accuracy and estimates of genetic diversity. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e74612.
15. Araus J.L., Cairns J.E. Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19:52-61.
16. Fiorani F., Schurr U. Future Scenarios for plant phenotyping. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64:267-291.
17. Tuberosa R. Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era. Front. Physiol. 2012, 3:347.
18. Evenson R.E., Gollin D. Assessing the impact of the green revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science 2003, 300:758-762.
19. Longin C.F.H., et al. Hybrid breeding in autogamous cereals. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 125:1087-1096.
20. Whitford R., et al. Hybrid breeding in wheat: technologies to improve hybrid wheat seed production. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64:5411-5428.
21. Strigens A., et al. Unlocking the genetic diversity of maize landraces with doubled haploids opens new ways for breeding. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e57234.
22. Böhm J., et al. Breeding potential of European flint maize landraces evaluated by their testcross performance. Crop Sci. 2014, 54:1-8.
23. Tarter J.A., et al. Testcross performance of semiexotic inbred lines derived from Latin American maize accessions. Crop Sci. 2003, 43:2272-2278.
24. Fischer S., et al. Molecular marker assisted broadening of the Central European heterotic groups in rye with Eastern European germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 120:291-299.
25. Gowda M., et al. Relatedness severely impacts accuracy of marker-assisted selection for disease resistance in hybrid wheat. Heredity 2014, 112:552-561.
26. Zhao Y., et al. Dissecting the genetic architecture of frost tolerance in Central European winter wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64:4453-4460.
27. Zhao Y., et al. Bridging the gap between marker-assisted and genomic selection of heading time and plant height in hybrid wheat. Heredity 2014, 112:638-645.
28. Ribaut J-M., Ragot M. Marker-assisted selection to improve drought adaptation in maize: the backcross approach, perspectives, limitations, and alternatives. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58:351-360.
29. Tanksley S.D., Nelson J.C. Advanced backcross QTL analysis: a method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTLs from unadapted germplasm into elite breeding lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1995, 92:191-203.
30. Rattey A., Shorter R. Evaluation of CIMMYT conventional and synthetic spring wheat germplasm in rainfed sub-tropical environments. I. Grain yield. Field Crops Res. 2010, 118:273-281.
31. Dreisigacker S., et al. Use of synthetic hexaploid wheat to increase diversity for CIMMYT bread wheat improvement. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2007, 59:413-420.
32. Kempe K., Gils M. Pollination control technologies for hybrid breeding. Mol. Breed. 2011, 27:417-437.
33. Langer S., et al. Phenotypic evaluation of floral and flowering traits with relevance for hybrid breeding in wheat. Plant Breed. 2014, 10.1111/pbr.12192.
34. Neumann K., et al. Genome-wide association mapping: a case study in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol. Breed. 2011, 27:37-58.
35. Ahlemeyer J., Friedt W. Progress in winter wheat yield in Germany - What's the share of the genetic gain?. Tagung der Vereinigung der Pflanzenzüchter und Saatgutkaufleute Österreichs 2010, 19-23. Irdning Heft, (in German). Lehr- und Forschungsanstalt für Landwirtschaft Raumberg-Gumpenstein (Ed.).
36. Reif J.C., et al. Mapping QTLs with main and epistatic effects underlying grain yield and heading time in soft winter wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 123:283-292.
37. Longin C.F.H., et al. Hybrid wheat: quantitative genetic parameters and consequences for the design of breeding programs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2013, 126:2791-2801.
38. McCouch S., et al. Genomics of gene banks: a case study in rice. Am. J. Bot. 2012, 99:407-423.
39. Saintenac C., et al. Identification of wheat gene Sr35 that confers resistance to Ug99 stem rust race group. Science 2013, 341:783-786.
40. Periyannan S., et al. The gene Sr33, an ortholog of barley Mla genes, encodes resistance to wheat stem rust race Ug99. Science 2013, 341:786-788.
41. Crossa J., et al. Genomic prediction in CIMMYT maize and wheat breeding programs. Heredity 2014, 112:48-60.
42. Bernardo R. Genomewide selection for rapid introgression of exotic germplasm in maize. Crop Sci. 2009, 49:419-425.
43. de los Campos G., et al. Whole-genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breeding. Genetics 2013, 193:327-345.
44. Lorenz A.J. Resource allocation for maximizing prediction accuracy and genetic gain of genomic selection in plant breeding: a simulation experiment. G3 2013, 3:481-491.
45. Heslot N., et al. Genomic selection in plant breeding: a comparison of models. Crop Sci. 2012, 52:146-160.
46. Massman J.M., et al. Genomewide selection versus marker-assisted recurrent selection to improve grain yield and stover-quality traits for cellulosic ethanol in maize. Crop Sci. 2013, 53:58-66.
47. Habier D., et al. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 2007, 177:2389-2397.
48. Odong T.L., et al. Quality of core collections for effective utilisation of genetic resources review, discussion and interpretation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2013, 126:289-305.
49. Yabe S., et al. Potential of genomic selection for mass selection breeding in annual allogamous crops. Crop Sci. 2013, 53:95-105.
50. Rincent R., et al. Maximizing the reliability of genomic selection by optimizing the calibration set of reference individuals: comparison of methods in two diverse groups of maize inbreds (Zea mays L.). Genetics 2012, 192:715-728.
51. 1-Leistung und Elternwahl in der Züchtung von Selbstbefruchtern (in German). Bericht über die Arbeitstagung der Vereinigung österreichischer Pflanzenzüchter 1975, 243-248. Irdning Heft. Lehr- und Forschungsanstalt für Landwirtschaft Raumberg-Gumpenstein (Ed.).